Re: enabling wheezy-backports by default (Re: Backports integrated into the main archive
On Tue, 26 Mar 2013 19:02:25 +0100 Mike Gabriel wrote: > >> Or is there any harm? > > > > stable stops being stable? > > Only happens if you install with -t wheezy-backports, doesn't it? Yes, I think so and wrote as above. -- Regards, Hideki Yamane henrich @ debian.or.jp/org http://wiki.debian.org/HidekiYamane -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-devel-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/20130327113526.978f474bfb48a73d903fd...@debian.or.jp
Re: enabling wheezy-backports by default (Re: Backports integrated into the main archive
Hi, On Di 26 Mär 2013 16:12:36 CET Lennart Sorensen wrote: On Tue, Mar 26, 2013 at 02:16:51PM +0900, Hideki Yamane wrote: Hi, On Mon, 18 Mar 2013 13:59:02 +0100 Gerfried Fuchs wrote: > == For Users == > > What exactly does that mean for you? For users of wheezy, the > sources.list entry will be different, a simple substitute of squeeze > for wheezy won't work. The new format is: > > deb http://ftp.debian.org/debian/ wheezy-backports main So, is there plan to enable by default? Most of desktop users doesn't get used to edit system files, and enabling it solves some problems can help it, IMO. Or is there any harm? stable stops being stable? Only happens if you install with -t wheezy-backports, doesn't it? I suppose not, given you have to explicitly ask for the backports version with the default priorities as far as I know. At least for squeeze-backports that's the case. Mike -- DAS-NETZWERKTEAM mike gabriel, rothenstein 5, 24214 neudorf-bornstein fon: +49 (1520) 1976 148 GnuPG Key ID 0x25771B31 mail: mike.gabr...@das-netzwerkteam.de, http://das-netzwerkteam.de freeBusy: https://mail.das-netzwerkteam.de/freebusy/m.gabriel%40das-netzwerkteam.de.xfb pgpEJ6Z336VYG.pgp Description: Digitale PGP-Unterschrift
Re: enabling wheezy-backports by default (Re: Backports integrated into the main archive
On Tue, Mar 26, 2013 at 02:16:51PM +0900, Hideki Yamane wrote: > Hi, > > On Mon, 18 Mar 2013 13:59:02 +0100 > Gerfried Fuchs wrote: > > == For Users == > > > > What exactly does that mean for you? For users of wheezy, the > > sources.list entry will be different, a simple substitute of squeeze > > for wheezy won't work. The new format is: > > > > deb http://ftp.debian.org/debian/ wheezy-backports main > > So, is there plan to enable by default? > > > Most of desktop users doesn't get used to edit system files, and > enabling it solves some problems can help it, IMO. > > Or is there any harm? stable stops being stable? I suppose not, given you have to explicitly ask for the backports version with the default priorities as far as I know. -- Len Sorensen -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-devel-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/20130326151236.gd1...@csclub.uwaterloo.ca
enabling wheezy-backports by default (Re: Backports integrated into the main archive
Hi, On Mon, 18 Mar 2013 13:59:02 +0100 Gerfried Fuchs wrote: > == For Users == > > What exactly does that mean for you? For users of wheezy, the > sources.list entry will be different, a simple substitute of squeeze > for wheezy won't work. The new format is: > > deb http://ftp.debian.org/debian/ wheezy-backports main So, is there plan to enable by default? Most of desktop users doesn't get used to edit system files, and enabling it solves some problems can help it, IMO. Or is there any harm? -- Regards, Hideki Yamane henrich @ debian.or.jp/org http://wiki.debian.org/HidekiYamane -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-devel-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/20130326141651.da52d6aa1b8f56a485b0c...@debian.or.jp
