Bug#280803: Removing GFDL'ed docs from gcc-4.0 packages
Hi Matthias,
what's up with these bugs (280803 and 321780, 321781, 321782)? Can you
provide the patches you used to split out the docs from gcc-4.1? I
think we would need the patches corresponding to these changelog
entries:
gcc-4.1 (4.1.1ds1-12) unstable; urgency=medium
[Matthias Klose]
[...]
* Build without GFDL licensed docs. Closes: #384036.
- debian/patches/{svn-doc-updates,pr25524-doc,pr26885-doc}.dpatch:
Split out -doc specific patches.
- debian/*.texi, debian/porting.html: Add dummy documentation.
- debian/rules.unpack, debian/rules.patch: Update for non-gfdl build.
- fastjar.texi: Directly define the gcctabopt and gccoptlist macros.
and
gcc-4.1 (4.1.1-11) unstable; urgency=low
[Matthias Klose]
[...]
* Do not build the -doc packages and derived manual pages licensed under
the GFDL with invariant sections or cover texts.
Can you provide these patches, so that we can start working from them?
TIA, Frank
--
Dr. Frank Küster
Single Molecule Spectroscopy, Protein Folding @ Inst. f. Biochemie, Univ. Zürich
Debian Developer (teTeX/TeXLive)
Processed: tagging 280803
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: # Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.9.22 # sigh, bug hidden due to wrong tags :/ tags 280803 - sid Bug#280803: [NONFREE-DOC:GFDL1.2olisfcbc] contains non-free documentation Tags were: sid sarge-ignore Tags removed: sid End of message, stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database) -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Processed: [bts-link] source package gcc-4.0
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: # # bts-link upstream status pull for source package gcc-4.0 # see http://lists.debian.org/debian-devel-announce/2006/05/msg1.html # user [EMAIL PROTECTED] Setting user to [EMAIL PROTECTED] (was [EMAIL PROTECTED]). # remote status report for #86251 # * http://gcc.gnu.org/PR3511 # * remote status changed: ASSIGNED - RESOLVED # * remote resolution changed: (?) - FIXED # * closed upstream tags 86251 + fixed-upstream Bug#86251: [PR optimization/3511]: Inlined strlen() could be smarter Tags were: upstream Tags added: fixed-upstream usertags 86251 - status-ASSIGNED Bug#86251: [PR optimization/3511]: Inlined strlen() could be smarter Usertags were: status-ASSIGNED. Usertags are now: . usertags 86251 + status-RESOLVED resolution-FIXED Bug#86251: [PR optimization/3511]: Inlined strlen() could be smarter There were no usertags set. Usertags are now: resolution-FIXED status-RESOLVED. thanks Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database) -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[bts-link] source package gcc-4.0
# # bts-link upstream status pull for source package gcc-4.0 # see http://lists.debian.org/debian-devel-announce/2006/05/msg1.html # user [EMAIL PROTECTED] # remote status report for #86251 # * http://gcc.gnu.org/PR3511 # * remote status changed: ASSIGNED - RESOLVED # * remote resolution changed: (?) - FIXED # * closed upstream tags 86251 + fixed-upstream usertags 86251 - status-ASSIGNED usertags 86251 + status-RESOLVED resolution-FIXED thanks
[bts-link] source package gcc-snapshot
# # bts-link upstream status pull for source package gcc-snapshot # see http://lists.debian.org/debian-devel-announce/2006/05/msg1.html # user [EMAIL PROTECTED] # remote status report for #395162 # * http://gcc.gnu.org/PR29585 # * remote status changed: (?) - NEW usertags 395162 + status-NEW thanks
[bts-link] source package gcc-4.2
# # bts-link upstream status pull for source package gcc-4.2 # see http://lists.debian.org/debian-devel-announce/2006/05/msg1.html # user [EMAIL PROTECTED] # remote status report for #351786 # * http://gcc.gnu.org/PR16006 # * remote status changed: REOPENED - ASSIGNED usertags 351786 - status-REOPENED usertags 351786 + status-ASSIGNED thanks
[bts-link] source package gcj-4.1
# # bts-link upstream status pull for source package gcj-4.1 # see http://lists.debian.org/debian-devel-announce/2006/05/msg1.html # user [EMAIL PROTECTED] # remote status report for #392791 # * http://gcc.gnu.org/PR29547 # * remote status changed: (?) - RESOLVED # * remote resolution changed: (?) - WORKSFORME usertags 392791 + status-RESOLVED resolution-WORKSFORME thanks
[bts-link] source package gcc-4.1
# # bts-link upstream status pull for source package gcc-4.1 # see http://lists.debian.org/debian-devel-announce/2006/05/msg1.html # user [EMAIL PROTECTED] # remote status report for #394630 # * http://gcc.gnu.org/PR27891 # * remote status changed: (?) - ASSIGNED usertags 394630 + status-ASSIGNED # remote status report for #390694 # * http://gcc.gnu.org/PR29329 # * remote status changed: NEW - ASSIGNED usertags 390694 - status-NEW usertags 390694 + status-ASSIGNED # remote status report for #394630 # * http://gcc.gnu.org/PR27891 # * remote status changed: (?) - ASSIGNED usertags 394630 + status-ASSIGNED # remote status report for #394630 # * http://gcc.gnu.org/PR27891 # * remote status changed: (?) - ASSIGNED usertags 394630 + status-ASSIGNED # remote status report for #397671 # * http://gcc.gnu.org/PR28354 # * remote status changed: (?) - RESOLVED # * remote resolution changed: (?) - FIXED # * closed upstream tags 397671 + fixed-upstream usertags 397671 + status-RESOLVED resolution-FIXED thanks
Processed: [bts-link] source package gcc-4.1
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: # # bts-link upstream status pull for source package gcc-4.1 # see http://lists.debian.org/debian-devel-announce/2006/05/msg1.html # user [EMAIL PROTECTED] Setting user to [EMAIL PROTECTED] (was [EMAIL PROTECTED]). # remote status report for #394630 # * http://gcc.gnu.org/PR27891 # * remote status changed: (?) - ASSIGNED usertags 394630 + status-ASSIGNED Bug#394630: ICE on alpha There were no usertags set. Usertags are now: status-ASSIGNED. # remote status report for #390694 # * http://gcc.gnu.org/PR29329 # * remote status changed: NEW - ASSIGNED usertags 390694 - status-NEW Bug#390694: [PR29329, fixed in 4.2] [4.1 regression] internal consistency failure at -O2 Usertags were: status-NEW. Usertags are now: . usertags 390694 + status-ASSIGNED Bug#390694: [PR29329, fixed in 4.2] [4.1 regression] internal consistency failure at -O2 There were no usertags set. Usertags are now: status-ASSIGNED. # remote status report for #394630 # * http://gcc.gnu.org/PR27891 # * remote status changed: (?) - ASSIGNED usertags 394630 + status-ASSIGNED Bug#394630: ICE on alpha Usertags were: status-ASSIGNED. Usertags are now: status-ASSIGNED. # remote status report for #394630 # * http://gcc.gnu.org/PR27891 # * remote status changed: (?) - ASSIGNED usertags 394630 + status-ASSIGNED Bug#394630: ICE on alpha Usertags were: status-ASSIGNED. Usertags are now: status-ASSIGNED. # remote status report for #397671 # * http://gcc.gnu.org/PR28354 # * remote status changed: (?) - RESOLVED # * remote resolution changed: (?) - FIXED # * closed upstream tags 397671 + fixed-upstream Bug#397671: 0.9 printed as 0. instead of 1. by format(f3.0) There were no tags set. Tags added: fixed-upstream usertags 397671 + status-RESOLVED resolution-FIXED Bug#397671: 0.9 printed as 0. instead of 1. by format(f3.0) There were no usertags set. Usertags are now: resolution-FIXED status-RESOLVED. thanks Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database) -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#387875: Patch for ARM gcj
On Thu, Nov 09, 2006 at 07:59:20PM +0100, Matthias Klose wrote: Riku Voipio writes: tags 387875 +patch thanks Verified that gcj-4.1 builds with this patch, and with patched version ecj-bootstrap build fine as well. just to clarify, could you verify, that packages using gjdoc and ecj build as well? He wrote on IRC: suihkulokki drow: apparently installing fails :| suihkulokki installing gjdoc that is suihkulokki Setting up gjdoc (0.7.7-6) ... suihkulokki gcj-dbtool-4.1 succeeded unexpectedly suihkulokki gcj-dbtool-4.1 succeeded unexpectedly suihkulokki java.io.IOException: Invalid argument No stacktrace available suihkulokki . Where do we go from here? If the patch is still an improvement, I'd suggest including it; I'm not going to have another day to figure out what's wrong with gjdoc for a while. -- Daniel Jacobowitz CodeSourcery -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#280803: Removing GFDL'ed docs from gcc-4.0 packages
Frank =?UTF-8?Q?K=C3=BCster?= writes:
Hi Matthias,
what's up with these bugs (280803 and 321780, 321781, 321782)? Can you
provide the patches you used to split out the docs from gcc-4.1? I
think we would need the patches corresponding to these changelog
entries:
gcc-4.1 (4.1.1ds1-12) unstable; urgency=medium
[Matthias Klose]
[...]
* Build without GFDL licensed docs. Closes: #384036.
- debian/patches/{svn-doc-updates,pr25524-doc,pr26885-doc}.dpatch:
Split out -doc specific patches.
- debian/*.texi, debian/porting.html: Add dummy documentation.
- debian/rules.unpack, debian/rules.patch: Update for non-gfdl build.
- fastjar.texi: Directly define the gcctabopt and gccoptlist macros.
and
gcc-4.1 (4.1.1-11) unstable; urgency=low
[Matthias Klose]
[...]
* Do not build the -doc packages and derived manual pages licensed under
the GFDL with invariant sections or cover texts.
Can you provide these patches, so that we can start working from them?
all these patches are available in the gcccvs repository at
svn.debian.org. I didn't start working on these.
Matthias
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#387875: Patch for ARM gcj
Daniel Jacobowitz writes: On Thu, Nov 09, 2006 at 07:59:20PM +0100, Matthias Klose wrote: Riku Voipio writes: tags 387875 +patch thanks Verified that gcj-4.1 builds with this patch, and with patched version ecj-bootstrap build fine as well. just to clarify, could you verify, that packages using gjdoc and ecj build as well? He wrote on IRC: suihkulokki drow: apparently installing fails :| suihkulokki installing gjdoc that is suihkulokki Setting up gjdoc (0.7.7-6) ... suihkulokki gcj-dbtool-4.1 succeeded unexpectedly suihkulokki gcj-dbtool-4.1 succeeded unexpectedly suihkulokki java.io.IOException: Invalid argument No stacktrace available suihkulokki . Where do we go from here? If the patch is still an improvement, I'd suggest including it; I'm not going to have another day to figure out what's wrong with gjdoc for a while. Looks like we are back to a state where basic java programs do work? Riku, does a HelloWorld program compiled to native code work? I'll include the patch with the next upload (maybe today, or else on Monday). Matthias -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#181096: [Bug tree-optimization/9814] gcc fails to optimise if (l2) l|=2 away
-- pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org changed: What|Removed |Added BugsThisDependsOn||29797 http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=9814 --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You reported the bug, or are watching the reporter. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Our understanding is that
Earlier this year we wrote to you about our Knowledge Based Degree Program (KBDP). We thought we would follow up and see if there is any reason why you have not called our registrars office. Most people don't realize that these degrees are completely valid, and only our staff and yourself know that they are based on knowledge of the subject. If you are still interested in obtaining a degree then please give our counselors a call at anytime during the week. Counselor Office: 1-773-509-4920 Regards Rebecca Evans Prescott and Bates Degree Services -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Welcome to Al-Manahel Newsletter List
The subscription of the email address: [EMAIL PROTECTED] To the mailing list: Al-Manahel Newsletter List is all set. Thanks for subscribing! Date of this subscription: Fri Nov 10 14:17:21 2006 Please save this email message for future reference. --- You may automatically unsubscribe from this list at any time by visiting the following URL: http://al-manahel.com/cgi-bin/dada/mail.cgi?f=ul=mnl[EMAIL PROTECTED]p=8372464 If the above URL is inoperable, make sure that you have copied the entire address. Some mail readers will wrap a long URL and thus break this automatic unsubscribe mechanism. You may also change your subscription by visiting this list's main screen: http://al-manahel.com/cgi-bin/dada/mail.cgi?f=listl=mnl If you're still having trouble, please contact the list owner at: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] The following physical address is associated with this mailing list: - mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
gcc-4.0 4.0.3-7 MIGRATED to testing
FYI: The status of the gcc-4.0 source package in Debian's testing distribution has changed. Previous version: 4.0.3-3 Current version: 4.0.3-7 -- This email is automatically generated; [EMAIL PROTECTED] is responsible. See http://people.debian.org/~henning/trille/ for more information. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
gnat-4.1 4.1.1-19 MIGRATED to testing
FYI: The status of the gnat-4.1 source package in Debian's testing distribution has changed. Previous version: 4.1.1-16 Current version: 4.1.1-19 -- This email is automatically generated; [EMAIL PROTECTED] is responsible. See http://people.debian.org/~henning/trille/ for more information. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
