[Bug lto/43659] -flto doesn't remember -fPIC

[egallager at gcc dot gnu.org]

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=43659

Eric Gallager  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 Status|NEW |RESOLVED
 CC||egallager at gcc dot gnu.org
 Resolution|--- |FIXED

--- Comment #5 from Eric Gallager  ---
(In reply to Jan Hubicka from comment #4)
> This was fixed on mainline by patch of mine
> http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2011-01/msg00210.html
> perhaps it can be backported.

Any of the branches this might have been backported to are now closed; closing
this bug as FIXED then.

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You reported the bug.

Bug#892217: [PATCH] libffi: Please add support for the riscv64 architecture

[Aurelien Jarno]

On 2018-03-06 22:31, Karsten Merker wrote:
> Source: libffi
> Version: 3.3~20180131
> Severity: wishlist
> X-Debbugs-CC: debian-ri...@lists.debian.org
> Tags: patch
> User: debian-ri...@lists.debian.org
> Usertags: riscv64
> 
> Hello,
> 
> we are in the process of bootstrapping a Debian port for the
> riscv64 architecture (https://wiki.debian.org/RISC-V).  The
> libffi package is part of the build-dependency chain for the
> essential package set, so we need to build it for riscv64 to be
> able to complete the bootstrap process.
> 
> Current upstream libffi doesn't yet have support for the RISC-V
> architecture, but a pull request to add it has been submitted:
> 
>   https://github.com/libffi/libffi/pull/281/ respectively
>   https://patch-diff.githubusercontent.com/raw/libffi/libffi/pull/281.patch
> 
> The pull request has been authored by one of the Fedora riscv64
> porters and the Fedora riscv64 port already uses this patchset. 
> It would be great if you could add the patchset to the Debian
> libffi package as well.

Note that the patch has now been merged upstream:
https://github.com/libffi/libffi/commit/3840d49aaa831d649b1597518a2903dfed0d57f3

-- 
Aurelien Jarno  GPG: 4096R/1DDD8C9B
aurel...@aurel32.net http://www.aurel32.net