Re: dpkg-buildpackage -rfakeroot error

2002-08-11 Thread Adam Warner
Hi Bart Schuller,

 sh: debian/rules: /usr/bin/make: bad interpreter: Permission denied
 
 chmod +x debian/rules

Of course! Thanks Bart and Daniel.

The resulting diff of debian/rules to compile in POSIX regular expression
support for CLISP is below.

28a29
 --with-module=regexp \

Regards,
Adam





Re: dpkg-buildpackage -rfakeroot error

2002-08-11 Thread Matt Zimmerman
On Sun, Aug 11, 2002 at 11:54:34PM +1200, Adam Warner wrote:

 Could someone please help me interpret this clisp 2.28 build error:
 
 $dpkg-buildpackage -rfakeroot
 dpkg-buildpackage: source package is clisp
 dpkg-buildpackage: source version is 1:2.28-1
 dpkg-buildpackage: source maintainer is Will Newton [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 dpkg-buildpackage: host architecture is i386
  fakeroot debian/rules clean
 sh: debian/rules: /usr/bin/make: bad interpreter: Permission denied

chmod +x debian/rules

-- 
 - mdz




Re: dpkg-buildpackage -rfakeroot error

2002-08-11 Thread Matt Zimmerman
On Sun, Aug 11, 2002 at 02:12:25PM +0200, Daniel Kobras wrote:

 On Sun, Aug 11, 2002 at 02:05:23PM +0200, Bart Schuller wrote:
  
  chmod +x debian/rules
 
 Rather 'chmod +x /usr/bin/make' according to the error message.  Weird.

It is a confusing (confused) error message.  The permission problem is with
the script, not the interpreter.

-- 
 - mdz




Re: dpkg-buildpackage -rfakeroot error

2002-08-11 Thread Daniel Kobras
On Sun, Aug 11, 2002 at 01:29:19PM -0400, Matt Zimmerman wrote:
 On Sun, Aug 11, 2002 at 02:12:25PM +0200, Daniel Kobras wrote:
  Rather 'chmod +x /usr/bin/make' according to the error message.  Weird.
 
 It is a confusing (confused) error message.  The permission problem is with
 the script, not the interpreter.

Huh?

% chmod a-x debian/rules
% dpkg-buildpackage -rfakeroot -us -uc
dpkg-buildpackage: source package is noflushd
dpkg-buildpackage: source version is 2.6.3-1
dpkg-buildpackage: source maintainer is Daniel Kobras [EMAIL PROTECTED]
dpkg-buildpackage: host architecture is i386
 fakeroot debian/rules clean
sh: line 1: debian/rules: Permission denied
% chmod a+x debian/rules
% sudo chmod a-x /usr/bin/make
% dpkg-buildpackage -rfakeroot -us -uc
dpkg-buildpackage: source package is noflushd
dpkg-buildpackage: source version is 2.6.3-1
dpkg-buildpackage: source maintainer is Daniel Kobras [EMAIL PROTECTED]
dpkg-buildpackage: host architecture is i386
 fakeroot debian/rules clean
sh: debian/rules: /usr/bin/make: bad interpreter: Permission denied

The last line exactly matches the original error messages.  Clearly not
a problem with debian/rules, but with make.

Regards,

Daniel.




Re: dpkg-buildpackage -rfakeroot error

2002-08-11 Thread Paul Cupis
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1

On Sunday 11 August 2002 18:52, Daniel Kobras wrote:

 % chmod a-x debian/rules

*Ahem*

chmod a+x debian/rules


Paul Cupis
- -- 
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: GnuPG v1.0.7 (GNU/Linux)

iD8DBQE9VrUQIzuKV+SHX/kRAuugAJ9rpyEwDp7eQ+Bb+H1jvTnVG9lROgCdFGEH
WcMPVZ7+WRp3rLcdU3ZxNHs=
=E1tp
-END PGP SIGNATURE-




Re: dpkg-buildpackage -rfakeroot error

2002-08-11 Thread Jonas Meurer
On 11/08/2002 Daniel Kobras wrote:
 % chmod a+x debian/rules
 % sudo chmod a-x /usr/bin/make

First line right, second is moronic. /usr/bin/make is a binary, it must
be executable.

bye
 mejo




Re: dpkg-buildpackage -rfakeroot error

2002-08-11 Thread Paul Cupis
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1

On Sunday 11 August 2002 20:03, Paul Cupis wrote:
 On Sunday 11 August 2002 18:52, Daniel Kobras wrote:
  % chmod a-x debian/rules

 *Ahem*

 chmod a+x debian/rules

Never mind.

/me smacks himself

Paul Cupis
- -- 
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: GnuPG v1.0.7 (GNU/Linux)

iD8DBQE9VrhmIzuKV+SHX/kRAiXpAKCE+4eh8FHqb8BeSz/l1esRhxdIkwCfRQYX
qrYGt1qB9+Jt7muqEtWGYNY=
=VArT
-END PGP SIGNATURE-




Re: dpkg-buildpackage -rfakeroot error

2002-08-11 Thread Matt Zimmerman
On Sun, Aug 11, 2002 at 07:52:04PM +0200, Daniel Kobras wrote:

 On Sun, Aug 11, 2002 at 01:29:19PM -0400, Matt Zimmerman wrote:
  On Sun, Aug 11, 2002 at 02:12:25PM +0200, Daniel Kobras wrote:
   Rather 'chmod +x /usr/bin/make' according to the error message.  Weird.
  
  It is a confusing (confused) error message.  The permission problem is with
  the script, not the interpreter.
 
 Huh?
 
 [snip proof by example]
 
 The last line exactly matches the original error messages.  Clearly not
 a problem with debian/rules, but with make.

Oh yes, clearly.

mizar:[/tmp/test] cat  test
#!/usr/bin/doesnt-even-exist
mizar:[/tmp/test] ls -l
total 4
-rw-r--r--1 mdz  mdz29 2002-08-11 16:08 test
mizar:[/tmp/test] sh -c ./test
sh: line 1: ./test: Permission denied
mizar:[/tmp/test] chmod 611 test
mizar:[/tmp/test] ls -l test
-rw---x--x1 mdz  mdz29 2002-08-11 16:08 test
mizar:[/tmp/test] sh -c ./test  
sh: ./test: /usr/bin/doesnt-even-exist: bad interpreter: Permission denied

-- 
 - mdz