Re: Scsh (Was: Re: My orphaned packages.)
> "Daniel" == Daniel Kobras <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: Daniel> On 11 Sep 2000, Karl M. Hegbloom wrote: >> > "Daniel" == Daniel Kobras <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: >> Daniel> On 10 Sep 2000, Karl M. Hegbloom wrote: >> >> `scsh' ought to be taken over by someone who actually uses it. I've >> >> not even looked at it in over a year. >> Daniel> If nobody objects I'd like to do this together with Martin Daniel> Gasbichler who wrote a fair part of scsh 0.6. But me Daniel> having just applied for Debian maintainership this will Daniel> take some time... >> >> I also have an adoption offer from Georg Bauer (Cc'd), who I >> responded to on the attached message, telling him that if he contacts >> the new maintainer team and has a working `scsh' package, he can have >> it. >> >> Since you are teaming with Martin Gasbichler, and since Martin is a >> co-author of Scsh, I'd say that puts you two in as most qualified to >> handle the package. (Daniel? Please forward this mail to Martin.) >> >> Perhaps the three of you could team? What do you all think? Daniel> Sounds good to me. Martin is on vacation for a couple of days but I'm sure Daniel> we can work out a scheme everyone's confident with as soon as he's Daniel> back. The big problem IMHO however being that neither of us is registered Daniel> as a developer so far. I'd be happy to work on debs for a recent version Daniel> of scsh but we'd really need some maintainer to adopt the package until my Daniel> appliance gets through. Georg Bauer wrote back saying that he thinks you and Martin are more qualified, and thus should maintain the Scsh package. What stage of the new maintainer process are you in? Do you have working packages of Scsh done yet? Perhaps I can look them over and upload them for you. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Scsh (Was: Re: My orphaned packages.)
On Tue, 12 Sep 2000, Christian Kurz wrote: > You don't need a package maintainer to adopt the package for getting a > new package uploaded. A sponsor for you and Martin would be enough to > upload the package to the archive. Okay, sorry, wrong wording. That's what I had in mind. Someone to take the scsh package and put it up for us. In fact, it's the very procedure Joey Hess and I follow for noflushd. > Do you already are in the NM-Queue (nm.debian.org)? Yes. I had just applied when I saw Karl's mail about orphaned scsh. Thanks, Daniel. -- GNU/Linux Audio Mechanics - http://www.glame.de Cutting Edge Office - http://www.c10a02.de GPG Key ID 89BF7E2B - http://www.keyserver.net -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Scsh (Was: Re: My orphaned packages.)
On 00-09-12 Daniel Kobras wrote: > On 11 Sep 2000, Karl M. Hegbloom wrote: > > > "Daniel" == Daniel Kobras <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > > > Daniel> On 10 Sep 2000, Karl M. Hegbloom wrote: > > >> `scsh' ought to be taken over by someone who actually uses it. I've > > >> not even looked at it in over a year. > > > > Daniel> If nobody objects I'd like to do this together with Martin > > Daniel> Gasbichler who wrote a fair part of scsh 0.6. But me > > Daniel> having just applied for Debian maintainership this will > > Daniel> take some time... > > > > I also have an adoption offer from Georg Bauer (Cc'd), who I > > responded to on the attached message, telling him that if he contacts > > the new maintainer team and has a working `scsh' package, he can have > > it. > > > > Since you are teaming with Martin Gasbichler, and since Martin is a > > co-author of Scsh, I'd say that puts you two in as most qualified to > > handle the package. (Daniel? Please forward this mail to Martin.) > > > > Perhaps the three of you could team? What do you all think? > Sounds good to me. Martin is on vacation for a couple of days but I'm sure > we can work out a scheme everyone's confident with as soon as he's > back. The big problem IMHO however being that neither of us is registered > as a developer so far. I'd be happy to work on debs for a recent version > of scsh but we'd really need some maintainer to adopt the package until my > appliance gets through. You don't need a package maintainer to adopt the package for getting a new package uploaded. A sponsor for you and Martin would be enough to upload the package to the archive. Do you already are in the NM-Queue (nm.debian.org)? Ciao Christian -- Ein "Nein" ausgesprochen mit der tiefsten Überzeugung ist besser und größer als ein "Ja" um zu gefallen oder noch schlimmer, um Schwierigkeiten zu umgehen. -- Mahatma Gandhi -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Scsh (Was: Re: My orphaned packages.)
On 11 Sep 2000, Karl M. Hegbloom wrote: > > "Daniel" == Daniel Kobras <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > Daniel> On 10 Sep 2000, Karl M. Hegbloom wrote: > >> `scsh' ought to be taken over by someone who actually uses it. I've > >> not even looked at it in over a year. > > Daniel> If nobody objects I'd like to do this together with Martin > Daniel> Gasbichler who wrote a fair part of scsh 0.6. But me > Daniel> having just applied for Debian maintainership this will > Daniel> take some time... > > I also have an adoption offer from Georg Bauer (Cc'd), who I > responded to on the attached message, telling him that if he contacts > the new maintainer team and has a working `scsh' package, he can have > it. > > Since you are teaming with Martin Gasbichler, and since Martin is a > co-author of Scsh, I'd say that puts you two in as most qualified to > handle the package. (Daniel? Please forward this mail to Martin.) > > Perhaps the three of you could team? What do you all think? Sounds good to me. Martin is on vacation for a couple of days but I'm sure we can work out a scheme everyone's confident with as soon as he's back. The big problem IMHO however being that neither of us is registered as a developer so far. I'd be happy to work on debs for a recent version of scsh but we'd really need some maintainer to adopt the package until my appliance gets through. Regards, Daniel. -- GNU/Linux Audio Mechanics - http://www.glame.de Cutting Edge Office - http://www.c10a02.de GPG Key ID 89BF7E2B - http://www.keyserver.net -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Scsh (Was: Re: My orphaned packages.)
Hi! On Mon, Sep 11, 2000 at 01:42:14PM -0700, Karl M. Hegbloom wrote: > Since you are teaming with Martin Gasbichler, and since Martin is a > co-author of Scsh, I'd say that puts you two in as most qualified to > handle the package. (Daniel? Please forward this mail to Martin.) Yup, they are much more qualified than me, I think. > Perhaps the three of you could team? What do you all think? Since they are already two people, I won't think another one is really needed. I am just as happy if somebody else maintains it. As long as bugs get fixed, it's fine with me. bye, Georg -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Scsh (Was: Re: My orphaned packages.)
> "Daniel" == Daniel Kobras <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: Daniel> On 10 Sep 2000, Karl M. Hegbloom wrote: >> `scsh' ought to be taken over by someone who actually uses it. I've >> not even looked at it in over a year. Daniel> If nobody objects I'd like to do this together with Martin Daniel> Gasbichler who wrote a fair part of scsh 0.6. But me Daniel> having just applied for Debian maintainership this will Daniel> take some time... I also have an adoption offer from Georg Bauer (Cc'd), who I responded to on the attached message, telling him that if he contacts the new maintainer team and has a working `scsh' package, he can have it. Since you are teaming with Martin Gasbichler, and since Martin is a co-author of Scsh, I'd say that puts you two in as most qualified to handle the package. (Daniel? Please forward this mail to Martin.) Perhaps the three of you could team? What do you all think? 8<--->8 From: Georg Bauer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Subject: Bug#71265: Documentation for scsh not in /usr/share/doc To: "Karl M. Hegbloom" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, gb <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Date: Sun, 10 Sep 2000 22:26:42 +0200 Hi! On 10 Sep 2000 11:26:13 -0700 [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Karl M. Hegbloom) wrote: > Ok. I sure wish someone would take over `scsh'. I've not got time > for it anymore. I am not a debian developer currently, but I would step up if some maintainer is needed. scsh is quite cool and I once created my own package for it (yours wasn't available at that time). I am not that new on debian packages, as I have my own repository for (mostly hack) packages for my own use (http://www.gws-online.de/download/), so I think I could handle it. I didn't keep up with debian developments in the political area, so I am not quite sure about what would be needed to be done be me to step up, but your best way out might be to help me in ;-) -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]