Re: Releasing DEP 5 in two weeks in the absence of blocking bugs.
Le Wed, Jan 18, 2012 at 06:13:05PM -0800, Russ Allbery a écrit : Charles Plessy ple...@debian.org writes: I do not intend to push a document on which persons disagree, so please, if you think that there are serious problems with the current wording DEP 5, or if you found an important bug in its syntax, report it to the BTS. I reported what I think are problems with the current wording just now to debian-policy, and yes, I believe that should block marking it as ACCEPTED. Thanks Russ. I found your arguments convincing (in 8739bcv2xz@windlord.stanford.edu sent on debian-project, not -policy). If you do not mind, I will be a bit formal and forward them to the BTS. Let's make sure to be clear that DEP 5 does not require to document more than the current practice. Thank you as well for framing clearly the questions to the FTP Masters. Have a nice day, -- Charles Plessy Tsurumi, Kanagawa, Japan -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-devel-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/20120120010459.gb28...@merveille.plessy.net
Re: Releasing DEP 5 in two weeks in the absence of blocking bugs.
Le Wed, Jan 18, 2012 at 07:13:34PM +0100, Stefano Zacchiroli a écrit : The above notwithstanding, we can probably learn from this thread that, for the future, it would help to first announce I'm about to mark DEP-$x as ACCEPTED and then doing that. I personally don't think it is a big deal, but given that others disagree, ... why not. Dear Stefano and everybody, this is probably the occasion for me to remind that I posted such a message for DEP 5 last December, and that I have not read disagreements. http://lists.debian.org/debian-project/2011/12/msg00011.html While I wrote “in two weeks” at that time, it would have fell on the 24th, which in retrospect I felt was not appropriate. Now that I have almost resumed my routine activities, I am ready to keep my promise, probably next week. I do not intend to push a document on which persons disagree, so please, if you think that there are serious problems with the current wording DEP 5, or if you found an important bug in its syntax, report it to the BTS. More than one year ago, Lars announced on debian-devel-announce “DEP5: CANDIDATE and ready for use in squeeze+1”. Let's make sure it happens. Have a nice day, -- Charles Plessy Tsurumi, Kanagawa, Japan -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-devel-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/20120119005013.gb11...@merveille.plessy.net
Re: Releasing DEP 5 in two weeks in the absence of blocking bugs.
Charles Plessy ple...@debian.org writes: I do not intend to push a document on which persons disagree, so please, if you think that there are serious problems with the current wording DEP 5, or if you found an important bug in its syntax, report it to the BTS. I reported what I think are problems with the current wording just now to debian-policy, and yes, I believe that should block marking it as ACCEPTED. -- Russ Allbery (r...@debian.org) http://www.eyrie.org/~eagle/ -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-devel-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/87boq0v3ri@windlord.stanford.edu
