Re: lynx 2.8.4dev.16 --with-ssl

2001-01-10 Thread Joseph Carter 
On Tue, Jan 02, 2001 at 02:44:16PM +, Colin Watson wrote:
 Since ssl support (configure --with-ssl) is now integrated in the main
 lynx source, will lynx-ssl be obsolete? And will lynx has to go to
 non-US? Or do we still need separate version?
 
 Since lynx is GPLed, surely we shouldn't be linking it to OpenSSL at
 all? :( (Unless there's an exception I'm not aware of ...)

AFAIK, there isn't.  =(

-- 
Joseph Carter [EMAIL PROTECTED]Free software developer

aj come on
aj it's a pico clone
aj it's *meant* to be annoying



pgpAb0KsrKeln.pgp
Description: PGP signature

lynx 2.8.4dev.16 --with-ssl

2001-01-02 Thread Christoph Martin 
Since ssl support (configure --with-ssl) is now integrated in the main
lynx source, will lynx-ssl be obsolete? And will lynx has to go to
non-US? Or do we still need separate version?

Christoph

-- 

Christoph Martin, Uni-Mainz, Germany
 Internet-Mail:  [EMAIL PROTECTED]
--export-a-crypto-system-sig -RSA-3-lines-PERL--
#!/usr/bin/perl -sp0777iX+d*lMLa^*lN%0]dsXx++lMlN/dsM0j]dsj
$/=unpack('H*',$_);$_=`echo 16dio\U$kSK$/SM$n\EsN0p[lN*1
lK[d2%Sa2/d0$^Ixp|dc`;s/\W//g;$_=pack('H*',/((..)*)$/)
#what's this? see http://www.dcs.ex.ac.uk/~aba/rsa/

Re: lynx 2.8.4dev.16 --with-ssl

2001-01-02 Thread Colin Watson 
Christoph Martin [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Since ssl support (configure --with-ssl) is now integrated in the main
lynx source, will lynx-ssl be obsolete? And will lynx has to go to
non-US? Or do we still need separate version?

Since lynx is GPLed, surely we shouldn't be linking it to OpenSSL at
all? :( (Unless there's an exception I'm not aware of ...)

-- 
Colin Watson [EMAIL PROTECTED]