Re: apt 0.6 downloads from second archive?
Received Mon 25 Jul 2005 8:02pm +1000 from Goswin von Brederlow: Graham Williams [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: Received Fri 22 Jul 2005 11:58pm +1000 from Goswin von Brederlow: Graham Williams [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: Received Fri 22 Jul 2005 9:27am +1000 from Matthew Palmer: On Thu, Jul 21, 2005 at 07:12:29AM +1000, Graham Williams wrote: Since installing apt 0.6 on an otherwise up-to-date unstable (except for anything depending on the aspell libraries...) packages on my local archive are being overlooked even though this archive is listed before others in my apt/sources.list. Downgrading to apt 0.5 and things work again as expected (i.e., most is downloaded from localhost). ... It is all http! deb http://localhost/pub/debian unstable main contrib non-free deb ftp://ftp.nerim.net/debian-marillat/ unstable main deb ftp://ftp.iinet.net.au/debian/debian/ unstable main contrib non-free deb ftp://mirror.aarnet.edu.au/pub/debian unstable main contrib deb http://ftp.debian.org/debian unstable main contrib non-free Regards, Graham What does apt-cache policy something say? As per my original email $ apt-cache policy most most: Installed: (none) Candidate: 4.9.5-1 Version table: 4.9.5-1 0 500 http://localhost unstable/main Packages 500 ftp://ftp.iinet.net.au unstable/main Packages 500 ftp://mirror.aarnet.edu.au unstable/main Packages 500 http://ftp.debian.org unstable/main Packages But $ sudo apt-get install most Reading package lists... Done Building dependency tree... Done The following NEW packages will be installed: most 0 upgraded, 1 newly installed, 0 to remove and 184 not upgraded. Need to get 42.2kB of archives. After unpacking 147kB of additional disk space will be used. Get:1 ftp://ftp.iinet.net.au unstable/main most 4.9.5-1 [42.2kB] Fetched 42.2kB in 9s (4502B/s) -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: apt 0.6 downloads from second archive?
Graham Williams [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: Received Fri 22 Jul 2005 11:58pm +1000 from Goswin von Brederlow: Graham Williams [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: Received Fri 22 Jul 2005 9:27am +1000 from Matthew Palmer: On Thu, Jul 21, 2005 at 07:12:29AM +1000, Graham Williams wrote: Since installing apt 0.6 on an otherwise up-to-date unstable (except for anything depending on the aspell libraries...) packages on my local archive are being overlooked even though this archive is listed before others in my apt/sources.list. Downgrading to apt 0.5 and things work again as expected (i.e., most is downloaded from localhost). ... It is all http! deb http://localhost/pub/debian unstable main contrib non-free deb ftp://ftp.nerim.net/debian-marillat/ unstable main deb ftp://ftp.iinet.net.au/debian/debian/ unstable main contrib non-free deb ftp://mirror.aarnet.edu.au/pub/debian unstable main contrib deb http://ftp.debian.org/debian unstable main contrib non-free Regards, Graham What does apt-cache policy something say? MfG Goswin -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: apt 0.6 downloads from second archive?
Received Fri 22 Jul 2005 11:58pm +1000 from Goswin von Brederlow: Graham Williams [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: Received Fri 22 Jul 2005 9:27am +1000 from Matthew Palmer: On Thu, Jul 21, 2005 at 07:12:29AM +1000, Graham Williams wrote: Since installing apt 0.6 on an otherwise up-to-date unstable (except for anything depending on the aspell libraries...) packages on my local archive are being overlooked even though this archive is listed before others in my apt/sources.list. Downgrading to apt 0.5 and things work again as expected (i.e., most is downloaded from localhost). Huge (uninformed) guess, but apt may be preferring packages from repositories it can verify the contents of. Besides, if the versions are the same, then the contents should be the the same too, and (modulo bandwidth charges) which one you get from shouldn't matter. BTW, the new (twisted-based) apt-proxy rocks hard, if it's your traffic allowances you're worried about (and who wouldn't be in Australia, given what we get charged). - Matt Thanks for the guess Matt. I've added a Releases.gpg and it did not make any difference. Traffic's not the issue - I download all new upgrades early each morning automatically and they go into this local archive so that when I get up, a distupgrade used to flash by - not now since it has to grab them all again :-( I'll have a look at apt-proxy. Thanks, Graham What does your sources.list look like? It seems like file:// and copy:// urls behave differently with the new secure apt. E.g. they don't get md5sum checked. Try looping them through ftp or http. MfG Goswin It is all http! deb http://localhost/pub/debian unstable main contrib non-free deb ftp://ftp.nerim.net/debian-marillat/ unstable main deb ftp://ftp.iinet.net.au/debian/debian/ unstable main contrib non-free deb ftp://mirror.aarnet.edu.au/pub/debian unstable main contrib deb http://ftp.debian.org/debian unstable main contrib non-free Regards, Graham -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: apt 0.6 downloads from second archive?
Received Fri 22 Jul 2005 9:27am +1000 from Matthew Palmer: On Thu, Jul 21, 2005 at 07:12:29AM +1000, Graham Williams wrote: Since installing apt 0.6 on an otherwise up-to-date unstable (except for anything depending on the aspell libraries...) packages on my local archive are being overlooked even though this archive is listed before others in my apt/sources.list. Downgrading to apt 0.5 and things work again as expected (i.e., most is downloaded from localhost). Huge (uninformed) guess, but apt may be preferring packages from repositories it can verify the contents of. Besides, if the versions are the same, then the contents should be the the same too, and (modulo bandwidth charges) which one you get from shouldn't matter. BTW, the new (twisted-based) apt-proxy rocks hard, if it's your traffic allowances you're worried about (and who wouldn't be in Australia, given what we get charged). - Matt Thanks for the guess Matt. I've added a Releases.gpg and it did not make any difference. Traffic's not the issue - I download all new upgrades early each morning automatically and they go into this local archive so that when I get up, a distupgrade used to flash by - not now since it has to grab them all again :-( I'll have a look at apt-proxy. Thanks, Graham -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: apt 0.6 downloads from second archive?
Graham Williams [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: Received Fri 22 Jul 2005 9:27am +1000 from Matthew Palmer: On Thu, Jul 21, 2005 at 07:12:29AM +1000, Graham Williams wrote: Since installing apt 0.6 on an otherwise up-to-date unstable (except for anything depending on the aspell libraries...) packages on my local archive are being overlooked even though this archive is listed before others in my apt/sources.list. Downgrading to apt 0.5 and things work again as expected (i.e., most is downloaded from localhost). Huge (uninformed) guess, but apt may be preferring packages from repositories it can verify the contents of. Besides, if the versions are the same, then the contents should be the the same too, and (modulo bandwidth charges) which one you get from shouldn't matter. BTW, the new (twisted-based) apt-proxy rocks hard, if it's your traffic allowances you're worried about (and who wouldn't be in Australia, given what we get charged). - Matt Thanks for the guess Matt. I've added a Releases.gpg and it did not make any difference. Traffic's not the issue - I download all new upgrades early each morning automatically and they go into this local archive so that when I get up, a distupgrade used to flash by - not now since it has to grab them all again :-( I'll have a look at apt-proxy. Thanks, Graham What does your sources.list look like? It seems like file:// and copy:// urls behave differently with the new secure apt. E.g. they don't get md5sum checked. Try looping them through ftp or http. MfG Goswin -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: apt 0.6 downloads from second archive?
On Thu, Jul 21, 2005 at 07:12:29AM +1000, Graham Williams wrote: Since installing apt 0.6 on an otherwise up-to-date unstable (except for anything depending on the aspell libraries...) packages on my local archive are being overlooked even though this archive is listed before others in my apt/sources.list. Downgrading to apt 0.5 and things work again as expected (i.e., most is downloaded from localhost). Huge (uninformed) guess, but apt may be preferring packages from repositories it can verify the contents of. Besides, if the versions are the same, then the contents should be the the same too, and (modulo bandwidth charges) which one you get from shouldn't matter. BTW, the new (twisted-based) apt-proxy rocks hard, if it's your traffic allowances you're worried about (and who wouldn't be in Australia, given what we get charged). - Matt -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
apt 0.6 downloads from second archive?
Since installing apt 0.6 on an otherwise up-to-date unstable (except for anything depending on the aspell libraries...) packages on my local archive are being overlooked even though this archive is listed before others in my apt/sources.list. Downgrading to apt 0.5 and things work again as expected (i.e., most is downloaded from localhost). $ apt-cache policy most most: Installed: (none) Candidate: 4.9.5-1 Version table: 4.9.5-1 0 500 http://localhost unstable/main Packages 500 ftp://ftp.iinet.net.au unstable/main Packages 500 ftp://mirror.aarnet.edu.au unstable/main Packages 500 http://ftp.debian.org unstable/main Packages $ sudo apt-get install most Reading package lists... Done Building dependency tree... Done The following NEW packages will be installed: most 0 upgraded, 1 newly installed, 0 to remove and 184 not upgraded. Need to get 42.2kB of archives. After unpacking 147kB of additional disk space will be used. Get:1 ftp://ftp.iinet.net.au unstable/main most 4.9.5-1 [42.2kB] Fetched 42.2kB in 9s (4502B/s) Some configuration must have changed, or the localhost needs to support the new gpg? Any ideas? Thanks, Graham -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
