Bug#2048: Broken pipe from dpkg to head

1995-12-19 Thread Bill Mitchell

PACKAGE: dpkg
VERSION: 1.0.7

Script started on Mon Dec 18 21:19:37 1995
root:work# dpkg --info less*deb | head -1
 old debian package, version 0.939000.
Broken pipe
root:work# dpkg --info less*deb x
root:work# head -1 x
 old debian package, version 0.939000.
root:work# cat x | head -1
 old debian package, version 0.939000.
root:work# exit
Script done on Mon Dec 18 21:20:45 1995

[EMAIL PROTECTED] (Bill Mitchell)




Bug#2048: Broken pipe from dpkg to head

1995-12-19 Thread Richard Kettlewell
However: 

[EMAIL PROTECTED]:richard$ ls -l | head -1
total 19792
Broken pipe
[EMAIL PROTECTED]:richard$

Bill Mitchell writes:

PACKAGE: dpkg
VERSION: 1.0.7

Script started on Mon Dec 18 21:19:37 1995
root:work# dpkg --info less*deb | head -1
 old debian package, version 0.939000.
Broken pipe
root:work# dpkg --info less*deb x
root:work# head -1 x
 old debian package, version 0.939000.
root:work# cat x | head -1
 old debian package, version 0.939000.
root:work# exit
Script done on Mon Dec 18 21:20:45 1995



Re: Bug#2048: Broken pipe from dpkg to head

1995-12-19 Thread Ian Jackson
Bill Mitchell writes (Bug#2048: Broken pipe from dpkg to head):
 root:work# dpkg --info less*deb | head -1
  old debian package, version 0.939000.
 Broken pipe

Richard Kettlewell writes (Bug#2048: Broken pipe from dpkg to head):
 [EMAIL PROTECTED]:richard$ ls -l | head -1
 total 19792
 Broken pipe
 [EMAIL PROTECTED]:richard$

Quite.

I'm marking this as done.

RTFM bash(1).

Ian.



Re: Bug#2048: Broken pipe from dpkg to head

1995-12-19 Thread Bill Mitchell
Ian Jackson [EMAIL PROTECTED] said:

 RTFM bash(1).

Thanks for the pointer, Ian.  I'm sure that you thought that
it would be very helpful



Re: Bug#2048: Broken pipe from dpkg to head

1995-12-19 Thread Bruce Perens
I think Ian means that if the downstream program exits before the
upstream program, you'll get this message. Head is going to do that,
it's a feature.

I would like to maintain our reputation for gentle answers, thus RTFM
should be avoided, and RTFM a 138K document should not be considered
an answer :-) .
--
Bruce Perens [EMAIL PROTECTED] Pixar Animation Studios