Re: buildd.debian.org (was Re: buildd administration
Goswin von Brederlow wrote: >> Well, after looking at http://buildd.debian.org/~jeroen/status/ , >> I concur that it's as good a general interface to buildd status as >> buildd.net, >> and much better than the http://buildd.debian.org/ interface. > >Where did you find that url? In a random mailing list message to debian-devel in one of these threads. Not a great way to find information. :-P -- Nathanael Nerode <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> A thousand reasons. http://www.thousandreasons.org/ Lies, theft, war, kidnapping, torture, rape, murder... Get me out of this fascist nightmare! -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: buildd.debian.org (was Re: buildd administration
On Fri, Dec 16, 2005 at 04:02:01PM +0100, Goswin von Brederlow wrote: > > (The contact addresses and machine up/down statuses are a valuable part of > > buildd.net which *isn't* there, but that's another matter entirely, which > > requires different and additional work.) > The graphs are also not there. Looking at the graphs gives a very good > overview of the current trends. E.g. if some buildds break down the > needs-build will steadily rise on a single arch only while some > transition will make it rise on all archs. If some chroot is broken > the building will spike. and so on... > Judging the trends from the package list is much harder. Hmmm, I think I should do a presentation or so how to use buildd.net, what's all about, how you can find infos and how to interpret what you see -- Ciao...//Fon: 0381-2744150 Ingo \X/ SIP: [EMAIL PROTECTED] gpg pubkey: http://www.juergensmann.de/ij/public_key.asc -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: buildd.debian.org (was Re: buildd administration
Nathanael Nerode <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > So for various reasons the buildd.net status code is not considered ready > to be integrated on buildd.debian.org, either by its author or by its > maintainer or by Ryan Murray. Fine, I understand. > > Well, after looking at http://buildd.debian.org/~jeroen/status/ , > I concur that it's as good a general interface to buildd status as > buildd.net, > and much better than the http://buildd.debian.org/ interface. Where did you find that url? > (The contact addresses and machine up/down statuses are a valuable part of > buildd.net which *isn't* there, but that's another matter entirely, which > requires different and additional work.) The graphs are also not there. Looking at the graphs gives a very good overview of the current trends. E.g. if some buildds break down the needs-build will steadily rise on a single arch only while some transition will make it rise on all archs. If some chroot is broken the building will spike. and so on... Judging the trends from the package list is much harder. MfG Goswin -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: buildd.debian.org (was Re: buildd administration
On Wed, Dec 14, 2005 at 05:23:48AM +, Nathanael Nerode wrote: > (The contact addresses and machine up/down statuses are a valuable part of > buildd.net which *isn't* there, but that's another matter entirely, which > requires different and additional work.) > > However, even though this is on the same machine, this isn't linked from the > main http://buildd.debian.org webpage, or from the Developer's Corner. > Meanwhile, the andrea link on http://buildd.debian.org is completely dead. > (http://buildd.debian.org/andrea/) > > I politely request that a prominent link to > http://buildd.debian.org/~jeroen/status/ be placed on > http://buildd.debian.org/, and that the andrea link be either fixed or > removed. This should take less than five minutes for someone with access to > the web pages. > Changes in DD's corner contents should be discussed on d-www, eventually. It already links official and unofficial urls and it seems reasonable for listing those kinds of things. -- Francesco P. Lovergine -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
buildd.debian.org (was Re: buildd administration
So for various reasons the buildd.net status code is not considered ready to be integrated on buildd.debian.org, either by its author or by its maintainer or by Ryan Murray. Fine, I understand. Well, after looking at http://buildd.debian.org/~jeroen/status/ , I concur that it's as good a general interface to buildd status as buildd.net, and much better than the http://buildd.debian.org/ interface. (The contact addresses and machine up/down statuses are a valuable part of buildd.net which *isn't* there, but that's another matter entirely, which requires different and additional work.) However, even though this is on the same machine, this isn't linked from the main http://buildd.debian.org webpage, or from the Developer's Corner. Meanwhile, the andrea link on http://buildd.debian.org is completely dead. (http://buildd.debian.org/andrea/) I politely request that a prominent link to http://buildd.debian.org/~jeroen/status/ be placed on http://buildd.debian.org/, and that the andrea link be either fixed or removed. This should take less than five minutes for someone with access to the web pages. Sending to rmurray as the listed maintainer of the webpages. Cc:ing debian-devel on the theory that publicizing such a request will prevent duplicate requests. -- Nathanael Nerode neroden fastmail.fm -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
