Processed: setting package to dpkg dpkg-dev dselect, tagging 76295, tagging 220044, tagging 245562 ... ... ... ... ... ...
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > # Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.10.11 > package dpkg dpkg-dev dselect Ignoring bugs not assigned to: dselect dpkg-dev dpkg > tags 76295 + pending Bug#76295: [U-A] update-alternative doesn't check consistency if only one alternative There were no tags set. Bug#246906: /usr/sbin/update-alternatives: 'update-alternatives --sane' should clean up the database Bug#433567: emacs: alternatives problem Bug#451872: emacs22-gtk: replacing emacs-snapshot by emacs22 leads to broken alternatives Tags added: pending > tags 220044 + pending Bug#220044: update-alternatives does not restore (lost) link for slave files in target location Tags were: patch Bug#392440: update-alternatives could put an end to dangling symlinks Tags added: pending > tags 245562 + pending Bug#245562: dpkg-divert: no error reported when diverting into unexisting dir, even when --rename is not given Tags were: patch Tags added: pending > tags 246906 + pending Bug#246906: /usr/sbin/update-alternatives: 'update-alternatives --sane' should clean up the database Tags were: pending Bug#76295: [U-A] update-alternative doesn't check consistency if only one alternative Bug#433567: emacs: alternatives problem Bug#451872: emacs22-gtk: replacing emacs-snapshot by emacs22 leads to broken alternatives Tags added: pending > tags 392440 + pending Bug#392440: update-alternatives could put an end to dangling symlinks Tags were: pending patch Bug#220044: update-alternatives does not restore (lost) link for slave files in target location Tags added: pending > tags 433567 + pending Bug#433567: emacs: alternatives problem Tags were: pending Bug#76295: [U-A] update-alternative doesn't check consistency if only one alternative Bug#246906: /usr/sbin/update-alternatives: 'update-alternatives --sane' should clean up the database Bug#451872: emacs22-gtk: replacing emacs-snapshot by emacs22 leads to broken alternatives Tags added: pending > tags 441021 + pending Bug#441021: dpkg: update-alternatives breaks config on uninstall There were no tags set. Tags added: pending > tags 443241 + pending Bug#443241: dpkg: slave link for rxvt alternative lost, not being re-created There were no tags set. Tags added: pending > tags 451872 + pending Bug#451872: emacs22-gtk: replacing emacs-snapshot by emacs22 leads to broken alternatives Tags were: pending Bug#76295: [U-A] update-alternative doesn't check consistency if only one alternative Bug#246906: /usr/sbin/update-alternatives: 'update-alternatives --sane' should clean up the database Bug#433567: emacs: alternatives problem Tags added: pending > End of message, stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database) -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#457863: does not install
Hi, On Wed, 2007-12-26 at 17:54:56 +0100, David Andel wrote: > Package: aterm > Version: 1.0.1-3 > Severity: important > > Setting up aterm (1.0.1-3) ... > Use of uninitialized value in length at /usr/sbin/update-alternatives line > 735. I've fixed this now in git, but it should not be fatal. > update-alternatives: error or eof reading > /var/lib/dpkg/alternatives/x-terminal-emulator for update_mode () > dpkg: error processing aterm (--configure): > subprocess post-installation script returned error exit status 2 Could you send your '/var/lib/dpkg/alternatives/x-terminal-emulator' to this bug report? thanks, guillem -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Processed: Re: Bug#457863: does not install
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > reassign 457863 dpkg Bug#457863: does not install Bug reassigned from package `aterm' to `dpkg'. > thanks Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database) -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#457833: dpkg-shlibdeps: Doesn't find 32 bit libraries on amd64.
On Wed, Dec 26, 2007 at 02:54:11PM +0100, Raphael Hertzog wrote: > forcemerge 453885 457833 > thanks > > On Wed, 26 Dec 2007, Kurt Roeckx wrote: > > When building wine on amd64 we get the following error: > > dpkg-shlibdeps: failure: no dependency information found for > > /usr/lib32/libxml2.so.2 (used by debian/libwine/usr/lib/wine/msxml3.dll.so). > > > > The problem is that "/usr/lib32" is a symlink in the libc6-i386 package > > to /emul/ia32-linux/usr/lib where the library really is and that the > > dynamic linker's search path contains /usr/lib32/. So dpkg-shlibdeps > > doesn't find the package that has libxml2.so.2 in it. > > Can you retry with a dpkg snapshot taken from git ? > > git clone git://git.debian.org/git/dpkg/dpkg.git > > This was already reported in #453885 and should be fixed in the next > upload. Now I get: dpkg-shlibdeps: failure: no dependency information found for /emul/ia32-linux/usr/lib/libxml2.so.2 (used by debian/libwine/usr/lib/wine/msxml3.dll.so). It seems that the ia32-libs.shlibs file doesn't contain the needed info for libxml2. I'll file a bug report for that. Kurt -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Processed: setting package to dpkg dpkg-dev dselect, tagging 457784
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > # Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.10.11 > package dpkg dpkg-dev dselect Ignoring bugs not assigned to: dselect dpkg-dev dpkg > tags 457784 + pending Bug#457784: dpkg-source: fails to build source package with -sp/-sk There were no tags set. Tags added: pending > End of message, stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database) -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Processed: reassign 457833 to dpkg-dev, forcibly merging 453885 457833
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > # Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.10.11 > reassign 457833 dpkg-dev 1.14.12 Bug#457833: dpkg-shlibdeps: Doesn't find 32 bit libraries on amd64. Bug reassigned from package `dpkg' to `dpkg-dev'. > forcemerge 453885 457833 Bug#453885: dpkg-shlibdeps changes can't track symlinks (/usr/lib, /usr/lib64) Bug#457833: dpkg-shlibdeps: Doesn't find 32 bit libraries on amd64. Forcibly Merged 453885 457833. > End of message, stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database) -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#205011: It has produced remarkable results that have never been seen before with NO negative side effects.
We do recommend the 6 month package for better results and higher savings. http://southnewti.com -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#457833: dpkg-shlibdeps: Doesn't find 32 bit libraries on amd64.
forcemerge 453885 457833 thanks On Wed, 26 Dec 2007, Kurt Roeckx wrote: > When building wine on amd64 we get the following error: > dpkg-shlibdeps: failure: no dependency information found for > /usr/lib32/libxml2.so.2 (used by debian/libwine/usr/lib/wine/msxml3.dll.so). > > The problem is that "/usr/lib32" is a symlink in the libc6-i386 package > to /emul/ia32-linux/usr/lib where the library really is and that the > dynamic linker's search path contains /usr/lib32/. So dpkg-shlibdeps > doesn't find the package that has libxml2.so.2 in it. Can you retry with a dpkg snapshot taken from git ? git clone git://git.debian.org/git/dpkg/dpkg.git This was already reported in #453885 and should be fixed in the next upload. Cheers, -- Raphaël Hertzog Le best-seller français mis à jour pour Debian Etch : http://www.ouaza.com/livre/admin-debian/
Bug#457784: dpkg-source: fails to build source package with -sp/-sk
On Wed, Dec 26, 2007 at 02:50:12PM +0100, Raphael Hertzog wrote: > On Tue, 25 Dec 2007, Philipp Kern wrote: > > It seems to me that $origtargz is not set correctly, i.e. it's non-empty > > only on some special codepaths, whereas it was initialised on > > declaration before. > Indeed. I committed the patch attached. Feel free to try it and report if > there are any bad side-effects to this change. I'm not in the position to tell if there are bad side-effects, but it fixes the problem for me. (o: Kind regards, Philipp Kern -- .''`. Philipp Kern(proud) Debian Developer : :' : http://philkern.de Ubuntu MOTU `. `' xmpp:[EMAIL PROTECTED] `-finger pkern/[EMAIL PROTECTED] signature.asc Description: Digital signature
Bug#457784: dpkg-source: fails to build source package with -sp/-sk
On Tue, 25 Dec 2007, Philipp Kern wrote:
> It seems to me that $origtargz is not set correctly, i.e. it's non-empty
> only on some special codepaths, whereas it was initialised on
> declaration before.
Indeed. I committed the patch attached. Feel free to try it and report if
there are any bad side-effects to this change.
Cheers,
--
Raphaël Hertzog
Le best-seller français mis à jour pour Debian Etch :
http://www.ouaza.com/livre/admin-debian/
commit e1cc494b6e8811fd4fc9fed2a7d458ae8849ccdd
Author: Raphael Hertzog <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Date: Wed Dec 26 14:47:50 2007 +0100
dpkg-source: fix regression in the behaviour of options -sk -sK -sp -sP
Those options need the name of a tarball in $origtargz but this variable
was only set if -sa or -sA was used (or if a tarball was explicitely
listed on the command line). $origtargz is now again set at declaration
time if we can find a corresponding tarball. Also add some comments to
make this part of the code somewhat more understandable.
diff --git a/ChangeLog b/ChangeLog
index 497ba7e..5421f37 100644
--- a/ChangeLog
+++ b/ChangeLog
@@ -1,3 +1,8 @@
+2007-12-26 Raphael Hertzog <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
+
+ * scripts/dpkg-source.pl: Provide a sane default $origtargz in all
+ cases when such a file exists.
+
2007-12-20 Raphael Hertzog <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
* scripts/dpkg-shlibdeps.pl: Always consider the shlibs of the
diff --git a/debian/changelog b/debian/changelog
index a67755f..d962f66 100644
--- a/debian/changelog
+++ b/debian/changelog
@@ -35,6 +35,7 @@ dpkg (1.14.13) UNRELEASED; urgency=low
sure that the generated dependency is at least as strict as this one.
* Fix dpkg-gensymbols to not update version info of a deprecated symbol.
Closes: #457739
+ * Fix dpkg-source's behaviour with options -sk -sK -sp -sP. Closes: #457784
[ Guillem Jover ]
* Ignore the man pages when building without NLS support. Closes: #457673
diff --git a/scripts/dpkg-source.pl b/scripts/dpkg-source.pl
index 020a0c4..0640db4 100755
--- a/scripts/dpkg-source.pl
+++ b/scripts/dpkg-source.pl
@@ -416,7 +416,22 @@ if ($opmode eq 'build') {
my $origdir = "$dir.orig";
my $origtargz;
+# Try to find a .orig tarball for the package
+my @origtargz = map { "$basename.orig.tar.$comp_ext{$_}" } ($compression,
@comp_supported);
+foreach my $origtar (@origtargz) {
+ if (stat($origtar)) {
+ -f _ || error(_g("packed orig `%s' exists but is not a plain file"),
+ $origtar);
+ $origtargz = $origtar;
+ last;
+ } elsif ($! != ENOENT) {
+ syserr(_g("unable to stat putative packed orig `%s'"), $origtar);
+ }
+}
+
if (@ARGV) {
+ # We have a second-argument or , check what it
+ # is to decide the mode to use
my $origarg = shift(@ARGV);
if (length($origarg)) {
stat($origarg) ||
@@ -447,27 +462,20 @@ if ($opmode eq 'build') {
$sourcestyle);
}
} elsif ($sourcestyle =~ m/[aA]/) {
- my @origtargz = map { "$basename.orig.tar.$comp_ext{$_}" }
($compression, @comp_supported);
- foreach my $origtar (@origtargz) {
- if (stat($origtar)) {
- -f _ || error(_g("packed orig `%s' exists but is not a plain
file"),
- $origtar);
- $sourcestyle =~ y/aA/pP/;
- $origtargz = $origtar;
- last;
- } elsif ($! != ENOENT) {
- syserr(_g("unable to stat putative packed orig `%s'"),
$origtar);
- }
- }
- if (!$origtargz) {
+ # We have no explicit or , try to use
+ # a .orig tarball first, then a .orig directory and fall back to
+ # creating a native .tar.gz
+ if ($origtargz) {
+ $sourcestyle =~ y/aA/pP/; # .orig.tar.
+ } else {
if (stat($origdir)) {
-d _ || error(_g("unpacked orig `%s' exists but is not a
directory"),
$origdir);
- $sourcestyle =~ y/aA/rR/;
+ $sourcestyle =~ y/aA/rR/; # .orig directory
} elsif ($! != ENOENT) {
syserr(_g("unable to stat putative unpacked orig `%s'"),
$origdir);
} else {
- $sourcestyle =~ y/aA/nn/;
+ $sourcestyle =~ y/aA/nn/; # Native tar.gz
}
}
}
Bug#457833: dpkg-shlibdeps: Doesn't find 32 bit libraries on amd64.
Package: dpkg Version: 1.14.12 Severity: important Hi, When building wine on amd64 we get the following error: dpkg-shlibdeps: failure: no dependency information found for /usr/lib32/libxml2.so.2 (used by debian/libwine/usr/lib/wine/msxml3.dll.so). The problem is that "/usr/lib32" is a symlink in the libc6-i386 package to /emul/ia32-linux/usr/lib where the library really is and that the dynamic linker's search path contains /usr/lib32/. So dpkg-shlibdeps doesn't find the package that has libxml2.so.2 in it. Kurt -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#457815: closed by Raphael Hertzog <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> (Re: Bug#457815: dpkg-dev: dpkg-shlibdeps misses symbols and thus outputs false warnings (redux))
On 26/12/2007, Debian Bug Tracking System wrote: > Looks like libm is really missing ... /me blames ldd and hides. > Here it looks like dpkg-shlibdeps is right. :-) Yup, sorry for the troubles. Cheers, -- Cyril Brulebois pgpHkHiaBwuey.pgp Description: PGP signature
Bug#7056: Surveyor Apple
Can't satisfy your girlfriend? http://www.Begnwast.com of patterns with others In their native -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#55364: Arm Treadmill
Become the ultimate pleasure machine http://www.Convsiumiet.com challenging. Something own with your co-worker -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#457739: /usr/bin/dpkg-gensymbols: dpkg-gensymbols doesn't grok #DEPRECATED ...# versions properly
On Tue, 25 Dec 2007, Pierre Habouzit wrote: > -#DEPRECATED: 1.1.6# [EMAIL PROTECTED] 1.1.3 > -#DEPRECATED: 1.1.6# [EMAIL PROTECTED] 1.1.3 > +#DEPRECATED: 1.1.6-1# [EMAIL PROTECTED] 1.1.3 > +#DEPRECATED: 1.1.6-1# [EMAIL PROTECTED] 1.1.3 > [EMAIL PROTECTED] 1.1.3 > [EMAIL PROTECTED] 1.1.3 > [EMAIL PROTECTED] 1.1.3 > > Which should not yield a diff as 1.1.6-1 >= 1.1.6 Indeed doko already noticed it and notified me. So it was fixed in git already: http://git.debian.org/?p=dpkg/dpkg.git;a=commit;h=261d067696bd54c87108c32957226bf9fbfcf35a Cheers, -- Raphaël Hertzog Le best-seller français mis à jour pour Debian Etch : http://www.ouaza.com/livre/admin-debian/
Bug#4655: God Shoes
Your online shopping is safe & secure with EliteHerbal http://www.Idealsteenser.com your time on...something somewhere in the world -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Processed: setting package to dpkg dpkg-dev dselect, tagging 457739
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > # Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.10.11 > package dpkg dpkg-dev dselect Ignoring bugs not assigned to: dselect dpkg-dev dpkg > tags 457739 + pending Bug#457739: /usr/bin/dpkg-gensymbols: dpkg-gensymbols doesn't grok #DEPRECATED ...# versions properly There were no tags set. Tags added: pending > End of message, stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database) -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#457815: marked as done (dpkg-dev: dpkg-shlibdeps misses symbols and thus outputs false warnings (redux))
Your message dated Wed, 26 Dec 2007 09:44:57 +0100
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#457815: dpkg-dev: dpkg-shlibdeps misses symbols and thus
outputs false warnings (redux)
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.
(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am
talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration
somewhere. Please contact me immediately.)
Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)
--- Begin Message ---
Package: dpkg-dev
Version: 1.14.12
Severity: normal
Hi,
it looks like dpkg-dev (or symbol stuff) is missing some symbols. While
building libpano13 (pkg-phototools/libpano.git on git.d.o, in the
libpano13/unstable branch, uscan is your friend), I've got:
$ grep 'found in none of the libraries' ../libpano13_2.9.12-1_i386.build
dpkg-shlibdeps: warning: symbol exp used by
debian/libpano13-0/usr/lib/libpano13.so.0.0.0 found in none of the libraries.
dpkg-shlibdeps: warning: symbol hypot used by
debian/libpano13-0/usr/lib/libpano13.so.0.0.0 found in none of the libraries.
dpkg-shlibdeps: warning: symbol atan2 used by
debian/libpano13-0/usr/lib/libpano13.so.0.0.0 found in none of the libraries.
dpkg-shlibdeps: warning: symbol atan used by
debian/libpano13-0/usr/lib/libpano13.so.0.0.0 found in none of the libraries.
dpkg-shlibdeps: warning: symbol asin used by
debian/libpano13-0/usr/lib/libpano13.so.0.0.0 found in none of the libraries.
dpkg-shlibdeps: warning: symbol atanh used by
debian/libpano13-0/usr/lib/libpano13.so.0.0.0 found in none of the libraries.
dpkg-shlibdeps: warning: symbol log used by
debian/libpano13-0/usr/lib/libpano13.so.0.0.0 found in none of the libraries.
dpkg-shlibdeps: warning: symbol pow used by
debian/libpano13-0/usr/lib/libpano13.so.0.0.0 found in none of the libraries.
dpkg-shlibdeps: warning: symbol ceil used by
debian/libpano13-0/usr/lib/libpano13.so.0.0.0 found in none of the libraries.
dpkg-shlibdeps: warning: symbol floor used by
debian/libpano13-0/usr/lib/libpano13.so.0.0.0 found in none of the libraries.
Looks like libm, right? Let's check:
$ for i in `grep 'found in none of the libraries'
../libpano13_2.9.12-1_i386.build | awk '{print $4}'`; do nm -D /usr/lib/libm.so
| cut -b 10- | grep "^W $i$" ; done
W exp
W hypot
W atan2
W atan
W asin
W atanh
W log
W pow
W ceil
W floor
I'm not that willing to dig it out how you gather symbol information,
but it really looks like you're missing something here.
And that's AFAICT not a duplicate of #454036, I'll be following up there
in some minutes.
Cheers,
--
Cyril Brulebois
--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message ---
On Wed, 26 Dec 2007, Cyril Brulebois wrote:
> it looks like dpkg-dev (or symbol stuff) is missing some symbols. While
> building libpano13 (pkg-phototools/libpano.git on git.d.o, in the
> libpano13/unstable branch, uscan is your friend), I've got:
>
> $ grep 'found in none of the libraries' ../libpano13_2.9.12-1_i386.build
> dpkg-shlibdeps: warning: symbol exp used by
> debian/libpano13-0/usr/lib/libpano13.so.0.0.0 found in none of the libraries.
$ objdump -p debian/libpano13-0/usr/lib/libpano13.so.0.0.0 | grep NEEDED
NEEDED libjpeg.so.62
NEEDED libpng12.so.0
NEEDED libtiff.so.4
NEEDED libz.so.1
NEEDED libc.so.6
Looks like libm is really missing ...
> I'm not that willing to dig it out how you gather symbol information,
> but it really looks like you're missing something here.
Here it looks like dpkg-shlibdeps is right. :-)
Cheers,
--
Raphaël Hertzog
Le best-seller français mis à jour pour Debian Etch :
http://www.ouaza.com/livre/admin-debian/
--- End Message ---
