Processed: tags
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: tags 170507 - help Bug#170507: glibc: header goofup on hppa breaks XFree86 compilation Tags were: help Tags removed: help tags 170507 + patch Bug#170507: glibc: header goofup on hppa breaks XFree86 compilation There were no tags set. Tags added: patch thanks Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database) -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#172545: transmeta longrun fails with unstable libc6 (pread/pwrite)
Package: libc6 Version: 2.3.1-5 i have a Fujitsu P-Series laptop (TM5800 CPU @ 800MHz) running Linux 2.4.20 (debian) with devfs, CONFIG_MCRUSOE, CONFIG_X86_MSR, and CONFIG_X86_CPUID. longrun is a tool to change the settings of Transmeta CPUs. longrun works fine with libc6 2.2.5-14.3. When i try upgrading to 2.3.1-5 then i get a failure at the first call to read_cpuid() in check_cpu(), line 186. This suggests that pread got broken somehow in the new libc. -- Victory to the Divine Mother!! after all, http://sahajayoga.org http://why-compete.org -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#172545: transmeta longrun fails with unstable libc6 (pread/pwrite)
On Wed, Dec 11, 2002 at 12:09:42AM +0530, Joshua N Pritikin wrote: Package: libc6 Version: 2.3.1-5 i have a Fujitsu P-Series laptop (TM5800 CPU @ 800MHz) running Linux 2.4.20 (debian) with devfs, CONFIG_MCRUSOE, CONFIG_X86_MSR, and CONFIG_X86_CPUID. longrun is a tool to change the settings of Transmeta CPUs. longrun works fine with libc6 2.2.5-14.3. When i try upgrading to 2.3.1-5 then i get a failure at the first call to read_cpuid() in check_cpu(), line 186. This suggests that pread got broken somehow in the new libc. Oy. I don't have access to a transmeta CPU to do any testing or troubleshooting on this. Do you have the skills to look into it more? If not, I don't know how quickly this will be gotten to. Tks, Jeff Bailey -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#172562: libc6: hex floats negative exponent
On Wed, Dec 11, 2002 at 07:32:18AM +1000, Kevin Ryde wrote: A program foo.c, prints 1.0, where I expected it to print 8.0, since the exponent for a hex float is a power of 2. What arch is this for, please? -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#172562: libc6: hex floats negative exponent
Jeff Bailey [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: What arch is this for, please? Sorry, yes, this is i386. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#172545: marked as done (transmeta longrun fails with unstable libc6 (pread/pwrite))
Your message dated Wed, 11 Dec 2002 11:08:10 +0900 with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED] and subject line Bug#172545: transmeta longrun fails with unstable libc6 (pread/pwrite) has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith. (NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact me immediately.) Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database) -- Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 10 Dec 2002 18:39:52 + From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Tue Dec 10 12:39:52 2002 Return-path: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Received: from texas.pobox.com [64.49.223.111] by master.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.12 1 (Debian)) id 18LpIO-0008US-00; Tue, 10 Dec 2002 12:39:52 -0600 Received: from always.joy.eth.net (unknown [61.11.23.196]) by texas.pobox.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id C01FF45367 for [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Tue, 10 Dec 2002 13:39:47 -0500 (EST) Received: by always.joy.eth.net (sSMTP sendmail emulation); Wed, 11 Dec 2002 00:09:42 +0530 Date: Wed, 11 Dec 2002 00:09:42 +0530 From: Joshua N Pritikin [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: transmeta longrun fails with unstable libc6 (pread/pwrite) Message-ID: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline User-Agent: Mutt/1.4i Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-7.2 required=5.0 tests=SIGNATURE_SHORT_DENSE,SPAM_PHRASE_00_01,USER_AGENT, USER_AGENT_MUTT version=2.41 X-Spam-Level: Package: libc6 Version: 2.3.1-5 i have a Fujitsu P-Series laptop (TM5800 CPU @ 800MHz) running Linux 2.4.20 (debian) with devfs, CONFIG_MCRUSOE, CONFIG_X86_MSR, and CONFIG_X86_CPUID. longrun is a tool to change the settings of Transmeta CPUs. longrun works fine with libc6 2.2.5-14.3. When i try upgrading to 2.3.1-5 then i get a failure at the first call to read_cpuid() in check_cpu(), line 186. This suggests that pread got broken somehow in the new libc. -- Victory to the Divine Mother!! after all, http://sahajayoga.org http://why-compete.org --- Received: (at 172545-close) by bugs.debian.org; 11 Dec 2002 02:08:45 + From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Tue Dec 10 20:08:45 2002 Return-path: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Received: from 23.1.111.219.st.excite.co.jp (master.hanzubon.org) [219.111.1.23] by master.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.12 1 (Debian)) id 18LwIn-0005Fx-00; Tue, 10 Dec 2002 20:08:45 -0600 Received: from iceman.hanzubon.jp (iceman.hanzubon.jp [192.168.100.12]) by master.hanzubon.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id BCF0B8DD9B; Wed, 11 Dec 2002 11:08:13 +0900 (JST) Date: Wed, 11 Dec 2002 11:08:10 +0900 From: ISHIKAWA Mutsumi [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: Bug#172545: transmeta longrun fails with unstable libc6 (pread/pwrite) In-Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] References: [EMAIL PROTECTED] User-Agent: Wanderlust/2.9.15 (Unchained Melody) SEMI/1.14.4 (Hosorogi) FLIM/1.14.4 (=?ISO-8859-4?Q?Kashiharajing=FE-mae?=) APEL/10.4 Emacs/21.2 (i386-pc-linux-gnu) MULE/5.0 (SAKAKI) Organization: Yendot.org unstable guy X-CVSROOT: cvs -d :ext:cvs.hanzubon.org:/var/cvs co -r unstable HANZUBON MIME-Version: 1.0 (generated by SEMI 1.14.4 - Hosorogi) Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Message-Id: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-14.7 required=5.0 tests=IN_REP_TO,NOSPAM_INC,QUOTED_EMAIL_TEXT,REFERENCES, SIGNATURE_SHORT_DENSE,SPAM_PHRASE_00_01,USER_AGENT version=2.41 X-Spam-Level: In [EMAIL PROTECTED] Joshua N Pritikin [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Package: libc6 Version: 2.3.1-5 i have a Fujitsu P-Series laptop (TM5800 CPU @ 800MHz) running Linux 2.4.20 (debian) with devfs, CONFIG_MCRUSOE, CONFIG_X86_MSR, and CONFIG_X86_CPUID. longrun is a tool to change the settings of Transmeta CPUs. longrun works fine with libc6 2.2.5-14.3. When i try upgrading to 2.3.1-5 then i get a failure at the first call to read_cpuid() in check_cpu(), line 186. This suggests that pread got broken somehow in the new libc. No, it is not a bug of glibc. It is a bug of longrun and already fixed, you should upgrade longrun package. http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?archive=nobug=165781 -- ISHIKAWA Mutsumi [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED] -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Processed: tags
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: tags 170507 - help Bug#170507: glibc: header goofup on hppa breaks XFree86 compilation Tags were: help Tags removed: help tags 170507 + patch Bug#170507: glibc: header goofup on hppa breaks XFree86 compilation There were no tags set. Tags added: patch thanks Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database)
Bug#172545: transmeta longrun fails with unstable libc6 (pread/pwrite)
Package: libc6 Version: 2.3.1-5 i have a Fujitsu P-Series laptop (TM5800 CPU @ 800MHz) running Linux 2.4.20 (debian) with devfs, CONFIG_MCRUSOE, CONFIG_X86_MSR, and CONFIG_X86_CPUID. longrun is a tool to change the settings of Transmeta CPUs. longrun works fine with libc6 2.2.5-14.3. When i try upgrading to 2.3.1-5 then i get a failure at the first call to read_cpuid() in check_cpu(), line 186. This suggests that pread got broken somehow in the new libc. -- Victory to the Divine Mother!! after all, http://sahajayoga.org http://why-compete.org
Bug#172545: transmeta longrun fails with unstable libc6 (pread/pwrite)
On Wed, Dec 11, 2002 at 12:09:42AM +0530, Joshua N Pritikin wrote: Package: libc6 Version: 2.3.1-5 i have a Fujitsu P-Series laptop (TM5800 CPU @ 800MHz) running Linux 2.4.20 (debian) with devfs, CONFIG_MCRUSOE, CONFIG_X86_MSR, and CONFIG_X86_CPUID. longrun is a tool to change the settings of Transmeta CPUs. longrun works fine with libc6 2.2.5-14.3. When i try upgrading to 2.3.1-5 then i get a failure at the first call to read_cpuid() in check_cpu(), line 186. This suggests that pread got broken somehow in the new libc. Oy. I don't have access to a transmeta CPU to do any testing or troubleshooting on this. Do you have the skills to look into it more? If not, I don't know how quickly this will be gotten to. Tks, Jeff Bailey
Bug#172562: libc6: hex floats negative exponent
Package: libc6
Version: 2.3.1-5
A program foo.c,
#include stdio.h
#include stdlib.h
int
main (void)
{
printf (%f\n, strtod(0x10p-1,NULL));
}
prints 1.0, where I expected it to print 8.0, since the exponent for a
hex float is a power of 2.
For what it's worth, this only seems to be a problem for small
negative exponents, when there's more mantissa digits than the
exponent value. But obviously one failing case is better than any
amount of speculation :).
Bug#172562: libc6: hex floats negative exponent
On Wed, Dec 11, 2002 at 07:32:18AM +1000, Kevin Ryde wrote: A program foo.c, prints 1.0, where I expected it to print 8.0, since the exponent for a hex float is a power of 2. What arch is this for, please?
Bug#172562: libc6: hex floats negative exponent
Jeff Bailey [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: What arch is this for, please? Sorry, yes, this is i386.
Bug#172545: transmeta longrun fails with unstable libc6 (pread/pwrite)
Oy. I don't have access to a transmeta CPU to do any testing or troubleshooting on this. Do you have the skills to look into it more? If not, I don't know how quickly this will be gotten to. This was reported before: http://lists.debian.org/debian-glibc/2002/debian-glibc-200210/msg00397.html randolph
Bug#172545: marked as done (transmeta longrun fails with unstable libc6 (pread/pwrite))
Your message dated Wed, 11 Dec 2002 11:08:10 +0900 with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED] and subject line Bug#172545: transmeta longrun fails with unstable libc6 (pread/pwrite) has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith. (NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact me immediately.) Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database) -- Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 10 Dec 2002 18:39:52 + From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Tue Dec 10 12:39:52 2002 Return-path: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Received: from texas.pobox.com [64.49.223.111] by master.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.12 1 (Debian)) id 18LpIO-0008US-00; Tue, 10 Dec 2002 12:39:52 -0600 Received: from always.joy.eth.net (unknown [61.11.23.196]) by texas.pobox.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id C01FF45367 for [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Tue, 10 Dec 2002 13:39:47 -0500 (EST) Received: by always.joy.eth.net (sSMTP sendmail emulation); Wed, 11 Dec 2002 00:09:42 +0530 Date: Wed, 11 Dec 2002 00:09:42 +0530 From: Joshua N Pritikin [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: transmeta longrun fails with unstable libc6 (pread/pwrite) Message-ID: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline User-Agent: Mutt/1.4i Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-7.2 required=5.0 tests=SIGNATURE_SHORT_DENSE,SPAM_PHRASE_00_01,USER_AGENT, USER_AGENT_MUTT version=2.41 X-Spam-Level: Package: libc6 Version: 2.3.1-5 i have a Fujitsu P-Series laptop (TM5800 CPU @ 800MHz) running Linux 2.4.20 (debian) with devfs, CONFIG_MCRUSOE, CONFIG_X86_MSR, and CONFIG_X86_CPUID. longrun is a tool to change the settings of Transmeta CPUs. longrun works fine with libc6 2.2.5-14.3. When i try upgrading to 2.3.1-5 then i get a failure at the first call to read_cpuid() in check_cpu(), line 186. This suggests that pread got broken somehow in the new libc. -- Victory to the Divine Mother!! after all, http://sahajayoga.org http://why-compete.org --- Received: (at 172545-close) by bugs.debian.org; 11 Dec 2002 02:08:45 + From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Tue Dec 10 20:08:45 2002 Return-path: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Received: from 23.1.111.219.st.excite.co.jp (master.hanzubon.org) [219.111.1.23] by master.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.12 1 (Debian)) id 18LwIn-0005Fx-00; Tue, 10 Dec 2002 20:08:45 -0600 Received: from iceman.hanzubon.jp (iceman.hanzubon.jp [192.168.100.12]) by master.hanzubon.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id BCF0B8DD9B; Wed, 11 Dec 2002 11:08:13 +0900 (JST) Date: Wed, 11 Dec 2002 11:08:10 +0900 From: ISHIKAWA Mutsumi [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: Bug#172545: transmeta longrun fails with unstable libc6 (pread/pwrite) In-Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] References: [EMAIL PROTECTED] User-Agent: Wanderlust/2.9.15 (Unchained Melody) SEMI/1.14.4 (Hosorogi) FLIM/1.14.4 (=?ISO-8859-4?Q?Kashiharajing=FE-mae?=) APEL/10.4 Emacs/21.2 (i386-pc-linux-gnu) MULE/5.0 (SAKAKI) Organization: Yendot.org unstable guy X-CVSROOT: cvs -d :ext:cvs.hanzubon.org:/var/cvs co -r unstable HANZUBON MIME-Version: 1.0 (generated by SEMI 1.14.4 - Hosorogi) Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Message-Id: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-14.7 required=5.0 tests=IN_REP_TO,NOSPAM_INC,QUOTED_EMAIL_TEXT,REFERENCES, SIGNATURE_SHORT_DENSE,SPAM_PHRASE_00_01,USER_AGENT version=2.41 X-Spam-Level: In [EMAIL PROTECTED] Joshua N Pritikin [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Package: libc6 Version: 2.3.1-5 i have a Fujitsu P-Series laptop (TM5800 CPU @ 800MHz) running Linux 2.4.20 (debian) with devfs, CONFIG_MCRUSOE, CONFIG_X86_MSR, and CONFIG_X86_CPUID. longrun is a tool to change the settings of Transmeta CPUs. longrun works fine with libc6 2.2.5-14.3. When i try upgrading to 2.3.1-5 then i get a failure at the first call to read_cpuid() in check_cpu(), line 186. This suggests that pread got broken somehow in the new libc. No, it is not a bug of glibc. It is a bug of longrun and already fixed, you should upgrade longrun package. http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?archive=nobug=165781 -- ISHIKAWA Mutsumi [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED]
