Re: rm -r * and the default prompt

1997-05-27 Thread Nicolás Lichtmaier
On Wed, 21 May 1997, Chris Fearnley wrote:

 '=?iso-8859-1?Q?Nicol=E1s_Lichtmaier?= wrote:'
 
  So I say: PS1=[\\u] \\h:\\w\\$    =D
 No, PS1='[EMAIL PROTECTED]:\w\$ ' !
 I guess this will become a flame war.  So I'd prefer to leave prompt
 alone.  Or maybe the boot disks can have a dialog script to help the
 user choose a prompt?

 Ok..! Let's use PS1='[EMAIL PROTECTED]:\w\$ '... It's much better than ' 
\\$'...

 It would be nice to have some a `Configure prompt' option somewhere. We
could have a list of prompts for the user to choose..!

-- 
Nicolás Lichtmaier.-


--
TO UNSUBSCRIBE FROM THIS MAILING LIST: e-mail the word unsubscribe to
[EMAIL PROTECTED] .
Trouble?  e-mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] .



Re: rm -r * and the default prompt

1997-05-27 Thread Nicolás Lichtmaier
On Thu, 22 May 1997, Chris Fearnley wrote:

 How about:
 PS1='\[\033[40;31m\]pwd: \[\033[40;33m\]\w \[\033[40;[EMAIL PROTECTED] '
 I'll repeat my conclusion:  leave it as PS1=\\$ 

 That's your `conclusion'? After _what_ thinking?

 and provide a
 customization app for sysadmins to edit /etc/profile and another for
 users to edit ~/.bash_profile (and other dotfiles too, of course) and
 keep the installation's paws away from customizations that EVERYBODY
 has a different opinion about.

 That's a very weak argument. In building an operating system we should
make some decisions. Your problem is that you think that we aren't capable
to decide a prompt? I say: Let's use any simple/reasonable/useful prompt,
I like mine, but I don't care... =)

-- 
Nicolás Lichtmaier.-


--
TO UNSUBSCRIBE FROM THIS MAILING LIST: e-mail the word unsubscribe to
[EMAIL PROTECTED] .
Trouble?  e-mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] .



Re: rm -r * and the default prompt

1997-05-27 Thread Santiago Vila Doncel
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-

On Mon, 26 May 1997, Nicolás Lichtmaier wrote:

  Ok..! Let's use PS1='[EMAIL PROTECTED]:\w\$ '... It's much better than ' 
 \\$'...

Yes!, please!, let's use PS1='[EMAIL PROTECTED]:\w\$ ' !

Or even better: PS1='[EMAIL PROTECTED]:\w\$ ' for root and PS1='\h:\w\$ ' for
normal users (/etc/profile). (After all, normal users do not change
uid so often that they forgot the current one :-)

-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: 2.6.3ia
Charset: latin1

iQCVAgUBM4s66yqK7IlOjMLFAQHCIgQAmtOLOEblGomrcP8WW704P1WbrMoCQiXT
VZom4goa2SOrh5x0/bXrXWtGKy81djhaLmKIB7N+AN6M6bTdptCSKZjxcATOAwW8
lxre03Ps/JcJiAipP5TTPXzPiLr7URiBWieR7TmHzICKEN02d779aAR5iGUisZ63
VZaSzz4XX5U=
=nt/G
-END PGP SIGNATURE-

Santiago Vila [EMAIL PROTECTED]


--
TO UNSUBSCRIBE FROM THIS MAILING LIST: e-mail the word unsubscribe to
[EMAIL PROTECTED] .
Trouble?  e-mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] .



Re: rm -r * and the default prompt

1997-05-23 Thread Chris Fearnley
'Raul Miller wrote:'

 '=?iso-8859-1?Q?Nicol=E1s_Lichtmaier?= wrote:'
  So I say: PS1=[\\u] \\h:\\w\\$    =D
On May 21, Chris Fearnley wrote
 No, PS1='[EMAIL PROTECTED]:\w\$ ' !
 
I'd prefer PS1='\$ '

However, if you want all that fanciness, a compromise is:
PS1='[EMAIL PROTECTED] \W\$ '

How about:
PS1='\[\033[40;31m\]pwd: \[\033[40;33m\]\w \[\033[40;[EMAIL PROTECTED] '

I'll repeat my conclusion:  leave it as PS1=\\$  and provide a
customization app for sysadmins to edit /etc/profile and another for
users to edit ~/.bash_profile (and other dotfiles too, of course) and
keep the installation's paws away from customizations that EVERYBODY
has a different opinion about.

-- 
Christopher J. Fearnley  |  Linux/Internet Consulting
[EMAIL PROTECTED]   |  Design Science Revolutionary
http://www.netaxs.com/~cjf   |  Explorer in Universe
ftp://ftp.netaxs.com/people/cjf  |  Dare to be Naive -- Bucky Fuller


--
TO UNSUBSCRIBE FROM THIS MAILING LIST: e-mail the word unsubscribe to
[EMAIL PROTECTED] . 
Trouble?  e-mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] .



Re: rm -r * and the default prompt

1997-05-22 Thread Karl M. Hegbloom

# Function for Midnight Commander - see its help screens
mc() {
MC=/tmp/mc$$-$RANDOM
/usr/bin/mc -c -x -P $@  $MC
cd `cat $MC`
rm $MC
unset MC;
}



status_after_prompt() { 
prompt_status=$?
if [ $prompt_status != 0 ]
then
echo [status $prompt_status]
fi
}
export PROMPT_COMMAND=status_after_prompt

if [ $TERM == emacs ]
then
  export PS1='\w\n\$ '
elif [ $TERM = xterm -o $TERM = xterm-color ]
then
  set_titlebar () { echo -n ]2;$*; }
  export -f set_titlebar

  my_dirname () { 
if [ ${PWD#$HOME} != $PWD ]
then
  echo '~'${PWD#$HOME}
else
  echo $PWD
fi
  }
  export -f my_dirname

  export PS1='\n\!\$ '

  PROMPT_COMMAND=$PROMPT_COMMAND';eval set_titlebar 
$(whoami)@$(hostname):$(my_dirname)'
  export PROMPT_COMMAND

else
  export PS1='[EMAIL PROTECTED]:\w\n\!\$ '
fi

# I don't think this is the right way to do this... is it?
if [ $TERM = xterm ]
then
  export TERM=xterm-color
  tset 2 /dev/null
fi

export PAGER='less'
news -p
echo 
fortune -a
echo 
check-sendfile


--
TO UNSUBSCRIBE FROM THIS MAILING LIST: e-mail the word unsubscribe to
[EMAIL PROTECTED] . 
Trouble?  e-mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] .



Re: rm -r * and the default prompt

1997-05-22 Thread Raul Miller
 '=?iso-8859-1?Q?Nicol=E1s_Lichtmaier?= wrote:'
  So I say: PS1=[\\u] \\h:\\w\\$    =D
On May 21, Chris Fearnley wrote
 No, PS1='[EMAIL PROTECTED]:\w\$ ' !
 
 I guess this will become a flame war.  So I'd prefer to leave prompt
 alone.  Or maybe the boot disks can have a dialog script to help the
 user choose a prompt?

I'd prefer PS1='\$ '

However, if you want all that fanciness, a compromise is:
PS1='[EMAIL PROTECTED] \W\$ '

This doesn't eat up your screen when you're way down in the directory
tree (you even still wind up using pwd occasionally).  Also, I think
the space makes the prompt look better than the :

But, please remember to consider users of ash, ksh and zsh.

-- 
Raul


--
TO UNSUBSCRIBE FROM THIS MAILING LIST: e-mail the word unsubscribe to
[EMAIL PROTECTED] . 
Trouble?  e-mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] .



Re: rm -r * and the default prompt

1997-05-21 Thread Karl M. Hegbloom
 John == John Goerzen [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:

John I don't think Debian is really aiming at newbies.  (RedHat
John is) Debian is aiming at the power user or admin type -- the
John people that already know Unix.

 But you have to consider the case of an ISP that wants to use Debian
GNU/Linux.  Most of the users have little experience with Linux or
Unix.  Of course to be an ISP, you have to know enough to at least set 
up a prompt in /etc/profile... ;-)

-- 
Karl M. Hegbloom [EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://www.inetarena.com/~karlheg
Portland, OR  USA
Debian GNU 1.2  Linux 2.1.36 AMD K5 PR-133


--
TO UNSUBSCRIBE FROM THIS MAILING LIST: e-mail the word unsubscribe to
[EMAIL PROTECTED] . 
Trouble?  e-mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] .



Re: rm -r * and the default prompt

1997-05-21 Thread Tom Lees
On Mon, 19 May 1997, Christoph Lameter wrote:

 Anybody should know that before typing rm -rf * or an equivolent,
 you THINK FIRST, every time.
 
 The problem does not arise when you type rm the first time but after you
 have some confidence and you think you know what you are doing.
 
 Everybody knows what you should think first. But who does after getting
 used to it?

Generally, after installing any system, I add this to ~/.profile for
root:-

alias rm=/bin/rm -i

This pretty much stops me from doing anything stupid - especially by a
typo, like mistyping rm /etc/*~ as rm /etc/*... I did that once :(.

-- 
Tom Lees [EMAIL PROTECTED]http://www.lpsg.demon.co.uk/
PGP ID 87D4D065, fingerprint 2A 66 86 9D 02 4D A6 1E  B8 A2 17 9D 4F 9B 89 D6
finger [EMAIL PROTECTED] for full public key (also available on keyservers)


--
TO UNSUBSCRIBE FROM THIS MAILING LIST: e-mail the word unsubscribe to
[EMAIL PROTECTED] . 
Trouble?  e-mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] .



Re: rm -r * and the default prompt

1997-05-21 Thread Christoph Lameter
I can put that into the chris-cust package ...

On Tue, 20 May 1997, Tom Lees wrote:

On Mon, 19 May 1997, Christoph Lameter wrote:

 Anybody should know that before typing rm -rf * or an equivolent,
 you THINK FIRST, every time.
 
 The problem does not arise when you type rm the first time but after you
 have some confidence and you think you know what you are doing.
 
 Everybody knows what you should think first. But who does after getting
 used to it?

Generally, after installing any system, I add this to ~/.profile for
root:-

alias rm=/bin/rm -i

This pretty much stops me from doing anything stupid - especially by a
typo, like mistyping rm /etc/*~ as rm /etc/*... I did that once :(.

-- 
Tom Lees [EMAIL PROTECTED]   http://www.lpsg.demon.co.uk/
PGP ID 87D4D065, fingerprint 2A 66 86 9D 02 4D A6 1E  B8 A2 17 9D 4F 9B 89 D6
finger [EMAIL PROTECTED] for full public key (also available on keyservers)




--- +++ --- +++ --- +++ --- +++ --- +++ --- +++ --- +++ ---


--
TO UNSUBSCRIBE FROM THIS MAILING LIST: e-mail the word unsubscribe to
[EMAIL PROTECTED] . 
Trouble?  e-mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] .



Re: rm -r * and the default prompt

1997-05-21 Thread Philip Hands
Generally, after installing any system, I add this to ~/.profile for
root:-

alias rm=/bin/rm -i

This is a BAD thing to do.  If you want this use a different name, like:

  alias del=/bin/rm -i

Otherwise it is all too easy to get into the habit of doing

  rm *

and picking the ones you want, which is fine until you log into a system that 
doesn't have the alias, or you su and lose the alias.

Cheers, Phil.



--
TO UNSUBSCRIBE FROM THIS MAILING LIST: e-mail the word unsubscribe to
[EMAIL PROTECTED] . 
Trouble?  e-mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] .



Re: rm -r * and the default prompt

1997-05-21 Thread Christoph Lameter
I dont care how the prompt looks. Just pick one and dont leave it the way
it is. Who is the maintainer of the package in question? Let him decide.

On Wed, 21 May 1997, Chris Fearnley wrote:

'=?iso-8859-1?Q?Nicol=E1s_Lichtmaier?= wrote:'

 So I say: PS1=[\\u] \\h:\\w\\$    =D

No, PS1='[EMAIL PROTECTED]:\w\$ ' !

I guess this will become a flame war.  So I'd prefer to leave prompt
alone.  Or maybe the boot disks can have a dialog script to help the
user choose a prompt?

-- 
Christopher J. Fearnley  |  Linux/Internet Consulting
[EMAIL PROTECTED]   |  Design Science Revolutionary
http://www.netaxs.com/~cjf   |  Explorer in Universe
ftp://ftp.netaxs.com/people/cjf  |  Dare to be Naive -- Bucky Fuller



--- +++ --- +++ --- +++ --- +++ --- +++ --- +++ --- +++ ---


--
TO UNSUBSCRIBE FROM THIS MAILING LIST: e-mail the word unsubscribe to
[EMAIL PROTECTED] . 
Trouble?  e-mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] .



Re: rm -r * and the default prompt

1997-05-20 Thread Brian Mays
This is why changing the default prompt for everyone is not a good
idea.  You guys can't even agree on what you want the new prompt to
be.  And if you want my personal preference, any prompt longer than
'$ ' is too long.  If I want to know what directory I'm in, I just
pwd.

Instead of arguing back and forth about this new prompt, please do
something constructive.  Build a Debian 4 dummies package, which
includes your favorite prompt along with all of the other nice
defaults that you wish to include.  Add a sentence in the package's
description that says If you are new to Debian or Linux, this package
comes HIGHLY RECOMMENDED.

Of course, there will be some technical details with the
implementation of this package that will need to be ironed out, such
as how to get PS='your favorite prompt' into /etc/profile, but I'm
sure that these will be minor.  If you want to get fancy, you can also
add to this package some useful scripts for configuring a Debian
system that no Unix real man would need or want.

I believe that the newbie-friendly defaults should be collected in one
place and not scattered across many Debian packages.  If they are in
one package (or a small number of packages), it will be easier for us
to define what the Debian newbie-friendly environment is and to plan
what we want it to become.  I especially believe that these defaults
should be optional.

Remember, the user should configure her system, not deconfigure it.
If she must spend time and effort to rid her system of somebody else's
nifty configuration, then IMO we're doing it wrong.

Brian


--
TO UNSUBSCRIBE FROM THIS MAILING LIST: e-mail the word unsubscribe to
[EMAIL PROTECTED] . 
Trouble?  e-mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] .



Re: rm -r * and the default prompt

1997-05-20 Thread John Goerzen
Nicolás Lichtmaier [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:

  Most people that adopt Linux come from DOS. Linux is expanding the UNIX
 users base. I come from DOS-OS/2 too. I used Slackware, and I changed
 because it was a mess. Current newbies that start with RH won't change to
 Debian, they don't need to. And those newbies learn, become `RH-gurus' and
 sit quietly at home waiting for a commercial corporation to handle their
 OS =).

  I also think that we should try to aim to the bigger amount of targets
 that we can...

  So I say: PS1=[\\u] \\h:\\w\\$    =D

I agree with most of what you are saying; however, I think you sorta
missed the point I was trying to make (which is probably my fault
because I didn't make it very clearly g)

My problem is not so much with changing root's default prompt on new
installations; I have changed the default on my machines anyway.  My
problem is with going in and changing accepted Unix standards solely
to be more friendly to beginners that aren't paying attention to
what they are doing.  IMHO, people that aren't paying attention before
typing a rm -rf * don't have any business running Unix in the first
place.

Anybody should know that before typing rm -rf * or an equivolent,
you THINK FIRST, every time.

--
John Goerzen  | Running Debian GNU/Linux (www.debian.org)
Custom Programming|
[EMAIL PROTECTED] |


--
TO UNSUBSCRIBE FROM THIS MAILING LIST: e-mail the word unsubscribe to
[EMAIL PROTECTED] .
Trouble?  e-mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] .



Re: rm -r * and the default prompt

1997-05-20 Thread John Goerzen
The difference is that RedHat's X configurator configures not only X,
but also mail, news, printers, networking, etc.  It's a configurator
that runs under X -- not really a configurator for XFree86.

If we are wanting to go that way; fine.  I have no problem with it.
As long as we don't go so far as RedHat and make the X configurator
the *only* configuration aide in the system.  I hate the choice of
either having to boot to X or find configs by hand.

Mark Eichin [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:

  If we want to be friendly to newbies, we can write an X configurator
  like RedHat; but I don't think that's what we want.
 
 I've heard rumors of this, but not seen it -- how does it differ from
 XF86Setup (not xf86config, which is probably what the debian
 old-timers think of, but the new tk-based config tool that comes with
 xfree86 3.2?)  And what's is license?  Any reason we can't bpackage it
 too, at least as an option?
   _Mark_ [EMAIL PROTECTED]
   The Herd of Kittens
   Debian X Maintainer
 

-- 
John Goerzen  | Running Debian GNU/Linux (www.debian.org)
Custom Programming| 
[EMAIL PROTECTED] | 


--
TO UNSUBSCRIBE FROM THIS MAILING LIST: e-mail the word unsubscribe to
[EMAIL PROTECTED] . 
Trouble?  e-mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] .



Re: rm -r * and the default prompt

1997-05-20 Thread Christoph Lameter
Anybody should know that before typing rm -rf * or an equivolent,
you THINK FIRST, every time.

The problem does not arise when you type rm the first time but after you
have some confidence and you think you know what you are doing.

Everybody knows what you should think first. But who does after getting
used to it?

--- +++ --- +++ --- +++ --- +++ --- +++ --- +++ --- +++ ---


--
TO UNSUBSCRIBE FROM THIS MAILING LIST: e-mail the word unsubscribe to
[EMAIL PROTECTED] . 
Trouble?  e-mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] .



Re: rm -r * and the default prompt

1997-05-20 Thread Mark Eichin
Oh, I see.  Nevermind then -- what you're saying is that the X
configurator is at the level of an X based dselect -- so that's the
problem of the diety team, right?  (Thus it's not something I need
to be particularly concerned with.)  Thanks...  _Mark_


--
TO UNSUBSCRIBE FROM THIS MAILING LIST: e-mail the word unsubscribe to
[EMAIL PROTECTED] . 
Trouble?  e-mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] .



Re: rm -r * and the default prompt

1997-05-20 Thread Philip Hands
 Anybody should know that before typing rm -rf * or an equivalent,
 you THINK FIRST, every time.

And AFTER you type it.

The prompt doesn't make the slightest difference when the death knell sounds:

  rm: .o: No such file or directory

and it dawns on you there was an extra space in the last thing you typed:

  rm -f * .o

Argh!

At least GNU rm won't do what a version of Xenix (running on a 80186 :) did to 
me once.  In response to an attempt to to get rid of my personal defaults:

 # cd /home/phil
 # rm -rf .*

It recursed upwards (..) and killed everything under /home

Unix, World of Adventure --- The trick is to keep your backups up to date.

Cheers, Phil.




--
TO UNSUBSCRIBE FROM THIS MAILING LIST: e-mail the word unsubscribe to
[EMAIL PROTECTED] . 
Trouble?  e-mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] .



Re: rm -r * and the default prompt

1997-05-20 Thread Nicolás Lichtmaier
On 19 May 1997, John Goerzen wrote:

 I agree with most of what you are saying; however, I think you sorta
 missed the point I was trying to make (which is probably my fault
 because I didn't make it very clearly g)

 =)

 My problem is not so much with changing root's default prompt on new
 installations; I have changed the default on my machines anyway.  My
 problem is with going in and changing accepted Unix standards solely
 to be more friendly to beginners that aren't paying attention to
 what they are doing.  IMHO, people that aren't paying attention before
 typing a rm -rf * don't have any business running Unix in the first
 place.
 Anybody should know that before typing rm -rf * or an equivolent,
 you THINK FIRST, every time.

 Of course..! I'm not saying that we should add a `Are you sure?' prompt..
=)

 However, we should be careful to choose _useful_ `accepted UNIX'
standards. eg: the prompt $  is the standard. /bin/ash is much more
standard than bash. 

-- 
Nicolás Lichtmaier.-


--
TO UNSUBSCRIBE FROM THIS MAILING LIST: e-mail the word unsubscribe to
[EMAIL PROTECTED] .
Trouble?  e-mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] .



Re: rm -r * and the default prompt

1997-05-20 Thread Andreas Jellinghaus
On May 19, Nicolás Lichtmaier wrote
 On Mon, 19 May 1997, Christoph Lameter wrote:
 
   So I say: PS1=[\\u] \\h:\\w\\$    =D
  Too long. But better than nothing.
 
  It isn't too long...!
 
 [nick] newton:~/src/deb/lftp-0.11.1$ 
 [nick] newton:~/src/deb/lftp-0.11.1$ 
 [nick] newton:~/src/deb/lftp-0.11.1$ ls
 
  Or the other version:
 
 [EMAIL PROTECTED]:~/src/deb/lftp-0.11.1$
 [EMAIL PROTECTED]:~/src/deb/lftp-0.11.1$
 [EMAIL PROTECTED]:~/src/deb/lftp-0.11.1$ _
 
  Note that the first is much more readable...!

but it can also be :
[EMAIL 
PROTECTED]:~/isdn/update/isdnutils-2.0.1/tools/isdnlog/contrib/xisdnload$ 
[EMAIL 
PROTECTED]:~/isdn/update/isdnutils-2.0.1/tools/isdnbutton/sample/sample2/etc/rc.d/init.d$

you see : its not a very good one...
(these prompts are not constructed ! they are reality, and everytiem i
have such a long prompt, i hate my prompt)

regards, andreas


--
TO UNSUBSCRIBE FROM THIS MAILING LIST: e-mail the word unsubscribe to
[EMAIL PROTECTED] . 
Trouble?  e-mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] .



Re: rm -r * and the default prompt

1997-05-20 Thread Nicolás Lichtmaier
On Mon, 19 May 1997, Brian Mays wrote:

 This is why changing the default prompt for everyone is not a good
 idea.  You guys can't even agree on what you want the new prompt to
 be.  And if you want my personal preference, any prompt longer than
 '$ ' is too long.  If I want to know what directory I'm in, I just
 pwd.
 
 Instead of arguing back and forth about this new prompt, please do
 something constructive.  Build a Debian 4 dummies package, which
 includes your favorite prompt along with all of the other nice
 defaults that you wish to include.  Add a sentence in the package's
 description that says If you are new to Debian or Linux, this package
 comes HIGHLY RECOMMENDED.
 
 Of course, there will be some technical details with the
 implementation of this package that will need to be ironed out, such
 as how to get PS='your favorite prompt' into /etc/profile, but I'm
 sure that these will be minor.  If you want to get fancy, you can also
 add to this package some useful scripts for configuring a Debian
 system that no Unix real man would need or want.
 
 I believe that the newbie-friendly defaults should be collected in one
 place and not scattered across many Debian packages.  If they are in
 one package (or a small number of packages), it will be easier for us
 to define what the Debian newbie-friendly environment is and to plan
 what we want it to become.  I especially believe that these defaults
 should be optional.
 
 Remember, the user should configure her system, not deconfigure it.
 If she must spend time and effort to rid her system of somebody else's
 nifty configuration, then IMO we're doing it wrong.
 

 I think that this is the kind of thinking that is killing Debian.

 1) Newbie setting doesn't mean annoying settings.
 2) `real men' like you can change those settings.
 3) Configuration packages is an awful idea that goes against the idea of
package. A better solution would be a system setting that packages would
check an install the apropiate default.
 4) We aren't building a distribution only for us.

 Let's stop being so narrow minded... We need a little of marketing... We
need to be known as an easy distribution for newbies...

-- 
Nicolás Lichtmaier.-


--
TO UNSUBSCRIBE FROM THIS MAILING LIST: e-mail the word unsubscribe to
[EMAIL PROTECTED] .
Trouble?  e-mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] .



Re: rm -r * and the default prompt

1997-05-20 Thread Manoj Srivastava
Hi,
[This may well be orthogonal, or in addition to, the solutions discussed]

Maybe we could offer some example of tips and tricks? My
 preffered prompt mechanism sets the xterm title to (like right now) 
 [EMAIL PROTECTED]:~/var/tmp
 with a short prompt of '__ ', or the above becomes my prompt on a
 non-xterm. 

I limit the size of the dir string to 25 characters (a
 perl script run by my cd alias that chops leading dir components
 untill there is just one left, or the length requirement is
 satisfied). 

Some people seem to like this sort of a thing, and this maybe
 hard for a neophyte to set up. I'm sure that this forum can come up
 with scads of such ``real men'' examples (sorry, sue and susan)

manoj
-- 
 The Avis WIZARD decides if you get to drive a car. Your head won't
 touch the pillow of a Sheraton unless their computer says it's okay.
 Arthur Miller
Manoj Srivastava   url:mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Mobile, Alabama USAurl:http://www.datasync.com/%7Esrivasta/


--
TO UNSUBSCRIBE FROM THIS MAILING LIST: e-mail the word unsubscribe to
[EMAIL PROTECTED] . 
Trouble?  e-mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] .



Re: rm -r * and the default prompt

1997-05-19 Thread John Goerzen
Nicolás Lichtmaier [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:

  Be prepared to receive lots of messages saying things like unix is for
 real men that can look manpages set their own prompts and we shouldn't
 make any decision about the system's look and feel, the sysadm should...
  The kind of decisions that keep newbie Linux users away from Debian...

I don't think Debian is really aiming at newbies.  (RedHat is)  Debian
is aiming at the power user or admin type -- the people that already
know Unix.  Debian is wonderful for people like that -- you get the
raw power of Unix with the most tedious tasks conveniently automated
via the package manager.  I don't think that we should go around
changing defaults like prompts just to be more friendly to newbies.
If we want to be friendly to newbies, we can write an X configurator
like RedHat; but I don't think that's what we want.

Just my two cents...

--
John Goerzen  | Running Debian GNU/Linux (www.debian.org)
Custom Programming|
[EMAIL PROTECTED] |


--
TO UNSUBSCRIBE FROM THIS MAILING LIST: e-mail the word unsubscribe to
[EMAIL PROTECTED] .
Trouble?  e-mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] .



Re: rm -r * and the default prompt

1997-05-19 Thread Mark Eichin
 If we want to be friendly to newbies, we can write an X configurator
 like RedHat; but I don't think that's what we want.

I've heard rumors of this, but not seen it -- how does it differ from
XF86Setup (not xf86config, which is probably what the debian
old-timers think of, but the new tk-based config tool that comes with
xfree86 3.2?)  And what's is license?  Any reason we can't bpackage it
too, at least as an option?
_Mark_ [EMAIL PROTECTED]
The Herd of Kittens
Debian X Maintainer


--
TO UNSUBSCRIBE FROM THIS MAILING LIST: e-mail the word unsubscribe to
[EMAIL PROTECTED] . 
Trouble?  e-mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] .



Re: rm -r * and the default prompt

1997-05-19 Thread Nicolás Lichtmaier
On 18 May 1997, John Goerzen wrote:

   Be prepared to receive lots of messages saying things like unix is for
  real men that can look manpages set their own prompts and we shouldn't
  make any decision about the system's look and feel, the sysadm should...
   The kind of decisions that keep newbie Linux users away from Debian...
 I don't think Debian is really aiming at newbies.  (RedHat is)  Debian
 is aiming at the power user or admin type -- the people that already
 know Unix.  Debian is wonderful for people like that -- you get the
 raw power of Unix with the most tedious tasks conveniently automated
 via the package manager.  I don't think that we should go around
 changing defaults like prompts just to be more friendly to newbies.
 If we want to be friendly to newbies, we can write an X configurator
 like RedHat; but I don't think that's what we want.

 I don't agree.

 Most people that adopt Linux come from DOS. Linux is expanding the UNIX
users base. I come from DOS-OS/2 too. I used Slackware, and I changed
because it was a mess. Current newbies that start with RH won't change to
Debian, they don't need to. And those newbies learn, become `RH-gurus' and
sit quietly at home waiting for a commercial corporation to handle their
OS =).

 I also think that we should try to aim to the bigger amount of targets
that we can...

 So I say: PS1=[\\u] \\h:\\w\\$    =D

-- 
Nicolás Lichtmaier.-


--
TO UNSUBSCRIBE FROM THIS MAILING LIST: e-mail the word unsubscribe to
[EMAIL PROTECTED] .
Trouble?  e-mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] .



Re: rm -r * and the default prompt

1997-05-19 Thread Christoph Lameter
 So I say: PS1=[\\u] \\h:\\w\\$    =D

Too long. But better than nothing.

--- +++ --- +++ --- +++ --- +++ --- +++ --- +++ --- +++ ---


--
TO UNSUBSCRIBE FROM THIS MAILING LIST: e-mail the word unsubscribe to
[EMAIL PROTECTED] . Trouble? 
e-mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] .



Re: rm -r * and the default prompt

1997-05-19 Thread Andreas Jellinghaus
On May 19, Christoph Lameter wrote
  So I say: PS1=[\\u] \\h:\\w\\$    =D
 
 Too long. But better than nothing.

PS=[EMAIL PROTECTED]:\\w\\$  ?
2 charaters shorter... :-)

regards, andreas


--
TO UNSUBSCRIBE FROM THIS MAILING LIST: e-mail the word unsubscribe to
[EMAIL PROTECTED] . 
Trouble?  e-mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] .



Re: rm -r * and the default prompt

1997-05-19 Thread Christoph Lameter
Too long when displayed. Not too long when specified.

Wit the hostname and the current directory I already run into more than 80
characters at times.

On Mon, 19 May 1997, Andreas Jellinghaus wrote:

On May 19, Christoph Lameter wrote
  So I say: PS1=[\\u] \\h:\\w\\$    =D
 
 Too long. But better than nothing.

PS=[EMAIL PROTECTED]:\\w\\$  ?
2 charaters shorter... :-)

regards, andreas




--- +++ --- +++ --- +++ --- +++ --- +++ --- +++ --- +++ ---


--
TO UNSUBSCRIBE FROM THIS MAILING LIST: e-mail the word unsubscribe to
[EMAIL PROTECTED] . 
Trouble?  e-mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] .