On Fri, Oct 26, 2012 at 09:48:18AM +0200, Gergely Nagy wrote: > why would it hurt > to bake in a worst-case scenario with no acks or nacks? (I can accept > defaulting to no too, after a timeout, as long as there's one. I would > find the result pointless and silly, but at least it puts an end to it, > which the current proposal doesn't.)
I would not object against including this in the text. Regards, Bart Martens -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-devel-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/20121026094407.gc23...@master.debian.org
