Julien Cristau julien.cris...@logilab.fr writes:
On Sun, Sep 30, 2012 at 00:28:15 +0700, Ivan Shmakov wrote:
I tend to think that a re-build (via binNMU or otherwise) will be
sufficient for most of the packages affected.
Unless there'll be objections, I'm going to file the respective bug
reports regarding the versioned dependency on libhdf5-7 against the
following packages. (The affected versions and architectures
[though only amd64 and i386 were tested] are shown, as well as the
Depends: list items triggering the check.)
NAK. If a binNMU is all that's needed then please don't file bugs
against the packages. See http://wiki.debian.org/binNMU
ACK, thanks for the pointer!
The problem is that I'm yet unsure whether a binNMU will be
sufficient or not. My analysis is below, and unless there'd be
objections, I'd be filing a bug against release.debian.org, with
the binNMU entries as follows.
nmu libcgns_3.1.3.4-1 . ALL . -m 'Rebuilt against libhdf5-7 = 1.8.8-7.1'
nmu nexus_4.2.1-svn1614-1 . ALL . -m 'Rebuilt against libhdf5-7 = 1.8.8-7.1'
nmu r-cran-hdf5_1.6.10-1 . ALL . -m 'Rebuilt against libhdf5-7 = 1.8.8-7.1'
nmu tessa_0.3.1-6 . ALL . -m 'Rebuilt against libhdf5-7 = 1.8.8-7.1'
nmu udav_0.7.1.2-3 . ALL . -m 'Rebuilt against libhdf5-7 = 1.8.8-7.1'
AIUI, the packages affected are exactly those built against
pre-1.8.8-7.1 versions of the Source: hdf5 libraries. That may
explain the versioned dependency, and may be a good indication
for that a binNMU will be sufficient to get the issue fixed.
--cut:
http://packages.debian.org/changelogs/pool/main/h/hdf5/hdf5_1.8.8-9/changelog --
hdf5 (1.8.8-7.1) unstable; urgency=low
* Non-maintainer upload.
* Stop building the c++ libraries, nothing uses them. And don't version the
libhdf5-7 symbols file, so the dependency can also be satisfied by the mpi
packages' Provides.
* Use DEB_HOST_ARCH instead of DEB_BUILD_ARCH in debian/rules.
* Don't require root for debian/rules clean.
-- Julien Cristau jcris...@debian.org Sat, 18 Feb 2012 12:25:35 +
--cut:
http://packages.debian.org/changelogs/pool/main/h/hdf5/hdf5_1.8.8-9/changelog --
As per http://packages.qa.debian.org/, all the packages I've
listed before entered unstable prior to 2012-02-18 (except for
Source: tessa, which was uploaded a couple of days after.)
http://packages.qa.debian.org/libc/libcgns.html
• [2012-01-24] Accepted 3.1.3.4-1 in unstable (low) (Sylvestre
Ledru)
http://packages.qa.debian.org/n/nexus.html
• [2011-07-31] Accepted 4.2.1-svn1614-1 in unstable (low) (Tobias
Stefan Richter)
NB: apparently, nexus was re-built once as 4.2.1-svn1614-1+b1 on
2012-01-26 (before hdf5_1.8.8-7.1, and still bearing a possibly
unwarranted versioned dependency on libhdf5-7.)
http://packages.qa.debian.org/r/r-cran-hdf5.html
• [2012-01-18] Accepted 1.6.10-1 in unstable (low) (Dirk
Eddelbuettel)
http://packages.qa.debian.org/t/tessa.html
• [2012-02-20] Accepted 0.3.1-6 in unstable (low) (Josselin Mouette)
http://packages.qa.debian.org/u/udav.html
• [2012-01-25] Accepted 0.7.1.2-3 in unstable (low) (Salvatore
Bonaccorso)
TIA.
--
FSF associate member #7257
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-devel-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: http://lists.debian.org/86fw5wp27b@gray.siamics.net
