Re: please document why a package has been dropped from Testing/Bullseye

2021-05-11 Thread Phil Morrell
On Mon, May 10, 2021 at 06:23:34AM -0500, Michael Lustfield wrote:
> On Sun, 9 May 2021 07:30:04 +0200
> Harald Dunkel  wrote:
> > 
> > https://packages.debian.org/search?keywords=rsnapshot doesn't tell, so I 
> > wonder
> > what is the recommended way to find out why rsnapshot (or any other package)
> > has been dropped from Testing?
> 
> I was wondering what the easiest and most sensible way would be to find/share
> this information. My first thought was feeding something like
> 'aptitude search ~o' into a script that checks for RM bugs in the bug tracker.
> It seems like it would be an easy enough trigger to write, but it would be
> time-consuming to run and would add a fair bit of load to the bug tracker.

Hi Michael, it sounds like you would be interested in installing the
how-can-i-help package, where you can run queries pre-filtered to the
list of packages you have locally installed.

how-can-i-help --old --show no-testing,testing-autorm


signature.asc
Description: PGP signature


Re: please document why a package has been dropped from Testing/Bullseye

2021-05-10 Thread Michael Lustfield
On Sun, 9 May 2021 07:30:04 +0200
Harald Dunkel  wrote:

> Hi folks,
> 
> https://packages.debian.org/search?keywords=rsnapshot doesn't tell, so I 
> wonder
> what is the recommended way to find out why rsnapshot (or any other package)
> has been dropped from Testing?

I was wondering what the easiest and most sensible way would be to find/share
this information. My first thought was feeding something like
'aptitude search ~o' into a script that checks for RM bugs in the bug tracker.
It seems like it would be an easy enough trigger to write, but it would be
time-consuming to run and would add a fair bit of load to the bug tracker.

> rsnapshot is still in Sid. I found #986709, of course, but this information
> should be much easier to access.

I should have asked that the removal include sid. For personal things, I've
been fairly happy with restic+b2 as a replacement. For servers, 

-- 
Michael Lustfield



Re: please document why a package has been dropped from Testing/Bullseye

2021-05-08 Thread Andrey Rahmatullin
On Sun, May 09, 2021 at 07:30:04AM +0200, Harald Dunkel wrote:
> Hi folks,
> 
> https://packages.debian.org/search?keywords=rsnapshot doesn't tell, so I 
> wonder
> what is the recommended way to find out why rsnapshot (or any other package)
> has been dropped from Testing?
packages.debian.org is indeed very basic and user-oriented. Most things
not visible there (and most things interesting to contributors) are at
http://tracker.debian.org/pkg/rsnapshot
There you can see both the "[2021-04-11] rsnapshot REMOVED from testing
(Debian testing watch)" news item where you can see the reason for removal,
and the "testing migrations" block with excuses stating the reason for not
migrating back (note that sometimes these are different reasons).

-- 
WBR, wRAR


signature.asc
Description: PGP signature


Re: please document why a package has been dropped from Testing/Bullseye

2021-05-08 Thread Andreas Metzler
On 2021-05-09 Harald Dunkel  wrote:
> https://packages.debian.org/search?keywords=rsnapshot doesn't tell, so
> I wonder what is the recommended way to find out why rsnapshot (or any
> other package) has been dropped from Testing?

> rsnapshot is still in Sid. I found #986709, of course, but this
> information should be much easier to access.

Hello,

Look at https://tracker.debian.org/pkg/rsnapshot or
https://packages.qa.debian.org/rsnapshot

cu Andreas
-- 
`What a good friend you are to him, Dr. Maturin. His other friends are
so grateful to you.'
`I sew his ears on from time to time, sure'



please document why a package has been dropped from Testing/Bullseye

2021-05-08 Thread Harald Dunkel

Hi folks,

https://packages.debian.org/search?keywords=rsnapshot doesn't tell, so I wonder
what is the recommended way to find out why rsnapshot (or any other package)
has been dropped from Testing?

rsnapshot is still in Sid. I found #986709, of course, but this information
should be much easier to access.


Regards
Harri