Re: Using standardized SI prefixes

2007-06-13 Thread Onno Benschop
As I see it there are two ways of resolving the difference between KiB
and KB.

* Use Rosetta to update the text and fix the output so that it now
  reads KiB. This would be relatively simple to do, but not actually
  helpful longer term.
* Fix the source code that calculates KB by doing a bit shift[0] and
  instead dividing the number of bytes by a power of 10.



[0] I'm assuming that most applications will calculate how many
Kilobytes/Megabytes are used by dividing by a power of two.

-- 
Onno Benschop

Connected via Optus B3 at S31°54'06 - E115°50'39 (Yokine, WA)
--
()/)/)()..ASCII for Onno..
|?..EBCDIC for Onno..
--- -. -. ---   ..Morse for Onno..

Proudly supported by Skipper Trucks, Highway1, Concept AV, Sony Central, Dalcon
ITmaze   -   ABN: 56 178 057 063   -  ph: 04 1219    -   [EMAIL PROTECTED]


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Re: Using standardized SI prefixes

2007-06-12 Thread Onno Benschop
On 12/06/07 15:37, Christof Krüger wrote:
 Just because something has been done wrong for a long time doesn't make
 it right. People who know the inconsistencies get used to them and do
 not want to change it because it may be inconvenient for them or it
 simply sounds stupid to them (what an argument!).
 However, this means that _every_ new generation of students and
 hobbyists has to go through learning the inconsistencies if we change
 nothing. Hooray, confusion till the end of times!

 But if we pushed the use of SI-prefixes, the computer-gurus would have
 to get used to the new system but following generations would profit
 from having a consistent unit system. In my opinion this is something
 that is worth the effort. The problem with such big changes is that a
 critical mass is needed to benefit from this new system and the faster
 it is achieved, the shorter the confusion-period will be.
 I think that the open source community should participate since
 consistent and unambiguous conventions are a good thing (TM).

 Christof Krüger


Until you wrote these two paragraphs I was not particularly interested.
Your email prompted me to read some more. Now I'm happy to be counted in
the camp of those that chant standardise. (Of course now I'll be
laughed at because of using kibibytes, but you get that :)

To be fair, I suspect that the use of kibibyte in spoken language would
be phased out over time. Perhaps the IEC did pronounce them out aloud so
we would all be embarrassed into using the SI units :)

And just in case anyone else was as confused as I was, wikipedia cleared
it up for me:

* http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Kibibyte
* http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Kibi


(Ironically, my spell-checker had never heard of a kibibyte :)

-- 
Onno Benschop

Connected via Optus B3 at S31°54'06 - E115°50'39 (Yokine, WA)
--
()/)/)()..ASCII for Onno..
|?..EBCDIC for Onno..
--- -. -. ---   ..Morse for Onno..

Proudly supported by Skipper Trucks, Highway1, Concept AV, Sony Central, Dalcon
ITmaze   -   ABN: 56 178 057 063   -  ph: 04 1219    -   [EMAIL PROTECTED]


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]