Re: Allow encfs into jessie?
On 11/09/2014 18:33, Eduard Bloch wrote: Otherwise we should disable support for 1024b GPG keys ASAP so nobody could use them anymore. Please also note, that the primary author (after a period of dormancy) is back and seems to be actively working on remediating the issues (cf. https://github.com/vgough/encfs). Best regards – Miroslaw Baran -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-devel-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: https://lists.debian.org/5b776392f3d47dd3acf40decc1366...@hell.pl
Re: Seeking help with OpenVPN scripts and systemd
On 11/09/2014 03:53, Paul Wise wrote: Ultimately, I think this should all be replaced by VPN support in NetworkManager and systemd-networkd. Does NetworkManager support multiple VPN connections right now? (Also, what about persistent VPN setups that are independent from the desktop session?) Best regards – Miroslaw Baran -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-devel-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: https://lists.debian.org/ee189171298eb898c18f9de4ebf18...@hell.pl
Re: Reverting to GNOME for jessie's default desktop
Olav Vitters wrote: My response specifically deals with this. Yes, nice if Debian Developers could keep the response. However, there is nothing in there about must not be dropped without good reason. If upstream removes support, so be it. Then it is very nice if the support is patched back in, but there is nothing in the decision that it is expected that anyone could expect packagers to do this. Olav, would you mind to clarify in what capacity are you on this list? (Debian user? Debian maintainer? Debian developer? GNOME upstream developer? Systemd developer? Interested independent party? Something else altogether?) (I hope you wont't think this question to be rude – I like to have a bit of clarity.) Thanks in advance, Best regards – Miroslaw Baran -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-devel-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: https://lists.debian.org/3c817a9379195d1e8db6a44a3112c...@hell.pl
Re: people.debian.org will move from ravel to paradis and become HTTPS only
W dniu 20/07/2014 11:01, Peter Palfrader napisał(a): I do think that if DSA are going to enforce such a policy, they should be able to explain why. What Ondřej said a.k.a. “because”. Do try better. – j. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-devel-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: https://lists.debian.org/c34936335ed61fa36ed5657b33eea...@hell.pl
Re: How to avoid stealth installation of systemd?
Michael Biebl made an argument from authority: Am 01.07.2014 17:35, schrieb Juliusz Chroboczek: I am not a Debian Developer. I am not bound by the Social Contract. I may remind you about [1] then. If you feel like you need to rant or vent, please do it someplace else or expect a terse answer like the one you got. Your answer wasn't *just* terse. Your answer was downright rude. Kind regards, – Miroslaw Baran -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-devel-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: https://lists.debian.org/d834210ada34efc7aeca83a89e022...@hell.pl
Re: How to avoid stealth installation of systemd?
Thijs Kinkhorst wrote: The responses from the systemd maintainers are indeed on the terse side, but I can imagine that your style of bug reporting does not invite our volunteers to spend more time on it. The replies were not just terse, the replies were downright rude. Can we perhaps agree that the maintainers should not be unnecessarily rude? Kind regards – Jubal -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-devel-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: https://lists.debian.org/b8fa256c3779e8ce42a4f6c471f9e...@hell.pl
Re: How to avoid stealth installation of systemd?
On 1 July 2014 19:15:32 IST, Ondřej Surý ond...@sury.org wrote: unless you offer to ack as a front desk for bugs in systemd, then please go with your judgments elsewhere. Your judgmental comments are neither helpful nor welcome here. My comment was factual and polite, thank you very much. Being a DD is not a free pass for being unnecessarily abrasive, and one does not get special blessing just by by having their key anointed by the keyring's grace. HTH, HAND – Mirosław Baran -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-devel-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: https://lists.debian.org/77d611e1-6844-4d08-ab6d-4554b2600...@email.android.com
Re: Bug#727708: tech-ctte: Decide which init system to default to in Debian.
Christoph Anton Mitterer cales...@scientia.net wrote: For those who haven't seen it, Lennart has posted some of his comments about all this on G+: https://plus.google.com/u/0/115547683951727699051/posts/8RmiAQsW9qf And the RH PR circus has already started around it. Lennart's g+ note is written in his usual half-truth/half-omission mode. Not helpful at all. – jubal -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-devel-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/04eff1e2-e227-4e7c-8c7d-defcf62f2...@email.android.com
