RFS tag?
Hi, what about an RFS tag for ITPs or and RFS bug report for wnpp. So debian developers who like to sponsor a package don't have to read debian-mentors. I think it would be a good idea. Regards Nico -- Nico Golde - [EMAIL PROTECTED] | GPG: 1024D/73647CFF ,'`. [EMAIL PROTECTED] | http://www.ngolde.de ( grml.org VIM has two modes - the one in which it beeps`._,' and the one in which it doesn't -- encrypted mail preferred
Re: RFS tag?
On Wednesday 05 January 2005 09:50, Nico Golde wrote: Hi, what about an RFS tag for ITPs or and RFS bug report for wnpp. So debian developers who like to sponsor a package don't have to read debian-mentors. I think it would be a good idea. As a person looking for sponsors from time to time, I second this. B/R, -- Frederik Dannemare | mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] http://qa.debian.org/developer.php?login=Frederik+Dannemare http://frederik.dannemare.net | http://www.linuxworlddomination.dk
Re: RFS tag?
* Nico Golde [Wed, 05 Jan 2005 09:50:42 +0100]: From: Nico Golde [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] ^^ is there a reason for this? breaks mutt's 'L'ist-reply... Hi, what about an RFS tag for ITPs or and RFS bug report for wnpp. So debian developers who like to sponsor a package don't have to read debian-mentors. I think it would be a good idea. Justin Pryzby has been working lately on this. you may find this thread [1] on -mentors interesting. I particularly like and fully support jvw's suggestion [2] about the forwarded status. for a more-bloated proposal, also from Justin, see [3]. [1] http://lists.debian.org/debian-mentors/2005/01/msg00037.html [2] http://lists.debian.org/debian-mentors/2005/01/msg00038.html [3] http://lists.debian.org/debian-mentors/2005/01/msg00010.html hth, -- Adeodato Simó EM: asp16 [ykwim] alu.ua.es | PK: DA6AE621 Create a system that is usable even by idiots, and only idiots will use it.
Re: RFS tag?
hi, * Frederik Dannemare [EMAIL PROTECTED] [2005-01-05 12:43]: On Wednesday 05 January 2005 09:50, Nico Golde wrote: Hi, what about an RFS tag for ITPs or and RFS bug report for wnpp. So debian developers who like to sponsor a package don't have to read debian-mentors. I think it would be a good idea. As a person looking for sponsors from time to time, I second this. thats the best reason i think. there are many people who sponsor packages which they find accidental because they don't read -mentors. that would be a good solution. who is responsible for such things? regards nico -- Nico Golde - [EMAIL PROTECTED] | GPG: 1024D/73647CFF ,'`. [EMAIL PROTECTED] | http://www.ngolde.de ( grml.org VIM has two modes - the one in which it beeps`._,' and the one in which it doesn't -- encrypted mail preferred
Re: RFS tag?
hi, * Adeodato Simó [EMAIL PROTECTED] [2005-01-05 18:02]: * Nico Golde [Wed, 05 Jan 2005 09:50:42 +0100]: From: Nico Golde [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] ^^ is there a reason for this? breaks mutt's 'L'ist-reply... Hi, what about an RFS tag for ITPs or and RFS bug report for wnpp. So debian developers who like to sponsor a package don't have to read debian-mentors. I think it would be a good idea. Justin Pryzby has been working lately on this. you may find this thread [1] on -mentors interesting. I particularly like and fully support jvw's suggestion [2] about the forwarded status. for a more-bloated proposal, also from Justin, see [3]. ah ok thanks. maybe i will contact him. regards nico -- Nico Golde - [EMAIL PROTECTED] | GPG: 1024D/73647CFF ,'`. [EMAIL PROTECTED] | http://www.ngolde.de ( grml.org VIM has two modes - the one in which it beeps`._,' and the one in which it doesn't -- encrypted mail preferred signature.asc Description: Digital signature
Re: RFS tag?
On Wed, Jan 05, 2005 at 01:30:21PM +0100, Nico Golde wrote: hi, * Frederik Dannemare [EMAIL PROTECTED] [2005-01-05 12:43]: On Wednesday 05 January 2005 09:50, Nico Golde wrote: Hi, what about an RFS tag for ITPs or and RFS bug report for wnpp. So debian developers who like to sponsor a package don't have to read debian-mentors. I think it would be a good idea. As a person looking for sponsors from time to time, I second this. thats the best reason i think. there are many people who sponsor packages which they find accidental because they don't read -mentors. that would be a good solution. who is responsible for such things? regards nico Hi debiandeveloperfolken, this has insired a 'mako'esque idea: Debian package personals: AD#1 says I have a new VIM extension that does cool new tricks with Clippy(tm), I'm looking for a special someone to sponser VIM-CLIPPYS-RETURN. Email me at [EMAIL PROTECTED] AD#2 says I'm a DD looking for some extra packages to add to the VIM collection. If you have the project that sparks my interest, email me at [EMAIL PROTECTED] Taglike: We get new packages into Debian by bringing people together! -Kev -- counter.li.org #238656 -- goto counter.li.org and be counted! (__) (oo) /--\/ / ||| * /\---/\ ~~ ~~ Have you mooed today?... signature.asc Description: Digital signature
