Bug#123468: [Bug c/6906] warn about asserts with side effects
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=6906 Eric Gallager changed: What|Removed |Added See Also||https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzill ||a/show_bug.cgi?id=105369 -- You are receiving this mail because: You reported the bug.
[Bug middle-end/323] optimized code gives strange floating point results
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=323 Eric Gallager changed: What|Removed |Added See Also|https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzill | |a/show_bug.cgi?id=68180,| |https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzill | |a/show_bug.cgi?id=64410 | -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug.
[Bug middle-end/323] optimized code gives strange floating point results
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=323 Eric Gallager changed: What|Removed |Added CC||jakub at gcc dot gnu.org See Also||https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzill ||a/show_bug.cgi?id=68180, ||https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzill ||a/show_bug.cgi?id=64410, ||https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzill ||a/show_bug.cgi?id=89653 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug.
[Bug c++/12567] [Core/253] g++ fails to recognize ill-formed-ness of initializers
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=12567 Eric Gallager changed: What|Removed |Added CC||egallager at gcc dot gnu.org -- You are receiving this mail because: You reported the bug.
[Bug c/9071] Warning for blocks not closed in same file as opened in
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=9071 Eric Gallager changed: What|Removed |Added CC||dmalcolm at gcc dot gnu.org, ||egallager at gcc dot gnu.org -- You are receiving this mail because: You reported the bug.
[Bug testsuite/32064] ssp tests can't find libssp
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=32064 Eric Gallager changed: What|Removed |Added CC||egallager at gcc dot gnu.org -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug.
[Bug libffi/28036] libffi executable stack (missing .note.GNU-stack on .o files)
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=28036 Eric Gallager changed: What|Removed |Added CC||egallager at gcc dot gnu.org -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug.
[Bug testsuite/37703] Ada testsuites lack multilib support
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=37703 Eric Gallager changed: What|Removed |Added CC||egallager at gcc dot gnu.org -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug.
[Bug middle-end/323] optimized code gives strange floating point results
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=323 Eric Gallager changed: What|Removed |Added CC||egallager at gcc dot gnu.org -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug.
[Bug target/35488] A incorrect result in a simple division, only in 32-bit gcc.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=35488 Eric Gallager changed: What|Removed |Added See Also||https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzill ||a/show_bug.cgi?id=323 CC||egallager at gcc dot gnu.org -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug.
[Bug middle-end/323] optimized code gives strange floating point results
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=323 Eric Gallager changed: What|Removed |Added See Also||https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzill ||a/show_bug.cgi?id=35488 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug.
[Bug middle-end/323] optimized code gives strange floating point results
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=323 --- Comment #213 from Eric Gallager --- (In reply to Eric Gallager from comment #212) > (In reply to Rich Felker from comment #211) > > If new reports are going to be marked as duplicates of this, then can it > > please be moved from SUSPENDED status to REOPENED? The situation is far > > worse than what seems to have been realized last this was worked on, as > > evidenced by pr 85957. These issues just came up again breaking real-world > > software in https://github.com/OSGeo/PROJ/issues/1906 > > Uh... I'm not seeing "REOPENED" on the menu for possible statuses? Maybe a > bug can only have the REOPENED status if it's actually been closed in the > past, and this might not have actually been closed before? I thought this > had been closed at one point, but it looks like I was wrong... Hold on, let > me check the (very long) history for this bug... OK, never mind, it looks like this bug has actually been closed before like I thought originally; whether or not a bug can have its status changed to REOPENED or not must depend on its current status, rather than any past status it might have had... So, I guess I can either close it temporarily and then immediately reopen it, or give it some other status. Which would you prefer? -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug.
[Bug middle-end/323] optimized code gives strange floating point results
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=323 --- Comment #212 from Eric Gallager --- (In reply to Rich Felker from comment #211) > If new reports are going to be marked as duplicates of this, then can it > please be moved from SUSPENDED status to REOPENED? The situation is far > worse than what seems to have been realized last this was worked on, as > evidenced by pr 85957. These issues just came up again breaking real-world > software in https://github.com/OSGeo/PROJ/issues/1906 Uh... I'm not seeing "REOPENED" on the menu for possible statuses? Maybe a bug can only have the REOPENED status if it's actually been closed in the past, and this might not have actually been closed before? I thought this had been closed at one point, but it looks like I was wrong... Hold on, let me check the (very long) history for this bug... -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug.
[Bug middle-end/323] optimized code gives strange floating point results
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=323 Eric Gallager changed: What|Removed |Added See Also||https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzill ||a/show_bug.cgi?id=85957 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug.
[Bug libffi/28036] libffi executable stack (missing .note.GNU-stack on .o files)
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=28036 Eric Gallager changed: What|Removed |Added See Also||https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzill ||a/show_bug.cgi?id=92820 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug.
[Bug libffi/28036] libffi executable stack (missing .note.GNU-stack on .o files)
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=28036 Eric Gallager changed: What|Removed |Added URL||http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-p ||atches/2006-12/msg00948.htm ||l CC||debian-gcc at lists dot debian.org -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug.
[Bug testsuite/32064] ssp tests can't find libssp
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=32064 Eric Gallager changed: What|Removed |Added CC||rob1weld at aol dot com -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug.
[Bug middle-end/323] optimized code gives strange floating point results
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=323 Eric Gallager changed: What|Removed |Added CC||egallager at gcc dot gnu.org See Also||https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzill ||a/show_bug.cgi?id=34678, ||https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzill ||a/show_bug.cgi?id=36578, ||https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzill ||a/show_bug.cgi?id=37845, ||http://sourceware.org/bugzi ||lla/show_bug.cgi?id=6981 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug.
[Bug testsuite/37703] Ada testsuites lack multilib support
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=37703 Eric Gallager changed: What|Removed |Added See Also||https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzill ||a/show_bug.cgi?id=37704 --- Comment #5 from Eric Gallager --- Related: bug 37704 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug.
[Bug target/37637] Build fails with reserved constraints
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=37637 Eric Gallager changed: What|Removed |Added Status|WAITING |RESOLVED Resolution|--- |WORKSFORME --- Comment #3 from Eric Gallager --- (In reply to Matthias Klose from comment #2) > Debian doesn't have any s390 hardware anymore. multilib builds on > s390x-linux-gnu work, so maybe just close this issue. OK. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug.
[Bug target/37637] Build fails with reserved constraints
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=37637 Eric Gallager changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |WAITING Last reconfirmed||2018-12-07 Ever confirmed|0 |1 --- Comment #1 from Eric Gallager --- Does this still happen with newer versions of GCC? -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug.
[Bug middle-end/19430] taking address of a var causes missing uninitialized warning (virtual PHI with MEM)
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=19430 Eric Gallager changed: What|Removed |Added See Also||https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzill ||a/show_bug.cgi?id=18501 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug.
[Bug middle-end/19430] taking address of a var causes missing uninitialized warning (virtual PHI with MEM)
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=19430 Eric Gallager changed: What|Removed |Added See Also||https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzill ||a/show_bug.cgi?id=81889 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug.
[Bug target/37637] Build fails with reserved constraints
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=37637 Eric Gallager changed: What|Removed |Added Keywords||build CC||egallager at gcc dot gnu.org -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug.
[Bug go/46958] ARM Go Does Not Compile (__builtin_return_address)
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46958 Eric Gallager changed: What|Removed |Added See Also||https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzill ||a/show_bug.cgi?id=46986 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug.
[Bug go/46965] SH Go Does not Compile (__builtin_return_address)
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46965 Eric Gallager changed: What|Removed |Added See Also||https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzill ||a/show_bug.cgi?id=46986 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug.
[Bug testsuite/32064] ssp tests can't find libssp
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=32064 --- Comment #7 from Eric Gallager --- (In reply to H.J. Lu from comment #6) > (In reply to comment #5) > > Still an issue, e.g. on Solaris 11. > > > > You can try my patches from 2007 to see if they > work for you. They're almost 11 years old by this point... -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug.
[Bug other/35511] release scripts added release note to zlib/ChangeLog, not zlib/ChangeLog.gcj
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=35511 Eric Gallager changed: What|Removed |Added Status|WAITING |RESOLVED Resolution|--- |INVALID --- Comment #3 from Eric Gallager --- (In reply to Eric Gallager from comment #2) > (In reply to Eric Gallager from comment #1) > > (In reply to Debian GCC Maintainers from comment #0) > > > the release scripts added the release note for 4.3.0 to zlib/ChangeLog > > > (upstream), not zlib/ChangeLog.gcj > > > > IMO zlib/ChangeLog.gcj should be renamed since gcj has been removed from > > gcc. > > Putting this in WAITING for someone else's opinion Closing due to no replies in 3 months. -- You are receiving this mail because: You reported the bug.
[Bug testsuite/37703] Ada testsuites lack multilib support
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=37703 Eric Gallager changed: What|Removed |Added CC||egallager at gcc dot gnu.org See Also||https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzill ||a/show_bug.cgi?id=37681 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug.
[Bug tree-optimization/16876] [4.2 Regression] ICE on testcase with -O3 in fold-const
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=16876 Eric Gallager changed: What|Removed |Added See Also||https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzill ||a/show_bug.cgi?id=26732 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug.
[Bug lto/43659] -flto doesn't remember -fPIC
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=43659 Eric Gallager changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED CC||egallager at gcc dot gnu.org Resolution|--- |FIXED --- Comment #5 from Eric Gallager --- (In reply to Jan Hubicka from comment #4) > This was fixed on mainline by patch of mine > http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2011-01/msg00210.html > perhaps it can be backported. Any of the branches this might have been backported to are now closed; closing this bug as FIXED then. -- You are receiving this mail because: You reported the bug.
[Bug testsuite/32064] ssp tests can't find libssp
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=32064 Eric Gallager changed: What|Removed |Added Keywords||patch CC||egallager at gcc dot gnu.org -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug.
[Bug target/28490] [4.0/4.1 regression] ICE in ia64_expand_move, at config/ia64/ia64.c:1088
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=28490 Eric Gallager changed: What|Removed |Added See Also||https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzill ||a/show_bug.cgi?id=42040 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug.
[Bug tree-optimization/16876] [4.2 Regression] ICE on testcase with -O3 in fold-const
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=16876 Eric Gallager changed: What|Removed |Added See Also||https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzill ||a/show_bug.cgi?id=28848 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug.
[Bug other/35511] release scripts added release note to zlib/ChangeLog, not zlib/ChangeLog.gcj
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=35511 Eric Gallager changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |WAITING Last reconfirmed||2018-01-27 Ever confirmed|0 |1 --- Comment #2 from Eric Gallager --- (In reply to Eric Gallager from comment #1) > (In reply to Debian GCC Maintainers from comment #0) > > the release scripts added the release note for 4.3.0 to zlib/ChangeLog > > (upstream), not zlib/ChangeLog.gcj > > IMO zlib/ChangeLog.gcj should be renamed since gcj has been removed from gcc. Putting this in WAITING for someone else's opinion -- You are receiving this mail because: You reported the bug.
[Bug bootstrap/32840] bootstrap broken on ix86-linux-gnu targets with --enable-targets=all
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=32840 Eric Gallager changed: What|Removed |Added Status|WAITING |RESOLVED Resolution|--- |FIXED --- Comment #3 from Eric Gallager --- (In reply to Eric Gallager from comment #2) > (In reply to H.J. Lu from comment #1) > > Can you verify if it is the same as PR 31868? There is a a patch for PR > > 31868. > > ...which is now closed as FIXED. So is this fixed as well? No response, so I'm assuming the answer was yes. -- You are receiving this mail because: You reported the bug.
[Bug other/35511] release scripts added release note to zlib/ChangeLog, not zlib/ChangeLog.gcj
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=35511 Eric Gallager changed: What|Removed |Added CC||egallager at gcc dot gnu.org --- Comment #1 from Eric Gallager --- (In reply to Debian GCC Maintainers from comment #0) > the release scripts added the release note for 4.3.0 to zlib/ChangeLog > (upstream), not zlib/ChangeLog.gcj IMO zlib/ChangeLog.gcj should be renamed since gcj has been removed from gcc. -- You are receiving this mail because: You reported the bug.
[Bug libobjc/28565] building with --enable-objc-gc doesn't link with the gc convenience library
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=28565 Eric Gallager changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED CC||egallager at gcc dot gnu.org Resolution|--- |INVALID --- Comment #1 from Eric Gallager --- GCC no longer includes its own gc convenience library; libobjc_gc should be linking against an external gc library instead. -- You are receiving this mail because: You reported the bug.
[Bug bootstrap/32840] bootstrap broken on ix86-linux-gnu targets with --enable-targets=all
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=32840 Eric Gallager changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |WAITING Last reconfirmed||2017-07-21 CC||egallager at gcc dot gnu.org Ever confirmed|0 |1 --- Comment #2 from Eric Gallager --- (In reply to H.J. Lu from comment #1) > Can you verify if it is the same as PR 31868? There is a a patch for PR > 31868. ...which is now closed as FIXED. So is this fixed as well? -- You are receiving this mail because: You reported the bug.
[Bug middle-end/323] optimized code gives strange floating point results
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=323 egallager at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added CC||j.d.pryce at ntlworld dot com --- Comment #203 from egallager at gcc dot gnu.org --- *** Bug 34261 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. *** -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug.
