Bug#727708: init system question before the technical committee

[Steven Chamberlain]

The sysvinit page doesn't have a specific maintainer/advocate.  It is a
collection of opinions from discussion on debian-devel@ and elsewhere.
Other camps have already responded to parts they don't agree with.

Unless any volunteers want to make last-minute small changes, it can
probably be taken as 'complete' as soon the tech-ctte is ready to move
forward with this.  I think maintainers of all the other proposals have
said they are ready now.

Thanks,
Regards,
-- 
Steven Chamberlain
ste...@pyro.eu.org



signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature

Bug#727708: sysvinit: moving the contents out of the Essential: yes package?

[Marko Randjelovic]

On Tue, 26 Nov 2013 18:42:43 +0800
Thomas Goirand  wrote:

> With the above, it's easy to switch from one to the other. Well, that is
> before the mess with the version-depends on sysv-rc introduced by the
> debhelper thing for upstart, which messed-up a few things... I hope many
> packages have been rebuilt with the new debhelper version since that has
> been corrected, especially the essential ones (like ifupdown and the
> others (I can't remember)).

Then I don't understand why on 'multiple' page they say sysvinit+openrc
is infeasible.

-- 
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Little_Red_Riding_Hood

my homepage: http://mr.flossdaily.org


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-ctte-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: http://lists.debian.org/20131127124939.10da4...@eunet.rs