Re: Followup on C++ standardisation meeting
2018-11-05 10:37 Jussi Pakkanen: Hi all This email is a followup to this earlier issue: https://lists.debian.org/debian-devel/2018/10/msg00044.html The TL/DR is that unfortunately I could not organize any sort of meeting of interested parties for th meeting (which is this week). Fortunately based on the discussion other people are have something going on, please get in contact with them if you would like to participate. [...] Hope you find it useful, Thanks for working on this, it's very important to convince people designing languages that static building is not good, specially in such an important decision-taking meeting as this C++ one in San Diego. Cheers. -- Manuel A. Fernandez Montecelo
Followup on C++ standardisation meeting
Hi all This email is a followup to this earlier issue: https://lists.debian.org/debian-devel/2018/10/msg00044.html The TL/DR is that unfortunately I could not organize any sort of meeting of interested parties for th meeting (which is this week). Fortunately based on the discussion other people are have something going on, please get in contact with them if you would like to participate. I did however manage to write a quick blog post about the background and use cases for shared libs and ABI stability which can be used as background information and to get the discussion going. It is available here: https://nibblestew.blogspot.com/2018/11/some-use-cases-for-shared-linking-and.html (It does contain some inaccuracies, there is an errata at the end.) Hope you find it useful,
