Orphaning some packages
-devel, I have less time for packaging work these days, especially for packages I have no personal or work connection to. Therefore, I am orphaning a bunch of packages. Even though I have some time available at Debconf, I'm orphaning these now so that the adopter can make use the Debconf time instead going forward. On each of the RFAs I have added notes where I thought it made sense. If you have any specific questions, please address to the corresponding RFA bug. #590772 libgc -- conservative garbage collector for C #590773 reinteract -- Worksheet-based graphical Python shell #590774 robocode -- Java programming game based on battle tanks #590775 reviewboard -- Web-based code review tool #590776 python-django-djblets -- Re-usable components for Django projects #590777 pyke -- Prolog-inspired Python logic programming toolkit #590778 trac-spamfilter -- Spam-prevention plugin for Trac #590779 udptunnel -- Tunnel UDP packets over a TCP connection #590780 relational -- Educational tool for relational algebra #590781 decoratortools -- version-agnostic decorators support for Python Regards, -- ,''`. : :' : Chris Lamb `. `'` la...@debian.org `- signature.asc Description: PGP signature
Re: hello dear need seo link builder
add me for link exc
Bug#590747: ITP: joblib -- tools to provide lightweight pipelining in Python
Package: wnpp Severity: wishlist Owner: Yaroslav Halchenko * Package name: joblib Version : 0.4.2 Upstream Author : Gael Varoquaux * URL : http://packages.python.org/joblib/ * License : BSD Programming Lang: Python Description : tools to provide lightweight pipelining in Python Joblib is a set of tools to provide lightweight pipelining in Python. In particular, joblib offers: - transparent disk-caching of the output values and lazy re-evaluation (memoize pattern) - easy simple parallel computing - logging and tracing of the execution . Joblib is optimized to be fast and robust in particular on large, long-running functions and has specific optimizations for numpy arrays. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-devel-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/20100729003840.17032.32068.report...@novo.onerussian.com
Re: Moving diversions between packages
Hi Russ, On Thu, Jul 22, 2010 at 06:47:34AM -0700, Russ Allbery wrote: > We're attempting to solve this problem by splitting out just the libGL > library into a separate package (libgl1-nvidia) that can be independently > installed. However, that means the diversions of libGL have to move from > nvidia-glx to this new package. And that's where we ran into problems. Somewhat orthogonal to your original question, but the Ubuntu nvidia packages have recently switched to using alternatives instead of diversions for managing the libgl bits for various reasons. It would be great if Debian and Ubuntu could get synced up on this... and maybe moving to alternatives solves the problem with moving diversions, since alternatives don't have the unpack ordering problem that diversions do. Cc:ing the Ubuntu nvidia package maintainer to make him aware of this discussion. -- Steve Langasek Give me a lever long enough and a Free OS Debian Developer to set it on, and I can move the world. Ubuntu Developerhttp://www.debian.org/ slanga...@ubuntu.com vor...@debian.org signature.asc Description: Digital signature
Re: Re: How to make Debian more attractive for users, was: Re: The number of popcon.debian.org-submissions is falling
On Tue, Jul 27, 2010 at 07:53:55AM +0200, Josselin Mouette wrote: > Le lundi 26 juillet 2010 à 20:19 +0200, Magnus Berg a écrit : > > And you wonder: "How to make Debian more attractive for users". :-) > > > > First thing: Average Linux user may not be very interested in spam > > hunting. > > Second thing: If you intend to be attractive for the average Linux > > user - Ubuntu users for instance - keep in mind that most users want a > > user friendly, easy to use distro, with helpful and understanding > > crew. If you intend to keep on working with computer nerds in mind you > > will never be attractive for the average Linux user. > > We want the distribution to be friendly and easy to use by anyone. > > We want to receive bug reports only from computer nerds since they are > the ones who write useful reports. > > How are those two statements incompatible? IMO because lambda user and average nerd don't use the same software, or at least not in the same way, so they don't experience the same bugs. (gnome-app-install, some specific usages of gedit or gui admin apps, games for children) That would be interessting to get a stats per source pkg: number of bugs submitted / popcon(vote) -- Simon Paillard -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-devel-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/20100728213814.ga31...@dedibox.ebzao.info
Bug#590694: ITP: bluedevil -- Bluetooth support components for KDE
Package: wnpp Severity: wishlist Owner: George Kiagiadakis * Package name: bluedevil Version : 1.0~rc1 Upstream Author : Alex Fiestas * URL : http://gitorious.org/bluedevil * License : GPL-3 Programming Lang: C++ Description : Bluetooth support components for KDE BlueDevil is a set of components, which integrates bluetooth within the KDE SC, for example adding a system preference module (KCM), or allowing to browse the files in a cell phone from you favorite file browser. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-devel-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/20100728141440.18453.86795.report...@mdxdesktop.ozas.sytes.net
Re: Uploads without the architecture-dependant binary packages.
Julien Cristau writes: > On Tue, Jul 27, 2010 at 08:54:08 +0900, Charles Plessy wrote: > >> while I managed to trigger autobuilding on all architectures for one package >> (velvet) in February, the same approach applied to another another one >> (emboss) >> gives problems: the architecture-dependant packages are built, but they are >> not >> transferred to the archive. In both cases I think I did the same: >> >> - Remove mention of the local build architecture in the Binary field. >> - Remove mention of the architecture-dependant packages in the Description >> and >>Checksums fields. >> - Upload only the architecture-independant packages using the hand-edited >> Debian >>source control file. >> >> http://packages.qa.debian.org/v/velvet/news/20100220T041711Z.html >> http://packages.qa.debian.org/e/emboss/news/20100723T023358Z.html >> >> Was there a change in the meantime that makes the trick impossible ? >> > No, you just need to fix your changes file name to not clash with the > buildd. > > 20100723023339|process-upload|dak|Processing changes > file|emboss_6.3.1-2_amd64.changes > 20100723023358|process-upload|dak|installing > changes|emboss_6.3.1-2_amd64.changes > > I assume the above is your upload. > > 20100723091703|process-upload|dak|Processing changes > file|emboss_6.3.1-2_amd64.changes > 20100723091705|process-upload|dak|rejected|emboss_6.3.1-2_amd64.changes > > And this is the buildd trying to upload a file with the same name. > > See also /srv/ftp.debian.org/queue/reject/emboss_6.3.1-2_amd64.reason > > Cheers, > Julien Maybe there should be a tool (small wrapper script) to edit the changes file the right way. There are probably more people that would like to do this and a lot more people that would like to see it being used. MfG Goswin -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-devel-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/87sk33wv0v@frosties.localdomain
Re: Bug#590527: ITP: mussh -- MUltihost SSH Wrapper
On Tue, Jul 27, 2010 at 12:46:16AM -0400, Holger Levsen wrote: > Hi Jacob, > > On Montag, 26. Juli 2010, Jacob Luna Lundberg wrote: > > * Package name: mussh > > > > Mussh is a shell script that allows you to execute a command > > or script over ssh on multiple hosts with one command. When > > possible mussh will use ssh-agent and RSA/DSA keys to minimize > > the need to enter your password more than once. > > how is that different to dsh, already present in Debian? Or clusterssh ? -- ·O· Pierre Habouzit ··Omadco...@debian.org OOOhttp://www.madism.org -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-devel-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/20100728131459.gh6...@madism.org
Add My id
Hi , I need urgent finance insurance investment business mobile electronic pr2 Thanks
