Re: sash (was Re: demo vs. real package: FYI (was ...))

1999-09-21 Thread Raul Miller
On Mon, Sep 20, 1999 at 02:46:09PM -0700, Joey Hess wrote:
 Raul Miller wrote:
  Also, if you can anticipate any failure modes where sash would damage
  the password file I'd appreciate hearing about them.  It's already
  the case that if sash has any problem writing out the new password
  file that it won't install it.
 
 I think you should just use useradd to edit the password file.

You mean without ensuring that the password is useful?

I've already elected to give the admin a choice (whether or not to add
the account -- that'll be in the next release).  The problem with password
prompting is that it doesn't fit well into an automated or gui install.

Under these circumstances do you still feel it's useful to add
a locked account?

-- 
Raul



Re: sash (was Re: demo vs. real package: FYI (was ...))

1999-09-21 Thread Raul Miller
On Mon, Sep 20, 1999 at 06:02:47PM -0400, Greg Johnson wrote:
 Here's one (happend to me).  I have a '+' at the end of my /etc/passwd file
 for nis.  sash tried to add the new root acccount at teh end of /etc/passwd
 AFTER the +.  didn't work.

That was sash 3.3-5

Sash 3.3-6 already addresses this issue.

Thanks,

-- 
Raul



Re: A few changes

1999-09-21 Thread Bjoern Brill
On Sat, 18 Sep 1999, Darren Benham wrote:

 Bugs are no longer deleted!!!  We don't have a way for you to access them
 directly but there's an official location in the database where they're
 being archived.  We're trying to decide how to serve them up... by
 requesting a bug number, obviously, but any other way?  Do we need them
 index by maintainer or package?  Remember, these are closed -- solved --
 bugs.

The correct and usual thing to do when finding a bug is to look into the
BTS to see if it has already been filed or even dealt with. Now remember a
lot of Debian users live off stable from CD. Considering the time between
to stable releases, chances are high someone discovers a bug long after
it has been closed (because he's installing a previously unused package).
The person will then be disappointed (because Debian doesnt't handle
rather obvious bugs) and/or file it again.

Conclusion: make closed bugs available by package. The original bug
report and the closing message should be sufficient.

Bjorn Brill [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Frankfurt am Main, Germany




Re: Source Cds

1999-09-21 Thread Chris Lawrence
On Sep 19, Ben Pfaff wrote:
 Tomasz Wegrzanowski [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
 
I suggest compressing source code by bzip2
Many CD resellers add something to 2nd source cd
and it will make A LOT of free place for them (100-150 MB!!!)
Bzip2 is no problem because it is possibly available on every
Debian system and I dont want religious answers here.
 
 We've discussed this here before.  Have you read through the
 debian-devel archives on this subject already?

There is actually an open policy proposal on this (which I proposed).
I'll have to sit down and hack on dpkg-dev to implement it, which may
overcome some of the objections.

Anyway, look in debian-policy's archives from the last 3-4 months.


Chris
-- 
=
|  Chris Lawrence |   Visit my home page!   |
| [EMAIL PROTECTED]| http://www.lordsutch.com/chris/ |
| | |
| Grad Student, Pol. Sci. | Do you want your bank to snoop? |
|University of Mississippi|http://www.defendyourprivacy.com/|
=



grep-ing available made easy

1999-09-21 Thread Bjoern Brill

Hello,

I have just finished the first 90% (that is, I have a decently working
beta version, but some things are still suboptimal) of something that
could be vaguely described as

Package: debcrawler
Section: admin
Priority: optional
Version: 0.19
Depends: boa | httpd, lynx | www-browser, dpkg (= 1.4), dpkg ( 1.5)
Description: browse your Debian binary packages via WWW
 debCrawler (completely unrelated to a well-known web indexing service)
 is a small tool to search the local database of installable Debian
 *.deb software packages for various criteria and display the
 results through a web browser. It does not attempt to cover package
 management. The output is formatted in a fashion that aims at readability
 on several different web browsers, including lynx.
 .
 debCrawler is a CGI application, so a http daemon with CGI support
 must be set up on the local machine. Note that dhttpd does *not* support
 CGIs (that means you have to use another httpd implementation).


It was inspired by hours of screen-staring in front of dselect,
some grep/sed/perl orgies with available and, of course,
http://www.debian.org/distrib/packages.

I'd be glad if some of you would try it and send me comments and bugs.
I'd be even more glad if somebody could package it (I am no Debian
developer yet, there are some technical problems, and I don't have the
time to overcome any of these two obstacles at the moment).

You can get it at

 http://fs.math.uni-frankfurt.de/~brill/debcrawler-0.19.tar.gz
 

Thanks
 

Bjorn Brill [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Frankfurt am Main, Germany





Re: Announcing debconf, configuration management for debian

1999-09-21 Thread Hamish Moffatt
On Mon, Sep 20, 1999 at 02:57:42PM -0600, Scott Barker wrote:
 dpkg -i package
 dpkg-reconfigure
 
 you could just run:
 
 dpkg -i --reconfigure package
 
 I'm probably thinking too far ahead right now, though...

Why would you install the package (which presumably includes
configuration) and then immediately reconfigure it?


Hamish
-- 
Hamish Moffatt VK3SB (ex-VK3TYD). 
CCs of replies from mailing lists are welcome.



apt-get upgrade unstable killed old libc5-compat

1999-09-21 Thread Mr. Christopher F. Miller
RE: potato upgrade killed libc5

I ran an apt-get upgrade over the past weekend.  That and/or an upgrade
to new 2.2.12 kernel seems to have killed all my old binaries depending
on libc5.

Mostly the affected files amount to cruft.  There is(was) a commercial
xvscan with scanner support that died.  However, when this goes
onto our production machine it will surely kill all sorts of user
scripts that we do not maintain and that I'm sure our users do not 
maintain.

The libc5 libraries here have not been touched in months.

I've attached below a strace of two instances, one of a libc5
login, and another of a local accounting program.  The output in this
case does not mean much to me.  It does not go very far.  Is it even
done with the loader?

I hope this is a local feature but thought I'd post this note
just in case.  ;^)

i86 potato v2.2.12


cfm



-- 

Christopher F. Miller, Publisher [EMAIL PROTECTED]
MaineStreet Communications, Inc 208 Portland Road, Gray, ME  04039
1.207.657.5078   http://www.maine.com/
Database publishing, e-commerce, office/internet integration, Debian linux.

Script started on Mon Sep 20 19:50:09 1999

[EMAIL PROTECTED]:/bin# trace ./login.libc5
execve(./login.libc5, [./login.libc5], [/* 56 vars */]) = 0
mmap(NULL, 4096, PROT_READ|PROT_WRITE, MAP_PRIVATE|MAP_ANONYMOUS, -1, 0) = 
0x40006000
mprotect(0x4000, 19058, PROT_READ|PROT_WRITE|PROT_EXEC) = 0
mprotect(0x8048000, 36855, PROT_READ|PROT_WRITE|PROT_EXEC) = 0
stat(/etc/ld.so.cache, {st_mode=S_IFREG|0644, st_size=11649, ...}) = 0
open(/etc/ld.so.cache, O_RDONLY)  = 3
mmap(NULL, 11649, PROT_READ, MAP_SHARED, 3, 0) = 0x40007000
close(3)= 0
stat(/etc/ld.so.preload, 0xb7d8)  = -1 ENOENT (No such file or directory)
open(/lib/libc.so.5, O_RDONLY)= 3
read(3, \177ELF\1\1\1\0\0\0\0\0\0\0\0\0\3\0\3\0\1\0\0\0|-\1\000..., 4096) = 
4096
mmap(NULL, 778240, PROT_NONE, MAP_PRIVATE|MAP_ANONYMOUS, -1, 0) = 0x4000a000
mmap(0x4000a000, 543683, PROT_READ|PROT_EXEC, MAP_PRIVATE|MAP_FIXED, 3, 0) = 
0x4000a000
mmap(0x4008f000, 23252, PROT_READ|PROT_WRITE, MAP_PRIVATE|MAP_FIXED, 3, 
0x84000) = 0x4008f000
mmap(0x40095000, 207484, PROT_READ|PROT_WRITE, 
MAP_PRIVATE|MAP_FIXED|MAP_ANONYMOUS, -1, 0) = 0x40095000
close(3)= 0
mprotect(0x4000a000, 543683, PROT_READ|PROT_WRITE|PROT_EXEC) = 0
munmap(0x40007000, 11649)   = 0
--- SIGSEGV (Segmentation fault) ---
+++ killed by SIGSEGV +++

[EMAIL PROTECTED]:/bin# cd /home/cfo/.bin

[EMAIL PROTECTED]:/home/cfo/.bin# strace ./ledger-libc5 
execve(./ledger-libc5, [./ledger-libc5], [/* 56 vars */]) = 0
mmap(NULL, 4096, PROT_READ|PROT_WRITE, MAP_PRIVATE|MAP_ANONYMOUS, -1, 0) = 
0x40006000
mprotect(0x4000, 19058, PROT_READ|PROT_WRITE|PROT_EXEC) = 0
mprotect(0x8048000, 20200, PROT_READ|PROT_WRITE|PROT_EXEC) = 0
stat(/etc/ld.so.cache, {st_mode=S_IFREG|0644, st_size=11649, ...}) = 0
open(/etc/ld.so.cache, O_RDONLY)  = 3
mmap(NULL, 11649, PROT_READ, MAP_SHARED, 3, 0) = 0x40007000
close(3)= 0
stat(/etc/ld.so.preload, 0xb7d8)  = -1 ENOENT (No such file or directory)
open(/lib/libc.so.5, O_RDONLY)= 3
read(3, \177ELF\1\1\1\0\0\0\0\0\0\0\0\0\3\0\3\0\1\0\0\0|-\1\000..., 4096) = 
4096
mmap(NULL, 778240, PROT_NONE, MAP_PRIVATE|MAP_ANONYMOUS, -1, 0) = 0x4000a000
mmap(0x4000a000, 543683, PROT_READ|PROT_EXEC, MAP_PRIVATE|MAP_FIXED, 3, 0) = 
0x4000a000
mmap(0x4008f000, 23252, PROT_READ|PROT_WRITE, MAP_PRIVATE|MAP_FIXED, 3, 
0x84000) = 0x4008f000
mmap(0x40095000, 207484, PROT_READ|PROT_WRITE, 
MAP_PRIVATE|MAP_FIXED|MAP_ANONYMOUS, -1, 0) = 0x40095000
close(3)= 0
mprotect(0x4000a000, 543683, PROT_READ|PROT_WRITE|PROT_EXEC) = 0
munmap(0x40007000, 11649)   = 0
--- SIGSEGV (Segmentation fault) ---
+++ killed by SIGSEGV +++
[EMAIL PROTECTED]:/home/cfo/.bin# exit
exit

Script done on Mon Sep 20 19:50:58 1999

/lib/ld*

-rwxr-xr-x   1 root root81786 Sep 17 09:56 ld-2.1.2.so
lrwxrwxrwx   1 root root   13 Sep 14  1998 ld-linux.so - 
ld-linux.so.2
lrwxrwxrwx   1 root root   18 Sep 18 19:08 ld-linux.so.1 - 
ld-linux.so.1.9.11
-rwxr-xr-x   1 root root22311 Sep 17 10:52 ld-linux.so.1.9.11
lrwxrwxrwx   1 root root   11 Sep 18 19:09 ld-linux.so.2 - 
ld-2.1.2.so
-rwxr-xr-x   2 root root99488 Sep 17 10:52 ld.so
-rwxr-xr-x   2 root root99488 Sep 17 10:52 ld.so.1.9.11



Re: apt-get upgrade unstable killed old libc5-compat

1999-09-21 Thread Robert Thomson
On Mon, Sep 20, 1999 at 08:06:47PM -0500, Mr. Christopher F. Miller wrote:
 RE: potato upgrade killed libc5

Yes, and it's now fixed with ldso 1.9.11-3, which should be propagating around
the mirrors right now - if it isn't already.  It's on ftp.debian.org atm.

- Rob

-- 
For a man to truly understand rejection, he must first be ignored by a cat.



Re: ProFTPd being lame

1999-09-21 Thread David Bristel
I was refering to the equivilant of a VirtualServer section in Apache...to
just send Roxen the information for a new account, including IP address and
directories, and have it do it automatically without admin intervention.  While
it CAN be done, it would be a pain in the ass.

Dave Bristel


On Mon, 20 Sep 1999, Hirling Endre wrote:

 Date: Mon, 20 Sep 1999 20:30:40 +0200 (CEST)
 From: Hirling Endre [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 To: David Bristel [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 Cc: Anders Arnholm [EMAIL PROTECTED],
 Robert Stone [EMAIL PROTECTED],
 Chris Rutter [EMAIL PROTECTED], debian-devel@lists.debian.org
 Subject: Re: ProFTPd being lame 
 
 On Mon, 20 Sep 1999, David Bristel wrote:
 
  Off topic
  The only feature it lacks is the ability to do automated account setup from
  another script.  (Which is the ONLY thing that apache does better than 
  Roxen).
  Maybe I'll tinker a bit and make a module for auto-creation of new web 
  accounts
  from a shell script or something. Until then, for web hosting, Apache is the
  better choice.
  /Off topic
 
 Hmmm... what about SQL user auth module, user filesystem, and creating
 web accounts into a mysql table? You can authenticate your web, ftp,
 pop3 servers from it, and with a few lines of RXML/Pike the user can
 change his password from a browser via https. I think this can be very
 well automated. If you want a virtualhost per user, even a siple
 shell/perl script can fill a server template (or Pike script if you'd
 better like creating users from a web interface :))
 
 (or I'm misunderstanding what you mean as 'web account'..)
 
 greetings
 endre
 
 --
 ..all in all it's just another rule in the firewall. 
 
  /Ping Flood/
 
 



Re: Guessing the date style from the timezone for postgresql postinst

1999-09-21 Thread Daniel Barclay


 From: Oliver Elphick olly@lfix.co.uk


Style  DateDatetime
---
ISO1999-07-17  1999-07-17 07:09:18+01
  ^
Is that correct?  Doesn't ISO 8601 specify the character T 
between the date and the time?  


Daniel



taper up for adoption

1999-09-21 Thread Joey Hess
I never use taper anymore -- whould someone who does like to take the
package? It has several forwarded bug reports and isn't FHS yet, but no other
problems.

-- 
see shy jo



Re: Guessing the date style from the timezone for postgresql postin st

1999-09-21 Thread d1temp

On 20 Sep, Daniel Barclay wrote:
 From: Oliver Elphick olly@lfix.co.uk

Style  DateDatetime
---
ISO1999-07-17  1999-07-17 07:09:18+01
   ^
 Is that correct?  Doesn't ISO 8601 specify the character T 
 between the date and the time?  

I haven't found the standard itself but here is a pretty good doc: 
http://hydracen.com/dx/y2k/iso8601.htm

Excerpt:
--
The symbol T is used to separate the date and time parts of the 
combined representation. This may be omitted by mutual consent of 
those interchanging data, if ambiguity can be avoided. 

The complete representation is as follows: 

 19930214T131030 or 1993-02-14T13:10:30 

The date and/or time components independently obey the rules already 
given in the sections above, with the restrictions: 

   1.The date format should not be truncated on the right 
 (i.e., represented with lower precision) and the time format 
 should not be truncated on the left (i.e., no leading hyphens). 
   2.When the date format is truncated on the left, the leading 
 hyphens may be omitted. 
--

IMHO, but then we're using the ISO format here in Sweden, 
1999-07-17 07:09:18+01 is unambiguous, but if you're going to do it
by the standard why not go all the way...

/Michael
-- 
  Linux: Turn on...Tune in...Fork out...



Re: Announcing debconf, configuration management for debian

1999-09-21 Thread Aaron Van Couwenberghe
On Tue, Sep 21, 1999 at 11:02:58AM +1000, Hamish Moffatt wrote:
 On Mon, Sep 20, 1999 at 02:57:42PM -0600, Scott Barker wrote:
  dpkg -i package
  dpkg-reconfigure
  
  you could just run:
  
  dpkg -i --reconfigure package
  
  I'm probably thinking too far ahead right now, though...
 
 Why would you install the package (which presumably includes
 configuration) and then immediately reconfigure it?

The whole purpose of Wichert's spec is to force packages to install with a
default configuration, and then reconfigure themselves with data from the
database after installation. Whether questions are (all) asked before or
after installation is a secondary point

-- 
..Aaron Van Couwenberghe... [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Berlin: http://www.berlin-consortium.org
Debian GNU/Linux:   http://www.debian.org

There are three kinds of people in this world: those who can count and
those who can't.



Re: Announcing debconf, configuration management for debian

1999-09-21 Thread Joey Hess
Aaron Van Couwenberghe wrote:
 The whole purpose of Wichert's spec is to force packages to install with a
 default configuration, and then reconfigure themselves with data from the
 database after installation. Whether questions are (all) asked before or
 after installation is a secondary point

Er not really. The spec makes that possible, but it's hardly the entire
goal. Make note of the large amount of effort it goes to to allow you to
configure a package *before* installing it as well.

-- 
see shy jo



emacs and anacron on slink

1999-09-21 Thread Tomasz Wegrzanowski
Since I removed emacs 19 anacron sends me mail every day
in which it says :
File /usr/lib/emacs/19.34/i386-debian-linux/movemail registered but not 
installed

and since I removed all emacses from my computer there is
another line in everyday mail :
File /usr/lib/emacs/20.3/i386-debian-linux-gnu/movemail registered but not 
installed

I think this is a bug in emacs uninstalation script
I also think no editor should be privileged anyhow by debian
Everyones favorite editor is very intimate matter and
forcing anyone to use particular is breaking of users privacy



Re: static user IDs

1999-09-21 Thread Tomasz Wegrzanowski
Who will agree with me that
qmail[dsrqlp] should be forbidden
Their existance in /etc/passsd rape me thru my eyes
6 statics for pacage is a bad idea but
if this package isnt even free they should be
thown out without mercy



Re: emacs and anacron on slink

1999-09-21 Thread Ruud de Rooij
Tomasz Wegrzanowski [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:

 Since I removed emacs 19 anacron sends me mail every day
 in which it says :
 File /usr/lib/emacs/19.34/i386-debian-linux/movemail registered but not 
 installed
 
 and since I removed all emacses from my computer there is
 another line in everyday mail :
 File /usr/lib/emacs/20.3/i386-debian-linux-gnu/movemail registered but not 
 installed
 
 I think this is a bug in emacs uninstalation script

Indeed.  Please remove the offending lines from /etc/suid.conf
yourself.

 I also think no editor should be privileged anyhow by debian
 Everyones favorite editor is very intimate matter and
 forcing anyone to use particular is breaking of users privacy

Why do you think Debian is forcing you to use one specific editor?

- Ruud de Rooij.
-- 
ruud de rooij | [EMAIL PROTECTED] | http://ruud.org



ITP liberror-perl, libcorba-orbit-perl, libgnome-gnorba-perl

1999-09-21 Thread Paolo Molaro
Hi.
I plan to package libcorba-orbit-perl and libgnome-gnorba-perl:
these modules allow to use the Orbit ORB within perl and the
gnorba activation features.
liberror-perl is required by the above modules and so I'll package it
as well.

lupus

-- 
-
[EMAIL PROTECTED] debian/rules



ITP: greg

1999-09-21 Thread Tommi Virtanen
  I'm packaging greg,
  http://www.gnu.org/software/greg/
  (naturally GPL)

--8--
The Greg testing framework

Greg is a framework for testing other programs and libraries. Its
purpose is to provide a single front end for all tests and to be a
small, simple framework for writing tests. Greg leverages off the
Guile language to provide all the power (and more) of other test
frameworks with greater simplicity and ease of use.

The simplicity of the Greg framework makes it easy to write tests for
any program, but it was specifically written for use with
GNUstep-Guile to permit direct testing of the GNUstep libraries
without the necessity to run a separate driver program.

The core functionality of Greg is a Guile module which can be loaded
into any software with an embedded Guile interpreter. Any program
which uses Guile as it's scripting language can therefore use Greg to
test itself directly!

For testing external programs, Greg provides a compiled module that
may be dynamically linked into Guile to permit you to run an
application as a child process on a pseudo-terminal. In conjunction
with the standard Guile `expect' module, this lets you test external
programs.

Also provided is greg - a Guile script to invoke the Greg test
framework in much the same way that runtest is used in DejaGNU.

All tests have the same output format (enforced by the greg-testcase
procedure). Greg's output is designed to be both readable and readily
parsed by other software, so that it can be used as input to
customised testing processes.

Greg provides most of the functionality of DejaGNU but is rather
simpler. It omits specific support for cross-platform/remote testing
since this is really rather trivial to add where required and tends to
vary from site to site so much that an attempt at a generic solution
is pretty pointless. What Greg does do, is provide hooks to let you
easily introduce site specific code for handling those sorts of
situations.
--8--

-- 
Havoc Consulting | unix, linux, perl, mail, www, internet, security consulting
+358 50 5486010  | software development, unix administration, training



Roxen virtual servers, was: Re: ProFTPd being lame

1999-09-21 Thread Martin Bialasinski

* David == David Bristel [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

David I was refering to the equivilant of a VirtualServer section
David in Apache...to just send Roxen the information for a new
David account, including IP address and directories, and have it do
David it automatically without admin intervention.  While it CAN be
David done, it would be a pain in the ass.

Why this? Virtual servers in Roxern are defined in seperate files. So
copy a template into the conf dir, do some sed or perl to replace name 
and other things you want, do a reload of the configs, Voila. 

No manual intervention on the steps, fully scriptable.

Ask on the Roxen Mailinglist for example implementations, if you want
to do this.

Ciao,
Martin



Re: static user IDs

1999-09-21 Thread Florian Lohoff
On Tue, Sep 21, 1999 at 10:15:10AM +0200, Tomasz Wegrzanowski wrote:

 Who will agree with me that
 qmail[dsrqlp] should be forbidden
 Their existance in /etc/passsd rape me thru my eyes
 6 statics for pacage is a bad idea but
 if this package isnt even free they should be
 thown out without mercy

Agree ... qmail is nice - but it is non-free, nor the default mta for
debian.

Flo
-- 
Florian Lohoff  [EMAIL PROTECTED]   +49-5241-470566
  ...  The failure can be random; however, when it does occur, it is
  catastrophic and is repeatable  ... Cisco Field Notice



Re: emacs and anacron on slink

1999-09-21 Thread Tomasz Wegrzanowski
  I also think no editor should be privileged anyhow by debian
  Everyones favorite editor is very intimate matter and
  forcing anyone to use particular is breaking of users privacy
 
 Why do you think Debian is forcing you to use one specific editor?

I dont claim im forced to use emacs but i claim emacs is privileged
over other editors. For example :
1) It is installed in 2 different versions automatically - if someone wants 
different
version he should chose it himself
2) it takes 47 MB (7.37%) of first CD on which, in theory, the most useful 
packages
should be only placed.

I think it would be nice to users of another editors if emacs wouldnt be 
installed
twice by auto and all unimportant additions to it(and another version) will go 
to 2nd CD
(on which there are 2 MB of emacs more now)

tech:
Sizes was count by ls -l /cdrom/dists/slink/main/*/*/*emac* ~/b[12]
and summed by perlscript so there have to be correct




tama in slink

1999-09-21 Thread Tomasz Wegrzanowski
Am I only one thinking /var/lib/tama should be /var/lib/games/tama
or someone agrees with me
And shouldnt uninstalling script remove this dir?



Re: emacs and anacron on slink

1999-09-21 Thread Mark W. Eichin
Yes, the lack of suidregister unregistration is an already-reported
bug.  I even have it fixed, but was mocked by some of the /usr/share
changes and haven't got an updated build yet.

  2) it takes 47 MB (7.37%) of first CD on which, in theory, the most
  useful packages

This is a good point -- one might suggest (I'm not sure to whom?) that
emacs19 be relegated to disk2 and taken out of the install profiles,
esp. since emacs21 is almost out and might actually ship before
debian 2.2 :-)

_Mark_ [EMAIL PROTECTED]
The Herd of Kittens
Debian emacs19 Package Maintainer :-)



ITA: wmaker wamker-data

1999-09-21 Thread Chris McKillop
Hey...

I just noticed that wmaker and wmaker-data are up for
adoption.  If no one else is working on them, I will take over.

chris

-- 
^^
chris mckillop - [EMAIL PROTECTED]The faster I go, the behinder I get.
Debian GNU/Linux -- Lewis Carroll 
http://www.debian.org/  
Waterloo Aerial Robotics Group - http://ece.uwaterloo.ca/~warg/


pgpq5LYXiuGXk.pgp
Description: PGP signature


Re: ITA: wmaker wamker-data

1999-09-21 Thread Marcelo E. Magallon
 Chris McKillop [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:

  Hey...
  
   I just noticed that wmaker and wmaker-data are up for
  adoption.  If no one else is working on them, I will take over.

Hi, current maintainer here.

I'm moving to Germany, where I don't not yet sure if I'll be able to
maintain my packages, at least not until I get a computer of my own (i.e.,
something that I can break at will).  Gecko (who, IIRC, said doesn't follow
-devel on a regular basis) offered to NMU wmaker while I figure out this. 
If you are really interested in maintaining wmaker, at least for a while,
talk to him and let me know what you guys decide.

/me is building 0.61.0-1 right now, but won't be able to upload it.  You
(esp. Chris and Gecko) can find 0.61.0-1.diff at:

  http://master.debian.org/~mmagallo/wmaker/wmaker_0.61.0-1.diff.gz
  http://master.debian.org/~mmagallo/wmaker/wmaker_0.61.0-1.dsc

source is here:

  http://www.windowmaker.org/ftp/pub/beta/srcs/WindowMaker-0.61.0.tar.gz

This probably fixes some bugs, maybe an RC one.

I'll appreciate it if someone NMUs this.  You need debhelper, libPropList's
-dev, a bunch of graphic libraries -dev's (dpkg -s wmaker), X11 -dev's...

Thanks,

Marcelo



Re: Roxen virtual servers, was: Re: ProFTPd being lame

1999-09-21 Thread David Bristel
Hm, I didn't see that the config files were in text format.  From this, I'll
need to look again.  Thanks.

Dave Bristel


On 21 Sep 1999, Martin Bialasinski wrote:

 Date: 21 Sep 1999 13:21:56 +0200
 From: Martin Bialasinski [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 To: Debian Developerslist debian-devel@lists.debian.org
 Subject: Roxen virtual servers, was: Re: ProFTPd being lame
 Resent-Date: 21 Sep 1999 11:23:17 -
 Resent-From: debian-devel@lists.debian.org
 Resent-cc: recipient list not shown: ;
 
 
 * David == David Bristel [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
 
 David I was refering to the equivilant of a VirtualServer section
 David in Apache...to just send Roxen the information for a new
 David account, including IP address and directories, and have it do
 David it automatically without admin intervention.  While it CAN be
 David done, it would be a pain in the ass.
 
 Why this? Virtual servers in Roxern are defined in seperate files. So
 copy a template into the conf dir, do some sed or perl to replace name 
 and other things you want, do a reload of the configs, Voila. 
 
 No manual intervention on the steps, fully scriptable.
 
 Ask on the Roxen Mailinglist for example implementations, if you want
 to do this.
 
 Ciao,
   Martin
 
 
 -- 
 To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 



Which gcc builds potato?

1999-09-21 Thread Dale Scheetz
OK, I have recovered to a slink system, and I'm ready to upgrade it to
potato, which raises the above question. There are two gcc versions
available in the archives. Which one is being used to build the system?
Will either work? The libraries are pretty self explanitory, with the
exception of ncurses, which I assume is to be version 4 from what is found
in base?

Waiting is,

Dwarf
--
_-_-_-_-_-   Author of The Debian Linux User's Guide  _-_-_-_-_-_-

aka   Dale Scheetz   Phone:   1 (850) 656-9769
  Flexible Software  11000 McCrackin Road
  e-mail:  [EMAIL PROTECTED] Tallahassee, FL  32308

_-_-_-_-_-_- See www.linuxpress.com for more details  _-_-_-_-_-_-_-



Re: Announcing debconf, configuration management for debian

1999-09-21 Thread Scott Barker
On Tue, Sep 21, 1999 at 11:02:58AM +1000, Hamish Moffatt wrote:
 Why would you install the package (which presumably includes
 configuration) and then immediately reconfigure it?

You upgrade a package, and it gets installed with your previous configuration,
and you want to change that configuration. dpkg --configure simply re-runs the
postinstall script, which (assuming debconf was used) would simply reconfigure
using the previous configuration again.

-- 
Scott Barker   [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Linux Consultant   http://www.mostlylinux.ab.ca/scott

Looking for a husband? Know anyone looking for a husband? Well, I'm looking
for a wife. See http://www.mostlylinux.ab.ca/scott/wife.shtml

Want a good deal on a personal computer in Calgary, Alberta, Canada?
Visit http://www.mostlylinux.ab.ca/scott/computers.shtml

[ Unsolicited commercial and junk e-mail will be proof-read for US$100 ]

Do infants have as much fun in infancy as adults do in adultery?
   - ???



Re: Which gcc builds potato?

1999-09-21 Thread Ben Collins
On Tue, Sep 21, 1999 at 10:19:48AM +, Dale Scheetz wrote:
 OK, I have recovered to a slink system, and I'm ready to upgrade it to
 potato, which raises the above question. There are two gcc versions
 available in the archives. Which one is being used to build the system?
 Will either work? The libraries are pretty self explanitory, with the
 exception of ncurses, which I assume is to be version 4 from what is found
 in base?
 
 Waiting is,

gcc272 is not to be used at all for building sparc packages, I wish it
would just die right out of the distribution personally :)

gcc_2.95.2-0pre1 is what is suggested (and required if you don't want to
get bit in the ass by dumb compiler errors).

Ben



Re: Intent to create freedraft2D

1999-09-21 Thread Tomasz Wegrzanowski

Could you tell us more precisely : what it is to be ?




midnight commander and mp3s

1999-09-21 Thread Tomasz Wegrzanowski
I think default mp3 player for mc should be freeamp not mpg123
cause mpg123 isnt free but freeamp is and debian shouldnt
depend on nonfree soft anyhow as policy says



Re: midnight commander and mp3s

1999-09-21 Thread Martin Bialasinski

* Tomasz == Tomasz Wegrzanowski [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

Tomasz I think default mp3 player for mc should be freeamp not mpg123
Tomasz cause mpg123 isnt free but freeamp is and debian shouldnt
Tomasz depend on nonfree soft anyhow as policy says

Please install the package bug and report a bug on mc. This is the
only way to ensure the maintainer reads this suggestion.

Ciao,
Martin



Re: midnight commander and mp3s

1999-09-21 Thread Marcelo E. Magallon
 Tomasz Wegrzanowski [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:

  I think default mp3 player for mc should be freeamp not mpg123
  cause mpg123 isnt free but freeamp is and debian shouldnt
  depend on nonfree soft anyhow as policy says

update-mime(8), mailcap.order(8)


Marcelo



Re: Which gcc builds potato?

1999-09-21 Thread Dale Scheetz
On Tue, 21 Sep 1999, Ben Collins wrote:

 On Tue, Sep 21, 1999 at 10:19:48AM +, Dale Scheetz wrote:
  OK, I have recovered to a slink system, and I'm ready to upgrade it to
  potato, which raises the above question. There are two gcc versions
  available in the archives. Which one is being used to build the system?
  Will either work? The libraries are pretty self explanitory, with the
  exception of ncurses, which I assume is to be version 4 from what is found
  in base?
  
  Waiting is,
 
 gcc272 is not to be used at all for building sparc packages, I wish it
 would just die right out of the distribution personally :)
 
 gcc_2.95.2-0pre1 is what is suggested (and required if you don't want to
 get bit in the ass by dumb compiler errors).

Thanks, although the question was for Intel based builds, it is good to
know about sparc requirements as well.

So, what, if anything, is being built with egcs? 

Thanks,

Dwarf
--
_-_-_-_-_-   Author of The Debian Linux User's Guide  _-_-_-_-_-_-

aka   Dale Scheetz   Phone:   1 (850) 656-9769
  Flexible Software  11000 McCrackin Road
  e-mail:  [EMAIL PROTECTED] Tallahassee, FL  32308

_-_-_-_-_-_- See www.linuxpress.com for more details  _-_-_-_-_-_-_-



debconf for configuring a room full of machines

1999-09-21 Thread Edward Betts
Scott Barker [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
  A better approach, perhaps, will be to use the remote database capabilities
  of debconf to just pull settings off the old system when you install a
  package on the new one. Of course, that's all vaporware at this point.
 
 I guess I'm just too eager to roll this out in my labs, and I want that
 vaporware void filled :)

Write some code? Most Unix tools are written because people want to use them.
An example would be the device drivers in the Linux kernel being written by
people who have the hardware and want to get it working. I am supprised that
a program like debconf has not already been written by somebody with a room
full of identical machines wanting identical configuration on them.

 How do you feel about moving the template file out of the debian/ control
 structure, and into the filesystem? If it was /etc/debconf/package instead
 of debian/templates, dpkg-repack could handle it (and I could start
 repackaging packages for use in my labs).

Again the source code for dpkg-repack is avaliable. If you want to make
modifications to it the licence will let you. The same for debconf in fact.

 I don't mean to be pushy, I'm just very excited at the prospect of removing
 RedHat and replacing it with Debian on all my workstations.

Well each package is going to have to be moved to debconf, I estimate it will
take a few months at the very least, knowing Debian, probably closer to a
year. Although I suppose we have the fact that it is not all packages that
need to be updated, just ones that ask questions, so that should speed things
up. What timescale where you thinking about?

-- 
I consume, therefore I am



Roxen Configuration Files

1999-09-21 Thread David Coe
Package: roxen
Version: 1.3.111-8
Severity: wishlist

David Bristel [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:

 On 21 Sep 1999, Martin Bialasinski wrote:
 
  * David == David Bristel [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
  David I was refering to the equivilant of a VirtualServer section
  David in Apache...to just send Roxen the information for a new
  David account, including IP address and directories, and have it do
  David it automatically without admin intervention.  While it CAN be
  David done, it would be a pain in the ass.
  
  Why this? Virtual servers in Roxern are defined in seperate files. ...
 
 Hm, I didn't see that the config files were in text format.  From this, 
 I'll
 need to look again.  Thanks.

I fell into that trap too ... the Roxen configurator (browser-based) 
gives you no hint that configuration can also be done (much more easily 
and reliably and quickly, but that's beside the point) by editing 
ordinary text files. 

I suggest (wish) the roxen debian post-installation script would give
the user a clue about that, rather that just instructing how to start the
configurator, and that the upstream web-based configurator would advise 
the user that there is another way. 



Re: Which gcc builds potato?

1999-09-21 Thread Ruud de Rooij
Dale Scheetz [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:

 So, what, if anything, is being built with egcs? 

Nothing, since egcs does not exist in the distribution anymore.

- Ruud de Rooij.
-- 
ruud de rooij | [EMAIL PROTECTED] | http://ruud.org



gnome-utils in slink

1999-09-21 Thread Tomasz Wegrzanowski
gpenguin should fly so CENTER of penguin1.png is
at the mouse pointer not UPPER-LEFT corner

gw gives me :
** WARNING **: Could not open help topics file NULL



Re: gnome-utils in slink

1999-09-21 Thread Ruud de Rooij
Tomasz Wegrzanowski [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:

 gpenguin should fly so CENTER of penguin1.png is
 at the mouse pointer not UPPER-LEFT corner
 
 gw gives me :
 ** WARNING **: Could not open help topics file NULL

Please use the bug tracking system (see http://bugs.debian.org) to
report bugs instead of sending them to the developers discussion
mailing list.

- Ruud de Rooij.
-- 
ruud de rooij | [EMAIL PROTECTED] | http://ruud.org | http://weer.moonblade.net



Re: apt-get upgrade unstable killed old libc5-compat FIXED

1999-09-21 Thread Mr. Christopher F. Miller
On Mon, Sep 20, 1999 at 09:19:20PM -0400, Raul Miller wrote:
 I've heard that the bug is in ld.so, and that the current potato
 version of ldso fixes the problem.
 
 Can you verify or disprove that?
 
 Thanks,
 
 -- 
 Raul


Yes. This new ldso fixed it with the three libc5 binaries I had
remaining.  Thank you!

283020 Sep 18 13:55 ldso_1.9.11-3_i386.deb

cfm

 
 On Mon, Sep 20, 1999 at 08:06:47PM -0500, Mr. Christopher F. Miller wrote:
  RE: potato upgrade killed libc5
  
  I ran an apt-get upgrade over the past weekend.  That and/or an upgrade
  to new 2.2.12 kernel seems to have killed all my old binaries depending
  on libc5.
  
  Mostly the affected files amount to cruft.  There is(was) a commercial
  xvscan with scanner support that died.  However, when this goes
  onto our production machine it will surely kill all sorts of user
  scripts that we do not maintain and that I'm sure our users do not 
  maintain.
  
  The libc5 libraries here have not been touched in months.
  
  I've attached below a strace of two instances, one of a libc5
  login, and another of a local accounting program.  The output in this
  case does not mean much to me.  It does not go very far.  Is it even
  done with the loader?
  
  I hope this is a local feature but thought I'd post this note
  just in case.  ;^)
  
  i86 potato v2.2.12
  
  
  cfm
  
  
  
  -- 
  
  Christopher F. Miller, Publisher [EMAIL 
  PROTECTED]
  MaineStreet Communications, Inc 208 Portland Road, Gray, ME  04039
  1.207.657.5078   http://www.maine.com/
  Database publishing, e-commerce, office/internet integration, Debian linux.
  
  Script started on Mon Sep 20 19:50:09 1999
  
  [EMAIL PROTECTED]:/bin# trace ./login.libc5
  execve(./login.libc5, [./login.libc5], [/* 56 vars */]) = 0
  mmap(NULL, 4096, PROT_READ|PROT_WRITE, MAP_PRIVATE|MAP_ANONYMOUS, -1, 0) = 
  0x40006000
  mprotect(0x4000, 19058, PROT_READ|PROT_WRITE|PROT_EXEC) = 0
  mprotect(0x8048000, 36855, PROT_READ|PROT_WRITE|PROT_EXEC) = 0
  stat(/etc/ld.so.cache, {st_mode=S_IFREG|0644, st_size=11649, ...}) = 0
  open(/etc/ld.so.cache, O_RDONLY)  = 3
  mmap(NULL, 11649, PROT_READ, MAP_SHARED, 3, 0) = 0x40007000
  close(3)= 0
  stat(/etc/ld.so.preload, 0xb7d8)  = -1 ENOENT (No such file or 
  directory)
  open(/lib/libc.so.5, O_RDONLY)= 3
  read(3, \177ELF\1\1\1\0\0\0\0\0\0\0\0\0\3\0\3\0\1\0\0\0|-\1\000..., 4096) 
  = 4096
  mmap(NULL, 778240, PROT_NONE, MAP_PRIVATE|MAP_ANONYMOUS, -1, 0) = 0x4000a000
  mmap(0x4000a000, 543683, PROT_READ|PROT_EXEC, MAP_PRIVATE|MAP_FIXED, 3, 0) 
  = 0x4000a000
  mmap(0x4008f000, 23252, PROT_READ|PROT_WRITE, MAP_PRIVATE|MAP_FIXED, 3, 
  0x84000) = 0x4008f000
  mmap(0x40095000, 207484, PROT_READ|PROT_WRITE, 
  MAP_PRIVATE|MAP_FIXED|MAP_ANONYMOUS, -1, 0) = 0x40095000
  close(3)= 0
  mprotect(0x4000a000, 543683, PROT_READ|PROT_WRITE|PROT_EXEC) = 0
  munmap(0x40007000, 11649)   = 0
  --- SIGSEGV (Segmentation fault) ---
  +++ killed by SIGSEGV +++
  
  [EMAIL PROTECTED]:/bin# cd /home/cfo/.bin
  
  [EMAIL PROTECTED]:/home/cfo/.bin# strace ./ledger-libc5 
  execve(./ledger-libc5, [./ledger-libc5], [/* 56 vars */]) = 0
  mmap(NULL, 4096, PROT_READ|PROT_WRITE, MAP_PRIVATE|MAP_ANONYMOUS, -1, 0) = 
  0x40006000
  mprotect(0x4000, 19058, PROT_READ|PROT_WRITE|PROT_EXEC) = 0
  mprotect(0x8048000, 20200, PROT_READ|PROT_WRITE|PROT_EXEC) = 0
  stat(/etc/ld.so.cache, {st_mode=S_IFREG|0644, st_size=11649, ...}) = 0
  open(/etc/ld.so.cache, O_RDONLY)  = 3
  mmap(NULL, 11649, PROT_READ, MAP_SHARED, 3, 0) = 0x40007000
  close(3)= 0
  stat(/etc/ld.so.preload, 0xb7d8)  = -1 ENOENT (No such file or 
  directory)
  open(/lib/libc.so.5, O_RDONLY)= 3
  read(3, \177ELF\1\1\1\0\0\0\0\0\0\0\0\0\3\0\3\0\1\0\0\0|-\1\000..., 4096) 
  = 4096
  mmap(NULL, 778240, PROT_NONE, MAP_PRIVATE|MAP_ANONYMOUS, -1, 0) = 0x4000a000
  mmap(0x4000a000, 543683, PROT_READ|PROT_EXEC, MAP_PRIVATE|MAP_FIXED, 3, 0) 
  = 0x4000a000
  mmap(0x4008f000, 23252, PROT_READ|PROT_WRITE, MAP_PRIVATE|MAP_FIXED, 3, 
  0x84000) = 0x4008f000
  mmap(0x40095000, 207484, PROT_READ|PROT_WRITE, 
  MAP_PRIVATE|MAP_FIXED|MAP_ANONYMOUS, -1, 0) = 0x40095000
  close(3)= 0
  mprotect(0x4000a000, 543683, PROT_READ|PROT_WRITE|PROT_EXEC) = 0
  munmap(0x40007000, 11649)   = 0
  --- SIGSEGV (Segmentation fault) ---
  +++ killed by SIGSEGV +++
  [EMAIL PROTECTED]:/home/cfo/.bin# exit
  exit
  
  Script done on Mon Sep 20 19:50:58 1999
  
  /lib/ld*
  
  -rwxr-xr-x   1 root root81786 Sep 17 09:56 ld-2.1.2.so
  lrwxrwxrwx   1 root root   13 Sep 14  1998 ld-linux.so - 
  ld-linux.so.2
  lrwxrwxrwx   1 root root   18 Sep 18 19:08 ld-linux.so.1 - 
  ld-linux.so.1.9.11
  -rwxr-xr-x   1 root root22311 Sep 17 10:52 ld-linux.so.1.9.11
  lrwxrwxrwx 

Re: Which gcc builds potato?

1999-09-21 Thread Dale Scheetz
On 21 Sep 1999, Ruud de Rooij wrote:

 Dale Scheetz [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
 
  So, what, if anything, is being built with egcs? 
 
 Nothing, since egcs does not exist in the distribution anymore.

Well, egcs 1.1.2-2 is still in my source archives, so someone must be
using it. egcs64 is currently being used to build Ultra kernels, so I
figured the 32 bit egcs was being used for some purpose as well.

Thanks,

Dwarf
--
_-_-_-_-_-   Author of The Debian Linux User's Guide  _-_-_-_-_-_-

aka   Dale Scheetz   Phone:   1 (850) 656-9769
  Flexible Software  11000 McCrackin Road
  e-mail:  [EMAIL PROTECTED] Tallahassee, FL  32308

_-_-_-_-_-_- See www.linuxpress.com for more details  _-_-_-_-_-_-_-



RE: debconf for configuring a room full of machines

1999-09-21 Thread Sean 'Shaleh' Perry
The bigger issue is that until debconf has a real db, passing the answers an
admin would want into packages is rather painful.

Yes, this will allow for great power -- in the future.  The Debian install
procedure is undergoing lots of change.



unsibscribe

1999-09-21 Thread Nick Jennings
unsubscribe debian-devel@lists.debian.org



Re: Which gcc builds potato?

1999-09-21 Thread Matthias Klose
Ben Collins writes:
  On Tue, Sep 21, 1999 at 10:19:48AM +, Dale Scheetz wrote:
   OK, I have recovered to a slink system, and I'm ready to upgrade it to
   potato, which raises the above question. There are two gcc versions
   available in the archives. Which one is being used to build the system?
   Will either work? The libraries are pretty self explanitory, with the
   exception of ncurses, which I assume is to be version 4 from what is found
   in base?
   
   Waiting is,
  
  gcc272 is not to be used at all for building sparc packages, I wish it
  would just die right out of the distribution personally :)

hmm, still needed for providing the libstdc++ library for netscape et al.
we can get rid of gobjc272 however. I did not follow compilation of
newer 2.0.xx kernels with gcc-2.95.



Re: Which gcc builds potato?

1999-09-21 Thread Matthias Klose
Dale Scheetz writes:
  On 21 Sep 1999, Ruud de Rooij wrote:
  
   Dale Scheetz [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
   
So, what, if anything, is being built with egcs? 
   
   Nothing, since egcs does not exist in the distribution anymore.
  
  Well, egcs 1.1.2-2 is still in my source archives, so someone must be
  using it. egcs64 is currently being used to build Ultra kernels, so I
  figured the 32 bit egcs was being used for some purpose as well.

The egcs packages are used to build the libstdc++2.8 and libstdc++2.9
packages and therefore are still in potato. For the release they have
to be modified to build the runtime libraries only (if you want to
step forward for this task, you are welcome).

Starting with gcc-2.95.2-0pre2 the sparc gcc can build 32 bit and 64
bit binaries. I assume egcs64 will be kept as a fallback as we do with 
gcc272 for the other architectures.



/usr/share/doc will introduce lots of strangeness

1999-09-21 Thread Peter S Galbraith

I do all my work on Debian Slink i386, but just made a potato
install on Alpha.  To my surprise, some of my packages are broken
wrt the /usr/share issue on alpha.  Note that these are packages
that I haven't upgraded yet wrt this issue, and so they are
stated in the control file to be compliant to policy version
2.4.1 (and not 3.0.1).

$ dpkg -L xwatch
[cut]
/usr/doc
/usr/doc/xwatch
/usr/doc/xwatch/html
/usr/doc/xwatch/html/xwatch.html
/usr/doc/xwatch/html/xwatch01.html
/usr/doc/xwatch/html/xwatch02.html
/usr/doc/xwatch/html/xwatch03.html
/usr/doc/xwatch/html/xwatch04.html
/usr/doc/xwatch/html/xwatch05.html
/usr/doc/xwatch/html/index.html
/usr/doc/xwatch/xwatch.txt
/usr/share
/usr/share/doc
/usr/share/doc/xwatch
/usr/share/doc/xwatch/copyright
/usr/share/doc/xwatch/changelog.gz
/usr/share/doc/xwatch/README.debian
/usr/share/doc/xwatch/MAINTAINER.README
/usr/share/doc/xwatch/xwatch.README
/usr/share/doc/xwatch/changelog.Debian.gz
[cut]

My rules file installed the html files by hand in
/usr/doc/xwatch/html/ and debstd installed the other doc files
(readme, changelog and copyright).

I'm guessing a _lot_ of ported packages will be broken like
this since maybe developers use a combination of hand-rolling
commands and either debmake or debhelper commands in their rules
file.

As soon as a policy package is uploaded that is compliant with
the technical committee's decision on this issue, I plan to
upload new versions of all my packages such that they will be
rebuilt in all arches.  But if many developers don't do this for
potato, I'm sure non-i386 architectures will have a messy potato
release! 

-- 
Peter Galbraith, research scientist  [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Maurice Lamontagne Institute, Department of Fisheries and Oceans Canada
P.O. Box 1000, Mont-Joli Qc, G5H 3Z4 Canada. 418-775-0852 FAX: 775-0546
6623'rd GNU/Linux user at the Counter - http://counter.li.org/ 



Re: Which gcc builds potato?

1999-09-21 Thread Joel Klecker
At 20:00 +0200 1999-09-21, Matthias Klose wrote:
The egcs packages are used to build the libstdc++2.8 and libstdc++2.9
packages and therefore are still in potato. For the release they have
to be modified to build the runtime libraries only (if you want to
step forward for this task, you are welcome).
It also needs to build some sort of c compiler for alpha, since gcc 
2.95* cannot compile glibc on that architecture. Unless there is a 
fix in 2.95.2, which I doubt since I have seen it said that the root 
of the problem is too big to be addressed in a point release.

Also, there is not the possibility to build 'libstdc++2.8' or 
'libstdc++2.9' on a glibc 2.1-based system due to ABI changes in 
libio.
--
Joel Klecker (aka Espy)Debian GNU/Linux Developer
URL:mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] URL:mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
URL:http://web.espy.org/   URL:http://www.debian.org/



Re: Which gcc builds potato?

1999-09-21 Thread Ben Collins
On Tue, Sep 21, 1999 at 12:49:29PM +, Dale Scheetz wrote:
 On 21 Sep 1999, Ruud de Rooij wrote:
 
  Dale Scheetz [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
  
   So, what, if anything, is being built with egcs? 
  
  Nothing, since egcs does not exist in the distribution anymore.
 
 Well, egcs 1.1.2-2 is still in my source archives, so someone must be
 using it. egcs64 is currently being used to build Ultra kernels, so I
 figured the 32 bit egcs was being used for some purpose as well.
 
egcs isn't used anymore and is obsoleted by the latest gcc 2.95.x line.

Ben



ITO penguineyes and bvi

1999-09-21 Thread Christian Kurz
Hi,

I intent to orphan bvi and penguineyes. I will orphan bvi, because I
don't use it much anymore and penugineyes will get orphaned, because I
gave gnome I try, but I don't like it much and so I want to remove it,
which makes packaging penguineyes a bit hard. If somebody wants to take
one of the packages over, feel free to do so.

Ciao
 Christian
-- 

* Christian Kurz  Debian Developer/QA-Team *
*   Use Debian - a free Operating System   *




Re: Metapackages (was Re: Debian Weekly News - September 14th, 1999)

1999-09-21 Thread Joey Hess
Nicolás Lichtmaier wrote:
  I also find apt 0.3.11's apt-cache search to be quite useful (and fast).
 
  I use:
 
 perl -n00e '/xml/i  print;' /var/state/apt/lists/*Packages | less
 
  (to search for XML related packaged e.g.)

[EMAIL PROTECTED]:~apt-cache search xml
libroxen-swarm - Swarning stars module for the Roxen Challenger web server
cdindex-client - cdindex is intended to be the opensource replacement of
cddb(tm)
libroxen-mailit - Mail sening module for the Roxen Challenger web server
libroxen-floatingcode - FLOAT tag module for the Roxen Challenger web server
pythondoc - Generate reference manuals and indices from Python objects.
libxml-perl - Collection of Perl modules for working with XML
lib-xt-java - An implementation in Java of XSL Transformations
libxmltok1 - XML Parser Toolkit, runtime libraries
lib-xp-java - An XML Parser in Java
docbook-xml - XML DTD for DocBook
xbel-utils - XML Bookmark Exchange Language Utilities
sp - James Clark's SGML parsing tools
libxml-parser-perl - A Perl extension interface to expat.
librxp1 - Shared library for XML parsing and validating
xpuzzles - Collection of puzzles for X
gnome-think - Hierarchical organizer and outliner
xmpuzzles - Collection of puzzles for X w/ lesstif
tdtd - Emacs major mode for editing SGML and XML DTDs
lib-sax-java - A Java API for SAX XML parsing
libxml-dom-perl - Extension to XML::Parser to add DOM v1 interface
docbk-xml2x - Perl scripts to convert DocBk XML documents into troff and
Texinfo
libsp1-dev - James Clark's SP suite, developer support
doc-html-w3 - Recommendations of the W3
php3-xml - XML module for PHP3 (apache)
php3-cgi-xml - XML module for PHP3 (cgi)
python-xml - XML tools for Python
libxml-cgi-perl - Perl module to convert CGI.pm variables from/to XML.

etc

-- 
see shy jo



Re: Which gcc builds potato?

1999-09-21 Thread Matthias Klose
Joel Klecker writes:
  At 20:00 +0200 1999-09-21, Matthias Klose wrote:
  The egcs packages are used to build the libstdc++2.8 and libstdc++2.9
  packages and therefore are still in potato. For the release they have
  to be modified to build the runtime libraries only (if you want to
  step forward for this task, you are welcome).
  
  It also needs to build some sort of c compiler for alpha, since gcc 
  2.95* cannot compile glibc on that architecture. Unless there is a 
  fix in 2.95.2, which I doubt since I have seen it said that the root 
  of the problem is too big to be addressed in a point release.

2.95.2 isn't released yet. So there is hope ...

  Also, there is not the possibility to build 'libstdc++2.8' or 
  'libstdc++2.9' on a glibc 2.1-based system due to ABI changes in 
  libio.

There is a patch in the bug report for libstdc++2.8; I didn't try yet
to build. libstdc++2.9 should be removed from potato and replaced by a 
symlink to libstdc++2.9-glibc-2.1. From my understanding, the
libstdc++2.9(-glibc-2.0) won't run reliable on a glibc-2.1 based
system. As a release goal for potato (well, we don't have release
goals anymore, do we ;-) all native packages should depend on
libstdc++-2.10. These packages should be recompiled with the final
gcc-2.95.2, which is expected in October.



Re: Which gcc builds potato?

1999-09-21 Thread Marcus Brinkmann
On Tue, Sep 21, 1999 at 09:23:07AM -0400, Ben Collins wrote:
 On Tue, Sep 21, 1999 at 12:49:29PM +, Dale Scheetz wrote:
  On 21 Sep 1999, Ruud de Rooij wrote:
  
   Dale Scheetz [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
   
So, what, if anything, is being built with egcs? 
   
   Nothing, since egcs does not exist in the distribution anymore.
  
  Well, egcs 1.1.2-2 is still in my source archives, so someone must be
  using it. egcs64 is currently being used to build Ultra kernels, so I
  figured the 32 bit egcs was being used for some purpose as well.
  
 egcs isn't used anymore and is obsoleted by the latest gcc 2.95.x line.

Not true. The Hurd port is still using egcs. We would like to switch to gcc
2.95.x, but it has some problems. Mark Kettenis is working on it, and I am
sure we will follow very soon, but anyway, currently egcs is the only option
for us.

(gcc 2.95.x couldn't compile itself last time I tried).

Marcus

-- 
`Rhubarb is no Egyptian god.' Debian http://www.debian.org  Check Key server 
Marcus Brinkmann  GNUhttp://www.gnu.orgfor public PGP Key 
[EMAIL PROTECTED]PGP Key ID 36E7CD09
http://homepage.ruhr-uni-bochum.de/Marcus.Brinkmann/



Re: debconf for configuring a room full of machines

1999-09-21 Thread Scott Barker
On Tue, Sep 21, 1999 at 04:19:43PM +0100, Edward Betts wrote:
 Write some code? Most Unix tools are written because people want to use
 them.

Network databases aren't my area of expertise. I've written plenty of code,
just not code dealing with that.

 What timescale where you thinking about?

Immediately :)

Actually, as soon as debconf can handle what I need it to, I plan on
converting all the packages I need myself if I have to (and I'll pass my
changes on to the maintainters, if they want them).

-- 
Scott Barker   [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Linux Consultant   http://www.mostlylinux.ab.ca/scott

Looking for a husband? Know anyone looking for a husband? Well, I'm looking
for a wife. See http://www.mostlylinux.ab.ca/scott/wife.shtml

Want a good deal on a personal computer in Calgary, Alberta, Canada?
Visit http://www.mostlylinux.ab.ca/scott/computers.shtml

[ Unsolicited commercial and junk e-mail will be proof-read for US$100 ]

In times like these, it helps to recall that there have always been times
   like these.
   - Paul Harvey



Re: A few changes

1999-09-21 Thread Wichert Akkerman
Previously Joseph Carter wrote:
 Essentially, it does exactly what people like me have been complaining it
 didn't do:  IGNORE the MIME/PGP/whatever crap and just read the message.

That would be bad. At the very least it should complain loudly if the
message does not verify.

Wichert.

-- 
==
This combination of bytes forms a message written to you by Wichert Akkerman.
E-Mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
WWW: http://www.wi.leidenuniv.nl/~wichert/


pgpVLUFYV6RjU.pgp
Description: PGP signature


Re: A few changes

1999-09-21 Thread Darren Benham
The BTS should check pgp signatures?

On Tue, Sep 21, 1999 at 10:49:44PM +0200, Wichert Akkerman wrote:
 Previously Joseph Carter wrote:
  Essentially, it does exactly what people like me have been complaining it
  didn't do:  IGNORE the MIME/PGP/whatever crap and just read the message.
 
 That would be bad. At the very least it should complain loudly if the
 message does not verify.
 
 Wichert.
 
 -- 
 ==
 This combination of bytes forms a message written to you by Wichert Akkerman.
 E-Mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 WWW: http://www.wi.leidenuniv.nl/~wichert/




pgp04OPoBbzMr.pgp
Description: PGP signature


Re: A few changes

1999-09-21 Thread Samuel Tardieu
On 21/09, Darren Benham wrote:

| The BTS should check pgp signatures?

Well, IMO, [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED] and [EMAIL PROTECTED] should.


pgpOO3jJIuj3l.pgp
Description: PGP signature


Debian Weekly News - September 21st, 1999

1999-09-21 Thread Joey Hess
-- 
Debian Weekly News 
http://www.debian.org/News/weekly/current/issue/
Debian Weekly News - September 21st, 1999
-- 

Welcome to Debian Weekly News, a newsletter for the Debian developer
community.

Debconf has been released. Debconf is a configuration management tool
that lets Debian packages ask questions at install time using several
different interfaces. Plain text, dialog, GTK and web UI's are
currently supported, as well as non-interactive intallations. It will
support remote databases in the future, allowing whole clusters of
machines to be configured the same. Read the [8]introduction to
Debconf for more information. Quite a few people are eager to begin
using it soon.

Corel has started a closed beta test of their Corel Linux
distribution. Unfortunatly, they did so under a very restrictive
license, that [9]violates the GPL in several respects. The good news
is that Bruce Perens has already [10]contected Corel and we're
promised that this will be fixed.

The debian-laptop list has made a [11]proposal for making Debian more
laptop friendly. The idea is to create special laptop kernels, plus a
laptop meta package that pulls together everything a laptop user
needs. There seems to be no Linux distribution with a dedicated
laptop support yet, so Debian would be leading the way in this area.

Should proftpd be moved to contrib for security reasons? Many security
holes have been found it it lately and it seems likely more will show
up in the future, so some think it's a good idea to [12]move it out of
the main distribution. The maintainer prefers to [13]wait and see what
the situation is like when we freeze.

Joey Hess [14]posted what he confesses is a crazy idea: Fly all the
developers into a central location and have a debian conference. Many
people would like to go to such an event and think it'd be a good
thing for Debian and a lot of fun. But of course, no one knows where
we could find the large amount of money this would take, or what could
possibly be considered a central location for such a distributed
project.

Here's the [15]Debian JP News for this week. It includes an
interesting virtual apt server that generates packages apt requests,
from a running Debian system, using dpkg-repack.

New packages in Debian this week include the following and [16]28
more:
  * [17]chbg: ChBg is used for changing desktop background pictures in
X11
  * [18]clanlib0-display-glx: ClanLib display target for MesaGL
([19]dev)
  * [20]jmon: distributed resource monitor
  * [21]libgc5: Conservative garbage collector for C ([22]dev)
  * [23]libgd-gif1: GD Graphics Library with gif support ([24]tools,
[25]dev)
  * [26]libmon-perl: mon Perl modules for clients and server
  * [27]libsnmp4.0: UCD SNMP (Simple Network Management Protocol)
Library. ([28]dev)
  * [29]pidentd: TCP/IP IDENT protocol server.
  * [30]pydb: An enhanced Python command-line debugger
  * [31]python-pam: A Python interface to the PAM library.

Followups to last week's news:
  * In the wake of last week's changes the the Bug Tracking System,
Darren Benham posted a [32]summary of the changes he's made so
far. The biggest changs are that old fixed bugs are never deleted
anymore, they are archived, and that the BTS fully supports
PGP/GPG signed and mime formatted email.
  * The Debian Quality Assurance [33]web site is up.

Thanks to Randolph Chung and Katsura S. Yoshio for [34]contributing.
  _

References
8. http://www.debian.org/Lists-Archives/debian-devel-9909/msg01500.html
9. http://slashdot.org/article.pl?sid=99/09/20/1051226mode=nested
10. http://www.debian.org/Lists-Archives/debian-user-9909/msg02660.html
11. http://www.snafu.de/~wehe/debian_linux.html
12. http://www.debian.org/Lists-Archives/debian-devel-9909/msg01433.html
13. http://www.debian.org/Lists-Archives/debian-devel-9909/msg01434.html
14. http://www.debian.org/Lists-Archives/debian-devel-9909/msg01283.html
15. http://www2.osk.3web.ne.jp/~shishamo/debian/trans/djwn/wn091999.html
16. http://master.debian.org/~tausq/newpkgs.html
17. http://www.debian.org/Packages/unstable/graphics/chbg.html
18. http://www.debian.org/Packages/unstable/libs/clanlib0-display-glx.html
19. http://www.debian.org/Packages/unstable/devel/clanlib0-display-glx-dev.html
20. http://www.debian.org/Packages/unstable/admin/jmon.html
21. http://www.debian.org/Packages/unstable/libs/libgc5.html
22. http://www.debian.org/Packages/unstable/devel/libgc5-dev.html
23. http://www.debian.org/Packages/unstable/libs/libgd-gif1.html
24. http://www.debian.org/Packages/unstable/graphics/libgd-gif-tools.html
25. http://www.debian.org/Packages/unstable/libs/libgd-gif1-dev.html
26. http://www.debian.org/Packages/unstable/interpreters/libmon-perl.html
27.