Re: Caldera's lawsuit against Microsoft

1996-08-12 Thread Bruce Perens
From: Ian Jackson [EMAIL PROTECTED]

 I'm just posting here on what's really an irrelevant topic to say that
 I think it's a very good thing that someone is challenging Microsoft.

The terms of the suit require MS to give _Caldera_ details of APIs. Not
the general public, just Caldera. MS can still keep them under non-disclosure,
and Caldera would have to honor the terms of an NDA approved by the court.

So, I'm not sure this does a thing for people who write free software.

Bruce




Re: Caldera's lawsuit against Microsoft

1996-08-12 Thread Brian C. White
 The terms of the suit require MS to give _Caldera_ details of APIs. Not
 the general public, just Caldera. MS can still keep them under non-disclosure,
 and Caldera would have to honor the terms of an NDA approved by the court.

I noticed this too.  It could just be necessary to make the lawsuit
plausible, but I'm not so sure.

Brian
   ( [EMAIL PROTECTED] )

---
In theory, theory and practice are the same.  In practice, they're not.





Caldera's lawsuit against Microsoft

1996-08-10 Thread Ian Jackson
I should think that you've all heard about this by now - if not go and
look at comp.os.linux.announce.

I'm just posting here on what's really an irrelevant topic to say that
I think it's a very good thing that someone is challenging Microsoft.

I mailed Lyle Ball at Caldera to tell him so, and he thanked me for my
support and said:
 Please be vocal about your opinions
 on this case, especially on the forums.

So, here I am in my favourite forum :-).  If you want to discuss this
somewhere here probably isn't it.

Ian.