Bug#452022: dpkg-dev: please ignore symbols differences on non-official architectures
On Tue, 20 Nov 2007, Riku Voipio wrote: On armel architecture, the symbol differences have usually been inlined softfloat symbols being exported. Which is additional symbols and would thus not break symbol checking (if I understood correctly). Yes. What is more worrying is the lack of unofficial arch information in mole. You're welcome to help make it available. mole is hosted on merkel, its source code is on a public repository. Jeroen seemed to think that it shouldn't be too difficult to do. Jeroen, can you look into it? Thus maintainers are not aware of issues with their packages on unofficial archs until someeon files a bug. That's true even for official arches in many cases. :) Anyway, I have nothing against adding support for unofficial arches on mole but the unofficial arches need to be made available in some coherent archive to not have to hardcode an URL for each unofficial arch. Be that gnuab.org or doorstep.debian.net, it doesn't matter much. Though it's worth asking ourselves if it would make sense to have an intermediary fallback between debian/*.symbols.arch and debian/*.symbols that would be debian/*.symbols.kernel. One option would be to use dpkg-architecture provided variables: I know that, it's precisely because it's easy to do that I suggested it. If it's useful, I'll implement it. Cheers, -- Raphaël Hertzog Premier livre français sur Debian GNU/Linux : http://www.ouaza.com/livre/admin-debian/
Bug#452022: dpkg-dev: please ignore symbols differences on non-official architectures
On Tue, 20 Nov 2007, Raphael Hertzog wrote: Unfortunately I don't really like this idea because sbuild doesn't keep environment variables, and I don't really want to patch sbuild every time I want to update it instead of using the .deb package directly from debian-admin. This is surely a feature that could be added to sbuild. I asked neuro on IRC, I'm waiting his answer. FWIW, Ryan is not interested to add this feature. During the discussion, we came to the conclusion that we should rather avoid using debian/*.symbols files in favor of debian/*.symbols.arch when the package maintainer is not sure if there's going to be differences in the set of symbols for all architectures. He can use #include to avoid duplicating the content too many times. That way unofficial arch won't use symbols files until the maintainer explicitely added support for them. Cheers, -- Raphaël Hertzog Premier livre français sur Debian GNU/Linux : http://www.ouaza.com/livre/admin-debian/
Bug#452262: dpkg-shlibdeps: Undefined subroutine main::capit.
Package: dpkg-dev Version: 1.14.9 Severity: important Hi, When running dpkg-shlibdeps (with the -d command line option) from debian/rules of one of my packages, it aborts with the following error message: Undefined subroutine main::capit called at /usr/bin/dpkg-shlibdeps line 62. This subroutine is defined in /usr/lib/dpkg/controllib.pl which no longer gets included in dpkg-shlibdeps. TIA, Sebastian -- System Information: Debian Release: lenny/sid APT prefers unstable APT policy: (500, 'unstable') Architecture: i386 (x86_64) Kernel: Linux 2.6.17.13-vs2.0.2.1 Locale: LANG=C, LC_CTYPE=C (charmap=ANSI_X3.4-1968) Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/bash Versions of packages dpkg-dev depends on: ii binutils2.18.1~cvs20071027-1 The GNU assembler, linker and bina ii cpio2.9-6GNU cpio -- a program to manage ar ii dpkg1.14.9 package maintenance system for Deb ii make3.81-3 The GNU version of the make util ii patch 2.5.9-4 Apply a diff file to an original ii perl [perl5]5.8.8-12 Larry Wall's Practical Extraction ii perl-modules5.8.8-12 Core Perl modules Versions of packages dpkg-dev recommends: ii bzip2 1.0.3-7high-quality block-sorting file co ii gcc [c-compiler] 4:4.2.1-6 The GNU C compiler ii gcc-3.4 [c-compiler] 3.4.6-6The GNU C compiler ii gcc-4.2 [c-compiler] 4.2.2-3The GNU C compiler -- no debconf information -- Sebastian tokkee Harl +++ GnuPG-ID: 0x8501C7FC +++ http://tokkee.org/ Those who would give up Essential Liberty to purchase a little Temporary Safety, deserve neither Liberty nor Safety. -- Benjamin Franklin signature.asc Description: Digital signature
Bug#452273: dpkg-gencontrol: incorrect warning deb package with udeb specific field Installer-Menu-Item
Package: dpkg-dev
Version: 1.14.9
Severity: normal
Tags: d-i
During a build of debian-installer-utils, I got the following warnings:
dh_gencontrol -i
dpkg-gencontrol: warning: deb package with udeb specific field
Installer-Menu-Item
dpkg-gencontrol: warning: deb package with udeb specific field
Installer-Menu-Item
dpkg-gencontrol: warning: deb package with udeb specific field
Installer-Menu-Item
However, debian-installer-utils does not contain _any_ deb packages,
only udebs. So the warning is clearly incorrect.
The cause may be that the header saying they are a udeb is in the
control file _after_ the header listing the menu item. The code should
probably allow for that.
Example of the control fields for one of the udebs:
Package: di-utils-shell
Architecture: all
Depends: ${misc:Depends}, di-utils (= 1.18)
XB-Installer-Menu-Item: 95000
Description: Execute a shell
XC-Package-Type: udeb
-- System Information:
Debian Release: lenny/sid
APT prefers unstable
APT policy: (500, 'unstable')
Architecture: amd64 (x86_64)
Kernel: Linux 2.6.24-rc3 (SMP w/4 CPU cores)
Locale: LANG=en_US.UTF-8, LC_CTYPE=en_US.UTF-8 (charmap=UTF-8)
Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/bash
Versions of packages dpkg-dev depends on:
ii binutils2.18.1~cvs20071027-1 The GNU assembler, linker and bina
ii cpio2.9-6GNU cpio -- a program to manage ar
ii dpkg1.14.9 package maintenance system for Deb
ii make3.81-3 The GNU version of the make util
ii patch 2.5.9-4 Apply a diff file to an original
ii perl [perl5]5.8.8-12 Larry Wall's Practical Extraction
ii perl-modules5.8.8-12 Core Perl modules
Versions of packages dpkg-dev recommends:
ii bzip2 1.0.3-7high-quality block-sorting file co
ii gcc [c-compiler] 4:4.2.1-6 The GNU C compiler
ii gcc-4.1 [c-compiler] 4.1.2-17 The GNU C compiler
ii gcc-4.2 [c-compiler] 4.2.2-3The GNU C compiler
-- no debconf information
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#452273: dpkg-gencontrol: incorrect warning deb package with udeb specific field Installer-Menu-Item
On Wednesday 21 November 2007, Frans Pop wrote: Should we start converting to use Package-Type? Note that doing so now would _add_ the Package-Type header in control files, which I do not think is desired. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#452273: dpkg-gencontrol: incorrect warning deb package with udeb specific field Installer-Menu-Item
The actual problem seems to be that XC-Package-Type is not included in %f. Maybe because of the XC- prefix? From a debugging session: %f = ( 'Architecture' = 'all' 'Depends' = 'cdebconf-udeb, di-utils (= 1.18)' 'Description' = 'Execute a shell' 'Installer-Menu-Item' = 95000 'Maintainer' = 'Debian Install System Team [EMAIL PROTECTED]' 'Package' = 'di-utils-shell' 'Priority' = 'standard' 'Section' = 'debian-installer' 'Version' = 1.50 ) Note that almost all udebs currently have XC-Package-Type as header instead of Package-Type, so supporting that would be very much appreciated. Should we start converting to use Package-Type?
Processed: setting package to dpkg dpkg-dev dselect, tagging 452262
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: # Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.10.11 package dpkg dpkg-dev dselect Ignoring bugs not assigned to: dselect dpkg-dev dpkg tags 452262 + pending Bug#452262: dpkg-shlibdeps: Undefined subroutine main::capit. There were no tags set. Tags added: pending End of message, stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database) -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Processed: capit bug
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: severity 452262 serious Bug#452262: dpkg-shlibdeps: Undefined subroutine main::capit. Severity set to `serious' from `important' quit Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database) -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#452262: dpkg-shlibdeps: Undefined subroutine main::capit.
On Wed, 21 Nov 2007, Sebastian Harl wrote: When running dpkg-shlibdeps (with the -d command line option) from debian/rules of one of my packages, it aborts with the following error message: Undefined subroutine main::capit called at /usr/bin/dpkg-shlibdeps line 62. Thanks for the report, it's fixed in the git repo and will be in 1.14.10. Cheers, -- Raphaël Hertzog Premier livre français sur Debian GNU/Linux : http://www.ouaza.com/livre/admin-debian/
Bug#31311: Join our marketing team
We are Looking for partners worldwide. The position is home-based. Our Company Head Office is located in UK with branches all over the world. We are looking for talented, honest, reliable representatives from different regions. The ideal candidate will be an intelligent person, someone who can work autonomously with a high degree of enthusiasm. Our Company offers a very competitive salary to the successful candidate, along with an unrivalled career progression opportunity. If you would like to work with our active, dynamic team, we invite you to apply for employment. Preference will be given to applicants with knowledge of multiple languages. Please send the following information to [EMAIL PROTECTED] 1. Full name 2 Address of residence 3 Contact Phone numbers 4 Languages spoken 5 Whether you are interested in part time job or full time employment. Thank you. We look forward to working with you. If you received this message in error, please send a blank email to: [EMAIL PROTECTED] -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#134758: Create a successful career within our company
We are Looking for partners worldwide. The position is home-based. Our Company Head Office is located in UK with branches all over the world. We are looking for talented, honest, reliable representatives from different regions. The ideal candidate will be an intelligent person, someone who can work autonomously with a high degree of enthusiasm. Our Company offers a very competitive salary to the successful candidate, along with an unrivalled career progression opportunity. If you would like to work with our active, dynamic team, we invite you to apply for employment. Preference will be given to applicants with knowledge of multiple languages. Please send the following information to [EMAIL PROTECTED] 1. Full name 2 Address of residence 3 Contact Phone numbers 4 Languages spoken 5 Whether you are interested in part time job or full time employment. Thank you. We look forward to working with you. If you received this message in error, please send a blank email to: [EMAIL PROTECTED] -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#262596: marked as forwarded ([INSTALL-INFO] support documents with more than one section)
Your message dated Wed, 21 Nov 2007 20:12:47 + with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED] has caused the Debian Bug report #262596, regarding [INSTALL-INFO] support documents with more than one section to be marked as having been forwarded to the upstream software author(s) . (NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact me immediately.) Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database) ---BeginMessage--- We are Looking for partners worldwide. The position is home-based. Our Company Head Office is located in UK with branches all over the world. We are looking for talented, honest, reliable representatives from different regions. The ideal candidate will be an intelligent person, someone who can work autonomously with a high degree of enthusiasm. Our Company offers a very competitive salary to the successful candidate, along with an unrivalled career progression opportunity. If you would like to work with our active, dynamic team, we invite you to apply for employment. Preference will be given to applicants with knowledge of multiple languages. Please send the following information to [EMAIL PROTECTED] 1. Full name 2 Address of residence 3 Contact Phone numbers 4 Languages spoken 5 Whether you are interested in part time job or full time employment. Thank you. We look forward to working with you. If you received this message in error, please send a blank email to: [EMAIL PROTECTED] ---End Message---
Bug#180127: marked as forwarded ([INSTALL-INFO] support new direntry format)
Your message dated Wed, 21 Nov 2007 20:12:47 + with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED] has caused the Debian Bug report #180127, regarding [INSTALL-INFO] support new direntry format to be marked as having been forwarded to the upstream software author(s) . (NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact me immediately.) Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database) ---BeginMessage--- We are Looking for partners worldwide. The position is home-based. Our Company Head Office is located in UK with branches all over the world. We are looking for talented, honest, reliable representatives from different regions. The ideal candidate will be an intelligent person, someone who can work autonomously with a high degree of enthusiasm. Our Company offers a very competitive salary to the successful candidate, along with an unrivalled career progression opportunity. If you would like to work with our active, dynamic team, we invite you to apply for employment. Preference will be given to applicants with knowledge of multiple languages. Please send the following information to [EMAIL PROTECTED] 1. Full name 2 Address of residence 3 Contact Phone numbers 4 Languages spoken 5 Whether you are interested in part time job or full time employment. Thank you. We look forward to working with you. If you received this message in error, please send a blank email to: [EMAIL PROTECTED] ---End Message---
Bug#452273: Package-Type
Frans seems to be spot on, dpkg should honor XC-Package-Type, and Package-Type should be treated as an implicitly XC field, that is not propigated into built packages. Unless you have a plan for including Package-Type in a [u]]deb that I'm unaware of. -- see shy jo signature.asc Description: Digital signature
Bug#155676: Create a successful career within our company
We are Looking for partners worldwide. The position is home-based. Our Company Head Office is located in UK with branches all over the world. We are looking for talented, honest, reliable representatives from different regions. The ideal candidate will be an intelligent person, someone who can work autonomously with a high degree of enthusiasm. Our Company offers a very competitive salary to the successful candidate, along with an unrivalled career progression opportunity. If you would like to work with our active, dynamic team, we invite you to apply for employment. Preference will be given to applicants with knowledge of multiple languages. Please send the following information to [EMAIL PROTECTED] 1. Full name 2 Address of residence 3 Contact Phone numbers 4 Languages spoken 5 Whether you are interested in part time job or full time employment. Thank you. We look forward to working with you. If you received this message in error, please send a blank email to: [EMAIL PROTECTED] -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#452273: dpkg-gencontrol: incorrect warning deb package with udeb specific field Installer-Menu-Item
Hi, On Wed, 2007-11-21 at 17:10:39 +0100, Frans Pop wrote: The actual problem seems to be that XC-Package-Type is not included in %f. Maybe because of the XC- prefix? From a debugging session: %f = ( 'Architecture' = 'all' 'Depends' = 'cdebconf-udeb, di-utils (= 1.18)' 'Description' = 'Execute a shell' 'Installer-Menu-Item' = 95000 'Maintainer' = 'Debian Install System Team [EMAIL PROTECTED]' 'Package' = 'di-utils-shell' 'Priority' = 'standard' 'Section' = 'debian-installer' 'Version' = 1.50 ) Note that almost all udebs currently have XC-Package-Type as header instead of Package-Type, so supporting that would be very much appreciated. It's not included and has never been, because only the ones with B are. But now it's explicit given that dpkg-gencontrol supports the field. Package-Type should have been XB- from the beginning. That information is pertinent to the binary package and not to the changes file. Also this way dpkg-deb will be able to automatically select the correct extension, for example. So if there's no other argument I'll close the bug report tomorrow or so. Note that apart from the warning the current udebs should build as before. Should we start converting to use Package-Type? Sure. regards, guillem -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#452273: dpkg-gencontrol: incorrect warning deb package with udeb specific field Installer-Menu-Item
Guillem Jover wrote: It's not included and has never been, because only the ones with B are. But now it's explicit given that dpkg-gencontrol supports the field. Package-Type should have been XB- from the beginning. That information is pertinent to the binary package and not to the changes file. No, there is no reason to bloat udebs with this infrormation. This information is only used when building udebs. -- see shy jo signature.asc Description: Digital signature
