Re: List of packages that could be dropped
On Wed, 27 Dec 2000, [iso-8859-1] Petr ech wrote: |mhash (235 days old) No. I'm not sure if gorgo orphaned it or not. php4 builds an extension with he says, `i think i did... about the time when i orphaned php' -- [-] ``And there are plenty of other innovative pieces of software such as Napster and ICQ.'' -- comment on ``Systems Software Research is Irrelevant'' at http://freshmeat.net/news/2000/08/05/965534399.html
Re: sash (was Re: demo vs. real package: FYI (was ...))
On Sun, 19 Sep 1999, Raul Miller wrote: There's not a lot I can do about this beyond advising the sysadmin that it's a good idea. what about asking it before doing the actual cloning ? (should be defaulted to no, imho). as i see the postinst for 3.3-6, it does not ask... -- [-]
Re: new package
On Wed, 26 May 1999, Ed Breen wrote: failed dependencies: /bin/sh is needed by eic-4.0.1-2 ld-linux.so.2 is needed by eic-4.0.1-2 libc.so.6 is needed by eic-4.0.1-2 libm.so.6 is needed by eic-4.0.1-2 /home/edb/bin/eic is needed by eic-4.0.1-2 /usr/local/EiC/eic is needed by eic-4.0.1-2 /usr/local/bin/eic is needed by eic-4.0.1-2 quite well known stupidities of rpm, the first one atleast. i managed not to deal to much with rpm lately, so i don't know much about those. -- [-] All trespassing cockroaches will be horribly mutilated -- tegla The phrase, a bit too cluttered is not something I can convert into a patch ;-) -- dwarf
