On 08/31/2011 12:20 AM, Gunnar Wolf wrote:
Steve McIntyre dijo [Tue, Aug 30, 2011 at 08:16:19PM +0100]:
Humm… An idea could be:
‣ The term is defined to be for one year, with the possibility of one
automatic renewal
‣ If by (election date + 10 months) the DPL sends a (signed,
validated, blah) message, a simple referendum is held: secret vote
between a yes and a no (and... Further discussion? :-} )
‣ If the DPL seeking renewal gets a majority, his term is prolonged to
a second year
‣ If the DPL does not get a majority, he can still participate in a
regular election
‣ This mechanism can only be used once — A DPL wanting to run a third
term must win a regular (full) election
/me shudders at the extra complexity, especially how it would be
worded in the constitution. I'm tempted to say: let's just leave
things the way they are.
Oh, just wait until we get in DEP(n+1) where we require the
Constitution to be automatically parsable as well.
That would be DEP(n+2) as DEP(n+1) is the one which requires
automatically parsable DEPs.
--
Bernd ZeimetzDebian GNU/Linux Developer
http://bzed.dehttp://www.debian.org
GPG Fingerprints: ECA1 E3F2 8E11 2432 D485 DD95 EB36 171A 6FF9 435F
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-curiosa-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: http://lists.debian.org/4ebcf664.6050...@bzed.de
