Didier 'OdyX' Raboud writes:
> Dear Technical Committee members,
>
> I call for vote immediately on the following resolution.
>
> === Resolution ===
>
> The Technical Committee resolves to decline to override the debootstrap
> maintainers.
>
> Furthermore, using its §6.1.5 "Offering advice" power, the Technical
> Committee considers that the desirable solution at the time of `bullseye` is:
>
> * W: `weak`: both directory schemes are allowed, but packages should only
> be built on hosts with classical directory schemes (or in such
> chroots)
>
> * M: `middle`: both directory schemes are allowed, and packages (including
>official packages) can be built on hosts with either classical
>or "merged `/usr`" directory schemes
>
> * H: `hard`: both directory schemes are allowed, but packages should only
> be built on hosts with "merged `/usr`" directory schemes (or in
> such chroots)
>
> * FD: Further Discussion
>
> === End Resolution ===
I vote:
H > M > FD > W
Cheers, Phil.
--
|)| Philip Hands [+44 (0)20 8530 9560] HANDS.COM Ltd.
|-| http://www.hands.com/http://ftp.uk.debian.org/
|(| Hugo-Klemm-Strasse 34, 21075 Hamburg,GERMANY
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature