On Thu, 24 Jan 2008, Raphael Hertzog wrote:
Hi,
On Thu, 24 Jan 2008, Matthias Klose wrote:
Currently dpkg-shlibdeps emits wrong-leading warnings for packages
linked against libgcj_bc.so:
dpkg-shlibdeps: warning: debian/ecj-gcj/usr/bin/ecj-gcj shouldn't be linked
with libgcj_bc.so.1 (it uses none of its symbols).
dpkg-shlibdeps: warning: debian/ecj-gcj/usr/bin/ecj-gcj shouldn't be linked
with libpthread.so.0 (it uses none of its symbols).
dpkg-shlibdeps: warning: debian/ecj-gcj/usr/bin/ecj-gcj shouldn't be linked
with librt.so.1 (it uses none of its symbols).
dpkg-shlibdeps: warning: debian/ecj-gcj/usr/bin/ecj-gcj shouldn't be linked
with libz.so.1 (it uses none of its symbols).
dpkg-shlibdeps: warning: debian/ecj-gcj/usr/bin/ecj-gcj shouldn't be linked
with libdl.so.2 (it uses none of its symbols).
If libgcj_bc.so.1 is found as a dependency, only the symbols built
from the libgcj_bc.c file should be evaluated.
Sorry, I don't understand what you mean. Can you give some more details?
After a quick chat on IRC, it looks like the core problem might be that
libgcj_bc.so.1 in fact has a SONAME libgcj.so.X since it's just a
symlink...
At build time, it links with a libgcj_bc.so that contains just the
official symbols but at run time the official symbols are looked up in
another library... because libgcj_bc.so.1 is a symlink to that library.
The differing SONAME are probably the root cause of this problem.
We should find a way to register both SONAME as aliases to avoid this.
Cheers,
--
Raphaël Hertzog
Le best-seller français mis à jour pour Debian Etch :
http://www.ouaza.com/livre/admin-debian/