Re: packages up for adoption
Aníbal Monsalve Salazar [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: and one a month old, An upstream contributor promised to fix it and I'm waiting for a patch to test the fix. There is a workaround and the RC bug could be downgraded to important. No. Having a workaround in the bug log is not something that changes the severity of the bug. Please do not adopt more packages. Thanks. Marc -- BOFH #145: Flat tire on station wagon with tapes. (Never underestimate the bandwidth of a station wagon full of tapes hurling down the highway Andrew S. Tanenbaum) pgpVmhRqPCm8d.pgp Description: PGP signature
Re: packages up for adoption
On Tue, Aug 26, 2008 at 10:46:33PM +0100, James Troup wrote: Hi, The following packages are up for adoption: * p0f Hi, I'd like to take this one. Cheers, Pierre -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: packages up for adoption
Le Tue, Aug 26, 2008 at 06:15:01PM -0700, Steve Langasek a écrit : On Tue, Aug 26, 2008 at 10:46:33PM +0100, James Troup wrote: The following packages are up for adoption: * gawk * mawk * gawk-doc (non-free) I would be willing to take these three. Hi all, those packages seem to interest many persons. Wouldn't it make sense to have them team-maintained? Have a nice day, -- Charles Plessy Debian Med packaging team, Tsurumi, Kanagawa, Japan -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: packages up for adoption
Steve Langasek wrote: arthur loiret nmu uploaded latest upstream to experimental, so those are for him. Where by NMU you mean made an improper upload claiming to be the maintainer of a package that was not up for adoption? If he did not talk to James first, that is pretty bad and James deserves an apology. On the other hand, once the package is up for adoption, fixing 14 bugs seems like a relatively strong application for its maintenance even if it's only by housekeeping and new upstream versions. Kind regards T. -- Thomas Viehmann, http://thomas.viehmann.net/ -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: packages up for adoption
On Wed, Aug 27, 2008 at 05:32:27PM +0200, Thomas Viehmann wrote: Steve Langasek wrote: arthur loiret nmu uploaded latest upstream to experimental, so those are for him. Where by NMU you mean made an improper upload claiming to be the maintainer of a package that was not up for adoption? If he did not talk to James first, that is pretty bad and James deserves an apology. On the other hand, once the package is up for adoption, fixing 14 bugs seems like a relatively strong application for its maintenance even if it's only by housekeeping and new upstream versions. right i should have uploaded to delayed. arthur apologised to james afaij he is right now 3 days on vac, but will be back soonest and ready to take care of the gawk, gawk-doc, mawk packages. sunny greetings -- maks -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: packages up for adoption
James Troup [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: The following packages are up for adoption: Please note I said adoption, not orphaned. * gawk * mawk * gawk-doc (non-free) Steve Langasek is taking these 3. * quinn-diff Luk Claes is taking this. (Roger, I'm afraid I don't have a version control repository for quinn-diff. Honestly, I'd love to see the package be superseded by something new better. It's my first C project from almost 10 years ago, and it shows.) * gnupg-doc Don Armstrong is taking this. * p0f Pierre Chifflier is taking this. * gdbm Anibal Monsalve Salazar is taking this. Thanks to all of them. These 3 are still up for adoption: * gnus * gimp-dimage-color * xloadimage If no one wants gimp-dimage-color, I'll ask for it's removal. It's dead upstream and Konica Minolta don't even make cameras any more. -- James -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: packages up for adoption
On Wed, Aug 27, 2008 at 06:38:03PM +0100, James Troup wrote: These 3 are still up for adoption: * gnus * gimp-dimage-color * xloadimage Is there any reason to keep xloadimage around? From what I can tell, xli is a fork of it that saw some more development but both seem to be dead in the water. -- James GPG Key: 1024D/61326D40 2003-09-02 James Vega [EMAIL PROTECTED] signature.asc Description: Digital signature
Re: packages up for adoption
On Tue, Aug 26, 2008 at 10:46:33PM +0100, James Troup wrote: * gdbm * mawk I'll would like to take gdbm mawk signature.asc Description: Digital signature
Re: packages up for adoption
James Troup wrote: * quinn-diff I would like to take this one. Cheers Luk -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: packages up for adoption
On Tue, 26 Aug 2008, James Troup wrote: * gnupg-doc I'll take care of this one. Don Armstrong -- I leave the show floor, but not before a pack of caffeinated Jolt gum is thrust at me by a hyperactive girl screaming, Chew more! Do more! The American will to consume more and produce more personified in a stick of gum. I grab it. -- Chad Dickerson http://www.donarmstrong.com http://rzlab.ucr.edu -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: packages up for adoption
On Wed, Aug 27, 2008 at 08:30:48AM +1000, Aníbal Monsalve Salazar wrote: On Tue, Aug 26, 2008 at 10:46:33PM +0100, James Troup wrote: * gdbm * mawk I'll would like to take gdbm mawk You currently have two RC bugs open on two base packages that you maintain, one a year old and one a month old, plus two RC bugs on pacemaker. Aren't you already spread a little thin? -- Steve Langasek Give me a lever long enough and a Free OS Debian Developer to set it on, and I can move the world. Ubuntu Developerhttp://www.debian.org/ [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED] -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: packages up for adoption
On Tue, Aug 26, 2008 at 04:13:53PM -0700, Steve Langasek wrote: You currently have two RC bugs open on two base packages that you maintain, one a year old For that one, upstream didn't reply at all when asked about that issue and one a month old, An upstream contributor promised to fix it and I'm waiting for a patch to test the fix. plus two RC bugs on pacemaker. Those two are waiting until heartbeat is built without crm support. signature.asc Description: Digital signature
Re: packages up for adoption
On Wed, Aug 27, 2008 at 09:23:03AM +1000, Anibal Monsalve Salazar wrote: On Tue, Aug 26, 2008 at 04:13:53PM -0700, Steve Langasek wrote: You currently have two RC bugs open on two base packages that you maintain, one a year old For that one, upstream didn't reply at all when asked about that issue and one a month old, An upstream contributor promised to fix it and I'm waiting for a patch to test the fix. There is a workaround and the RC bug could be downgraded to important. plus two RC bugs on pacemaker. Those two are waiting until heartbeat is built without crm support. signature.asc Description: Digital signature
Re: packages up for adoption
hello, On Tue, Aug 26, 2008 at 10:46:33PM +0100, James Troup wrote: The following packages are up for adoption: * gawk * gawk-doc (non-free) arthur loiret nmu uploaded latest upstream to experimental, so those are for him. thanks -- maks -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: packages up for adoption
On Wed, Aug 27, 2008 at 12:41:20AM +0200, Luk Claes wrote: James Troup wrote: * quinn-diff I would like to take this one. Is this worth integrating with sbuild.git? Feel free to add it as part of the buildd-tools project on Alioth in either case, since it's needed by wanna-build. James, is there a CVS/SVN/GIT repo with the history? Regards, Roger -- .''`. Roger Leigh : :' : Debian GNU/Linux http://people.debian.org/~rleigh/ `. `' Printing on GNU/Linux? http://gutenprint.sourceforge.net/ `-GPG Public Key: 0x25BFB848 Please GPG sign your mail. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: packages up for adoption
On Tue, Aug 26, 2008 at 10:46:33PM +0100, James Troup wrote: The following packages are up for adoption: * gawk * mawk * gawk-doc (non-free) I would be willing to take these three. -- Steve Langasek Give me a lever long enough and a Free OS Debian Developer to set it on, and I can move the world. Ubuntu Developerhttp://www.debian.org/ [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED] -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: packages up for adoption
On Wed, Aug 27, 2008 at 01:42:12AM +0200, maximilian attems wrote: On Tue, Aug 26, 2008 at 10:46:33PM +0100, James Troup wrote: The following packages are up for adoption: * gawk * gawk-doc (non-free) arthur loiret nmu uploaded latest upstream to experimental, so those are for him. Where by NMU you mean made an improper upload claiming to be the maintainer of a package that was not up for adoption? -- Steve Langasek Give me a lever long enough and a Free OS Debian Developer to set it on, and I can move the world. Ubuntu Developerhttp://www.debian.org/ [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED] -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: packages up for adoption
David Watson wrote: I'll take rss2email if no one else wants to. Ok, you have it. Good luck! -- see shy jo signature.asc Description: Digital signature
Re: packages up for adoption
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Hi Serafeim. archivemail Anibal, funny as it may sound, would you mind letting archivemail to me? You can still have the rest :) (or else just ignore this email) Ok, go ahead. archivemail is written on Python. I'm expert on C/C++. I will take the rest. splitvt - I use it. unclutter - I use it. xaoom ? I think would be xzoom? Regards, - -- Anibal Avelar (FixXxeR) http://fixxxer.cc GPG: 83B64656 - C143 4AD8 B017 53FA B742 D6AA CEEA F9F3 83B6 4656 -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: GnuPG v1.4.6 (GNU/Linux) Comment: http://getfiregpg.org iD8DBQFIOZpszur584O2RlYRAgfkAJ9OHm0zS5Qe+mdM5nxmUYJRwol88gCaApfK vvsMOz1KQCabNjS+bgy8Owk= =CcyR -END PGP SIGNATURE- -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Re: packages up for adoption
Hi Michael, Michael Meskes wrote: Sorry guys, apparently this email of mine didn't make it to the list. Thus sending it again. Need to figure out what's going on as this happened twice. Am Mittwoch, 21. Mai 2008 20:53:51 schrieb Joey Hess: I'll no longer be maintaining the following packages. I plan to orphan them next week and hope to find new maintainers for them before then. ... acpi I take this one. Hmm, thinking about it, I wonder if we should bring all acpi related packages into a pkg-acpi group and maintain them together. I don't mind taking it either -- since I already maintain acpi-support, taking a related package seems like a pretty easy thing to do. Just let me know what you prefer (and please keep me in the CC since I'm not subscribed to the list ATM). Cheers, Bart -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: packages up for adoption
* Joey Hess ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote: I'll no longer be maintaining the following packages. I plan to orphan them next week and hope to find new maintainers for them before then. rss2email I'll take rss2email if no one else wants to. -- David Watson - Debian GNU/Linux Developer [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED] Web: http://planetwatson.co.uk/blog IM(Jabber): [EMAIL PROTECTED] signature.asc Description: Digital signature
Re: packages up for adoption
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Hi Joey. Im' very interested to adopt this packages: archivemail splitvt - I use it. unclutter - I use it. xaoom ? I think would be xzoom? Regards. - -- Anibal Avelar (FixXxeR) http://fixxxer.cc GPG: 83B64656 - C143 4AD8 B017 53FA B742 D6AA CEEA F9F3 83B6 4656 -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: GnuPG v1.4.6 (GNU/Linux) Comment: http://getfiregpg.org iD8DBQFINGLfzur584O2RlYRAr6UAJ0dw9JWHXPDApPsm+qXnn8U+TgHBwCfQSpy NA7YoqFubfGdZNlcpeKxtY0= =ql91 -END PGP SIGNATURE- -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: packages up for adoption
Joey Hess [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I'll no longer be maintaining the following packages. I plan to orphan them next week and hope to find new maintainers for them before then. aalib I'll adopt aalib. Regards, Bart Martens -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: packages up for adoption
Michael Meskes wrote: Am Mittwoch, 21. Mai 2008 20:53:51 schrieb Joey Hess: I'll no longer be maintaining the following packages. I plan to orphan them next week and hope to find new maintainers for them before then. ... acpi I take this one. Hmm, thinking about it, I wonder if we should bring all acpi related packages into a pkg-acpi group and maintain them together. Could be tricky since they also fit into groups like gnome, etc. Ok, you have acpi. My git repo is listed in the Vcs-Git field. It has a change (debhelper 7) that you may want to grab. -- see shy jo signature.asc Description: Digital signature
Re: packages up for adoption
Anibal Avelar wrote: Im' very interested to adopt this packages: archivemail splitvt - I use it. unclutter - I use it. xaoom ? I think would be xzoom? Yes, xzoom. Ok, please upload new versions with you as maintainer, and a few of these have unreleased changes for debhelper v7 in their git repositories (Vcs-Git fields). -- see shy jo signature.asc Description: Digital signature
Re: packages up for adoption
Bart Martens wrote: Joey Hess [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I'll no longer be maintaining the following packages. I plan to orphan them next week and hope to find new maintainers for them before then. aalib I'll adopt aalib. Both you and Anibal want this, so work something out. -- see shy jo signature.asc Description: Digital signature
Re: packages up for adoption
On Thu, 2008-05-22 at 13:36 -0400, Joey Hess wrote: Bart Martens wrote: Joey Hess [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I'll no longer be maintaining the following packages. I plan to orphan them next week and hope to find new maintainers for them before then. aalib I'll adopt aalib. Both you and Anibal want this, so work something out. Are you sure that Aníbal Monsalve Salazar is adopting aalib ? I don't read that on debian-devel... Maybe you agreed with Aníbal via private e-mail ? Regards, Bart Martens -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: packages up for adoption
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On Thu, May 22, 2008 at 12:59:55AM -0500, Anibal Avelar wrote: -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Hi Joey. Im' very interested to adopt this packages: archivemail Anibal, funny as it may sound, would you mind letting archivemail to me? You can still have the rest :) (or else just ignore this email) splitvt - I use it. unclutter - I use it. xaoom ? I think would be xzoom? Cheers, Serafeim -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: GnuPG v1.4.6 (GNU/Linux) iD8DBQFINdEt7cJFYjVTBOQRAngtAJsExPCPntBoNNP6ZJWaxjn/8nHLHACgsWxA KBFr6hzAMNk7qRcbVYvxo7g= =U3f2 -END PGP SIGNATURE- -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: packages up for adoption
* Lars Wirzenius [Thu, 22 May 2008 07:59:26 +0300]: Is acpi better than acpitool? My love will go to whichever uses /sys first. (#462305 and #463111) -- Adeodato Simó dato at net.com.org.es Debian Developer adeodato at debian.org «¡Pero si es tan español que debe de tener el cerebro en forma de botijo, con pitorro y todo!» -- Javier Cercas, “La velocidad de la luz” -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: packages up for adoption
Bart Martens wrote: On Thu, 2008-05-22 at 13:36 -0400, Joey Hess wrote: Bart Martens wrote: Joey Hess [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I'll no longer be maintaining the following packages. I plan to orphan them next week and hope to find new maintainers for them before then. aalib I'll adopt aalib. Both you and Anibal want this, so work something out. Are you sure that Aníbal Monsalve Salazar is adopting aalib ? I don't read that on debian-devel... Maybe you agreed with Aníbal via private e-mail ? Anibal mailed me privately earlier. -- see shy jo signature.asc Description: Digital signature
Re: packages up for adoption
Sorry guys, apparently this email of mine didn't make it to the list. Thus sending it again. Need to figure out what's going on as this happened twice. Am Mittwoch, 21. Mai 2008 20:53:51 schrieb Joey Hess: I'll no longer be maintaining the following packages. I plan to orphan them next week and hope to find new maintainers for them before then. ... acpi I take this one. Hmm, thinking about it, I wonder if we should bring all acpi related packages into a pkg-acpi group and maintain them together. Michael -- Michael Meskes Email: Michael at Fam-Meskes dot De, Michael at Meskes dot (De|Com|Net|Org) ICQ: 179140304, AIM/Yahoo: michaelmeskes, Jabber: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Go VfL Borussia! Go SF 49ers! Use Debian GNU/Linux! Use PostgreSQL! -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: packages up for adoption
to, 2008-05-22 kello 04:35 +0200, Michael Meskes kirjoitti: Am Mittwoch, 21. Mai 2008 20:53:51 schrieb Joey Hess: I'll no longer be maintaining the following packages. I plan to orphan them next week and hope to find new maintainers for them before then. ... acpi I take this one. Hmm, thinking about it, I wonder if we should bring all acpi related packages into a pkg-acpi group and maintain them together. Is acpi better than acpitool? -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Packages up for adoption
Hi Steve, On Tue, Oct 10, 2006 at 08:25:26PM +0100, Steve Kemp wrote: * flawfinder * pscan As I haven't gotten around to do too much audit work, I'll at least take care of a few audit tools: flawfinder and pscan. It seems rats already has a new maintainer... Cheers, Uwe. -- Uwe Hermann http://www.hermann-uwe.de http://www.it-services-uh.de | http://www.crazy-hacks.org http://www.holsham-traders.de | http://www.unmaintained-free-software.org signature.asc Description: Digital signature
Re: Packages up for adoption
On Sat, Oct 14, 2006 at 10:52:41PM +0200, Uwe Hermann wrote: Hi Steve, On Tue, Oct 10, 2006 at 08:25:26PM +0100, Steve Kemp wrote: * flawfinder * pscan As I haven't gotten around to do too much audit work, I'll at least take care of a few audit tools: flawfinder and pscan. It seems rats already has a new maintainer... Great - thanks a lot. Once I've gotten all the packages adopted I'll be able to dedicate at least one evening a week to doing auditing work. Steve -- signature.asc Description: Digital signature
Re: Packages up for adoption
* Steve Kemp ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) : I've recently orphaned all my packages whilst being on a bit of hiatus from project work. [...] Several packages are still unclaimed, although people have offered on some of them. Please take a look at the list if you're interested: [...] * libcgi-session-expiresessions-perl[O] As a member of the Debian Perl Group, I suggest that we adopt that one. If nobody disagrees, I'm going to adopt the package for the Perl Group. Cheers, -- Alexis Sukrieh [EMAIL PROTECTED] 0x1EE5DD34[EMAIL PROTECTED] The real glory of maintainership isn't making the big and important decisions. The real glory lies in all the small stuff that doesn't really matter, and that people will just argue forever. -- Linus Torvalds -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Packages up for adoption
On Tuesday 10 October 2006 21:25, Steve Kemp wrote: I've recently orphaned all my packages whilst being on a bit of hiatus from project work. * driftnet * dsniff I'll take driftnet. What would a network admin do without it? ;) I saw that Christian Kujau showed interest in dsniff (bug#390822). I'd be willing to be his sponsor if he wants to adopt the package. Christoph -- ~ ~ .signature [Modified] 1 line --100%--1,48 All -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Packages up for adoption: gnokii, coldsync
On 15:03 Sun 11 Dec 2005, George Wright wrote: * on Sun, Dec 11, 2005 at 12:21:28PM +1000, Bradley Marshall wrote: I'm not sure if this is the right process to follow, so please let me know if there's something else I should be doing. ditto for me - shall I fill in an ITA? I'm not a DD and am unsure as to how to proceed. Yes, please. -- David Moreno Garza [EMAIL PROTECTED] | http://www.damog.net/ [EMAIL PROTECTED] | GPG: C671257D Por mi raza, hablará el espíritu. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Packages up for adoption: gnokii, coldsync
* on Sun, Dec 11, 2005 at 12:21:28PM +1000, Bradley Marshall wrote: I'm not sure if this is the right process to follow, so please let me know if there's something else I should be doing. ditto for me - shall I fill in an ITA? I'm not a DD and am unsure as to how to proceed. There's not much there, but the interesting ones are probably gnokii I'll take this, use it a lot and am relatively OK with how upstream works Please copy me on any replies, I'm not on the list. Done. George Wright -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Packages up for adoption: ap-utils, igal, tcpflow
On Thu, May 15, 2003 at 09:39:54PM +0100, Robert McQueen wrote: Just a brief note to draw people's attention to the following RFAs I filed a few days ago: #193116 ap-utils -- Access Point SNMP Utils for Linux #193117 igal -- online image gallery generator #193118 tcpflow -- TCP flow recorder I'd take tcpflow if it's not already been claimed, it nicely comliments dsniff which I already have. Steve -- pgpym700RqGop.pgp Description: PGP signature
Re: Packages up for adoption: ap-utils, igal, tcpflow
On Thu, May 15, 2003 at 09:39:54PM +0100, Robert McQueen wrote: Just a brief note to draw people's attention to the following RFAs I filed a few days ago: #193116 ap-utils -- Access Point SNMP Utils for Linux #193117 igal -- online image gallery generator #193118 tcpflow -- TCP flow recorder Please see the bugs for more information about the status of each package, and please e-mail me if you are interested in adopting them (I am not on this list). I will like to adopt ap-utils, im using the 1.1 package but i have a few problem that is resolved in the current 1.3 version If you think I could to the job i will send the request to wnpp. Best regards -- Celso Gonzalez [EMAIL PROTECTED] pgpyszsCsfXNh.pgp Description: PGP signature
Re: Packages up for adoption: ap-utils, igal, tcpflow
On Fri, May 16, 2003 at 08:48:46AM +0100, Steve Kemp wrote: I'd take tcpflow if it's not already been claimed, it nicely comliments dsniff which I already have. Steve It's yours. Regards, Rob
Re: Packages up for adoption: ap-utils, igal, tcpflow
On Fri, May 16, 2003 at 12:51:40PM +0200, Celso González wrote: I will like to adopt ap-utils, i??m using the 1.1 package but i have a few problem that is resolved in the current 1.3 version If you think I could to the job i will send the request to wnpp. Best regards Fine by me. As far as I can tell you're not a DD or in the NM queue, so you will need to find a sponsor. I'd offer, put the purpose of putting these packages up for adoption is removing the need for me to spend any more time on them. :D Regards, Rob
