Re: Uploading packages built against testing? (was: openssl will block bacula into etch?)
On Mon, 29 May 2006 10:27:45 +0200, Frank Küster [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Would it be acceptable to build bacula (or any other package with that problem) in an etch environment, or on sid with manually installed libssl from etch, and upload that to unstable? No, that won't fix the problem for the packages built on buildds. Greetings Marc -- -- !! No courtesy copies, please !! - Marc Haber |Questions are the | Mailadresse im Header Mannheim, Germany | Beginning of Wisdom | http://www.zugschlus.de/ Nordisch by Nature | Lt. Worf, TNG Rightful Heir | Fon: *49 621 72739834
Re: Uploading packages built against testing? (was: openssl will block bacula into etch?)
On Mon, May 29, 2006 at 10:27:45AM +0200, Frank K?ster wrote: Would it be acceptable to build bacula (or any other package with that problem) in an etch environment, or on sid with manually installed libssl from etch, and upload that to unstable? After checking that it works in unstable, of course. That wouldn't help unless you uploaded for all architectures: the buildds would build against unstable (there are other problems with doing this too - see the list archives). -- You grabbed my hand and we fell into it, like a daydream - or a fever. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Uploading packages built against testing? (was: openssl will block bacula into etch?)
Am Montag, 29. Mai 2006 10:27 schrieb Frank Küster: Would it be acceptable to build bacula (or any other package with that problem) in an etch environment, or on sid with manually installed libssl from etch, and upload that to unstable? After checking that it works in unstable, of course. No, but you could manually set all stuff in Depends to the needed versions. That would also work for the buildds, I guess. HS PS: I bravely accept some flames for this suggestion... pgpBdAMTEqsyO.pgp Description: PGP signature
Re: Uploading packages built against testing? (was: openssl will block bacula into etch?)
On Mon, May 29, 2006 at 08:58:19PM +0200, Hendrik Sattler wrote: Am Montag, 29. Mai 2006 10:27 schrieb Frank Küster: Would it be acceptable to build bacula (or any other package with that problem) in an etch environment, or on sid with manually installed libssl from etch, and upload that to unstable? After checking that it works in unstable, of course. No, but you could manually set all stuff in Depends to the needed versions. That would also work for the buildds, I guess. No. If you're overriding the Depends generated by the build environment, your packages are fucked, either now or later. -- Steve Langasek Give me a lever long enough and a Free OS Debian Developer to set it on, and I can move the world. [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.debian.org/ signature.asc Description: Digital signature
Re: Uploading packages built against testing? (was: openssl will block bacula into etch?)
* Hendrik Sattler [Mon, 29 May 2006 20:58:19 +0200]: PS: I bravely accept some flames for this suggestion... Sure, here, have some: - http://lists.debian.org/debian-devel/2006/05/msg01393.html - http://lists.debian.org/debian-devel/2006/05/msg00752.html - http://lists.debian.org/debian-legal/2006/03/msg00098.html You have three days now to read the threads/flames whose initial messages are those mentioned above, and on Jun 2nd, you'll be required to take an exam to show your knowledge on the matters there discussed, for example: In which message (please give a Message-ID) does Penny Leach confess her real name to be Penelope? Have fun, -- Adeodato Simó dato at net.com.org.es Debian Developer adeodato at debian.org Listening to: Maximilian Hecker - Daze Of Nothing -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
