Seeking for advice on packaging reunified upstream source

2008-04-01 Thread Francisco Moya
Dear all,

I'm the current maintainer of ZeroC Ice packages.  Ice is a GPL'd
CORBA-like middleware for distributed heterogeneous computing.

Recently the upstream developers reunified all of the source packages
into a single big tarball.  Some of the packages (the Java5 packages)
work well under icedtea and Sun JRE 6 but they don't work at all under
any other Java 6 JVM distributed in Debian. Therefore they should go
to contrib.  But now there is just one source package.  AFAIK IcedTea
is entering main debian soon.

Should I split the source package into a main and contrib part?
Should I release binaries for the DFSG-free part and provide a simple
way to recompile the package with the full functionality?
Should I provide binaries in main for the Java packages generated with
gcj (they would run fine with IcedTea)?
Is it fine to upload a binary to contrib while the source package is in main?

Best regards,
Paco

-- 
Paco Moya [EMAIL PROTECTED]


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Re: Seeking for advice on packaging reunified upstream source

2008-04-01 Thread Bastian Blank
On Tue, Apr 01, 2008 at 12:06:49PM +0200, Francisco Moya wrote:
 Should I provide binaries in main for the Java packages generated with
 gcj (they would run fine with IcedTea)?

I don't see a reason to not do that.

 Is it fine to upload a binary to contrib while the source package is in main?

Technicaly this is possible, but AFAIK the ftp team don't longer want
this to be used.

Bastian

-- 
A woman should have compassion.
-- Kirk, Catspaw, stardate 3018.2


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Re: Seeking for advice on packaging reunified upstream source

2008-04-01 Thread Matthew Johnson
On Tue Apr 01 14:26, Bastian Blank wrote:
 On Tue, Apr 01, 2008 at 12:06:49PM +0200, Francisco Moya wrote:
  Should I provide binaries in main for the Java packages generated with
  gcj (they would run fine with IcedTea)?
 
 I don't see a reason to not do that.

I believe this is still required to be in contrib (certainly I have
packages meeting that description), the binaries depend on something
outside of main to run...

Matt
-- 
Matthew Johnson


signature.asc
Description: Digital signature