Re: Bug#71107: [wmono@debian.org: Re: RFC: removal of libqt1g from woody]
reopen 71107 retitle 71107 Explorer is unmaintained and should be removed thanks On Sun, Sep 10, 2000 at 03:27:00AM +1200, Michael Beattie wrote: > > > It's orphaned. And has been for about 7 months. The "maintainer" > > > should be debian-qa, but it has not been reset to that. > > > > ...that would explain it. :) > > righto then, if people come to a consensus, file a bug on ftp.d.o to get it > moved to project/orphaned/, removed, or have the maintainer overriden. Please move it to orphaned. It's neither maintained in Debian nor upstream and the homepage is dead. We have enough file manager in the dist. If a new version appears we can still add it to potato with a Replaces: explorer and that's it. Greetings Torsten -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Bug#71107: [wmono@debian.org: Re: RFC: removal of libqt1g from woody]
On Sat, Sep 09, 2000 at 02:01:00AM -0700, Ivan E. Moore II wrote: > > Oh, yeah. > > > > http://bugs.debian.org/68274 > > > > It's orphaned. And has been for about 7 months. The "maintainer" > > should be debian-qa, but it has not been reset to that. > > ...that would explain it. :) righto then, if people come to a consensus, file a bug on ftp.d.o to get it moved to project/orphaned/, removed, or have the maintainer overriden. -- Michael Beattie ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) - Drive nail here ( ) to need a new monitor. - Debian GNU/Linux Ooohh You are missing out! pgp1smLMO7qtU.pgp Description: PGP signature
Re: Bug#71107: [wmono@debian.org: Re: RFC: removal of libqt1g from woody]
> > The maintainer may be unaware of our conversation, (god knows why) > > and may be working on an upload as we speak. IMO, its the same > > philosophy as doing a NMU. > > Oh, yeah. > > http://bugs.debian.org/68274 > > It's orphaned. And has been for about 7 months. The "maintainer" > should be debian-qa, but it has not been reset to that. ...that would explain it. :) -- Ivan E. Moore II [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://snowcrash.tdyc.com GPG KeyID=90BCE0DD GPG Fingerprint=F2FC 69FD 0DA0 4FB8 225E 27B6 7645 8141 90BC E0DD -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Bug#71107: [wmono@debian.org: Re: RFC: removal of libqt1g from woody]
>> Michael Beattie <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > The maintainer may be unaware of our conversation, (god knows why) > and may be working on an upload as we speak. IMO, its the same > philosophy as doing a NMU. Oh, yeah. http://bugs.debian.org/68274 It's orphaned. And has been for about 7 months. The "maintainer" should be debian-qa, but it has not been reset to that. Marcelo -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Bug#71107: [wmono@debian.org: Re: RFC: removal of libqt1g from woody]
On Fri, Sep 08, 2000 at 06:39:36PM -0700, Ivan E. Moore II wrote: > > As it is now the current package does not work, cannot be installed due > to dependencies, and it's not part of main. The last few uploads have > been done as NMU's... that in itself could suggest that it could be removed. but... > I understand not removing a package that works without the maintainers > approval, but a package that is non-functional and un-installable? > (not trying to beat you up..just trying to understand...if this is > policy then I need to bring this scenerio up to debian-policy...) The maintainer may be unaware of our conversation, (god knows why) and may be working on an upload as we speak. IMO, its the same philosophy as doing a NMU. > Anyways, I will continue to look online for this and hope either to get > it to work or for the Maintainer to pipe up. Feel free... I would suggest you simply file an RC bug on explorer, so that when woody comes around to being frozen, it will be removed, if it has not been resolved. -- Michael Beattie ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) - i've been doing timing tests while playing mp3s in the background, haven't i? bloody stupid multitasking operating systems aj: hehe aj: here, have a copy of DOS - Debian GNU/Linux Ooohh You are missing out! pgpg1XH6EB0tv.pgp Description: PGP signature
Re: Bug#71107: [wmono@debian.org: Re: RFC: removal of libqt1g from woody]
> > I would also recommend removing explorer as it depends on a non-existant > > package (qt1g and not libqt1g) and therefore isn't installable. > > done. > > I cannot remove explorer unless the maintainer asks. besides, it should be > recompilable with qt2.2. > ok...the source we (Debian) have for explorer does not compile against qt2. The web site it refers to (and ftp site) don't work...it also seems that upstream has changed the name of the package...and that site is also non functional. All documentation I have seen on the net says it is coded for qt1 only and that documentation is 3 years old. As it is now the current package does not work, cannot be installed due to dependencies, and it's not part of main. The last few uploads have been done as NMU's... I understand not removing a package that works without the maintainers approval, but a package that is non-functional and un-installable? (not trying to beat you up..just trying to understand...if this is policy then I need to bring this scenerio up to debian-policy...) Anyways, I will continue to look online for this and hope either to get it to work or for the Maintainer to pipe up. Ivan -- Ivan E. Moore II [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://snowcrash.tdyc.com GPG KeyID=90BCE0DD GPG Fingerprint=F2FC 69FD 0DA0 4FB8 225E 27B6 7645 8141 90BC E0DD pgp1XOt9jIug5.pgp Description: PGP signature
