Re: Conflicting assignment of privileged ports on boot, once again
What is currently the expert way to avoid/handle such port conflicts in Debian? /etc/bindresvport.blacklist Thanks for the hint, this is what I was looking for. So the world has moved since 2005, at list a bit. 873 (rsync) is not listed in this file. - Is this a bug in libc6? - ... or in rsync? (Are the services supposed to add their ports on installation?) - ... or is it up to the administrator to add the ports manually? I couldn't find any policy on who is responsible for entering the port number. It seems to be the last option, which is not completely satisfactory, since it involves trial-and-error. Gernot -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-devel-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Re: Conflicting assignment of privileged ports on boot, once again
Gernot Salzer sal...@logic.at wrote: Hi, - ... or is it up to the administrator to add the ports manually? That's it. The most common offenders are already in the list; if you're seeing the problem routinely with a popular service that's not on the list already, that'd be a wishlist bug against libc6. JB. -- Julien BLACHE - Debian GNU/Linux Developer - jbla...@debian.org Public key available on http://www.jblache.org - KeyID: F5D6 5169 GPG Fingerprint : 935A 79F1 C8B3 3521 FD62 7CC7 CD61 4FD7 F5D6 5169 -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-devel-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Re: Conflicting assignment of privileged ports on boot, once again
[Julien BLACHE] That's it. The most common offenders are already in the list; if you're seeing the problem routinely with a popular service that's not on the list already, that'd be a wishlist bug against libc6. URL:https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/glibc/+bug/306007 and URL:http://www.novell.com/support/search.do?cmd=displayKCdocType=kcexternalId=7002186sliceId=1docTypeID=DT_TID_1_1dialogID=67050089stateId=0%200%2067048399 report of a bug in the parsing of that file, failing with the current content. Is this issue fixed in Debian? Happy hacking, -- Petter Reinholdtsen -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-devel-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Re: Conflicting assignment of privileged ports on boot, once again
On Thu, Jul 16, 2009 at 07:46:14PM +0200, Julien BLACHE wrote: Gernot Salzer sal...@logic.at wrote: Hi, - ... or is it up to the administrator to add the ports manually? That's it. The most common offenders are already in the list; if you're seeing the problem routinely with a popular service that's not on the list already, that'd be a wishlist bug against libc6. Interestingly, none of the tcp ports between 600 and 1024 that are listed in /etc/services appear in this file. Even more interesting, none of the ports in the /etc/bindresvport.blacklist are in /etc/services. Mike -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-devel-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Re: Conflicting assignment of privileged ports on boot, once again
Petter Reinholdtsen p...@hungry.com wrote: Hi, URL:https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/glibc/+bug/306007 and URL:http://www.novell.com/support/search.do?cmd=displayKCdocType=kcexternalId=7002186sliceId=1docTypeID=DT_TID_1_1dialogID=67050089stateId=0%200%2067048399 report of a bug in the parsing of that file, failing with the current content. Is this issue fixed in Debian? Let's ask the glibc folks. JB. -- Julien BLACHE - Debian GNU/Linux Developer - jbla...@debian.org Public key available on http://www.jblache.org - KeyID: F5D6 5169 GPG Fingerprint : 935A 79F1 C8B3 3521 FD62 7CC7 CD61 4FD7 F5D6 5169 -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-devel-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Re: Conflicting assignment of privileged ports on boot, once again
[Mike Hommey]
Interestingly, none of the tcp ports between 600 and 1024 that are
listed in /etc/services appear in this file. Even more interesting,
none of the ports in the /etc/bindresvport.blacklist are in
/etc/services.
Really? This is from my sid chroot:
% for n in $(awk '{print $1}' /etc/bindresvport.blacklist | \
grep -v '#'); do grep $n /etc/services ; done
ipp 631/tcp # Internet Printing Protocol
ipp 631/udp
ldaps 636/tcp # LDAP over SSL
ldaps 636/udp
imaps 993/tcp # IMAP over SSL
imaps 993/udp
pop3s 995/tcp # POP-3 over SSL
pop3s 995/udp
%
Happy hacking,
--
Petter Reinholdtsen
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-devel-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Re: Conflicting assignment of privileged ports on boot, once again
On Thu, Jul 16, 2009 at 09:06:56PM +0200, Julien BLACHE wrote: Petter Reinholdtsen p...@hungry.com wrote: Hi, URL:https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/glibc/+bug/306007 and URL:http://www.novell.com/support/search.do?cmd=displayKCdocType=kcexternalId=7002186sliceId=1docTypeID=DT_TID_1_1dialogID=67050089stateId=0%200%2067048399 report of a bug in the parsing of that file, failing with the current content. Is this issue fixed in Debian? It's difficult to fix an issue you are not aware of. Nobody has reported the bug so far. If someone can get the fix from Novell, sure we can fix it. -- Aurelien Jarno GPG: 1024D/F1BCDB73 aurel...@aurel32.net http://www.aurel32.net -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-devel-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
