Re: [OT] Re: Bug#213897: ITP: libclass-dbi-abstractsearch-perl -- Abstract Class::DBI's SQL with SQL::Abstract
On Mon, Oct 06, 2003 at 08:49:25PM -0400, Joe Drew wrote: On Mon, 2003-10-06 at 18:06, Richard Braakman wrote: It's::not::like::this::sort::of::jargon::is::difficult::to::understand,::or ::that::writing::package::descriptions::which::rely::entirely::on::one's ::understanding of::what::other::packages::do::is::uncommon. I really hope you used sed or some workalike to accomplish that. workalike? sed is a workalike for the real editor. :%s/ /::/g For some reason, I had it in my mind that Branden used emacs, which spawned the 'workalike' comment. I have no evidence to back that up, though. Emacs would be a good editor for the Overfiend, though. I think he uses vim. Check the comments in some of the X scripts at least: $ tail -n1 /etc/X11/Xsession # vim:ai:et:sts=2:sw=2:tw=80: -- gram signature.asc Description: Digital signature
[OT] Re: Bug#213897: ITP: libclass-dbi-abstractsearch-perl -- Abstract Class::DBI's SQL with SQL::Abstract
On Mon, 2003-10-06 at 18:06, Richard Braakman wrote: It's::not::like::this::sort::of::jargon::is::difficult::to::understand,::or ::that::writing::package::descriptions::which::rely::entirely::on::one's ::understanding of::what::other::packages::do::is::uncommon. I really hope you used sed or some workalike to accomplish that. workalike? sed is a workalike for the real editor. :%s/ /::/g For some reason, I had it in my mind that Branden used emacs, which spawned the 'workalike' comment. I have no evidence to back that up, though. Emacs would be a good editor for the Overfiend, though. -- Joe Drew [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED] My weblog doesn't detail my personal life: http://me.woot.net
