Re: Inactive maintainer for teamspeak packages
On Sat, Aug 13, 2011 at 10:27:08AM +0200, Stephan Windmüller wrote: > For more than a half year I am monitoring the state of the non-free > teamspeak packages. A new upstream version is available for more than a > year (bug #594318) and there is also a grave bug with an attached patch > (bug #598304). > > However, there has been no reply by the maintainer of the packages. All > bugs are unmodified for at least 300 days. I tried to contact him in > January but since then he did not reply. > > Does anyone know something about this maintainer or the states of these > packages? Just for your information: the MIA team is aware of the situation and trying to solve it. Getting the packages in better shape (by offering help, possibly NMUing) is appreciated. We're trying to find a nice way out long-term. By the way, you can contact the MIA team at m...@qa.debian.org if you have concerns about maintainers being inactive or unresponsive. Hints to improve archive quality and quality of life of overworked maintainers are always welcome. Hauke -- .''`. Jan Hauke Rahmwww.jhr-online.de : :' : Debian Developer www.debian.org `. `'` Member of the Linux Foundationwww.linux.com `- Fellow of the Free Software Foundation Europe www.fsfe.org signature.asc Description: Digital signature
Re: Inactive maintainer for teamspeak packages
On Sat, Aug 13, 2011 at 10:27:08AM +0200, Stephan Windmüller wrote: > For more than a half year I am monitoring the state of the non-free > teamspeak packages. A new upstream version is available for more than a > year (bug #594318) and there is also a grave bug with an attached patch > (bug #598304). > However, there has been no reply by the maintainer of the packages. All > bugs are unmodified for at least 300 days. I tried to contact him in > January but since then he did not reply. > Does anyone know something about this maintainer or the states of these > packages? I know that teamspeak-client:amd64 should be dropped from the archive now that we have multiarch support for all the relevant X libraries... :) So I could probably be convinced to help with an NMU of the package on that basis, though I wouldn't be interested in maintaining it. -- Steve Langasek Give me a lever long enough and a Free OS Debian Developer to set it on, and I can move the world. Ubuntu Developerhttp://www.debian.org/ slanga...@ubuntu.com vor...@debian.org signature.asc Description: Digital signature
Re: Inactive maintainer for teamspeak packages
On Sat, Aug 13, 2011 at 10:27 AM, Stephan Windmüller wrote: > Does anyone know something about this maintainer or the states of these > packages? It looks like he isn't active on other packages too, for eg aircrack-ng (RC bug) or ntfs-3g (hijacked). -- bye, pabs http://wiki.debian.org/PaulWise -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-devel-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/caktje6eg+ry-6a-lwgga7ygwzouo2yfmb4mttfhmb+16jxs...@mail.gmail.com
Inactive maintainer for teamspeak packages
Hello! For more than a half year I am monitoring the state of the non-free teamspeak packages. A new upstream version is available for more than a year (bug #594318) and there is also a grave bug with an attached patch (bug #598304). However, there has been no reply by the maintainer of the packages. All bugs are unmodified for at least 300 days. I tried to contact him in January but since then he did not reply. Does anyone know something about this maintainer or the states of these packages? Regards Stephan -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-devel-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/4e46355c.5080...@white-hawk.de