Re: Bug#808767: ITP: apt-transport-gs -- APT transport for repositories privately held on GCS
On 2015-12-25 08:36, Joerg Jaspert wrote: that links later are starting with gs://, but if people think it should be gcs instead I'll change it. Why are they gs: when its for gcs? Because branding changes all the time. \-: The corresponding tool is also called "gsutil" (although most stuff seems to migrate into "gcloud" instead). Kind regards Philipp Kern
Re: Bug#808767: ITP: apt-transport-gs -- APT transport for repositories privately held on GCS
On 14164 March 1977, Marcin Kulisz wrote: >> * Marcin Kulisz (kuLa) , 2015-12-22, 16:07: >> >* Package name: apt-transport-gs >> s/gs/gcs/ ? > Honestly I'm not sure about it (I mean package name not the change). I don't > really mind to change it to gcs. > I called package *-gs to keep it in the 2 letter convention and to > emphasise Which two-letter convention? apt-transport-https apt-transport-spacewalk apt-transport-s3 apt-transport-tor > that links later are starting with gs://, but if people think it > should be gcs instead I'll change it. Why are they gs: when its for gcs? -- bye, Joerg Marge, it takes two to lie. One to lie and one to listen.
Re: Bug#808767: ITP: apt-transport-gs -- APT transport for repositories privately held on GCS
On Wednesday 23 December 2015 09:54:05 Marcin Kulisz wrote: > Honestly I'm not sure about it (I mean package name not the change). I don't > really mind to change it to gcs. > I called package *-gs to keep it in the 2 letter convention and to emphasise > that links later are starting with gs://, but if people think > it should be gcs instead I'll change it. When I read "apt-transport-gs" package name, I wondered what ghostscript (/usr/bin/gs) got to do with apt... IMHO, "-gcs" suffix is better. Hope this helps -- https://github.com/dod38fr/ -o- http://search.cpan.org/~ddumont/ http://ddumont.wordpress.com/ -o- irc: dod at irc.debian.org
Re: Bug#808767: ITP: apt-transport-gs -- APT transport for repositories privately held on GCS
On 2015-12-23 10:33:43, Jakub Wilk wrote: > * Marcin Kulisz (kuLa) , 2015-12-22, 16:07: > >* Package name: apt-transport-gs > > s/gs/gcs/ ? Honestly I'm not sure about it (I mean package name not the change). I don't really mind to change it to gcs. I called package *-gs to keep it in the 2 letter convention and to emphasise that links later are starting with gs://, but if people think it should be gcs instead I'll change it. -- |_|0|_| | |_|_|0| "Heghlu'Meh QaQ jajVam" | |0|0|0| kuLa - | gpg --keyserver pgp.mit.edu --recv-keys 0x58C338B3 3DF1 A4DF C732 4688 38BC F121 6869 30DD 58C3 38B3 signature.asc Description: PGP signature
Re: Bug#808767: ITP: apt-transport-gs -- APT transport for repositories privately held on GCS
* Marcin Kulisz (kuLa) , 2015-12-22, 16:07: * Package name: apt-transport-gs s/gs/gcs/ ? -- Jakub Wilk
Bug#808767: ITP: apt-transport-gs -- APT transport for repositories privately held on GCS
Package: wnpp Severity: wishlist Owner: "Marcin Kulisz (kuLa)" * Package name: apt-transport-gs Upstream Author : Dhaivat Pandit * URL : https://github.com/ceocoder/apt-gcs * License : MIT Programming Lang: go Description : APT transport for repositories privately held on GCS Transport for apt allowing to have private repositories on Google Cloud Storage