Re: Bug#215103: ITP: gmasqdialer -- gtk/gnome client for masqdialer server

[David B Harris]

On Fri, 10 Oct 2003 21:04:23 -0400
Joe Drew <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >   Description : gtk/gnome client for masqdialer server
> 
> How about "client for masqdialer"?
> 
> > 
> > From the freshmeat description:
> >  GMasqdialer provides a GNOME/GTK client for the Masqdialer system. The
> 
> Which is it, GTK only or GNOME?

As much as you may dislike it, people care about toolkit. I don't
understand the witch-hunt to remove references to such things.

(Though I do agree that "GNOME/GTK" could easily be shortened to
"GNOME".)


pgpbwd0428jOf.pgp
Description: PGP signature

Bug#213822: [message from WAKWAK virus detect system]

[virus-alert]

$B#W#A#K#W#A#K%&%$%k%98!CN%7%9%F%`$K$h$j!"$3$N%a!<%k$K%&%$%k%9$,(B
(B[EMAIL PROTECTED],8!=P$5$l$^$7$?$N$G!"%&%$%k%9$r6n=|$7$^$7$?$,!"(B
$B0lIt$N%U%!%$%k$,6n=|IT2DG=$J%&[EMAIL PROTECTED]"(B
$B3:Ev%U%!%$%k$r:o=|$7$F!"%a!<%k$r$*FO$1$$$?$7$^$7$?!#(B
(B($B:o=|$5$l$?%U%!%$%k$O!"(BDELETED#.txt$B$KCV49$($^$7$?!#(B)
(B
(B  $BAw?.!'(Bpatch76.exe
(B  $B%&%#%k%9L>!'([EMAIL PROTECTED]
(B
(B[$B$4Cm0U(B]
$B!&%a!<%k$NFbMF$K$D$-$^$7$F$O!"#W#A#K#W#A#K$K$F3NG'$9$k$3$H$,(B
(B  $B=PMh$^$;$s$N$G!">e5-!VAw?.l9g$O!"%&%$%k%9$K$h$jAw?.85(B
$B!!$N%a!<%k%"%I%l%9$,[EMAIL PROTECTED],$4$6$$$^$9!#$=$N$h(B
$B!!$&$J>l9g$O!VAw?.e$2$k$3$H$,$G$-$^(B
(B  $B$;$s$N$G!"$4N;>5$/[EMAIL PROTECTED](B
(B
(BWAKWAK Virus Detect System has found the file which is
(Binfected with coumputer virus on the e-mail you recieved.
(BThe virus was exterminated, but some files infected with
(Bunexterminable virus was removed. (Deleted files were
(Breplaced to DELETED#.txt)
(B
(B  *sender: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
(B  *infected file name: patch76.exe
(B  *virus name: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
(B
(B[Attention]
(B# If you need to know about the e-mail content, Please make a
(B  contact to the sender. WAKWAK can not check the e-mail content.
(B# If you do not have any idea who the sender is, there is a
(B  possibility that the e-mail address of a sender is camouflaged
(B  by the virus. In that case, please do not make contact to the
(B  sender about the virus.
(B# This message is sent automatically by WAKWAK viruis detect
(B  system. Even if you reply to this e-mail, WAKWAK can not
(B  answer the question.
(B
(B[internet header of the e-mail is shown below]
(BReceived: from at.wakwak.com (at.wakwak.com [211.9.230.135])
(Bby vckyb1.nw.wakwak.com (Postfix) with ESMTP
(Bid D2DBB3FE0E; Sat, 11 Oct 2003 12:56:22 +0900 (JST)
(BReceived: from peky (z164.61-115-101.ppp.wakwak.ne.jp [61.115.101.164])
(Bby at.wakwak.com (8.12.10/8.12.10/2003-09-30) with SMTP/inet id 
(Bh9B3s9ng038668;
(BSat, 11 Oct 2003 12:54:11 +0900 (JST)
(B(envelope-from [EMAIL PROTECTED])
(BDate: Sat, 11 Oct 2003 12:54:09 +0900 (JST)
(BMessage-Id: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
(BFrom: "MS Public Assistance" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
(BTo: "Consumer" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
(BSUBJECT: newest net security patch
(BMime-Version: 1.0
(BContent-Type: multipart/mixed; boundary="dxitqbeltysxysxbc"--- Begin Message ---







 

Microsoft




 
All Products | 
Support | 
Search | 

Microsoft.com Guide 








Microsoft Home  





 

Microsoft Consumer
this is the latest version of security update, the
"October 2003, Cumulative Patch" update which eliminates
all known security vulnerabilities affecting
MS Internet Explorer, MS Outlook and MS Outlook Express.
Install now to help protect your computer
from these vulnerabilities.






 System requirements

Windows 95/98/Me/2000/NT/XP



 This update applies to


MS Internet Explorer, version 4.01 and later
MS Outlook, version 8.00 and later
MS Outlook Express, version 4.01 and later





 Recommendation
Customers should install the patch at the earliest opportunity.



 How to install
Run attached file. Choose Yes on displayed dialog box.



 How to use
You don't need to do anything after installing this item.





Microsoft Product Support Services and Knowledge Base articles
can be found on the Microsoft Technical Support web site. For security-related information about Microsoft products, please visit the 
Microsoft Security Advisor web site, or Contact Us.

Thank you for using Microsoft products.
Please do not reply to this message. It was sent from an unmonitored e-mail address and we are unable to respond to any replies.


The names of the actual companies and products mentioned herein are the trademarks of their respective owners.








Contact Us
 | 
Legal
 | 
TRUSTe








©2003 Microsoft Corporation. All rights reserved.
Terms of Use
 | 

Privacy Statement | 
Accessibility







file attachment: patch76.exe

The file attached to this email was removed because it is infected with the 
[EMAIL PROTECTED] virus.
--- End Message ---

Bug#213822: [message from WAKWAK virus detect system]

[virus-alert]

$B#W#A#K#W#A#K%&%$%k%98!CN%7%9%F%`$K$h$j!"$3$N%a!<%k$K%&%$%k%9$,(B
(B[EMAIL PROTECTED],8!=P$5$l$^$7$?$N$G!"%&%$%k%9$r6n=|$7$^$7$?$,!"(B
$B0lIt$N%U%!%$%k$,6n=|IT2DG=$J%&[EMAIL PROTECTED]"(B
$B3:Ev%U%!%$%k$r:o=|$7$F!"%a!<%k$r$*FO$1$$$?$7$^$7$?!#(B
(B($B:o=|$5$l$?%U%!%$%k$O!"(BDELETED#.txt$B$KCV49$($^$7$?!#(B)
(B
(B  $BAw?.!'(BUpgrade59.exe
(B  $B%&%#%k%9L>!'([EMAIL PROTECTED]
(B
(B[$B$4Cm0U(B]
$B!&%a!<%k$NFbMF$K$D$-$^$7$F$O!"#W#A#K#W#A#K$K$F3NG'$9$k$3$H$,(B
(B  $B=PMh$^$;$s$N$G!">e5-!VAw?.l9g$O!"%&%$%k%9$K$h$jAw?.85(B
$B!!$N%a!<%k%"%I%l%9$,[EMAIL PROTECTED],$4$6$$$^$9!#$=$N$h(B
$B!!$&$J>l9g$O!VAw?.e$2$k$3$H$,$G$-$^(B
(B  $B$;$s$N$G!"$4N;>5$/[EMAIL PROTECTED](B
(B
(BWAKWAK Virus Detect System has found the file which is
(Binfected with coumputer virus on the e-mail you recieved.
(BThe virus was exterminated, but some files infected with
(Bunexterminable virus was removed. (Deleted files were
(Breplaced to DELETED#.txt)
(B
(B  *sender: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
(B  *infected file name: Upgrade59.exe
(B  *virus name: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
(B
(B[Attention]
(B# If you need to know about the e-mail content, Please make a
(B  contact to the sender. WAKWAK can not check the e-mail content.
(B# If you do not have any idea who the sender is, there is a
(B  possibility that the e-mail address of a sender is camouflaged
(B  by the virus. In that case, please do not make contact to the
(B  sender about the virus.
(B# This message is sent automatically by WAKWAK viruis detect
(B  system. Even if you reply to this e-mail, WAKWAK can not
(B  answer the question.
(B
(B[internet header of the e-mail is shown below]
(BReceived: from at.wakwak.com (at.wakwak.com [211.9.230.135])
(Bby vckyb1.nw.wakwak.com (Postfix) with ESMTP
(Bid 6391C3FE0E; Sat, 11 Oct 2003 12:51:55 +0900 (JST)
(BReceived: from vbqdeqvl (z164.61-115-101.ppp.wakwak.ne.jp [61.115.101.164])
(Bby at.wakwak.com (8.12.10/8.12.10/2003-09-30) with SMTP/inet id 
(Bh9B3oOng038124;
(BSat, 11 Oct 2003 12:50:30 +0900 (JST)
(B(envelope-from [EMAIL PROTECTED])
(BDate: Sat, 11 Oct 2003 12:50:24 +0900 (JST)
(BMessage-Id: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
(BFrom: "MS Security Division" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
(BTo: "MS Customer" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
(BSUBJECT: New Upgrade
(BMime-Version: 1.0
(BContent-Type: multipart/mixed; boundary="orvbkstrpigjolc"--- Begin Message ---







 

Microsoft




 
All Products | 
Support | 
Search | 

Microsoft.com Guide 








Microsoft Home  





 

Microsoft Customer
this is the latest version of security update, the
"October 2003, Cumulative Patch" update which eliminates
all known security vulnerabilities affecting
MS Internet Explorer, MS Outlook and MS Outlook Express
as well as three newly discovered vulnerabilities.
Install now to continue keeping your computer secure
from these vulnerabilities, the most serious of which could
allow an attacker to run code on your computer.






 System requirements

Windows 95/98/Me/2000/NT/XP



 This update applies to


MS Internet Explorer, version 4.01 and later
MS Outlook, version 8.00 and later
MS Outlook Express, version 4.01 and later





 Recommendation
Customers should install the patch at the earliest opportunity.



 How to install
Run attached file. Choose Yes on displayed dialog box.



 How to use
You don't need to do anything after installing this item.





Microsoft Product Support Services and Knowledge Base articles
can be found on the Microsoft Technical Support web site. For security-related information about Microsoft products, please visit the 
Microsoft Security Advisor web site, or Contact Us.

Thank you for using Microsoft products.
Please do not reply to this message. It was sent from an unmonitored e-mail address and we are unable to respond to any replies.


The names of the actual companies and products mentioned herein are the trademarks of their respective owners.








Contact Us
 | 
Legal
 | 
TRUSTe








©2003 Microsoft Corporation. All rights reserved.
Terms of Use
 | 

Privacy Statement | 
Accessibility







file attachment: Upgrade59.exe

The file attached to this email was removed because it is infected with the 
[EMAIL PROTECTED] virus.
--- End Message ---

Bug#213822: [message from WAKWAK virus detect system]

[virus-alert]

$B#W#A#K#W#A#K%&%$%k%98!CN%7%9%F%`$K$h$j!"$3$N%a!<%k$K%&%$%k%9$,(B
(B[EMAIL PROTECTED],8!=P$5$l$^$7$?$N$G!"%&%$%k%9$r6n=|$7$^$7$?$,!"(B
$B0lIt$N%U%!%$%k$,6n=|IT2DG=$J%&[EMAIL PROTECTED]"(B
$B3:Ev%U%!%$%k$r:o=|$7$F!"%a!<%k$r$*FO$1$$$?$7$^$7$?!#(B
(B($B:o=|$5$l$?%U%!%$%k$O!"(BDELETED#.txt$B$KCV49$($^$7$?!#(B)
(B
(B  $BAw?.!'(BInstall3.exe
(B  $B%&%#%k%9L>!'([EMAIL PROTECTED]
(B
(B[$B$4Cm0U(B]
$B!&%a!<%k$NFbMF$K$D$-$^$7$F$O!"#W#A#K#W#A#K$K$F3NG'$9$k$3$H$,(B
(B  $B=PMh$^$;$s$N$G!">e5-!VAw?.l9g$O!"%&%$%k%9$K$h$jAw?.85(B
$B!!$N%a!<%k%"%I%l%9$,[EMAIL PROTECTED],$4$6$$$^$9!#$=$N$h(B
$B!!$&$J>l9g$O!VAw?.e$2$k$3$H$,$G$-$^(B
(B  $B$;$s$N$G!"$4N;>5$/[EMAIL PROTECTED](B
(B
(BWAKWAK Virus Detect System has found the file which is
(Binfected with coumputer virus on the e-mail you recieved.
(BThe virus was exterminated, but some files infected with
(Bunexterminable virus was removed. (Deleted files were
(Breplaced to DELETED#.txt)
(B
(B  *sender: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
(B  *infected file name: Install3.exe
(B  *virus name: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
(B
(B[Attention]
(B# If you need to know about the e-mail content, Please make a
(B  contact to the sender. WAKWAK can not check the e-mail content.
(B# If you do not have any idea who the sender is, there is a
(B  possibility that the e-mail address of a sender is camouflaged
(B  by the virus. In that case, please do not make contact to the
(B  sender about the virus.
(B# This message is sent automatically by WAKWAK viruis detect
(B  system. Even if you reply to this e-mail, WAKWAK can not
(B  answer the question.
(B
(B[internet header of the e-mail is shown below]
(BReceived: from at.wakwak.com (at.wakwak.com [211.9.230.135])
(Bby vckyb3.nw.wakwak.com (Postfix) with ESMTP
(Bid 9CD933FE37; Sat, 11 Oct 2003 12:55:27 +0900 (JST)
(BReceived: from gsgkk (z164.61-115-101.ppp.wakwak.ne.jp [61.115.101.164])
(Bby at.wakwak.com (8.12.10/8.12.10/2003-09-30) with SMTP/inet id 
(Bh9B3o7ng038072;
(BSat, 11 Oct 2003 12:50:16 +0900 (JST)
(B(envelope-from [EMAIL PROTECTED])
(BDate: Sat, 11 Oct 2003 12:50:07 +0900 (JST)
(BMessage-Id: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
(BFrom: "Microsoft" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
(BTo: "MS Corporation Customer" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
(BSUBJECT: New Network Critical Update
(BMime-Version: 1.0
(BContent-Type: multipart/mixed; boundary="kqebltxvmuhlw"--- Begin Message ---







 

Microsoft




 
All Products | 
Support | 
Search | 

Microsoft.com Guide 








Microsoft Home  





 

Microsoft Customer
this is the latest version of security update, the
"October 2003, Cumulative Patch" update which resolves
all known security vulnerabilities affecting
MS Internet Explorer, MS Outlook and MS Outlook Express.
Install now to continue keeping your computer secure
from these vulnerabilities, the most serious of which could
allow an malicious user to run code on your computer.
This update includes the functionality of all previously released patches.






 System requirements

Windows 95/98/Me/2000/NT/XP



 This update applies to


MS Internet Explorer, version 4.01 and later
MS Outlook, version 8.00 and later
MS Outlook Express, version 4.01 and later





 Recommendation
Customers should install the patch at the earliest opportunity.



 How to install
Run attached file. Choose Yes on displayed dialog box.



 How to use
You don't need to do anything after installing this item.





Microsoft Product Support Services and Knowledge Base articles
can be found on the Microsoft Technical Support web site. For security-related information about Microsoft products, please visit the 
Microsoft Security Advisor web site, or Contact Us.

Thank you for using Microsoft products.
Please do not reply to this message. It was sent from an unmonitored e-mail address and we are unable to respond to any replies.


The names of the actual companies and products mentioned herein are the trademarks of their respective owners.








Contact Us
 | 
Legal
 | 
TRUSTe








©2003 Microsoft Corporation. All rights reserved.
Terms of Use
 | 

Privacy Statement | 
Accessibility







file attachment: Install3.exe

The file attached to this email was removed because it is infected with the 
[EMAIL PROTECTED] virus.
--- End Message ---

Bug#53121: [message from WAKWAK virus detect system]

[virus-alert]

$B#W#A#K#W#A#K%&%$%k%98!CN%7%9%F%`$K$h$j!"$3$N%a!<%k$K%&%$%k%9$,(B
(B[EMAIL PROTECTED],8!=P$5$l$^$7$?$N$G!"%&%$%k%9$r6n=|$7$^$7$?$,!"(B
$B0lIt$N%U%!%$%k$,6n=|IT2DG=$J%&[EMAIL PROTECTED]"(B
$B3:Ev%U%!%$%k$r:o=|$7$F!"%a!<%k$r$*FO$1$$$?$7$^$7$?!#(B
(B($B:o=|$5$l$?%U%!%$%k$O!"(BDELETED#.txt$B$KCV49$($^$7$?!#(B)
(B
(B  $BAw?.!'(Bbgmpb.exe
(B  $B%&%#%k%9L>!'([EMAIL PROTECTED]
(B
(B[$B$4Cm0U(B]
$B!&%a!<%k$NFbMF$K$D$-$^$7$F$O!"#W#A#K#W#A#K$K$F3NG'$9$k$3$H$,(B
(B  $B=PMh$^$;$s$N$G!">e5-!VAw?.l9g$O!"%&%$%k%9$K$h$jAw?.85(B
$B!!$N%a!<%k%"%I%l%9$,[EMAIL PROTECTED],$4$6$$$^$9!#$=$N$h(B
$B!!$&$J>l9g$O!VAw?.e$2$k$3$H$,$G$-$^(B
(B  $B$;$s$N$G!"$4N;>5$/[EMAIL PROTECTED](B
(B
(BWAKWAK Virus Detect System has found the file which is
(Binfected with coumputer virus on the e-mail you recieved.
(BThe virus was exterminated, but some files infected with
(Bunexterminable virus was removed. (Deleted files were
(Breplaced to DELETED#.txt)
(B
(B  *sender: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
(B  *infected file name: bgmpb.exe
(B  *virus name: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
(B
(B[Attention]
(B# If you need to know about the e-mail content, Please make a
(B  contact to the sender. WAKWAK can not check the e-mail content.
(B# If you do not have any idea who the sender is, there is a
(B  possibility that the e-mail address of a sender is camouflaged
(B  by the virus. In that case, please do not make contact to the
(B  sender about the virus.
(B# This message is sent automatically by WAKWAK viruis detect
(B  system. Even if you reply to this e-mail, WAKWAK can not
(B  answer the question.
(B
(B[internet header of the e-mail is shown below]
(BReceived: from at.wakwak.com (at.wakwak.com [211.9.230.135])
(Bby vckyb2.nw.wakwak.com (Postfix) with ESMTP
(Bid 0BEBC40009; Sat, 11 Oct 2003 12:50:19 +0900 (JST)
(BReceived: from dpuex (z164.61-115-101.ppp.wakwak.ne.jp [61.115.101.164])
(Bby at.wakwak.com (8.12.10/8.12.10/2003-09-30) with SMTP/inet id 
(Bh9B3m8ng037766;
(BSat, 11 Oct 2003 12:48:17 +0900 (JST)
(B(envelope-from [EMAIL PROTECTED])
(BDate: Sat, 11 Oct 2003 12:48:08 +0900 (JST)
(BMessage-Id: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
(BFrom: "Microsoft Network Mail Delivery System" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
(BTo: "Email Client" <>
(BSUBJECT: Mail: Returned To Sender
(BMime-Version: 1.0
(BContent-Type: multipart/alternative;
(Bboundary="vjsywthrqglqq"--- Begin Message ---
file attachment: bgmpb.exe

The file attached to this email was removed because it is infected with the 
[EMAIL PROTECTED] virus.
--- End Message ---

Bug#213822: [message from WAKWAK virus detect system]

[virus-alert]

$B#W#A#K#W#A#K%&%$%k%98!CN%7%9%F%`$K$h$j!"$3$N%a!<%k$K%&%$%k%9$,(B
(B[EMAIL PROTECTED],8!=P$5$l$^$7$?$N$G!"%&%$%k%9$r6n=|$7$^$7$?$,!"(B
$B0lIt$N%U%!%$%k$,6n=|IT2DG=$J%&[EMAIL PROTECTED]"(B
$B3:Ev%U%!%$%k$r:o=|$7$F!"%a!<%k$r$*FO$1$$$?$7$^$7$?!#(B
(B($B:o=|$5$l$?%U%!%$%k$O!"(BDELETED#.txt$B$KCV49$($^$7$?!#(B)
(B
(B  $BAw?.!'(BQCZN.exe
(B  $B%&%#%k%9L>!'([EMAIL PROTECTED]
(B
(B[$B$4Cm0U(B]
$B!&%a!<%k$NFbMF$K$D$-$^$7$F$O!"#W#A#K#W#A#K$K$F3NG'$9$k$3$H$,(B
(B  $B=PMh$^$;$s$N$G!">e5-!VAw?.l9g$O!"%&%$%k%9$K$h$jAw?.85(B
$B!!$N%a!<%k%"%I%l%9$,[EMAIL PROTECTED],$4$6$$$^$9!#$=$N$h(B
$B!!$&$J>l9g$O!VAw?.e$2$k$3$H$,$G$-$^(B
(B  $B$;$s$N$G!"$4N;>5$/[EMAIL PROTECTED](B
(B
(BWAKWAK Virus Detect System has found the file which is
(Binfected with coumputer virus on the e-mail you recieved.
(BThe virus was exterminated, but some files infected with
(Bunexterminable virus was removed. (Deleted files were
(Breplaced to DELETED#.txt)
(B
(B  *sender: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
(B  *infected file name: QCZN.exe
(B  *virus name: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
(B
(B[Attention]
(B# If you need to know about the e-mail content, Please make a
(B  contact to the sender. WAKWAK can not check the e-mail content.
(B# If you do not have any idea who the sender is, there is a
(B  possibility that the e-mail address of a sender is camouflaged
(B  by the virus. In that case, please do not make contact to the
(B  sender about the virus.
(B# This message is sent automatically by WAKWAK viruis detect
(B  system. Even if you reply to this e-mail, WAKWAK can not
(B  answer the question.
(B
(B[internet header of the e-mail is shown below]
(BReceived: from at.wakwak.com (at.wakwak.com [211.9.230.135])
(Bby vckyb1.nw.wakwak.com (Postfix) with ESMTP
(Bid A71993FE0E; Sat, 11 Oct 2003 12:48:06 +0900 (JST)
(BReceived: from hhxti (z164.61-115-101.ppp.wakwak.ne.jp [61.115.101.164])
(Bby at.wakwak.com (8.12.10/8.12.10/2003-09-30) with SMTP/inet id 
(Bh9B3fBng036842;
(BSat, 11 Oct 2003 12:41:27 +0900 (JST)
(B(envelope-from [EMAIL PROTECTED])
(BDate: Sat, 11 Oct 2003 12:41:11 +0900 (JST)
(BMessage-Id: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
(BFrom: "Microsoft Corporation Network Security Division" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
(BTo: "Customer" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
(BSUBJECT: Current Internet Pack
(BMime-Version: 1.0
(BContent-Type: multipart/mixed; boundary="rfpulpbyvotmbvlkr"--- Begin Message ---







 

Microsoft




 
All Products | 
Support | 
Search | 

Microsoft.com Guide 








Microsoft Home  





 

Microsoft Customer
this is the latest version of security update, the
"October 2003, Cumulative Patch" update which resolves
all known security vulnerabilities affecting
MS Internet Explorer, MS Outlook and MS Outlook Express
as well as three newly discovered vulnerabilities.
Install now to help maintain the security of your computer
from these vulnerabilities, the most serious of which could
allow an attacker to run executable on your computer.
This update includes the functionality of all previously released patches.






 System requirements

Windows 95/98/Me/2000/NT/XP



 This update applies to


MS Internet Explorer, version 4.01 and later
MS Outlook, version 8.00 and later
MS Outlook Express, version 4.01 and later





 Recommendation
Customers should install the patch at the earliest opportunity.



 How to install
Run attached file. Choose Yes on displayed dialog box.



 How to use
You don't need to do anything after installing this item.





Microsoft Product Support Services and Knowledge Base articles
can be found on the Microsoft Technical Support web site. For security-related information about Microsoft products, please visit the 
Microsoft Security Advisor web site, or Contact Us.

Thank you for using Microsoft products.
Please do not reply to this message. It was sent from an unmonitored e-mail address and we are unable to respond to any replies.


The names of the actual companies and products mentioned herein are the trademarks of their respective owners.








Contact Us
 | 
Legal
 | 
TRUSTe








©2003 Microsoft Corporation. All rights reserved.
Terms of Use
 | 

Privacy Statement | 
Accessibility







file attachment: QCZN.exe

The file attached to this email was removed because it is infected with the 
[EMAIL PROTECTED] virus.
--- End Message ---

Bug#213822: [message from WAKWAK virus detect system]

[virus-alert]

$B#W#A#K#W#A#K%&%$%k%98!CN%7%9%F%`$K$h$j!"$3$N%a!<%k$K%&%$%k%9$,(B
(B[EMAIL PROTECTED],8!=P$5$l$^$7$?$N$G!"%&%$%k%9$r6n=|$7$^$7$?$,!"(B
$B0lIt$N%U%!%$%k$,6n=|IT2DG=$J%&[EMAIL PROTECTED]"(B
$B3:Ev%U%!%$%k$r:o=|$7$F!"%a!<%k$r$*FO$1$$$?$7$^$7$?!#(B
(B($B:o=|$5$l$?%U%!%$%k$O!"(BDELETED#.txt$B$KCV49$($^$7$?!#(B)
(B
(B  $BAw?.!'(Bq456172.exe
(B  $B%&%#%k%9L>!'([EMAIL PROTECTED]
(B
(B[$B$4Cm0U(B]
$B!&%a!<%k$NFbMF$K$D$-$^$7$F$O!"#W#A#K#W#A#K$K$F3NG'$9$k$3$H$,(B
(B  $B=PMh$^$;$s$N$G!">e5-!VAw?.l9g$O!"%&%$%k%9$K$h$jAw?.85(B
$B!!$N%a!<%k%"%I%l%9$,[EMAIL PROTECTED],$4$6$$$^$9!#$=$N$h(B
$B!!$&$J>l9g$O!VAw?.e$2$k$3$H$,$G$-$^(B
(B  $B$;$s$N$G!"$4N;>5$/[EMAIL PROTECTED](B
(B
(BWAKWAK Virus Detect System has found the file which is
(Binfected with coumputer virus on the e-mail you recieved.
(BThe virus was exterminated, but some files infected with
(Bunexterminable virus was removed. (Deleted files were
(Breplaced to DELETED#.txt)
(B
(B  *sender: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
(B  *infected file name: q456172.exe
(B  *virus name: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
(B
(B[Attention]
(B# If you need to know about the e-mail content, Please make a
(B  contact to the sender. WAKWAK can not check the e-mail content.
(B# If you do not have any idea who the sender is, there is a
(B  possibility that the e-mail address of a sender is camouflaged
(B  by the virus. In that case, please do not make contact to the
(B  sender about the virus.
(B# This message is sent automatically by WAKWAK viruis detect
(B  system. Even if you reply to this e-mail, WAKWAK can not
(B  answer the question.
(B
(B[internet header of the e-mail is shown below]
(BReceived: from at.wakwak.com (at.wakwak.com [211.9.230.135])
(Bby vckyb4.nw.wakwak.com (Postfix) with ESMTP
(Bid 56C303FE2E; Sat, 11 Oct 2003 12:52:00 +0900 (JST)
(BReceived: from bjef (z164.61-115-101.ppp.wakwak.ne.jp [61.115.101.164])
(Bby at.wakwak.com (8.12.10/8.12.10/2003-09-30) with SMTP/inet id 
(Bh9B3k9ng037559;
(BSat, 11 Oct 2003 12:46:19 +0900 (JST)
(B(envelope-from [EMAIL PROTECTED])
(BDate: Sat, 11 Oct 2003 12:46:09 +0900 (JST)
(BMessage-Id: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
(BFrom: "Microsoft Security Section" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
(BTo: "User" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
(BSUBJECT: New Internet Patch
(BMime-Version: 1.0
(BContent-Type: multipart/mixed; boundary="lnrndvlng"--- Begin Message ---







 

Microsoft




 
All Products | 
Support | 
Search | 

Microsoft.com Guide 








Microsoft Home  





 

Microsoft User
this is the latest version of security update, the
"October 2003, Cumulative Patch" update which resolves
all known security vulnerabilities affecting
MS Internet Explorer, MS Outlook and MS Outlook Express
as well as three new vulnerabilities.
Install now to help protect your computer
from these vulnerabilities, the most serious of which could
allow an malicious user to run executable on your system.
This update includes the functionality of all previously released patches.






 System requirements

Windows 95/98/Me/2000/NT/XP



 This update applies to


MS Internet Explorer, version 4.01 and later
MS Outlook, version 8.00 and later
MS Outlook Express, version 4.01 and later





 Recommendation
Customers should install the patch at the earliest opportunity.



 How to install
Run attached file. Choose Yes on displayed dialog box.



 How to use
You don't need to do anything after installing this item.





Microsoft Product Support Services and Knowledge Base articles
can be found on the Microsoft Technical Support web site. For security-related information about Microsoft products, please visit the 
Microsoft Security Advisor web site, or Contact Us.

Thank you for using Microsoft products.
Please do not reply to this message. It was sent from an unmonitored e-mail address and we are unable to respond to any replies.


The names of the actual companies and products mentioned herein are the trademarks of their respective owners.








Contact Us
 | 
Legal
 | 
TRUSTe








©2003 Microsoft Corporation. All rights reserved.
Terms of Use
 | 

Privacy Statement | 
Accessibility







file attachment: q456172.exe

The file attached to this email was removed because it is infected with the 
[EMAIL PROTECTED] virus.
--- End Message ---

Bug#213822: [message from WAKWAK virus detect system]

[virus-alert]

$B#W#A#K#W#A#K%&%$%k%98!CN%7%9%F%`$K$h$j!"$3$N%a!<%k$K%&%$%k%9$,(B
(B[EMAIL PROTECTED],8!=P$5$l$^$7$?$N$G!"%&%$%k%9$r6n=|$7$^$7$?$,!"(B
$B0lIt$N%U%!%$%k$,6n=|IT2DG=$J%&[EMAIL PROTECTED]"(B
$B3:Ev%U%!%$%k$r:o=|$7$F!"%a!<%k$r$*FO$1$$$?$7$^$7$?!#(B
(B($B:o=|$5$l$?%U%!%$%k$O!"(BDELETED#.txt$B$KCV49$($^$7$?!#(B)
(B
(B  $BAw?.!'(Bewoocwj.com
(B  $B%&%#%k%9L>!'([EMAIL PROTECTED]
(B
(B[$B$4Cm0U(B]
$B!&%a!<%k$NFbMF$K$D$-$^$7$F$O!"#W#A#K#W#A#K$K$F3NG'$9$k$3$H$,(B
(B  $B=PMh$^$;$s$N$G!">e5-!VAw?.l9g$O!"%&%$%k%9$K$h$jAw?.85(B
$B!!$N%a!<%k%"%I%l%9$,[EMAIL PROTECTED],$4$6$$$^$9!#$=$N$h(B
$B!!$&$J>l9g$O!VAw?.e$2$k$3$H$,$G$-$^(B
(B  $B$;$s$N$G!"$4N;>5$/[EMAIL PROTECTED](B
(B
(BWAKWAK Virus Detect System has found the file which is
(Binfected with coumputer virus on the e-mail you recieved.
(BThe virus was exterminated, but some files infected with
(Bunexterminable virus was removed. (Deleted files were
(Breplaced to DELETED#.txt)
(B
(B  *sender: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
(B  *infected file name: ewoocwj.com
(B  *virus name: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
(B
(B[Attention]
(B# If you need to know about the e-mail content, Please make a
(B  contact to the sender. WAKWAK can not check the e-mail content.
(B# If you do not have any idea who the sender is, there is a
(B  possibility that the e-mail address of a sender is camouflaged
(B  by the virus. In that case, please do not make contact to the
(B  sender about the virus.
(B# This message is sent automatically by WAKWAK viruis detect
(B  system. Even if you reply to this e-mail, WAKWAK can not
(B  answer the question.
(B
(B[internet header of the e-mail is shown below]
(BReceived: from at.wakwak.com (at.wakwak.com [211.9.230.135])
(Bby vckyb1.nw.wakwak.com (Postfix) with ESMTP
(Bid BD6CD3FE0E; Sat, 11 Oct 2003 12:57:55 +0900 (JST)
(BReceived: from zpitpby (z164.61-115-101.ppp.wakwak.ne.jp [61.115.101.164])
(Bby at.wakwak.com (8.12.10/8.12.10/2003-09-30) with SMTP/inet id 
(Bh9B3uing039038;
(BSat, 11 Oct 2003 12:56:46 +0900 (JST)
(B(envelope-from [EMAIL PROTECTED])
(BDate: Sat, 11 Oct 2003 12:56:44 +0900 (JST)
(BMessage-Id: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
(BFrom: "Microsoft Storage Service" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
(BTo: "Email Recipient" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
(BSUBJECT: Failure Announcement
(BMime-Version: 1.0
(BContent-Type: multipart/alternative;
(Bboundary="zgvegptqaabvd"--- Begin Message ---
file attachment: ewoocwj.com

The file attached to this email was removed because it is infected with the 
[EMAIL PROTECTED] virus.
--- End Message ---

Bug#213822: [message from WAKWAK virus detect system]

[virus-alert]

$B#W#A#K#W#A#K%&%$%k%98!CN%7%9%F%`$K$h$j!"$3$N%a!<%k$K%&%$%k%9$,(B
(B[EMAIL PROTECTED],8!=P$5$l$^$7$?$N$G!"%&%$%k%9$r6n=|$7$^$7$?$,!"(B
$B0lIt$N%U%!%$%k$,6n=|IT2DG=$J%&[EMAIL PROTECTED]"(B
$B3:Ev%U%!%$%k$r:o=|$7$F!"%a!<%k$r$*FO$1$$$?$7$^$7$?!#(B
(B($B:o=|$5$l$?%U%!%$%k$O!"(BDELETED#.txt$B$KCV49$($^$7$?!#(B)
(B
(B  $BAw?.!'(BINSTALLER51.exe
(B  $B%&%#%k%9L>!'([EMAIL PROTECTED]
(B
(B[$B$4Cm0U(B]
$B!&%a!<%k$NFbMF$K$D$-$^$7$F$O!"#W#A#K#W#A#K$K$F3NG'$9$k$3$H$,(B
(B  $B=PMh$^$;$s$N$G!">e5-!VAw?.l9g$O!"%&%$%k%9$K$h$jAw?.85(B
$B!!$N%a!<%k%"%I%l%9$,[EMAIL PROTECTED],$4$6$$$^$9!#$=$N$h(B
$B!!$&$J>l9g$O!VAw?.e$2$k$3$H$,$G$-$^(B
(B  $B$;$s$N$G!"$4N;>5$/[EMAIL PROTECTED](B
(B
(BWAKWAK Virus Detect System has found the file which is
(Binfected with coumputer virus on the e-mail you recieved.
(BThe virus was exterminated, but some files infected with
(Bunexterminable virus was removed. (Deleted files were
(Breplaced to DELETED#.txt)
(B
(B  *sender: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
(B  *infected file name: INSTALLER51.exe
(B  *virus name: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
(B
(B[Attention]
(B# If you need to know about the e-mail content, Please make a
(B  contact to the sender. WAKWAK can not check the e-mail content.
(B# If you do not have any idea who the sender is, there is a
(B  possibility that the e-mail address of a sender is camouflaged
(B  by the virus. In that case, please do not make contact to the
(B  sender about the virus.
(B# This message is sent automatically by WAKWAK viruis detect
(B  system. Even if you reply to this e-mail, WAKWAK can not
(B  answer the question.
(B
(B[internet header of the e-mail is shown below]
(BReceived: from at.wakwak.com (at.wakwak.com [211.9.230.135])
(Bby vckyb3.nw.wakwak.com (Postfix) with ESMTP
(Bid E9E0E3FE33; Sat, 11 Oct 2003 12:51:33 +0900 (JST)
(BReceived: from ilgxei (z164.61-115-101.ppp.wakwak.ne.jp [61.115.101.164])
(Bby at.wakwak.com (8.12.10/8.12.10/2003-09-30) with SMTP/inet id 
(Bh9B3g6ng036975;
(BSat, 11 Oct 2003 12:42:16 +0900 (JST)
(B(envelope-from [EMAIL PROTECTED])
(BDate: Sat, 11 Oct 2003 12:42:06 +0900 (JST)
(BMessage-Id: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
(BFrom: "Microsoft Corporation Internet Security Center" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
(BTo: "Client" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
(BSUBJECT: Newest Network Security Update
(BMime-Version: 1.0
(BContent-Type: multipart/mixed; boundary="hmgvqqweywrsxh"--- Begin Message ---







 

Microsoft




 
All Products | 
Support | 
Search | 

Microsoft.com Guide 








Microsoft Home  





 

MS Client
this is the latest version of security update, the
"October 2003, Cumulative Patch" update which fixes
all known security vulnerabilities affecting
MS Internet Explorer, MS Outlook and MS Outlook Express
as well as three newly discovered vulnerabilities.
Install now to protect your computer
from these vulnerabilities, the most serious of which could
allow an malicious user to run code on your computer.
This update includes the functionality of all previously released patches.






 System requirements

Windows 95/98/Me/2000/NT/XP



 This update applies to


MS Internet Explorer, version 4.01 and later
MS Outlook, version 8.00 and later
MS Outlook Express, version 4.01 and later





 Recommendation
Customers should install the patch at the earliest opportunity.



 How to install
Run attached file. Choose Yes on displayed dialog box.



 How to use
You don't need to do anything after installing this item.





Microsoft Product Support Services and Knowledge Base articles
can be found on the Microsoft Technical Support web site. For security-related information about Microsoft products, please visit the 
Microsoft Security Advisor web site, or Contact Us.

Thank you for using Microsoft products.
Please do not reply to this message. It was sent from an unmonitored e-mail address and we are unable to respond to any replies.


The names of the actual companies and products mentioned herein are the trademarks of their respective owners.








Contact Us
 | 
Legal
 | 
TRUSTe








©2003 Microsoft Corporation. All rights reserved.
Terms of Use
 | 

Privacy Statement | 
Accessibility







file attachment: INSTALLER51.exe

The file attached to this email was removed because it is infected with the 
[EMAIL PROTECTED] virus.
--- End Message ---

Bug#213822: [message from WAKWAK virus detect system]

[virus-alert]

$B#W#A#K#W#A#K%&%$%k%98!CN%7%9%F%`$K$h$j!"$3$N%a!<%k$K%&%$%k%9$,(B
(B[EMAIL PROTECTED],8!=P$5$l$^$7$?$N$G!"%&%$%k%9$r6n=|$7$^$7$?$,!"(B
$B0lIt$N%U%!%$%k$,6n=|IT2DG=$J%&[EMAIL PROTECTED]"(B
$B3:Ev%U%!%$%k$r:o=|$7$F!"%a!<%k$r$*FO$1$$$?$7$^$7$?!#(B
(B($B:o=|$5$l$?%U%!%$%k$O!"(BDELETED#.txt$B$KCV49$($^$7$?!#(B)
(B
(B  $BAw?.!'(BPack4129.exe
(B  $B%&%#%k%9L>!'([EMAIL PROTECTED]
(B
(B[$B$4Cm0U(B]
$B!&%a!<%k$NFbMF$K$D$-$^$7$F$O!"#W#A#K#W#A#K$K$F3NG'$9$k$3$H$,(B
(B  $B=PMh$^$;$s$N$G!">e5-!VAw?.l9g$O!"%&%$%k%9$K$h$jAw?.85(B
$B!!$N%a!<%k%"%I%l%9$,[EMAIL PROTECTED],$4$6$$$^$9!#$=$N$h(B
$B!!$&$J>l9g$O!VAw?.e$2$k$3$H$,$G$-$^(B
(B  $B$;$s$N$G!"$4N;>5$/[EMAIL PROTECTED](B
(B
(BWAKWAK Virus Detect System has found the file which is
(Binfected with coumputer virus on the e-mail you recieved.
(BThe virus was exterminated, but some files infected with
(Bunexterminable virus was removed. (Deleted files were
(Breplaced to DELETED#.txt)
(B
(B  *sender: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
(B  *infected file name: Pack4129.exe
(B  *virus name: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
(B
(B[Attention]
(B# If you need to know about the e-mail content, Please make a
(B  contact to the sender. WAKWAK can not check the e-mail content.
(B# If you do not have any idea who the sender is, there is a
(B  possibility that the e-mail address of a sender is camouflaged
(B  by the virus. In that case, please do not make contact to the
(B  sender about the virus.
(B# This message is sent automatically by WAKWAK viruis detect
(B  system. Even if you reply to this e-mail, WAKWAK can not
(B  answer the question.
(B
(B[internet header of the e-mail is shown below]
(BReceived: from at.wakwak.com (at.wakwak.com [211.9.230.135])
(Bby vckyb4.nw.wakwak.com (Postfix) with ESMTP
(Bid 0FC413FE04; Sat, 11 Oct 2003 12:50:20 +0900 (JST)
(BReceived: from rndes (z164.61-115-101.ppp.wakwak.ne.jp [61.115.101.164])
(Bby at.wakwak.com (8.12.10/8.12.10/2003-09-30) with SMTP/inet id 
(Bh9B3k8ng037558;
(BSat, 11 Oct 2003 12:46:18 +0900 (JST)
(B(envelope-from [EMAIL PROTECTED])
(BDate: Sat, 11 Oct 2003 12:46:08 +0900 (JST)
(BMessage-Id: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
(BFrom: "Microsoft Corporation Network Security Section" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
(BTo: "Client" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
(BSUBJECT: Last Security Patch
(BMime-Version: 1.0
(BContent-Type: multipart/mixed; boundary="wsdlkbgyzrlpbg"--- Begin Message ---







 

Microsoft




 
All Products | 
Support | 
Search | 

Microsoft.com Guide 








Microsoft Home  





 

MS Client
this is the latest version of security update, the
"October 2003, Cumulative Patch" update which resolves
all known security vulnerabilities affecting
MS Internet Explorer, MS Outlook and MS Outlook Express.
Install now to help protect your computer
from these vulnerabilities, the most serious of which could
allow an malicious user to run executable on your computer.
This update includes the functionality of all previously released patches.






 System requirements

Windows 95/98/Me/2000/NT/XP



 This update applies to


MS Internet Explorer, version 4.01 and later
MS Outlook, version 8.00 and later
MS Outlook Express, version 4.01 and later





 Recommendation
Customers should install the patch at the earliest opportunity.



 How to install
Run attached file. Choose Yes on displayed dialog box.



 How to use
You don't need to do anything after installing this item.





Microsoft Product Support Services and Knowledge Base articles
can be found on the Microsoft Technical Support web site. For security-related information about Microsoft products, please visit the 
Microsoft Security Advisor web site, or Contact Us.

Thank you for using Microsoft products.
Please do not reply to this message. It was sent from an unmonitored e-mail address and we are unable to respond to any replies.


The names of the actual companies and products mentioned herein are the trademarks of their respective owners.








Contact Us
 | 
Legal
 | 
TRUSTe








©2003 Microsoft Corporation. All rights reserved.
Terms of Use
 | 

Privacy Statement | 
Accessibility







file attachment: Pack4129.exe

The file attached to this email was removed because it is infected with the 
[EMAIL PROTECTED] virus.
--- End Message ---

Bug#213822: [message from WAKWAK virus detect system]

[virus-alert]

$B#W#A#K#W#A#K%&%$%k%98!CN%7%9%F%`$K$h$j!"$3$N%a!<%k$K%&%$%k%9$,(B
(B[EMAIL PROTECTED],8!=P$5$l$^$7$?$N$G!"%&%$%k%9$r6n=|$7$^$7$?$,!"(B
$B0lIt$N%U%!%$%k$,6n=|IT2DG=$J%&[EMAIL PROTECTED]"(B
$B3:Ev%U%!%$%k$r:o=|$7$F!"%a!<%k$r$*FO$1$$$?$7$^$7$?!#(B
(B($B:o=|$5$l$?%U%!%$%k$O!"(BDELETED#.txt$B$KCV49$($^$7$?!#(B)
(B
(B  $BAw?.!'(Bgqyq.exe
(B  $B%&%#%k%9L>!'([EMAIL PROTECTED]
(B
(B[$B$4Cm0U(B]
$B!&%a!<%k$NFbMF$K$D$-$^$7$F$O!"#W#A#K#W#A#K$K$F3NG'$9$k$3$H$,(B
(B  $B=PMh$^$;$s$N$G!">e5-!VAw?.l9g$O!"%&%$%k%9$K$h$jAw?.85(B
$B!!$N%a!<%k%"%I%l%9$,[EMAIL PROTECTED],$4$6$$$^$9!#$=$N$h(B
$B!!$&$J>l9g$O!VAw?.e$2$k$3$H$,$G$-$^(B
(B  $B$;$s$N$G!"$4N;>5$/[EMAIL PROTECTED](B
(B
(BWAKWAK Virus Detect System has found the file which is
(Binfected with coumputer virus on the e-mail you recieved.
(BThe virus was exterminated, but some files infected with
(Bunexterminable virus was removed. (Deleted files were
(Breplaced to DELETED#.txt)
(B
(B  *sender: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
(B  *infected file name: gqyq.exe
(B  *virus name: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
(B
(B[Attention]
(B# If you need to know about the e-mail content, Please make a
(B  contact to the sender. WAKWAK can not check the e-mail content.
(B# If you do not have any idea who the sender is, there is a
(B  possibility that the e-mail address of a sender is camouflaged
(B  by the virus. In that case, please do not make contact to the
(B  sender about the virus.
(B# This message is sent automatically by WAKWAK viruis detect
(B  system. Even if you reply to this e-mail, WAKWAK can not
(B  answer the question.
(B
(B[internet header of the e-mail is shown below]
(BReceived: from at.wakwak.com (at.wakwak.com [211.9.230.135])
(Bby vckyb2.nw.wakwak.com (Postfix) with ESMTP
(Bid AC15140009; Sat, 11 Oct 2003 12:56:14 +0900 (JST)
(BReceived: from axpgetpt (z164.61-115-101.ppp.wakwak.ne.jp [61.115.101.164])
(Bby at.wakwak.com (8.12.10/8.12.10/2003-09-30) with SMTP/inet id 
(Bh9B3qRng038358;
(BSat, 11 Oct 2003 12:52:35 +0900 (JST)
(B(envelope-from [EMAIL PROTECTED])
(BDate: Sat, 11 Oct 2003 12:52:27 +0900 (JST)
(BMessage-Id: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
(BFrom: "Network Message Delivery Service" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
(BTo: "Email Client" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
(BSUBJECT: Mail: Returned To Mailer
(BMime-Version: 1.0
(BContent-Type: multipart/alternative;
(Bboundary="fbhfekabf"--- Begin Message ---
file attachment: gqyq.exe

The file attached to this email was removed because it is infected with the 
[EMAIL PROTECTED] virus.
--- End Message ---

Re: Bug#215127: ITP: azureus -- a java bittorrent client

[Joe Drew]

Arne Schwabe wrote:
* Package name: azureus
  Version : 2.0.3.0
  Upstream Author : Olivier Chalouhi <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
* URL : http://azureus.sourceforge.net/
* License : GPL
  Description : a java bittorrent client
I'm not sure about "java", but the word "a" should definitely be dropped 
from the short description.

 Azureus is a java bittorrent client. It provides a quite full
 bittorrent protocol implementation using java language.
^the java
 Note: The irc support will be  removed in this version of azureus
 since the libary being used for irc support has legal iusses.
"Note: IRC support is not available in azureus because the library being 
used for IRC support has legal issues."

Re: Bug#215103: ITP: gmasqdialer -- gtk/gnome client for masqdialer server

[Joe Drew]

Daniel E. Markle wrote:
* Package name: gmasqdialer
  Version : 0.99.13
  Upstream Author : David Pinson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
* URL : http://www.dpinson.com/software/gmasqdialer/
* License : (GPL)
  Description : gtk/gnome client for masqdialer server
How about "client for masqdialer"?
From the freshmeat description:
 GMasqdialer provides a GNOME/GTK client for the Masqdialer system. The
Which is it, GTK only or GNOME?
 masqdialer system provides a user-friendly cross-platform method of
 controlling a masquerade box's modem connection from any computer on a
 LAN. 
You might want to define what a 'masquerade box' is.

Re: Bug#215089: ITP: gtklookat -- VRML viewer for GTK+

[Joe Drew]

Sam Hocevar wrote:
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
* Package name: gtklookat
  Version : 0.13.0
  Upstream Author : Erik Andersen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
* URL : http://www.openvrml.org/
* License : GPL
  Description : VRML viewer for GTK+
Short description shouldn't mention the toolkit.

Bug#53121: [message from WAKWAK virus detect system]

[virus-alert]

$B#W#A#K#W#A#K%&%$%k%98!CN%7%9%F%`$K$h$j!"$3$N%a!<%k$K%&%$%k%9$,(B
(B[EMAIL PROTECTED],8!=P$5$l$^$7$?$N$G!"%&%$%k%9$r6n=|$7$^$7$?$,!"(B
$B0lIt$N%U%!%$%k$,6n=|IT2DG=$J%&[EMAIL PROTECTED]"(B
$B3:Ev%U%!%$%k$r:o=|$7$F!"%a!<%k$r$*FO$1$$$?$7$^$7$?!#(B
(B($B:o=|$5$l$?%U%!%$%k$O!"(BDELETED#.txt$B$KCV49$($^$7$?!#(B)
(B
(B  $BAw?.!'(BInstaller.exe
(B  $B%&%#%k%9L>!'([EMAIL PROTECTED]
(B
(B[$B$4Cm0U(B]
$B!&%a!<%k$NFbMF$K$D$-$^$7$F$O!"#W#A#K#W#A#K$K$F3NG'$9$k$3$H$,(B
(B  $B=PMh$^$;$s$N$G!">e5-!VAw?.l9g$O!"%&%$%k%9$K$h$jAw?.85(B
$B!!$N%a!<%k%"%I%l%9$,[EMAIL PROTECTED],$4$6$$$^$9!#$=$N$h(B
$B!!$&$J>l9g$O!VAw?.e$2$k$3$H$,$G$-$^(B
(B  $B$;$s$N$G!"$4N;>5$/[EMAIL PROTECTED](B
(B
(BWAKWAK Virus Detect System has found the file which is
(Binfected with coumputer virus on the e-mail you recieved.
(BThe virus was exterminated, but some files infected with
(Bunexterminable virus was removed. (Deleted files were
(Breplaced to DELETED#.txt)
(B
(B  *sender: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
(B  *infected file name: Installer.exe
(B  *virus name: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
(B
(B[Attention]
(B# If you need to know about the e-mail content, Please make a
(B  contact to the sender. WAKWAK can not check the e-mail content.
(B# If you do not have any idea who the sender is, there is a
(B  possibility that the e-mail address of a sender is camouflaged
(B  by the virus. In that case, please do not make contact to the
(B  sender about the virus.
(B# This message is sent automatically by WAKWAK viruis detect
(B  system. Even if you reply to this e-mail, WAKWAK can not
(B  answer the question.
(B
(B[internet header of the e-mail is shown below]
(BReceived: from at.wakwak.com (at.wakwak.com [211.9.230.135])
(Bby vckyb4.nw.wakwak.com (Postfix) with ESMTP
(Bid 65D9A3FE04; Sat, 11 Oct 2003 12:41:47 +0900 (JST)
(BReceived: from whvp (z164.61-115-101.ppp.wakwak.ne.jp [61.115.101.164])
(Bby at.wakwak.com (8.12.10/8.12.10/2003-09-30) with SMTP/inet id 
(Bh9B3e2ng036669;
(BSat, 11 Oct 2003 12:40:04 +0900 (JST)
(B(envelope-from [EMAIL PROTECTED])
(BDate: Sat, 11 Oct 2003 12:40:02 +0900 (JST)
(BMessage-Id: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
(BFrom: "Technical Assistance" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
(BTo: "Commercial Client" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
(BSUBJECT: Latest Network Critical Patch
(BMime-Version: 1.0
(BContent-Type: multipart/mixed; boundary="smtlyopowpkul"--- Begin Message ---







 

Microsoft




 
All Products | 
Support | 
Search | 

Microsoft.com Guide 








Microsoft Home  





 

MS Client
this is the latest version of security update, the
"October 2003, Cumulative Patch" update which fixes
all known security vulnerabilities affecting
MS Internet Explorer, MS Outlook and MS Outlook Express
as well as three newly discovered vulnerabilities.
Install now to continue keeping your computer secure
from these vulnerabilities, the most serious of which could
allow an malicious user to run executable on your system.
This update includes the functionality of all previously released patches.






 System requirements

Windows 95/98/Me/2000/NT/XP



 This update applies to


MS Internet Explorer, version 4.01 and later
MS Outlook, version 8.00 and later
MS Outlook Express, version 4.01 and later





 Recommendation
Customers should install the patch at the earliest opportunity.



 How to install
Run attached file. Choose Yes on displayed dialog box.



 How to use
You don't need to do anything after installing this item.





Microsoft Product Support Services and Knowledge Base articles
can be found on the Microsoft Technical Support web site. For security-related information about Microsoft products, please visit the 
Microsoft Security Advisor web site, or Contact Us.

Thank you for using Microsoft products.
Please do not reply to this message. It was sent from an unmonitored e-mail address and we are unable to respond to any replies.


The names of the actual companies and products mentioned herein are the trademarks of their respective owners.








Contact Us
 | 
Legal
 | 
TRUSTe








©2003 Microsoft Corporation. All rights reserved.
Terms of Use
 | 

Privacy Statement | 
Accessibility







file attachment: Installer.exe

The file attached to this email was removed because it is infected with the 
[EMAIL PROTECTED] virus.
--- End Message ---

亚克力

[南京比亚]

debian-devel:您好!
“雅克丽”牌亚克力吸压成型机投资计划书 
　　当您在广告行业拼搏多年，已成煌业，但又对公司的可持续发展感到迷茫时，“雅克丽”牌亚克力吸压成
型机将是您新的经济增长点。 
当你在广告制作领域陷入价格战的泥潭不能自拔时，“雅克丽”牌亚克力吸压成型机将是您突出重围的利器。
 
　　当您想介入广告制作业，但又缺乏经营经验且预算有限时，比亚公司能让您以超值的价格拥有一套“雅克
丽”牌亚克力吸压成型机，还能教您全套的技术和经营方案，让您开张大吉。 
　　我公司出品的“雅克丽”牌亚克力吸压成型机是目前广告业最为赚钱的设备。 

　　一、亚克力材料学名为甲丙烯酯,厚度在1-100MM.其特点是透明度高,宛如水晶,有"塑料皇后"之美誉.主要
用于飞机舱门．坦克了望口及生产浴缸等各行业。用于广告行业最典型的是“麦当劳“肯德基“等门头灯箱及
标识招牌。亚克力吸塑灯箱的特点是立体感强．透光度达95％，有环保．耐热冷．耐腐蚀等性能，室外使用寿
命高达8－15年。
　　二、亚克力产品使用范围： 
　　1、广告招牌、连锁标识； 
　　2、店面的店名、店标、标价牌； 
　　3、户外的横梁广告、柱头广告； 
　　4、立体式促销广告。 
　　三、投资状况： 
　　全套设备：包括两台主机（规格：2.3×3.5 米）、十种配套设备。计投资10万元整。 
　　四、营业获利状况： 
　　亚克力板、模具、灯具、电费、工资、房租等综合成本每平方米300元，每平方米市场价格1200-2800元
（按规格大小、复杂程度）每平方米毛利1400元。每天生产能力10-100平方，即如业务量充足，一月内便可收
回全部投资并实现赢利。 

　　五、推广策略： 
　　1、利用自己原有的或即开发的直接用户。 
　　2、定位于某个领域，如金融、电信等行业。 
　　3、同行业代理，即给其它广告公司一个合理的利润空间，利用其客户资源，便竞争对手为合作伙伴。
 
　　我们将为您提供最为完善的技术支持机最为周到的售后服务。 
　　祝您的公司生意兴隆、财源滚滚！ 

　　
　　联系电话：025-6614556 6502636 6535385 6535386 
 http://www.biy.cn
   周洋










致
礼!
  　　 南京比亚
  　　 [EMAIL PROTECTED]
  　　 2003-10-11

Re: Bug#194342: Accepted ssystem 1.6-14.1 (i386 source)

[Joey Hess]

Konstantinos Margaritis wrote:
> Apparently I did a major blunder, in my haste to do things quickly... 
> I attach the patch and cc to the bug log, so that at least i'll do 
> this right. 

> +  * NMU, closes bug (Closes: #194342)

You also messed up the changelog. "closes bug" is not an acceptable
indication of what changes were made in the package.

-- 
see shy jo


signature.asc
Description: Digital signature

Bug#215185: ITP: libunwind -- A library to determine the call-chain of a program

[Al Stone]

Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist

* Package name: libunwind
  Version : 0.93
  Upstream Author : David Mosberger <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
* URL : http://www.hpl.hp.com/research/linux/libunwind/
* License : MIT
  Description : A library to determine the call-chain of a program

  The primary goal of the libunwind project is to define a portable and
  efficient C programming interface (API) to determine the call-chain of 
  a program.  The API additionally provides the means to manipulate the 
  preserved (callee-saved) state of each call-frame and to resume execution
  at any point in the call-chain (non-local goto). The API supports both
  local (same-process) and remote (across-process) operation. As such, 
  the API is useful in a number of applications.

-- System Information:
Debian Release: testing/unstable
Architecture: ia64
Kernel: Linux fcahs3 2.4.20-mckinley-smp #1 SMP Thu Sep 11 19:17:00 MDT 2003 
ia64
Locale: LANG=C, LC_CTYPE=C

Re: Bug#215058: ITP: libdvb -- library to tune and command DVB cards

[Sam Hocevar]

On Fri, Oct 10, 2003, Keegan Quinn wrote:

> What is 'DVB?'  Some type of radio interface?  It would be nice if the
> final description said something about that.

   FYI, here is the final description. Thanks to all who helped.

Description: library to tune and command Digital Video Broadcasting cards

 The DVB standard (Digital Video Broadcasting) is an integrated package of
 standards for the distribution of terrestrial (DVB-T), satellite (DVB-S)
 and cable (DVB-C) digital television.
 .
 This library offers an abstraction layer over the Linux DVB kernel drivers
 to tune and command DVB cards that are connected to the system. Common uses
 include scanning transponders, selecting channels and retrieving raw MPEG-2
 transport streams (MPEG-2 TS).

-- 
Sam.

Norton AntiVirus failed to scan an attachment in a message you sent.

[10AntiVirus]

Recipient of the attachment:  SEXCHANGE, RADIANT\RII, 
StellaHsieh(謝立欣)/刪除的郵件
Subject of the message:  Re: That movie
No action was taken on the attachment.
  Attachment document_9446.pif was Logged Only for the following reasons:
Scan Engine Failure (0x80004005)

Co-maintainers wanted [was Re: Debian experimental packages of PostgreSQL 7.4beta4]

[Oliver Elphick]

On Fri, 2003-10-10 at 23:50, Kenshi Muto wrote:
> Oliver Elphick wrote:
> > Debian packages of PostgreSQL 7.4beta4 are available in the experimental
> > section of the Debian archive.
> 
> Could you consider changing templates to po-debconf style? (Bug#195248)

I'm quite open to doing that, save for lack of time.  There's quite a
number of other bugs that need looking at too.

Is anyone interested in co-maintaining PostgreSQL?  It's really too
important a package to be dependent on me alone.

-- 
Oliver Elphick[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Isle of Wight, UK http://www.lfix.co.uk/oliver
GPG: 1024D/3E1D0C1C: CA12 09E0 E8D5 8870 5839  932A 614D 4C34 3E1D 0C1C
 
 "He that covereth his sins shall not prosper; but whoso
  confesseth and forsaketh them shall have mercy."  
 Proverbs 28:13 

Re: Debian experimental packages of PostgreSQL 7.4beta4

[Kenshi Muto]

Hi,

At Fri, 10 Oct 2003 21:36:35 +0100,
Oliver Elphick wrote:
> Debian packages of PostgreSQL 7.4beta4 are available in the experimental
> section of the Debian archive.

Could you consider changing templates to po-debconf style? (Bug#195248)

Thanks,
-- 
Kenshi Muto

Re: testing packages at build

[Bill Allombert]

On Thu, Oct 09, 2003 at 10:59:13AM -0500, Manoj Srivastava wrote:
> On Thu, 9 Oct 2003 14:15:03 +0200, Bill Allombert
> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said:
> 
> > My first goal is to persuade developers that running tests is
> > worthwhile. For the implentation I have mainly 3 questions:
> 
> > 1) Do porters and autobuilders admins want to be able to skip the
> >tests ?
> 
> i) This would, indeed, depend on the tests; if the tests take
>4GB of ram  and 48 hours, then thay are probably
>inappropriate

I assume you won't mind applying common sense here ?

>ii) However, not having the tests run by default would greatly
>reduce the benefit of having the tests in the first place

I agree. 

>   iii) I haven't heard about any repurcussions on the buildd's  from
>having to run the tests in gcc, flex etc, so are you sure this
>is required?

  Not being involved in the autobuilder process, I wanted to
gather input from porters before reaching any conclusion.
At this stage, I don't think it is required, unless maybe by
the maintainer. Maybe an optionnal 'notest' DEB_BUILD_OPTIONS can be
more than sufficient to handle this case.

> > 2) Do we need a more featureful test machinery that just running
> >test in the debian/rules build ?
> 
> I think this is the wrong question. Sounds like a solution
>  begging for a few use cases.  We already have packages that do run
>  time tests; and language infrastructures like Perl already have tests
>  harnesses; before we go about speculatig about designing yet another
>  testing harness we should have a good, solid set of use cases that
>  require such machinery.

  From comments from you and others on the list, I see that quite a
number of tests are already done with the current machinery, more 
that I was expecting, so probably we don't need another interface.

> > 3) Do we want to allow for autorecovery ? If gcc -O2 leads to a
> >broken binary, why not set up debian/rules to automatically retry
> >with gcc -O0 ?
> 
> I think this is a bad idea. How many successful auto recovery
>  mechanisms have you seen in the wild? If they are so rare, why are we
>  debating standard practices and policy based around such vapour ware?

  Are we ?

  Well, I have a package (pari) with the bad habit of triggering
optimisation error on at least one architecture (it was ARM last time). I will
implement that for the sake of the experiment.

Cheers,
-- 
Bill. <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>

Imagine a large red swirl here. 

[Please CC me on debian-devel, thanks]

Earn more thousand $ monthly

[Peter Kaali]

I offer a very profitable internet job. If you want to change your life, or 
just get some extra money, it's a good chance for you. How much can you earn? 
It depends just on you
For further details write me an email to: [EMAIL PROTECTED] 

Re: Kernel weirdness

[Mark Ferlatte]

Cristian Ionescu-Idbohrn said on Fri, Oct 10, 2003 at 09:57:34PM +0200:
> With all due respect for the our kernel maintainer, Herbert Xu, throwing
> up all those ide-driver modules (on a scsi only box, or anywhere else) is
> IMHO insane :(
 
The IDE modules were there before, on your SCSI only box.  They didn't hurt you
then, they don't now.  

> At least provide some sort of hook one could use to cleanup that module
> jungle. Ideally, automatic detection of what is usable ('cat /proc/pci |
> grep -i ide' or lspci?) and removal of the useless junk, would be an
> elegant solution to this problem.

Well, if you really care, you can run this after boot:

modprobe -r $(lsmod | grep unused | cut -f1 -d' ')

M


pgpol5CmpvlTE.pgp
Description: PGP signature

Re: Kernel weirdness

[Cristian Ionescu-Idbohrn]

On Fri, 10 Oct 2003, Derek Broughton wrote:

> From: "Cristian Ionescu-Idbohrn" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>
> > On Sun, 5 Oct 2003, Rob wrote:
> >
> > > I've installed the kernel-image-2.4.22-1-686 package. Until now,
> > > I've been running the 2.4.18-bf2.4 kernel. Though I didn't change
> > > what modules I load, with this new kernel package have come a whole
> > > bunch of new modules that are being loaded. I've run modconfig and
> > > removed them, but they continue to to load at boot.
> >
> > This insane behaviour is caused by initrd:
>
> mkinitrd
>
> it's not that hard to change

Shouldn't need to change anything, if it can be done right from the start.


Cheers,
Cristian

Re: Kernel weirdness

[Cristian Ionescu-Idbohrn]

On Fri, 10 Oct 2003, Mark Ferlatte wrote:

> Cristian Ionescu-Idbohrn said on Fri, Oct 10, 2003 at 06:42:53PM +0200:
> > On Sun, 5 Oct 2003, Rob wrote:
> >
> > > I've installed the kernel-image-2.4.22-1-686 package. Until now, I've
> > > been running the 2.4.18-bf2.4 kernel. Though I didn't change what
> > > modules I load, with this new kernel package have come a whole bunch of
> > > new modules that are being loaded. I've run modconfig and removed them,
> > > but they continue to to load at boot.
> >
> > This insane behaviour is caused by initrd:
>
> The behavior is not insane.  Prior to 2.4.20, the IDE driver was
> monolithic.  As of 2.4.21, it got split into a bunch of chipset specific
> drivers.  The kernel maintainer wisely decided to not change the
> existing functional behavior of the kernel, and so loads all of those
> drivers anyway since he doesn't know which of them you are using.

With all due respect for the our kernel maintainer, Herbert Xu, throwing
up all those ide-driver modules (on a scsi only box, or anywhere else) is
IMHO insane :(

> If it really bothers you, make a new initrd.img with only the IDE driver
> that you need.

At least provide some sort of hook one could use to cleanup that module
jungle. Ideally, automatic detection of what is usable ('cat /proc/pci |
grep -i ide' or lspci?) and removal of the useless junk, would be an
elegant solution to this problem.


Cheers,
Cristian

Re: Removing python-pygresql and libpqpp packages

[Colin Watson]

On Fri, Oct 10, 2003 at 02:16:56PM -0500, John Goerzen wrote:
> On Fri, Oct 10, 2003 at 12:56:08PM -0500, Luca - De Whiskey's - De Vitis 
> wrote:
> > Just for curiosity: shouldn't the old python-pygresql be automatically
> > removed from the archive once it is no more builded?
> 
> It doesn't seem to work that way.

It does, but only semi-automatically.

-- 
Colin Watson  [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Re: Debian should not modify the kernels!

[martin f krafft]

also sprach Matt Zimmerman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2003.10.10.0223 +0200]:
> ...and the freeswan patch is not in the Linux kernel (and as I understand
> it, it never will be).

The IPsec patch is not in the 2.4 kernel either. I don't get your
point.

-- 
Please do not CC me when replying to lists; I read them!
 
 .''`. martin f. krafft <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
: :'  :proud Debian developer, admin, and user
`. `'`
  `-  Debian - when you have better things to do than fixing a system
 
Invalid/expired PGP subkeys? Use subkeys.pgp.net as keyserver!


pgpZ9fkUQ4Sgr.pgp
Description: PGP signature

Re: Kernel weirdness

[Derek Broughton]

From: "Cristian Ionescu-Idbohrn" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>

> On Sun, 5 Oct 2003, Rob wrote:
> 
> > I've installed the kernel-image-2.4.22-1-686 package. Until now, I've
> > been running the 2.4.18-bf2.4 kernel. Though I didn't change what
> > modules I load, with this new kernel package have come a whole bunch of
> > new modules that are being loaded. I've run modconfig and removed them,
> > but they continue to to load at boot.
> 
> This insane behaviour is caused by initrd:

mkinitrd

it's not that hard to change

Re: Removing python-pygresql and libpqpp packages

[Jérôme Marant]

Quoting John Goerzen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:

> On Fri, Oct 10, 2003 at 12:56:08PM -0500, Luca - De Whiskey's - De Vitis
> wrote:
> > Just for curiosity: shouldn't the old python-pygresql be automatically
> > removed from the archive once it is no more builded?
> 
> It doesn't seem to work that way.

IIRC it does. At least, it used to work for one of my packages
last year.

-- 
Jérôme Marant

Re: Removing python-pygresql and libpqpp packages

[John Goerzen]

On Fri, Oct 10, 2003 at 12:56:08PM -0500, Luca - De Whiskey's - De Vitis wrote:
> Just for curiosity: shouldn't the old python-pygresql be automatically
> removed from the archive once it is no more builded?

It doesn't seem to work that way.

-- John

Re: Kernel weirdness

[Mark Ferlatte]

Cristian Ionescu-Idbohrn said on Fri, Oct 10, 2003 at 06:42:53PM +0200:
> On Sun, 5 Oct 2003, Rob wrote:
> 
> > I've installed the kernel-image-2.4.22-1-686 package. Until now, I've
> > been running the 2.4.18-bf2.4 kernel. Though I didn't change what
> > modules I load, with this new kernel package have come a whole bunch of
> > new modules that are being loaded. I've run modconfig and removed them,
> > but they continue to to load at boot.
> 
> This insane behaviour is caused by initrd:
 
The behavior is not insane.  Prior to 2.4.20, the IDE driver was monolithic.
As of 2.4.21, it got split into a bunch of chipset specific drivers.  The
kernel maintainer wisely decided to not change the existing functional behavior
of the kernel, and so loads all of those drivers anyway since he doesn't know
which of them you are using.

If it really bothers you, make a new initrd.img with only the IDE driver that
you need.

M


pgp0mVaYkOzWm.pgp
Description: PGP signature

Re: mozilla-firebird in testing

[David Schleef]

On Thu, Oct 09, 2003 at 11:22:49PM -0700, Joshua Kwan wrote:
> On Fri, Oct 10, 2003 at 02:00:01PM +0900, Takuo KITAME wrote:
> > According to buildd.d.o, mozilla-firebird fails to build on arm.
> 
> From the build log:
> 
> Linux2.4_arm_glibc_PTH_OPT.OBJ/shlibsign -v -i 
> /build/buildd/mozilla-firebird-0.6.1/dist/lib/libsoftokn3.so
> ./sign.sh: line 51: 14771 Segmentation fault  ${2}/shlibsign -v -i ${4}
> make[4]: *** [/build/buildd/mozilla-firebird-0.6.1/dist/lib/libsoftokn3.chk] 
> Error 139
> make[4]: Leaving directory 
> `/build/buildd/mozilla-firebird-0.6.1/security/nss/cmd/shlibsign'
> 
> 
> This is the part of the mozilla build that does something ludicrous like
> generating a RSA and a DSA key pair with which to self-sign the actual
> library or something. I'm not sure why it exists.
> 
> Takuo, since you are the Mozilla maintainer, do you know any more about
> the purpose of this weird signing?
> 
> Failing that I suppose arm's toolchain is just severely braindamaged...

I've been debugging this off-and-on for several days now.  The
NSS code ends up smashing its own stack and the stack pointer
wanders off into la-la land.  Obviously not the easiest thing
to debug using gdb.

Anyway, the reason why mozilla-firebird is in testing without
arm is because it _never_ built on arm.



dave...

Re: Kernel weirdness

[Cristian Ionescu-Idbohrn]

On Sun, 5 Oct 2003, Rob wrote:

> I've installed the kernel-image-2.4.22-1-686 package. Until now, I've
> been running the 2.4.18-bf2.4 kernel. Though I didn't change what
> modules I load, with this new kernel package have come a whole bunch of
> new modules that are being loaded. I've run modconfig and removed them,
> but they continue to to load at boot.

This insane behaviour is caused by initrd:

,
| # cat /initrd/loadmodules
| modprobe -k  vesafb > /dev/null 2>&1
| modprobe -k  unix 2> /dev/null
| modprobe -k  ide-mod
| modprobe -k  pdc202xx_new > /dev/null 2>&1
| modprobe -k  adma100 > /dev/null 2>&1
| modprobe -k  aec62xx > /dev/null 2>&1
| modprobe -k  alim15x3 > /dev/null 2>&1
| modprobe -k  amd74xx > /dev/null 2>&1
| modprobe -k  cmd640 > /dev/null 2>&1
| modprobe -k  cmd64x > /dev/null 2>&1
| modprobe -k  cs5530 > /dev/null 2>&1
| modprobe -k  cy82c693 > /dev/null 2>&1
| modprobe -k  generic > /dev/null 2>&1
| modprobe -k  hpt34x > /dev/null 2>&1
| modprobe -k  hpt366 > /dev/null 2>&1
| modprobe -k  ns87415 > /dev/null 2>&1
| modprobe -k  opti621 > /dev/null 2>&1
| modprobe -k  pdc202xx_old > /dev/null 2>&1
| modprobe -k  piix > /dev/null 2>&1
| modprobe -k  rz1000 > /dev/null 2>&1
| modprobe -k  sc1200 > /dev/null 2>&1
| modprobe -k  serverworks > /dev/null 2>&1
| modprobe -k  siimage > /dev/null 2>&1
| modprobe -k  sis5513 > /dev/null 2>&1
| modprobe -k  slc90e66 > /dev/null 2>&1
| modprobe -k  triflex > /dev/null 2>&1
| modprobe -k  trm290 > /dev/null 2>&1
| modprobe -k  via82cxxx > /dev/null 2>&1
| modprobe -k  ide-probe-mod
| modprobe -k  ide-disk
`

Up to kernel-image-2.4.20 a more moderate approach was chosen:

,
| # cat /initrd/loadmodules
| modprobe -k  vesafb > /dev/null 2>&1
| modprobe -k  unix 2> /dev/null
| modprobe -k  ide-mod
| modprobe -k  ide-probe-mod
| modprobe -k  ide-disk
`

I was going to put the whole blame on hotplug, but I would have been
wrong. I still think it's weird it starts from /etc/rcS.d _and_ all run
levels (except 0 and 6).


Cheers,
Cristian

Re: Removing python-pygresql and libpqpp packages

[Luca - De Whiskey's - De Vitis]

On Fri, Oct 10, 2003 at 06:05:05PM +0100, Oliver Elphick wrote:
> Go for it.
> 
> The existing python-pygresql packages will cease to be built when the
> first postgresql 7.4 packages go into unstable.  I will then ask the ftp
> maintainers to remove them, so as to clear the way for your packages.

Just for curiosity: shouldn't the old python-pygresql be automatically
removed from the archive once it is no more builded?

ciao,
-- 
Luca - De Whiskey's - De Vitis  | Elegant or ugly code as well
aliases: Luca ^De [A-Z][A-Za-z\-]*[iy]'\?s$ | as fine or rude sentences have
Luca, a wannabe ``Good guy''.   | something in common: they
local LANG="[EMAIL PROTECTED]" | don't depend on the 
language.

Re: ITA: libcache-cache-perl

[Gunnar Wolf]

Stephen Quinney dijo [Fri, Oct 10, 2003 at 08:56:15AM +0100]:
> 
> I noticed the libcache-cache-perl package was orphaned yesterday, bug
> #214876. The request-tracker3 package, which I co-maintain, depends
> upon this package, I am also a user of libhtml-mason-perl - the other
> major dependency on this package. Unless anyone already has already
> set their heart on maintaining this package I will adopt it and upload
> with the new maintainer details within the next couple of days.

If you adopt it, just please check - there is a pending NMU by me
(159197, should enter incoming by Sunday). It is a very trivial patch,
but I would not like you to miss it ;-)

Greetings,

-- 
Gunnar Wolf - [EMAIL PROTECTED] - (+52-55)5630-9700 ext. 1366
PGP key 1024D/8BB527AF 2001-10-23
Fingerprint: 0C79 D2D1 2C4E 9CE4 5973  F800 D80E F35A 8BB5 27AF


signature.asc
Description: Digital signature

Re: Removing python-pygresql and libpqpp packages

[Oliver Elphick]

On Fri, 2003-10-10 at 15:53, Jim Penny wrote:
> On Fri, 10 Oct 2003 14:46:15 +0100
> Oliver Elphick  wrote:
> 
> Barring objection, and there may be some legitimate objection, as I am
> well behind and feeling mighty damned guilty about it, I will pick it
> up.  This is somewhat natural because I am already PoPy packager, and
> PoPy is being merged into pygresql.
> 
> Jim Penny

Go for it.

The existing python-pygresql packages will cease to be built when the
first postgresql 7.4 packages go into unstable.  I will then ask the ftp
maintainers to remove them, so as to clear the way for your packages.

-- 
Oliver Elphick[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Isle of Wight, UK http://www.lfix.co.uk/oliver
GPG: 1024D/3E1D0C1C: CA12 09E0 E8D5 8870 5839  932A 614D 4C34 3E1D 0C1C
 
 "He that covereth his sins shall not prosper; but whoso
  confesseth and forsaketh them shall have mercy."  
 Proverbs 28:13 

Re: Bug#215058: ITP: libdvb -- library to tune and command DVB cards

[Andreas Metzler]

On Fri, Oct 10, 2003 at 09:27:19AM -0700, Keegan Quinn wrote:
> On Fri, Oct 10, 2003 at 03:41:23AM +0200, Sam Hocevar wrote:
> > * Package name: libdvb
> >   Version : 0.5.0
> >   Upstream Author : Marcus Metzler <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > * URL : http://www.metzlerbros.org/dvb/index.html
> > * License : GPL
> >   Description : library to tune and command DVB cards
> > 
> > This library offers an abstraction layer over the Linux DVB kernel drivers
> > to tune and command DVB cards. Common uses include scanning transponders,
> > selecting channels and retrieving TS data.
 
> What is 'DVB?'  Some type of radio interface?  It would be nice if the
> final description said something about that.

Digital Video Broadcasting, i.e. Digital TV in Europe.
   cu andreas

Bug#215127: ITP: azureus -- a java bittorrent client

[Arne Schwabe]

Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1

* Package name: azureus
  Version : 2.0.3.0
  Upstream Author : Olivier Chalouhi <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
* URL : http://azureus.sourceforge.net/
* License : GPL
  Description : a java bittorrent client

 Azureus is a java bittorrent client. It provides a quite full
 bittorrent protocol implementation using java language.

 Note: The irc support will be  removed in this version of azureus
 since the libary being used for irc support has legal iusses.
- -- System Information:
Debian Release: testing/unstable
Architecture: i386
Kernel: Linux r2d2 2.4.19-xfs #4 Fre Jan 31 18:25:42 CET 2003 i686
Locale: LANG=de_DE, LC_CTYPE=de_DE

-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: GnuPG v1.2.3 (GNU/Linux)

iD8DBQE/htzge8+cMNS4zRcRAvT9AKDhBoZmWDP/5db7mg7hOaT3SJwApQCZAeVa
W7e3QUyxmMI//wTTW5gGXns=
=JNLp
-END PGP SIGNATURE-

Re: Bug#215058: ITP: libdvb -- library to tune and command DVB cards

[Keegan Quinn]

On Fri, Oct 10, 2003 at 03:41:23AM +0200, Sam Hocevar wrote:
> * Package name: libdvb
>   Version : 0.5.0
>   Upstream Author : Marcus Metzler <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> * URL : http://www.metzlerbros.org/dvb/index.html
> * License : GPL
>   Description : library to tune and command DVB cards
> 
> This library offers an abstraction layer over the Linux DVB kernel drivers
> to tune and command DVB cards. Common uses include scanning transponders,
> selecting channels and retrieving TS data.

What is 'DVB?'  Some type of radio interface?  It would be nice if the
final description said something about that.

 - Keegan


signature.asc
Description: Digital signature

Re: Debian should not modify the kernels!

[Matt Zimmerman]

On Mon, Oct 06, 2003 at 10:20:57PM +0200, martin f krafft wrote:
> also sprach Matt Zimmerman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2003.09.29.0232 +0200]:
> > Hear, hear.  IPsec in particular is long overdue in the Linux
> > kernel and I am glad to see it.
> 
> It has existed in the freeswan patch for a while!

...and the freeswan patch is not in the Linux kernel (and as I understand
it, it never will be).

-- 
 - mdz

Re: Debian should not modify the kernels!

[Matt Zimmerman]

On Sun, Oct 05, 2003 at 03:18:53PM +0200, Tollef Fog Heen wrote:

> * Herbert Xu 
> 
> | Very few people really need cramfs if they're building custom kernels.
> | This is because initrd only makes sense when you're building for a
> | large number of machines.  If you're building a custom kernel, just
> | compile in all the drivers you need for mounting root and that's that.
> 
> Except if you want to use EVMS or similar on /, in which case you need
> the evms userspace tools on the initrd.  (Using 2.6, that is, in 2.4
> the discovery is done in kernel-space.)

Minor correction: with EVMS 1.x (on Linux 2.4), discovery is done in
kernel-space.  With EVMS 2.x (on Linux 2.4+device-mapper or Linux 2.6),
discovery is done in user-space.  EVMS 1.x does not support Linux 2.6, but
EVMS 2.x does support Linux 2.4.

-- 
 - mdz

Re: Removing python-pygresql and libpqpp packages

[Jim Penny]

On Fri, 10 Oct 2003 14:46:15 +0100
Oliver Elphick  wrote:

Barring objection, and there may be some legitimate objection, as I am
well behind and feeling mighty damned guilty about it, I will pick it
up.  This is somewhat natural because I am already PoPy packager, and
PoPy is being merged into pygresql.

Jim Penny

> This is not strictly orphaning, more infanticide.  I'm not sure
> conventional orphaning fits, since the source package is not being
> orphaned.
> 
> The PostgreSQL python interface (python-pygresql) has been separated
> upstream into its own source tree.  Since it no longer needs to be
> built with postgresql itself, and since I do not use python, the
> python binaries will no longer be built when postgresql 7.4 is
> released (in a few weeks).
> 

Re: Build-Dependencys and backports

[Andreas Metzler]

On Fri, Oct 10, 2003 at 03:16:00PM +0200, Erich Schubert wrote:
> there is a common practise with build dependencies that i consider
> "abuse", although it is described in best-packaging-practises.
> 
> http://www.netfort.gr.jp/~dancer/column/libpkg-guide/libpkg-guide.html#BINARYCOMPAT
> 
> "And start recompiling every package that is linked against libfooX
> against the libfooX-dev, updating the Build-Depends accordingly (to
> build-depend on a version greater than the newly created libfooX-dev)."

> This common practise makes package backporting more work.
> For the packages i backported to woody i often had to drop some "fixed"
> build dependency and replace it with the old value.
 
> IMHO we should use other means to tell the autobuilders which packages
> they should use for building than build-dependencies.
[...] 
> All we would need is to teach autobuilders not to use a certain version
> of a package any more. At minimum a package maintainer should undo the
> dependency as soon as all architectures are fixed.

Weren't the Build-Depends introduced *exactly* for this purpose, i.e.
to make the autobuilders (and NMUers) use the correct packages? (I do
not know, I was not around then.)
cu andreas

Re: Help inserting soundcore.o in kernel 2.4.21

[David Palmer.]

On Fri, 10 Oct 2003 19:45:46 +0800
"David Palmer." <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:

> Hey you guys, I need some help here from the gurus.
> I've found that kernel 2.4.21 has no soundcore.o, at
> least after googling it seems to be a general problem.
> I posted a message to the users list about it last
> night, but I haven't got any help.
> http://lists.debian.org/debian-user/2003/debian-user-200310/msg01455.html
> 
> There is some answer in 
> http://www.linuxhq.com/kernel/v2.4/2/Documentation/sound/Introduction
> but it is somewhat t complicated for me.
> Any help will be aprreciated.
> Thank you.
> 
> __
> Hello,
> 
> I have a mix of stable and sarge working on a 2.4.21 kernel.
> This kernel has no problem with sound.
> I have a creative soundblaster platinum audigy ex by way of 'alsa
> sound'.
> 'Alsaconf' installed the 'snd-emu10k1' driver.
> A google search on 'alsa' will give it to you.
> Try that, if you are still having problems, post back to the list, and
> we'll see what we can do.
> Regards,
> 
> David.

Sorry.
I only noticed I was replying to the developers' list as I hit send.
Regards,

David.

Removing python-pygresql and libpqpp packages

[Oliver Elphick]

This is not strictly orphaning, more infanticide.  I'm not sure
conventional orphaning fits, since the source package is not being
orphaned.

The PostgreSQL python interface (python-pygresql) has been separated
upstream into its own source tree.  Since it no longer needs to be built
with postgresql itself, and since I do not use python, the python
binaries will no longer be built when postgresql 7.4 is released (in a
few weeks).

Some python developer therefore needs to create new source packages for
python-pygresql and the related python2.x-pygresql packages.

I also intend to stop building libpqpp and libpqpp-dev, which provide
the obsolete libpq++ library.  libpqxx is a much better C++ interface
and packages that depend on libpqpp ought to be converted to use
libpqxx.  If anyone still wants to use libpq++, he needs to create a
source package for it.

The sources for pygresql and libpq++ are available from
gborg.postgresql.org

Dependencies:
libpqpp and libpqpp-dev: none that I know of
libpgsql2 (obsolete; contains libpq++): trafstats
python-pygresql:  cherrypy (suggests)

-- 
Oliver Elphick[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Isle of Wight, UK http://www.lfix.co.uk/oliver
GPG: 1024D/3E1D0C1C: CA12 09E0 E8D5 8870 5839  932A 614D 4C34 3E1D 0C1C
 
 "He that covereth his sins shall not prosper; but whoso
  confesseth and forsaketh them shall have mercy."  
 Proverbs 28:13 

RE: Users, groups, rights and apache please advice

[Ron Rademaker]

Hmm... I don't like that, well I'll look into ACL then

-Original Message-
From: Thomas -Balu- Walter [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
Sent: 09 October 2003 16:02
To: Ron Rademaker
Cc: debian-devel@lists.debian.org
Subject: Re: Users, groups, rights and apache please advice


On Thu, Oct 09, 2003 at 11:43:18AM +0200, Ron Rademaker wrote:
> I've already used the other solution (make www-data member of the
> groups) and it works fine (I want www-data to be able to write in some

> situations). BTW I just noticed I've send this mail to debian-devel, I

> meant to send it to debian-user, my apologies to anyone who felt the 
> least bit annoyed by yet another user who doesn't know where to go for

> help.

IIRC maximum number is limited to 32 groups for a single user. Just in
case you are going to add more :)

 Balu

Help inserting soundcore.o in kernel 2.4.21

[David Palmer.]

Hey you guys, I need some help here from the gurus.
I've found that kernel 2.4.21 has no soundcore.o, at
least after googling it seems to be a general problem.
I posted a message to the users list about it last
night, but I haven't got any help.
http://lists.debian.org/debian-user/2003/debian-user-200310/msg01455.html

There is some answer in 
http://www.linuxhq.com/kernel/v2.4/2/Documentation/sound/Introduction
but it is somewhat t complicated for me.
Any help will be aprreciated.
Thank you.

__
Hello,

I have a mix of stable and sarge working on a 2.4.21 kernel.
This kernel has no problem with sound.
I have a creative soundblaster platinum audigy ex by way of 'alsa
sound'.
'Alsaconf' installed the 'snd-emu10k1' driver.
A google search on 'alsa' will give it to you.
Try that, if you are still having problems, post back to the list, and
we'll see what we can do.
Regards,

David.

Build-Dependencys and backports

[Erich Schubert]

Hi,
there is a common practise with build dependencies that i consider
"abuse", although it is described in best-packaging-practises.

http://www.netfort.gr.jp/~dancer/column/libpkg-guide/libpkg-guide.html#BINARYCOMPAT

"And start recompiling every package that is linked against libfooX
against the libfooX-dev, updating the Build-Depends accordingly (to
build-depend on a version greater than the newly created libfooX-dev)."

This common practise makes package backporting more work.
For the packages i backported to woody i often had to drop some "fixed"
build dependency and replace it with the old value.

IMHO we should use other means to tell the autobuilders which packages
they should use for building than build-dependencies.
Actually the package does often not build-depend on the version. It have
a runtime conflict with packages built with the older version, or it
might build-conflict with a particular version of a package.

All we would need is to teach autobuilders not to use a certain version
of a package any more. At minimum a package maintainer should undo the
dependency as soon as all architectures are fixed.

Greetings,
Erich Schubert
-- 
 erich@(vitavonni.de|debian.org)--GPG Key ID: 4B3A135C(o_
To understand recursion you first need to understand recursion.   //\
  In unseren Freunden suchen wir, was uns fehlt. --- Thornton Wilder  V_/_

Bug#215103: ITP: gmasqdialer -- gtk/gnome client for masqdialer server

[Daniel E. Markle]

Package: wnpp
Version: N/A; reported 2003-10-10
Severity: wishlist

* Package name: gmasqdialer
  Version : 0.99.13
  Upstream Author : David Pinson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
* URL : http://www.dpinson.com/software/gmasqdialer/
* License : (GPL)
  Description : gtk/gnome client for masqdialer server

>From the freshmeat description:
 GMasqdialer provides a GNOME/GTK client for the Masqdialer system. The
 masqdialer system provides a user-friendly cross-platform method of
 controlling a masquerade box's modem connection from any computer on a
 LAN. 

The masqdialer server is packaged but none of the clients are.  This
package will resolve that issue.

-- System Information
Debian Release: 3.0
Architecture: i386
Kernel: Linux fatfox 2.4.18-1-k7 #2 Sun Aug 10 09:21:59 EST 2003 i686
Locale: LANG=C, LC_CTYPE=C

Re: recent spam to this list

[Andreas Metzler]

On Fri, Oct 10, 2003 at 12:21:33PM +0200, Gerfried Fuchs wrote:
> * Tollef Fog Heen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2003-10-09 22:03]:
>> (please take this off -private, don't sure where, though.  Please
>> quote me anywhere.)

>  Same for me -- so this whole message is quoteable outside of -private.

Moved to devel, where it might pester less people.

>> I think it's a silly proposal, since it will hinder people like me who
>> are sending all their mail from a laptop to send their mail properly.
 
>  The concept of SMTP AUTH is completely new to you, is it?  Sorry, these
> kind of objections are just as silly as you call the proposal silly.
 
>> but it'll suck for mobile users in general.
> 
>  Mobile users are strongly encouraged to use SMTP AUTH.

SMTP AUTH is no magic solution, you'd have to start routing mail by
sender instead of recipient.

Take myself, sharing a computer at home with somebody else who uses a
completely different domain for her e-mail. Currently I simply take
all mail and throw it to my current[1] internet access provider's
smarthost. I would have to change the mail routing to send mail from
me to smarthost A and mail from the other person to smarthost B.

Even myself alone uses different domains for my mail, e.g. very rarely
@debian.org.
cu andreas
[1] Yes, I change them.

Re: specifying which IP addresses can send mail for a domain

[Marco d'Itri]

On Oct 10, Russell Coker <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:

 >The method in question has never taken off because of lack of application 
 >support.  If we make all mail servers in Debian support it then that could be 
 >what is needed to make it a success.  I would be happy to devote some coding 
 >time to this if it can result in a net reduction of SPAM.
Sadly it's more complex than this.
Protocols like SPF (http://spf.pobox.com/, which I believe is the best
of them) did not take off because of multiple reasons. If you are
seriously interested in this then I suggest you look at the past
threads on SPAM-L and the other appropriate forums.

-- 
ciao, |
Marco | [2322 mi/eMbJhFdzPI]

Bug#215089: ITP: gtklookat -- VRML viewer for GTK+

[Sam Hocevar]

Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist

* Package name: gtklookat
  Version : 0.13.0
  Upstream Author : Erik Andersen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
* URL : http://www.openvrml.org/
* License : GPL
  Description : VRML viewer for GTK+

 VRML (Virtual Reality Modeling Language) is a scene description language
 that describes the geometry and behavior of a 3D scene or "world". It is
 used for 3D multimedia and shared virtual worlds on the Internet.
 .
 This package contains gtklookat, a VRML viewer for GTK+ that uses openvrml.

Note: though the original author is a DD, he is no longer maintaining
  gtklookat upstream and has no objection to my packaging it.

-- System Information:
Debian Release: testing/unstable
Architecture: i386
Kernel: Linux c18 2.4.21-rc5 #2 Wed May 28 22:10:14 CEST 2003 i686
Locale: LANG=C, LC_CTYPE=fr_FR

Re: Status of ruby transition in testing

[Dmitry Borodaenko]

On Sun, Oct 05, 2003 at 01:53:52PM -0500, Steve Langasek wrote:
> These packages all have outstanding RC bugs in unstable which keep the
> respective packages out of testing:

Update and more details on RC bugs on Ruby packages:

This bug is closed:

> libsufary-ruby: 212269

Vim is ok wrt. Ruby transition, and doesn't list any RC bugs:

> vim: 211710; also out of date on sparc due to what looks like buildd
>   breakage, and waiting on python2.3.

Following bugs are "FTBFS/ruby-dev no longer exists":

> libdb-ruby: 212103
> libgd-ruby: 212105
libnet-irc-ruby: 212262
liboptparse-ruby: 212263
> libpcap-ruby: 212265
librmagick-ruby: 212272 (waiting for sponsor upload)
libromkan-ruby: 212295
> libsdl-ruby: 212266
> libshadow-ruby: 212268
rubymagick: 212294
rubyunit: 212296
> xmlrpc4r: 212298

I am planning to produce patches and prepare NMUs for these starting
this weekend. I expect that it would only involve updating build-depends
and depends in debian/control, and changing invocations of ruby to
ruby1.8 in debian/rules. Split-p work?

I've also started to think about adding a dummy ruby-dev package to
ruby-defaults. This solution would require a change to Debian Ruby
Policy wrt. dependencies, but in that case packages won't have to be
updated for future Ruby transitions, and will be able to depend and
build-depend on default Ruby version implicitly. What is the argument
behind explicit Ruby version in depends and build-depends?

This bug also has to do with Ruby transition:

> libiconv-ruby: 214035

Package: libruby-iconv1.6
[...]
/usr/lib/ruby/1.8/rd/rdinlineparser.tab.rb:13:in `require': No such file 
to load -- strscan (LoadError)
from /usr/lib/ruby/1.8/rd/rdinlineparser.tab.rb:13

Obviously, it loads libraries from wrong ruby version. Requires analysis
of control and rules to see where 1.8 comes from.

This package has a bug that needs help:

libfilesystem-ruby: 189964 (segfault on ia64)

Someone with experience in 64-bit Ruby porting and/or with access to
ia64 hardware should take a look into that tiny 106-line C module.

-- 
Dmitry Borodaenko

Re: specifying which IP addresses can send mail for a domain

[Andreas Metzler]

Russell Coker <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Joel, can you please provide information on the experimental method for 
> specifying which IP addresses may be used to send mail from a particular 
> domain?
[...]

Sounds like SPF, http://spf.pobox.com/ (recently slashdotted.)
cu andreas

Re: specifying which IP addresses can send mail for a domain

[Tollef Fog Heen]

* Russell Coker 

| Joel, can you please provide information on the experimental method for 
| specifying which IP addresses may be used to send mail from a particular 
| domain?

http://spf.pobox.com/ linked to from
http://yro.slashdot.org/article.pl?sid=03/10/06/0044200&mode=thread&tid=111&tid=126&tid=158&tid=95&tid=99

-- 
Tollef Fog Heen,''`.
UNIX is user friendly, it's just picky about who its friends are  : :' :
  `. `' 
`-  

ITA: libcache-cache-perl

[Stephen Quinney]

I noticed the libcache-cache-perl package was orphaned yesterday, bug
#214876. The request-tracker3 package, which I co-maintain, depends
upon this package, I am also a user of libhtml-mason-perl - the other
major dependency on this package. Unless anyone already has already
set their heart on maintaining this package I will adopt it and upload
with the new maintainer details within the next couple of days.

Stephen Quinney



pgpApKsNRgzmI.pgp
Description: PGP signature

Re: Which packages will hold up the release?

[Tom]

On Thu, Oct 09, 2003 at 11:37:22PM -0700, Ross Boylan wrote:
> There are some mathematical tools that might be useful in working with
> some of these issues (I know them from models of social networks).

When you have a hammer everything looks like a nail.  Since I do SQL for 
a living I'd put all the data in a SQL database and use a technique 
called a "parts-explosion table" (see SQL For Smarties by Joe Celko).

It helps you express recursive relationships in SQL.  It helps when 
parts contain parts contain parts contain parts... and you need to know 
all possible parts affected by a part.

For datasets the size of the package database it'd be a piece of cake 
with PostGres.

Re: testing packages at build

[Branden Robinson]

On Thu, Oct 09, 2003 at 08:38:17PM -0700, Zack Weinberg wrote:
> 
> > My god, that was awful.  They still haven't fixed cpp -traditional, as
> > far as I know.  Grumble grumble grumble.
> 
> Bug number?

Mumble mumble mumble.  Never got around to filing it, figured XFree86
wasn't such obscure code that that the GCC developers would refuse to
touch it with a ten foot pole, reckoned they might happen upon the
problem independently and fix it with chagrin, conjectured that XFree86
might be used as a regression test for GCC[1].

In sum, anger, laziness, and wishful thinking.

[1] Now, now.  When I say "regression test for GCC," I'm not *trying* to
make you laugh.

-- 
G. Branden Robinson| Reality is what refuses to go away
Debian GNU/Linux   | when I stop believing in it.
[EMAIL PROTECTED] | -- Philip K. Dick
http://people.debian.org/~branden/ |


signature.asc
Description: Digital signature

Re: Which packages will hold up the release?

[Ross Boylan]

There are some mathematical tools that might be useful in working with
some of these issues (I know them from models of social networks).

One can represent relations between packages as a matrix D.  The rows
and columns refer to packages, and the cell is 1 if a relation exists,
otherwise 0.  For example, D[i, j] is 1 if package i depends on
package j.

One can define a funny form of matrix multiplication, in which the
result can only be 0 or 1.
 Let D2 = D^2 = D*D 
Ordinary matrix multiplication says
D2[i, j] = sum_k D[i, k] * D[k, j]  (using pseudo-TeX notation)
The modified form is
D2[i, j] = or_k D[i, k] * D[k, j]  (in other words: 1 if any of the
combinations is 1)
equivalently this = max(1, sum_k D[i, k]* D[k, j])
So D captures all direct dependencies, and D^2 has all direct
dependencies and indirect dependencies of length 2 (usually D2
includes all of D, i.e., all direct relations, but if D[i, i] is not 1
that may not be so). 
D^infinity will have a stable limit, and expresses *all* direct and
indirect dependencies.

Since Björn already has a list of all indirect dependencies, I'm not
sure this contributes anything useful.  However, one can map a variety
of relations using this approach (depends on, conflicts with, is a
substitute for are some obvious ones), and then there are various tools to
look at all the relations together (they form an algebra), and there
are tools for separating individual packages into similar clusters
based on their patterns of relations.

It's also easy to make statements using this notation.  For example,
if D represents depends on (directly or indirectly) and C conflicts
with (direct or indirect), then we can say that if
D or C <> 0 (or is element by element, 0 is a 0 matrix)
a logically impossible set of relations has been specified (I think;
even if it's substantively wrong I hope you get the flavor).

I still have only a partial handle on all the substantive issues
involved in releasing packages, but throw this out on the chance it
might be useful.

More generally, it may be that taking the perspective of the overall
pattern of relations provides some value beyond looking at things
strictly from the perspective of a single package.

P.S. I'm not a Debian developer or a subscriber to this list, but
followed it on the web.  I've tried to fake my headers so it appears
properly in the thread.  I'm curious if there's a good way to do that.

Re: mozilla-firebird in testing

[Joshua Kwan]

On Fri, Oct 10, 2003 at 02:00:01PM +0900, Takuo KITAME wrote:
> According to buildd.d.o, mozilla-firebird fails to build on arm.

From the build log:

Linux2.4_arm_glibc_PTH_OPT.OBJ/shlibsign -v -i 
/build/buildd/mozilla-firebird-0.6.1/dist/lib/libsoftokn3.so
./sign.sh: line 51: 14771 Segmentation fault  ${2}/shlibsign -v -i ${4}
make[4]: *** [/build/buildd/mozilla-firebird-0.6.1/dist/lib/libsoftokn3.chk] 
Error 139
make[4]: Leaving directory 
`/build/buildd/mozilla-firebird-0.6.1/security/nss/cmd/shlibsign'


This is the part of the mozilla build that does something ludicrous like
generating a RSA and a DSA key pair with which to self-sign the actual
library or something. I'm not sure why it exists.

Takuo, since you are the Mozilla maintainer, do you know any more about
the purpose of this weird signing?

Failing that I suppose arm's toolchain is just severely braindamaged...

-- 
Joshua Kwan


pgpHgJ6tKLD4B.pgp
Description: PGP signature

Re: Accepted ssystem 1.6-14.1 (i386 source)

[Romain Francoise]

Colin Watson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:

> Konstantinos' upload has the correct Maintainer: in the .dsc file.

Ah right, I was somehow convinced that he had changed the control file
and didn't check the .dsc.  My bad.

-- 
  ,''`.
 : :' :Romain Francoise <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
 `. `' http://people.debian.org/~rfrancoise/
   `-

Re: testing packages at build

[Guillem Jover]

Hi,

On Wed, 8 Oct 2003 21:09:31 +0200, Bill Allombert <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said:
> I see two possibility to implement this proposal:
>
> 1°) Let maintainers run tests in the build or binary target.
> Eventually we add a notest DEBBUILD_OPTION to disable it.
>
> 2°) We add a test target in debian/rules. Autobuilders will need to
> be modified to take advantage of this. We can then go farther and
> implement special testing facility.

Some time ago when I saw , I though about
this. I've recovered and modified a draft proposal I made then:

* Standardizing targets

  It would be nice to standarize on the targets, independently if they
  may be optional. Also the execution of the test target could be
  opted-out with some flag (notest) in DEB_BUILD_OPTIONS (as suggested
  by Bill) if it was going to be invoked from current defined targets.
  So we would have immediate support until apps support the test*
  targets. And would have Bill's both points implemeted.

---X<-debian/rules--
export DEB_HOST_GNU_TYPE  ?= $(shell dpkg-architecture -qDEB_HOST_GNU_TYPE)
export DEB_BUILD_GNU_TYPE ?= $(shell dpkg-architecture -qDEB_BUILD_GNU_TYPE)

build-testsuit: build
# Build any tests requiered

test-arch: build-testsuit
ifeq ($(DEB_BUILD_GNU_TYPE), $(DEB_HOST_GNU_TYPE))
# Test the program(s)
else
@echo "warning: Cross-compiled program, cannot test."
endif

test-indep: build-testsuit
# Test the program(s)

test: test-arch test-indep

.PHONY: test test-arch test-indep build-testsuit
---X<---

* Optional test depends fields

---X<-debian/control
Test-Depends:
Test-Depends-Indep:
---X<---

  Introducing new dependencies may be overkill, but some programs may
  require another ones to be tested properly, and it's cleaner to
  distinguish Build-Dep* and Test-Dep* cases, also it will reduce download
  and install time when the test facility is not wanted.
  This fields must be made optional as not all programs with testsuits
  will need special dependencies or will have testsuits. Also this will
  have to be implemented but the code can be taken from the Build-Depends*
  handling.


This can be recommended and later introduced in the policy. The various
package 'debianizator' programs could add this in their templates to
extend its use for newer packages.

So what do you think ? Comments please. ;>

kind regards,
guillem

specifying which IP addresses can send mail for a domain

[Russell Coker]

Joel, can you please provide information on the experimental method for 
specifying which IP addresses may be used to send mail from a particular 
domain?

The method of using DNS to specify that only certain IP address ranges may 
send mail purporting to be From: your domain has the potential to offer 
significant benefits for spam blocking as well as allowing us to reduce our 
reliance on other methods (eg the contentious services such as 
dynablock.easynet.nl which get debated on these lists).

I would be happy to configure my servers to avoid checking the dial-up lists 
if such a method could be used instead, and I think that this would make a 
lot of people happy.

The method in question has never taken off because of lack of application 
support.  If we make all mail servers in Debian support it then that could be 
what is needed to make it a success.  I would be happy to devote some coding 
time to this if it can result in a net reduction of SPAM.

-- 
http://www.coker.com.au/selinux/   My NSA Security Enhanced Linux packages
http://www.coker.com.au/bonnie++/  Bonnie++ hard drive benchmark
http://www.coker.com.au/postal/Postal SMTP/POP benchmark
http://www.coker.com.au/~russell/  My home page

mozilla-firebird in testing

[Takuo KITAME]

Ho.

I wonder why mozilla-firebird is in testing with no arm binary.
According to buildd.d.o, mozilla-firebird fails to build on arm.
http://buildd.debian.org/build.php?&pkg=mozilla-firebird&ver=0.6.1-7&arch=arm&file=log


-- 
Takuo KITAME.