Re: Let's abandon debian-devel.

2014-11-10 Thread David L. Craig
On 14Nov11:0036+0100, Philipp Kern wrote:

> On 2014-11-10 18:20, David L. Craig wrote:
> >
> >But weaker by becoming more non-public?  At what point
> >is the Social Contract undermined?  What about transforming
> >those lists into readable by all but open only to
> >certain responsible posters instead?
> 
> wat. I think you missed the point Plessy tried to make.
> (Or exemplified it?)

Pardon me, but did you just publicly suggest I'm a
troublemaker?
-- 

May the LORD God bless you exceedingly abundantly!

Dave_Craig__
"So the universe is not quite as you thought it was.
 You'd better rearrange your beliefs, then.
 Because you certainly can't rearrange the universe."
__--from_Nightfall_by_Asimov/Silverberg_


signature.asc
Description: Digital signature


Re: Let's abandon debian-devel.

2014-11-10 Thread David L. Craig
On 14Nov10:2154+0100, Gergely Nagy wrote:

> You do realize topic lists are public too, right?

Yes, but most Debian users don't even know about
them nor do they need to since the traditional
lists have been doing their jobs for quite a
while.  If you shut them down, I expect most of
the public will not find the topic lists.
-- 

May the LORD God bless you exceedingly abundantly!

Dave_Craig__
"So the universe is not quite as you thought it was.
 You'd better rearrange your beliefs, then.
 Because you certainly can't rearrange the universe."
__--from_Nightfall_by_Asimov/Silverberg_


signature.asc
Description: Digital signature


Re: Let's abandon debian-devel.

2014-11-10 Thread David L. Craig
On 14Nov10:2325+0900, Charles Plessy wrote:

> With most of the work done on topic mailing lists, trolls lose the lever 
> effect
> they have when feasting on debian-devel or debian-vote.  Let's make our 
> project
> stronger by reducing thr attack surface for troublemakers.

But weaker by becoming more non-public?  At what point
is the Social Contract undermined?  What about transforming
those lists into readable by all but open only to
certain responsible posters instead?
-- 

May the LORD God bless you exceedingly abundantly!

Dave_Craig__
"So the universe is not quite as you thought it was.
 You'd better rearrange your beliefs, then.
 Because you certainly can't rearrange the universe."
__--from_Nightfall_by_Asimov/Silverberg_


signature.asc
Description: Digital signature


Re: so long and thanks for all the fish

2014-11-08 Thread David L. Craig
> On Fri, 07 Nov 2014, Joey Hess wrote:

> > originally joined in 1996. We've made some good things, and I wish
> > everyone well, but I'm out.

So long, and thanks for all the damn hard work and working code.
May you live long, prosper, and continue to inspire others to
greatness.
-- 

May the LORD God bless you exceedingly abundantly!

Dave_Craig__
"So the universe is not quite as you thought it was.
 You'd better rearrange your beliefs, then.
 Because you certainly can't rearrange the universe."
__--from_Nightfall_by_Asimov/Silverberg_


signature.asc
Description: Digital signature


Re: bugreports to systemd are getting rejected

2014-10-10 Thread David L. Craig
On 14Oct10:1855+0200, Salvo Tomaselli wrote:

[snip]
> The error that the other server returned was:
> 550 malware detected: Sanesecurity.Junk.3451.UNOFFICIAL: message rejected
[snip]
> ii  libblkid1   2.25.1-3
> 
> - Message truncated -

Any attachments?  It looks like something smells rotten
to the BTS MTA.
-- 

May the LORD God bless you exceedingly abundantly!

Dave_Craig__
"So the universe is not quite as you thought it was.
 You'd better rearrange your beliefs, then.
 Because you certainly can't rearrange the universe."
__--from_Nightfall_by_Asimov/Silverberg_


signature.asc
Description: Digital signature


Re: virt-manager

2014-09-28 Thread David L. Craig
On 14Sep27:0806-0700, Cameron Norman wrote:
> On Sat, Sep 27, 2014 at 7:58 AM, Fabrice Aeschbacher
>  wrote:
> > Dear maintainers,
> >
> > For now, virt-manager v1.x is in experimental only (1.0.1).
> >
> > The freeze for Jessie is approaching, and I wondered if something
> > particular is preventing the package migration from experimental to
> > unstable before the freeze (in less than 6 weeks).
> 
> Looks like this bug filed onto the version in experimental:
> https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=740047.
> 
> Seems like the maintainer might need help with it.

Not any more, it was just closed:

: From: Guido Günther 
: To: 740047-cl...@bugs.debian.org
: Subject: Bug#740047: fixed in virt-manager 1:1.0.1-2
: Date: Sun, 28 Sep 2014 12:23:02 +
-- 

May the LORD God bless you exceedingly abundantly!

Dave_Craig__
"So the universe is not quite as you thought it was.
 You'd better rearrange your beliefs, then.
 Because you certainly can't rearrange the universe."
__--from_Nightfall_by_Asimov/Silverberg_


signature.asc
Description: Digital signature