Accepted masqmail 0.2.30-1 (source amd64)

2011-09-13 Thread markus schnalke
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA512

Format: 1.8
Date: Mon, 29 Aug 2011 16:37:02 +0200
Source: masqmail
Binary: masqmail
Architecture: source amd64
Version: 0.2.30-1
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: high
Maintainer: markus schnalke mei...@marmaro.de
Changed-By: markus schnalke mei...@marmaro.de
Description: 
 masqmail   - mail transport agent for intermittently connected hosts
Closes: 610067 638002
Changes: 
 masqmail (0.2.30-1) unstable; urgency=high
 .
   * New upstream release. (Closes: #638002)
   * Improved (fixed) watch file.
   * Closing information ``bug'' from previous NMU. (Closes: #610067)
   * Bumped standards version to 3.9.2.
Checksums-Sha1: 
 36980b45f7c56484fb74493c73ea04855a9973a7 1726 masqmail_0.2.30-1.dsc
 cdcde68c045ba01f2dfe98e8af958b5c9f93673a 286509 masqmail_0.2.30.orig.tar.gz
 299d1f1c211bc91da51b320ce647cf305f495e73 65530 masqmail_0.2.30-1.diff.gz
 c7c52297b881439f78eca536ecc5d3cd10d07094 201258 masqmail_0.2.30-1_amd64.deb
Checksums-Sha256: 
 438d9a06a0a4d75d38b5e847819cf177e945723e64bc56801d8beabfbd1fc70f 1726 
masqmail_0.2.30-1.dsc
 78a79d7e86e1b2523ef731b295110c880932d6c187dbfc0c332b2f0aa7cbafb3 286509 
masqmail_0.2.30.orig.tar.gz
 ce397f7144df7dd1b5dd617724d83334fa13544aa29445035c0c0dad7fb2c1e8 65530 
masqmail_0.2.30-1.diff.gz
 a86505e5fa4a0bc3986e3de432a1e09a173f2f6ca09cb624099ee96d464a3b0d 201258 
masqmail_0.2.30-1_amd64.deb
Files: 
 5c369fd8262875fbd13701299cf629f8 1726 mail extra masqmail_0.2.30-1.dsc
 93d9d0e6e0421e0f6ac3b80cab99ce70 286509 mail extra masqmail_0.2.30.orig.tar.gz
 288f134294750dda940cca010c7def24 65530 mail extra masqmail_0.2.30-1.diff.gz
 d1fa424f2dd216b238d875b7c3019255 201258 mail extra masqmail_0.2.30-1_amd64.deb

-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: GnuPG v1.4.11 (GNU/Linux)
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=Q/Us
-END PGP SIGNATURE-


Accepted:
masqmail_0.2.30-1.diff.gz
  to main/m/masqmail/masqmail_0.2.30-1.diff.gz
masqmail_0.2.30-1.dsc
  to main/m/masqmail/masqmail_0.2.30-1.dsc
masqmail_0.2.30-1_amd64.deb
  to main/m/masqmail/masqmail_0.2.30-1_amd64.deb
masqmail_0.2.30.orig.tar.gz
  to main/m/masqmail/masqmail_0.2.30.orig.tar.gz


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-devel-changes-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: http://lists.debian.org/e1r3w9d-0002j3...@franck.debian.org



Accepted masqmail 0.2.27-1 (source amd64)

2010-07-30 Thread markus schnalke
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA512

Format: 1.8
Date: Mon, 19 Jul 2010 21:57:12 +0200
Source: masqmail
Binary: masqmail
Architecture: source amd64
Version: 0.2.27-1
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: low
Maintainer: markus schnalke mei...@marmaro.de
Changed-By: markus schnalke mei...@marmaro.de
Description: 
 masqmail   - mail transport agent for intermittently connected hosts
Changes: 
 masqmail (0.2.27-1) unstable; urgency=low
 .
   * New upstream release.
   * Updated the version string in configure.ac, which upstream forgot.
   * Set build depend on autotools-dev and used its scripts to ensure
 to have recent config.{sub,guess} files.
   * Suggest the MDA procmail.
   * Improved the copyright file.
   * Removed some pedantic lintian infos. Thanks to Jan Hauke Rahm for
 the hint.
   * Bumped standards version to 3.9.0.
Checksums-Sha1: 
 068339e3bc775605baf7dec989f60b5a1a41b73d 1112 masqmail_0.2.27-1.dsc
 05d7760530b8dce21955dbf3f6da5a5bb226d18c 285189 masqmail_0.2.27.orig.tar.gz
 183a2a8c7d64dfaf1a2508ae845249eb0231eb2d 65999 masqmail_0.2.27-1.diff.gz
 bd4d63f9cad2dae5170cd5d403529c5fb123dd0f 193158 masqmail_0.2.27-1_amd64.deb
Checksums-Sha256: 
 244f01ece5d49a29de1689b8990382227f1eef621e9d1690e7e068e8dccf7f2d 1112 
masqmail_0.2.27-1.dsc
 a272119d1c2219e0ec59dcfbb03cb4abfbc098430eb69457fabf2a6247674abf 285189 
masqmail_0.2.27.orig.tar.gz
 ef16325ae2d4e26018e54c729b3db06de4f9370f7839e6b683712ce049abaae9 65999 
masqmail_0.2.27-1.diff.gz
 b0550e796d0fd9db13deb17af822535e385f0154a41c7f41be349d04ac85 193158 
masqmail_0.2.27-1_amd64.deb
Files: 
 4932704b2bf54efeba24b3a51a286407 1112 mail extra masqmail_0.2.27-1.dsc
 3e088c3721625c50c67476cf5f32b1a5 285189 mail extra masqmail_0.2.27.orig.tar.gz
 aa3e37380dbe62802d1f26989b6421c3 65999 mail extra masqmail_0.2.27-1.diff.gz
 dd070b800a09ad28680c3620fadf6a94 193158 mail extra masqmail_0.2.27-1_amd64.deb

-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: GnuPG v1.4.10 (GNU/Linux)

iFYEAREKAAYFAkxSnW8ACgkQGOp6XeD8cQ23WwDdH27xcwAh9u1iLwzcGcQINTxx
6tZJefzO61dotwDdGSeveKeWTmFFkcuukWlzreqmuST1K49Rq2Yl1w==
=ZxLg
-END PGP SIGNATURE-


Accepted:
masqmail_0.2.27-1.diff.gz
  to main/m/masqmail/masqmail_0.2.27-1.diff.gz
masqmail_0.2.27-1.dsc
  to main/m/masqmail/masqmail_0.2.27-1.dsc
masqmail_0.2.27-1_amd64.deb
  to main/m/masqmail/masqmail_0.2.27-1_amd64.deb
masqmail_0.2.27.orig.tar.gz
  to main/m/masqmail/masqmail_0.2.27.orig.tar.gz


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-devel-changes-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: http://lists.debian.org/e1oemta-0006nq...@franck.debian.org



RFH: Hook script will be executed twice if ifup used to bring up ppp

2010-06-20 Thread markus schnalke
Hoi,

could someone please help me with a bug in the MTA masqmail?

A fix was already proposed but does it solve the problem the right
way? I am not familiar with ifup/ifdown, ppp and thelike,
unfortunately.


 The same hook script is installed in ip-up.d, ip-down.d, if-up.d and
 if-down.d.  If one brings up a PPP interface using ifup then both
 instances will be executed.  Ditto if one brings the interface down.
 A solution is to add something like:
 
   [ -x /etc/ppp/ip-up.d/1masqmail -a $MODE = start -a $METHOD = ppp ] 
  exit 0
   [ -x /etc/ppp/ip-down.d/1masqmail -a $MODE = stop -a $METHOD = ppp 
 ]  exit 0
 
 near the top of the script.


http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=212852


I would be glad if someone takes the time to support me in this case.


meillo


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-devel-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: http://lists.debian.org/1oqre9-2qo...@serveme.schnalke.local



Re: Removing the manpage requirement for GUI programs?

2010-02-27 Thread markus schnalke
[2010-02-27 20:06] Josselin Mouette j...@debian.org
 
 I think it is a waste of time to write manual pages that won't be
 maintained upstream, and that won't contain more useful information than
 --help. The purpose of a manual page is to document precisely the
 behavior of a program, and for GUI applications there is usually an
 associated GUI documentation instead.

Man pages have one more important advantage: Every command has one.

Do not underestimate this. On Debian systems, people know, if they
want to find out how to run a command and what command line options it
has, they look in its man page, cause every command has one.

If some graphical programs would not provide one, the the user would
first try to look in the man page and if it does not exist, he needs
to try --help (maybe he even needs to look for additional
documentation which would be application specific).

In my eyes, the largest advantage of man pages is that every command
has one.


meillo


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-devel-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: http://lists.debian.org/1nltwh-4mp...@serveme



User uucp to be member of group mail for `sendmail -f'?

2010-02-22 Thread markus schnalke
I work on bug #409912 [0] in the MTA masqmail currently.

[0] http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=409912

See also:
[1] http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=406395
[2] http://bugs.hylafax.org/show_bug.cgi?id=842

The point is that masqmail allows only root and the group mail to set
the from address (sendmail -f). But the program from hylafax runs as
user uucp.

For exim, this seems to be solved by adjusting the exim configuration:
``[...] you might use trusted_users and add uucp to it [...]'' [3].
See also [4]. It appears that the system administrator has to do the
change in order to enable uucp to call `sendmail -f ...'.

[3] http://pkg-exim4.alioth.debian.org/README/README.Debian.html#id305404
[4] http://lists.debian.org/debian-user/1998/08/msg03182.html


Masqmail does not provide this kind of configuration option. Only one
trusted group can be set up to now.

However, I think the problem could be solved by making the user uucp a
member of group mail. From my limited POV, this solution represents
the logic behind: uucp wants to use special facilities of the MTA,
thus it needs to be in group mail.

Like in exim's case, this change needs an action by the system
administrator. For masqmail, this action could influence other parts
of the system, but if it does, it probably does it the right way.


I request your comments.


meillo


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-devel-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: http://lists.debian.org/1njzs9-6lp...@serveme



What about David Frey (dfrey)?

2010-02-19 Thread markus schnalke
Does anyone know if he is still active? Or better: Is he still a DD?

I am intrested in adopting one of his orphaned packages and wanted to
talk to him before. Unfortunately df...@d.o is bouncing with:

  host master.debian.org [70.103.162.29]: 550 Unrouteable address

However, I found him on db.debian.org.

Can anyone clarify?


meillo


P.S.
Please CC me, as I'm off-list.


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-devel-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: http://lists.debian.org/1nipml-0xz...@serveme



Re: What about David Frey (dfrey)?

2010-02-19 Thread markus schnalke
[2010-02-19 11:00] Jonathan McDowell nood...@earth.li
 On Fri, Feb 19, 2010 at 11:08:35AM +0100, markus schnalke wrote:
  Does anyone know if he is still active? Or better: Is he still a DD?

 He retired from the project last May. Try david at eos.lugs.ch

Thanks. I'll try this address.



[2010-02-19 12:01] Raphael Hertzog hert...@debian.org
  However, I found him on db.debian.org.
 
 All past records are there but they have no GPG key associated
 anymore:

Ahh. Thanks for clarifying.


meillo


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-devel-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: http://lists.debian.org/1nirwl-1gx...@serveme



Accepted masqmail 0.2.21-8 (source i386)

2010-02-09 Thread markus schnalke
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1

Format: 1.8
Date: Mon, 08 Feb 2010 16:40:26 +0100
Source: masqmail
Binary: masqmail
Architecture: source i386
Version: 0.2.21-8
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: low
Maintainer: markus schnalke mei...@marmaro.de
Changed-By: markus schnalke mei...@marmaro.de
Description: 
 masqmail   - mail transport agent for intermittently connected hosts
Closes: 548168 555975
Changes: 
 masqmail (0.2.21-8) unstable; urgency=low
 .
   * Debconf translation update: Vietnamese by Clytie Siddall (Closes: #548168)
   * New debconf translation: Japanese by Hideki Yamane (Closes: #555975)
   * Bumped standards version to 3.8.4
   * Fixed lintian warnings
Checksums-Sha1: 
 bdd57136e568287bf660ae9eb97500a09add0524 1004 masqmail_0.2.21-8.dsc
 12f5dbe598df78b7eb5ce413df09db989f89b085 140904 masqmail_0.2.21-8.diff.gz
 d68abb84a07a7a56e2edaf53d31c15d3ace41902 152934 masqmail_0.2.21-8_i386.deb
Checksums-Sha256: 
 2ff0eb0fbdfd75437fda8fc2a78d0c799b8b059751266c69c54e47eba59425cf 1004 
masqmail_0.2.21-8.dsc
 bc32211368c1e9d28f265b9a373a5b20dc46d8b80f9966ffc82b5456f4a172d5 140904 
masqmail_0.2.21-8.diff.gz
 cf5802e7b5b6478271f958d70d5f34241333f4c1a2ea4aa3f98f0bd9ebe32142 152934 
masqmail_0.2.21-8_i386.deb
Files: 
 a7bb413a02b748eb380f223cfc49ad7d 1004 mail extra masqmail_0.2.21-8.dsc
 9e91dc331fb300b7a3f496356a7a6920 140904 mail extra masqmail_0.2.21-8.diff.gz
 b090580a9eabece4118f948ecac24fed 152934 mail extra masqmail_0.2.21-8_i386.deb

-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: GnuPG v1.4.10 (GNU/Linux)

iD8DBQFLcUKx1OXtrMAUPS0RAopJAKCXWKkqngk0fgZNJx39TEeLSXATiACgsXt9
V4wMVNll8xIpp32EjgGxXBs=
=Fi5H
-END PGP SIGNATURE-


Accepted:
masqmail_0.2.21-8.diff.gz
  to main/m/masqmail/masqmail_0.2.21-8.diff.gz
masqmail_0.2.21-8.dsc
  to main/m/masqmail/masqmail_0.2.21-8.dsc
masqmail_0.2.21-8_i386.deb
  to main/m/masqmail/masqmail_0.2.21-8_i386.deb


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-devel-changes-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org



Re: dpkg: error processing gawk (--configure)

2009-06-20 Thread markus schnalke
[2009-06-19 17:38] Raphael Hertzog hert...@debian.org
 On Thu, 18 Jun 2009, markus schnalke wrote:
  
  during the installation of `geda' on sid, I received following output:
  
  [...]
  Setting up gawk (1:3.1.6.dfsg-3) ...
  update-alternatives: error: alternative nawk can't be slave of awk: it is a 
  master alternative.
 [...]
  
  Anyone who can help me / fix the gawk package / knows what the problem
  is ...?
 
 Yes, rm -f /var/lib/dpkg/alternatives/nawk. The history of package
 ugprades has left cruft that confuse update-alternatives (which is now
 more strict that it used to be).

This solved it, thanks.

My bug against gawk was a too fast action. I'll care for closing it.



meillo


signature.asc
Description: Digital signature


dpkg: error processing gawk (--configure)

2009-06-18 Thread markus schnalke
Hoi,

during the installation of `geda' on sid, I received following output:

[...]
Setting up gawk (1:3.1.6.dfsg-3) ...
update-alternatives: error: alternative nawk can't be slave of awk: it is a 
master alternative.
dpkg: error processing gawk (--configure):
 subprocess installed post-installation script returned error exit status 2
dpkg: dependency problems prevent configuration of geda-gnetlist:
 geda-gnetlist depends on gawk; however:
  Package gawk is not configured yet.
dpkg: error processing geda-gnetlist (--configure):
 dependency problems - leaving unconfigured
dpkg: dependency problems prevent configuration of geda:
 geda depends on geda-gnetlist; however:
  Package geda-gnetlist is not configured yet.
dpkg: error processing geda (--configure):
 dependency problems - leaving unconfigured
Errors were encountered while processing:
 gawk
 geda-gnetlist
 geda
E: Sub-process /usr/bin/dpkg returned an error code (1)


Anyone who can help me / fix the gawk package / knows what the problem
is ...?


meillo


signature.asc
Description: Digital signature


Re: dpkg: error processing gawk (--configure)

2009-06-18 Thread markus schnalke
[2009-06-18 21:03] markus schnalke mei...@marmaro.de
 
 during the installation of `geda' on sid, I received following output:
 
 [...]
 Setting up gawk (1:3.1.6.dfsg-3) ...
 update-alternatives: error: alternative nawk can't be slave of awk: it is a 
 master alternative.

I had some deeper look and am now sure enough to consider this a bug
in the package.

Hence, I filed a bug against gawk.


A (maybe too simple) solution is removing all `nawk' stuff from
debian/postinst. Then I can build the package and install it without
problems.


meillo


signature.asc
Description: Digital signature


Accepted masqmail 0.2.21-7 (source i386)

2009-06-14 Thread markus schnalke
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1

Format: 1.8
Date: Sun, 14 Jun 2009 11:41:04 +0200
Source: masqmail
Binary: masqmail
Architecture: source i386
Version: 0.2.21-7
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: low
Maintainer: markus schnalke mei...@marmaro.de
Changed-By: markus schnalke mei...@marmaro.de
Description: 
 masqmail   - mail transport agent for intermittently connected hosts
Closes: 533006
Changes: 
 masqmail (0.2.21-7) unstable; urgency=low
 .
   * Fixed segfault when using pipe online detection (Closes: #533006)
Checksums-Sha1: 
 377b713ed9d29136a44d4a79b0952bc1ef1695a2 1003 masqmail_0.2.21-7.dsc
 1fde302793524829e65352ddc4ce5da59593ee43 117756 masqmail_0.2.21-7.diff.gz
 c07b971d931ba60e74a0d784c445cef36c9a7512 144890 masqmail_0.2.21-7_i386.deb
Checksums-Sha256: 
 06d4300c6d57252e9ac36378f50f12805b771d50f4fa25d023d8076ecdd12f88 1003 
masqmail_0.2.21-7.dsc
 6b3d296bafad41b8cd072b84b6c76cf2eddb7434799f0311e72f2531f3733e8b 117756 
masqmail_0.2.21-7.diff.gz
 dfbf4868cda30a38baea377f849cc0ed2e9eabb6c774f5b0694f4a6c28228c60 144890 
masqmail_0.2.21-7_i386.deb
Files: 
 ff6c02d4ec30247890440955dc595cbb 1003 mail extra masqmail_0.2.21-7.dsc
 dc77453b01f41a6b76439c4a9baba3a1 117756 mail extra masqmail_0.2.21-7.diff.gz
 d2220702c29bd9ce08799c13a29566bb 144890 mail extra masqmail_0.2.21-7_i386.deb

-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: GnuPG v1.4.9 (GNU/Linux)

iD8DBQFKNPRr1OXtrMAUPS0RAs+UAJsG2Msd1GdrNKe+v4DOdFs/A1daMACfSvHR
SOOpYQHXOOoFn3P+++T6YR0=
=X9cp
-END PGP SIGNATURE-


Accepted:
masqmail_0.2.21-7.diff.gz
  to pool/main/m/masqmail/masqmail_0.2.21-7.diff.gz
masqmail_0.2.21-7.dsc
  to pool/main/m/masqmail/masqmail_0.2.21-7.dsc
masqmail_0.2.21-7_i386.deb
  to pool/main/m/masqmail/masqmail_0.2.21-7_i386.deb


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-devel-changes-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org



Accepted masqmail 0.2.21-6 (source i386)

2009-05-27 Thread markus schnalke
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1

Format: 1.8
Date: Sun, 24 May 2009 20:23:33 +0200
Source: masqmail
Binary: masqmail
Architecture: source i386
Version: 0.2.21-6
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: low
Maintainer: markus schnalke mei...@marmaro.de
Changed-By: markus schnalke mei...@marmaro.de
Description: 
 masqmail   - mail transport agent for intermittently connected hosts
Closes: 174975 416237 417842 427095 427096 480477 504615 504794 505730 505794 
513332 522252 523698 524307 524497 524893 524917 525148 525397
Changes: 
 masqmail (0.2.21-6) unstable; urgency=low
 .
   * Added check for `hostname -f' error in debconf. (Closes: #416237)
   * Fixed delivering with empty or non-existent alias files. Thanks to Marcos
 Dione for the hint where to look. (Closes: #417842)
   * Fixed typos reported by Reuben Thomas. (Closes: #427096)
   * Fixed empty or only-whitespace connection names. (Closes: #427095)
   * Corrected man page about /etc/aliases. Thanks to Alexis. (Closes: #480477)
   * Closing old bug which is neither in etch nor in lenny. (Closes: #174975)
   * Added description to init script to remove lintian info.
   * Debconf templates and debian/control reviewed by the debian-l10n-
 english team as part of the Smith review project. (Closes: #522252)
   * [Debconf translation updates]
 - Swedish by Martin Bagge (Closes: #505794, #523698)
 - Italian by Vincenzo Campanella (Closes: #524307)
 - German by Matthias Julius (Closes: #524497)
 - Russian by Yuri Kozlov (Closes: #505730, #524893)
 - Portuguese by Traduz (Closes: #504794, #524917)
 - French by Ivan Buresi (Closes: #504615, #525148, #525397)
 - Vietnamese by Clytie Siddall (Closes: #513332)
   * fixed watch file
   * fixed lintian errors/warnings
   * updated to standards version 3.8.1
Checksums-Sha1: 
 b650f0503681ebb84172e3ac19c1bf58890c0624 1011 masqmail_0.2.21-6.dsc
 9416291c371b07482c7e273fe673c7fc4672cc65 117530 masqmail_0.2.21-6.diff.gz
 cc168ad437e1ee7018109d6709949583cd25d13b 145180 masqmail_0.2.21-6_i386.deb
Checksums-Sha256: 
 e64f7e13ad1260d90ada0e826333e33ee27c03e6ae7333c3fba390989d77ceb6 1011 
masqmail_0.2.21-6.dsc
 0d2c296dde905e6c51e4877ebda15b16f065144bb4d219a2dba2f47b7b6f693b 117530 
masqmail_0.2.21-6.diff.gz
 edab24370108bf3ad556cd77941b8fc35219cf4c096f89168e64d91fc08d646a 145180 
masqmail_0.2.21-6_i386.deb
Files: 
 4fcc824111072ab4288df4b89d9646ee 1011 mail extra masqmail_0.2.21-6.dsc
 67f318adaea76379df5cc4ea520f9dcd 117530 mail extra masqmail_0.2.21-6.diff.gz
 c89721a4c6818b247b31e6e42379a8c4 145180 mail extra masqmail_0.2.21-6_i386.deb

-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: GnuPG v1.4.9 (GNU/Linux)

iEYEARECAAYFAkocMsIACgkQ1OXtrMAUPS2VugCgi4d9bfhpTj63RROlug+F05z6
IMoAn0UdaiB4RN4gdYRlm8DqkABQ5KSp
=clwm
-END PGP SIGNATURE-


Accepted:
masqmail_0.2.21-6.diff.gz
  to pool/main/m/masqmail/masqmail_0.2.21-6.diff.gz
masqmail_0.2.21-6.dsc
  to pool/main/m/masqmail/masqmail_0.2.21-6.dsc
masqmail_0.2.21-6_i386.deb
  to pool/main/m/masqmail/masqmail_0.2.21-6_i386.deb


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-devel-changes-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org



Accepted masqmail 0.2.21-5 (source i386)

2009-03-09 Thread markus schnalke
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1

Format: 1.8
Date: Sun, 28 Sep 2008 21:51:21 +0200
Source: masqmail
Binary: masqmail
Architecture: source i386
Version: 0.2.21-5
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: low
Maintainer: markus schnalke mei...@marmaro.de
Changed-By: markus schnalke mei...@marmaro.de
Description: 
 masqmail   - A mailer for hosts without permanent internet connection
Closes: 452188
Changes: 
 masqmail (0.2.21-5) unstable; urgency=low
 .
   * New maintainer (Closes: #452188)
   * fixed most Lintian warnings
   * updated to standards version 3.8.0
Checksums-Sha1: 
 0259237f13c80790f9a0254eddafab104e155085 1013 masqmail_0.2.21-5.dsc
 e2505bf54b6982baf7375ea06d5ec311c8ec2574 102522 masqmail_0.2.21-5.diff.gz
 aca30fae5fed0a993a5dc19658b4e8c06916f925 133078 masqmail_0.2.21-5_i386.deb
Checksums-Sha256: 
 9356b0073506b437cb1a37d91bee6e37ea7f0d9e0a4b949cf68c32a55c518041 1013 
masqmail_0.2.21-5.dsc
 94690e882475318d9eac0b8839b4a93a58aef0e1736c5b20e3fda4fb2008196c 102522 
masqmail_0.2.21-5.diff.gz
 6f015b1f5e644f322d3cf3e9d695f676f8c98efcfefc0199448369531ded53a7 133078 
masqmail_0.2.21-5_i386.deb
Files: 
 40764dacb191ebecfc6e3459b0201309 1013 mail extra masqmail_0.2.21-5.dsc
 24507b39e15c8508ba8237d4c107f57c 102522 mail extra masqmail_0.2.21-5.diff.gz
 b22b85d9d957739ddfc664f418449256 133078 mail extra masqmail_0.2.21-5_i386.deb

-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: GnuPG v1.4.9 (GNU/Linux)

iEYEARECAAYFAkm1JXoACgkQbMaawmho9B+U5QCfdfpQDxN8dYMVIUQ1sI20mqEK
sVUAoMv0XMD5k6mQ6Ji33u3GvvWvbdCz
=emEf
-END PGP SIGNATURE-


Accepted:
masqmail_0.2.21-5.diff.gz
  to pool/main/m/masqmail/masqmail_0.2.21-5.diff.gz
masqmail_0.2.21-5.dsc
  to pool/main/m/masqmail/masqmail_0.2.21-5.dsc
masqmail_0.2.21-5_i386.deb
  to pool/main/m/masqmail/masqmail_0.2.21-5_i386.deb


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-devel-changes-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org



Re: percentage of popcon submitters

2009-01-16 Thread markus schnalke
[2009-01-16 10:09] Neil Williams codeh...@debian.org
 
 The whole thing is a complete unknown.

Of course you're right. But it's the best we have.

Instead of leaving it with ``we simply don't know'', I prefer to
estimate on the (unsure) data sources that are available.



For my case, I received valuable comments and approaches that improved
my estimations, so I thank everyone who contributed!


FYI:
I now assume one third of all Debian users submit their stats, with
the remark that one third is probably a high guess as it means there
would be only about 230 thousand Debian installations in total. But
according to counter.li.org between 490 thousand and 12 million Debian
users can be estimated. I later reduce the resulting number by one
third to respect users with multiple installations.

I think my final result is not too large, which is to avoid. If it
would be only 1/10 of the true number, I have no problem with it.



thanks again

meillo


signature.asc
Description: Digital signature


Re: percentage of popcon submitters

2009-01-16 Thread markus schnalke
[2009-01-16 12:06] Romain Beauxis to...@rastageeks.org
 Le Friday 16 January 2009 11:51:50 markus schnalke, vous avez écrit :
  [2009-01-16 10:09] Neil Williams codeh...@debian.org
 
   The whole thing is a complete unknown.
 
  Of course you're right. But it's the best we have.
 
  Instead of leaving it with ``we simply don't know'', I prefer to
  estimate on the (unsure) data sources that are available.
 
 Not that I like to be polemic, but this sentence doesn't mean anything.
 
 If the answer is we don't know, then we don't know. Problem is that you 
 don't give any ground to your claims, hence it is far worse to give any 
 estimation.

IMO that's not right if you want to act. Acting without any plan is
worse than acting with an estimation (that bases on the best
information available).

Imaging navigation within permanent fog. I think it is better to go
towards the most probable direction, instead of doing nothing because
you dont know. Of course this again is dependent on external factors
like dangerous ground ... thus no answer fits every case.

In the end it's a philosophical question anyway. ;-)


 Of course, you surely do not need such serious considerations for your 
 precise 
 issue

correct ;-)


meillo


signature.asc
Description: Digital signature


percentage of popcon submitters

2009-01-15 Thread markus schnalke
Hoi,

I know it is not possible to _know_ the real percentage of uses which
submit popcon stats of all users. But I want to ask for guesses,
because more oppinions do likely improve the result.

My current guess is between 1/3 and 2/3.

What do you think?


meillo


signature.asc
Description: Digital signature


Re: percentage of popcon submitters

2009-01-15 Thread markus schnalke
[2009-01-15 22:37] Michael Goetze mgoe...@mgoetze.net
 
 before wild speculations ensues, you might want to specify what you 
 really want to know: the percentage of people installing debian systems 
 who use popcon (always/sometimes), or the percentage of installed 
 machines that submit popcon data?

Seems my wording was unclear.

I want to know the percentage of installed machines that submit popcon
data.


Maybe some words about the background of this question:
I want to estimate the number of users of some software. Thus I have a
look at Popcon which tells me the number of installations of the
package. Now I need a good multiplicator (the searched one) to receive
an estimated number of users within Debian. I'll do the same for
Ubuntu's popcon and add guessed numbers for usage on other GNU and
Unix systems. That should lead to a quite good estimation.


 For example, I'm pretty sure any hosting company offering Debian on 
 dedicated servers will disable popcon by default...

And there is a number of systems without online connection, they will
also not submit.


meillo


signature.asc
Description: Digital signature


Re: percentage of popcon submitters

2009-01-15 Thread markus schnalke
[2009-01-16 05:59] Noah Slater nsla...@tumbolia.org
 On Thu, Jan 15, 2009 at 10:00:04PM +0100, markus schnalke wrote:
  I know it is not possible to _know_ the real percentage of uses which
  submit popcon stats of all users. But I want to ask for guesses,
  because more oppinions do likely improve the result.
 
This question of trying to figure out whether a book is good or bad by
   looking at it carefully or by taking the reports of a lot of people who
   looked at it carelessly is like this famous old problem: Nobody was
   permitted to see the Emperor of China, and the question was, What is the
   length of the Emperor of China's nose? To find out, you go all over the
   country asking people what they think the length of the Emperor of China's
   nose is, and you average it. And that would be very accurate because you
   averaged so many people. But it's no way to find anything out; when you have
   a very wide range of people who contribute without looking carefully at it,
   you don't improve your knowledge of the situation by averaging.
 
-- Richard P. Feynman, Surely You're Joking, Mr. 
 Feynman!

Good point, but one may refer to the Delphi method:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Delphi_method

However, the answers I received actually helped my. Not because they
were estimations, but because they were comments for what to keep in
mind.

In any way, I believe more oppinions do improve results, but not by
telling numbers one can average, but by showing how others see the
situation. This widens the own view.


meillo


signature.asc
Description: Digital signature


Re: percentage of popcon submitters

2009-01-15 Thread markus schnalke
[2009-01-15 23:25] Bernd Eckenfels e...@lina.inka.de
 In article 20090115210004.gv21...@serveme.schnalke.local you wrote:
  My current guess is between 1/3 and 2/3.
 
 Machines or Users?

Popcon focuses on machines. In the end I want users. But any number
would be good.


 According to Linuxcounter there are estimated 29,000,000 users and debian has
 18.36% which equals in 5m  debian users. Popcon lists 78k submissions,
 which is less than 2%

That is really a good approach. Thanks for that!

I seems to be quite sure that the popcon submitters are less than 1/3
of all Debian users.

Luciano Bello's calculation pointed to a similar way.


meillo


signature.asc
Description: Digital signature


masqmail revival!

2008-09-28 Thread markus schnalke
Hello users of masqmail,

I collected your email addresses from debian/changelog of the masqmail
package, the bugs in Debian for it and the archive of the old masqmail
mailinglist.
So everyone of you had some contact with this MTA.

You probably realized that Oliver Kurth (the upstream author and
former package maintainer) had stopped working on it. Actually he
wasn't seen for a long time and mails to him are bouncing.

I investigated for contact information and finally talked to him on
the phone. He's still alive, but is not active anymore on masqmail and
Debian.
He gave his okay that I can take masqmail upstream and maintain the
Debian package.

This is what I want to do. In addition, I write my diploma thesis at
the moment, and it's about masqmail also, so this fits good.


A new project website is created (but not finished):
  http://prog.marmaro.de/masqmail
and a new mailinglist aswell:
  [EMAIL PROTECTED]


The reasons I send this mail are to inform you about what I just told,
and I want to ask you for documentation and stuff you have about
masqmail---things that could help me on my thesis or on further
development.
Second, I want to invite you to help me in development and in
packageing.
Also I ask for advice and hints of any kind.

Maybe one of the DDs among you want to sponsor me, uploading the
package. 
Some kind of check of my work would be good too, if someone would like
to do that.


feel free to contact me

meillo


See also:
http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=452188


signature.asc
Description: Digital signature


Bug#484597: ITP: genwebgallery -- generates minimalistic web galleries

2008-06-04 Thread markus schnalke
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: markus schnalke [EMAIL PROTECTED]


* Package name: genwebgallery
  Version : 0.5
  Upstream Author : markus schnalke [EMAIL PROTECTED]
* URL : http://prog.marmaro.de/genwebgallery
* License : MIT/X
  Programming Lang: sh
  Description : generates minimalistic web galleries

Very simple tool to generate static HTML pages to view pictures on the
web. The generated pages are not very beautiful, but simple. They
contain just what is really needed - no fancy stuff. Also the generation
process is only one program call. You can specify some configuration
options like the dimension of the created thumbnails, the name of the
index page and some more.
All image processing is done via ImageMagick.


-- System Information:
Debian Release: 4.0
  APT prefers stable
  APT policy: (500, 'stable')
Architecture: i386 (i686)
Shell:  /bin/sh linked to /bin/bash
Kernel: Linux 2.6.18-4-686
Locale: LANG=en_US.UTF-8, LC_CTYPE=en_US.UTF-8 (charmap=UTF-8)



-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]