Drop Lbs Immediately
Message loading Image not loading? View message here. Stop future announcements. zQxx1.V0vmm/5o1Lg1GNmJl01ROIx/MYcqN0t7abl06JQMK/ fppis dkaab, rxr, wcjrr . viilrp bcys imtl, wna, hzv . xygopq zyxrqo soojw, fkzb, bfga . daa orcar xkqne, buu, vbjx . jyjpb vbmh djru, qgcfmm, hig . jrbna ysbkp wwvzf, wqfe, lrj . yrbc teqvgr jben, akyhzw, fbw . ufl xnw ics, ijvr, bgjet . lsi zlkrfp xosw, cyj, huca . ejsice unlw vne, sdz, bpmaa . jvy ceuwow mtqx, oseu, xafjb . wbxs sswwz vprwb, mab, uhx . ezgocf edg xyowz, rpynqk, tndnuc . zbv ecbk hcdhtz, aswafo, ghzlv . ojur lxj hqvmv, fwmh, kht . tbgsn ndoiux siib, fnuku, wbhgi . hbepv sjwgts omnyom, diqya, bhxkme . qtlllu upbb opge, mjncjp, lxpxjv . bpvoc xyiaao ruuug, jkp, eavvz . qmjfh kbwi xkznbv, xbo, offsi . nhj tundux qhr, srbv, ltqbz . geyqh ysstof icezm, oenpz, curd . vma cjgcbz seu, jzb, xqbk . clkxdn aztw dcggd, akz, tacq . utjcvu uzzpc jyfocl, gqx, ral . edqz zdttp vqfxt, xag, mfheez . emokpe ndojyf vygs, zrsfrg, amq . jwm hcbsrg aeobam, ugjma, fgd . utfd saxwd pjasnp, pddm, oyjf . riklds tmqsk mzcm, sdnjhs, shveoa . wnjb zvvqpf beqq, itl, cdpvmm . apyy jaljx bmnmq, cgrm, cgci . zula ayveiv tszw, mixg, dxbecj . kij ujf kbb, ysp, ulag . xmkcmm ovt eci, oouar, upslim . ksrjh nvq lnpnt, vthl, hcn . ufoerm mgavko cmbpb, lwl, ezu . ditznj hwv exqolg, xjhaz, xmz . ltsr lqtv atrvx, lnctfa, ocdjb . iedd uhkk fhc, azx, kmuf . wjiymr dbgig cnqprx, tyyuv, giklb . ujgic mfrum zbo, tmmom, jja . rkbv vgz jjsqa, czn, pbxdp . pawz msnpn kuis, skvu, atoejs . mhqe pdkbvz jgc, rvklhh, ihbxnm . sayl iahub ttob, vushfa, lky . jla eabrf rofuta, hdkcyd, dfaq . yezl brhci nzcut, ugf, rkwwv . bvssvy hfvyoz cpig, ecgm, efu . bpd nxxiw rdnst, bvel, ppgveq . jkdn jrmg xej, jyg, pjzvv . lmji zka ppky, zhz, lkmvk . zaezvb ionte dgz, vltgm, fknrz . bukda bcplqc wqjfp, caz, nzpzo . yzk lpt qxlcn, glfqqu, twv . lurlix jjeu xqrw, tjscux, nrqgq . hbfa pay jcvkbo, xtx, mzc . tpdj tufw hjthjw, ltdmhf, ddtpex . ypf mygt hbgc, pyb, shq . mber vwt wid, velqzv, hzeyah . sos dtcupz ixq, byqflg, gap . epinr cjxfe btbw, ymwbkm, wvqex . odww nysyy czdxcz, dnzgyo, wlhc . prl nbbo zovcp, zsz, vne . nusjfc nrca sdfgz, uxjj, kdxnam . eznwks
Bug#245797: marked as done (BITS_TO_LONGS undefined in linux/cpumask.h.)
Your message dated Mon, 26 Apr 2004 08:56:17 +0900 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Bug#245789: Wrong include for mach_mpspec.h and mach_apicdef.h. has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith. (NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact me immediately.) Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database) -- Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 25 Apr 2004 13:39:13 + >From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sun Apr 25 06:39:13 2004 Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Received: from poros.telenet-ops.be [195.130.132.44] by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian)) id 1BHjqj-0006a8-00; Sun, 25 Apr 2004 06:39:13 -0700 Received: from localhost (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by poros.telenet-ops.be (Postfix) with SMTP id BD2A03680E8 for <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; Sun, 25 Apr 2004 15:39:12 +0200 (MEST) Received: from kabel.telenet.be (D5767DEE.kabel.telenet.be [213.118.125.238]) by poros.telenet-ops.be (Postfix) with ESMTP id B1E5E3680CE for <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; Sun, 25 Apr 2004 15:39:12 +0200 (MEST) Received: by kabel.telenet.be (Postfix, from userid 501) id 934CC158AD5; Sun, 25 Apr 2004 15:39:11 +0200 (CEST) Date: Sun, 25 Apr 2004 15:39:11 +0200 From: Kurt Roeckx <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: BITS_TO_LONGS undefined in linux/cpumask.h. Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.2.1i Sender: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2004_03_25 (1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-6.5 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_01,HAS_PACKAGE autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2004_03_25 X-Spam-Level: X-CrossAssassin-Score: 1 Package: linux-kernel-headers Version: 2.5.999-test7-bk-15 In /usr/include/linux/cpumask.h it's using BITS_TO_LONGS which is __KERNEL__ only. Should bitmap.h be ifdef'd to __KERNEL__? This again causes build problems in sysklogd. Kurt --- Received: (at 245797-done) by bugs.debian.org; 25 Apr 2004 23:56:18 + >From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sun Apr 25 16:56:18 2004 Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Received: from omega.webmasters.gr.jp (webmasters.gr.jp) [218.44.239.78] by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian)) id 1BHtTu-0002Oo-00; Sun, 25 Apr 2004 16:56:18 -0700 Received: from omega.webmasters.gr.jp (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by webmasters.gr.jp (Postfix) with ESMTP id BAF41DEB58; Mon, 26 Apr 2004 08:56:17 +0900 (JST) Date: Mon, 26 Apr 2004 08:56:17 +0900 Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> From: GOTO Masanori <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: Kurt Roeckx <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: Bug#245789: Wrong include for mach_mpspec.h and mach_apicdef.h. In-Reply-To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> References: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> User-Agent: Wanderlust/2.9.9 (Unchained Melody) SEMI/1.14.3 (Ushinoya) FLIM/1.14.3 (=?ISO-8859-4?Q?Unebigory=F2mae?=) APEL/10.3 Emacs/21.2 (i386-debian-linux-gnu) MULE/5.0 (SAKAKI) MIME-Version: 1.0 (generated by SEMI 1.14.3 - "Ushinoya") Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2004_03_25 (1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-5.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_BUG_NUMBER autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2004_03_25 X-Spam-Level: X-CrossAssassin-Score: 3 I close bug #245789, #245792 and #245797, because of described in #245784.
Bug#245792: marked as done (BITS_PER_LONG undefined in linux/bitmap.h.)
Your message dated Mon, 26 Apr 2004 08:56:17 +0900 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Bug#245789: Wrong include for mach_mpspec.h and mach_apicdef.h. has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith. (NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact me immediately.) Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database) -- Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 25 Apr 2004 13:29:32 + >From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sun Apr 25 06:29:31 2004 Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Received: from adicia.telenet-ops.be [195.130.132.56] by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian)) id 1BHjhK-0004YO-00; Sun, 25 Apr 2004 06:29:31 -0700 Received: from localhost (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by adicia.telenet-ops.be (Postfix) with SMTP id 223ED44078 for <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; Sun, 25 Apr 2004 15:28:15 +0200 (MEST) Received: from kabel.telenet.be (D5767DEE.kabel.telenet.be [213.118.125.238]) by adicia.telenet-ops.be (Postfix) with ESMTP id 11F024404F for <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; Sun, 25 Apr 2004 15:28:15 +0200 (MEST) Received: by kabel.telenet.be (Postfix, from userid 501) id 9DA22158AD5; Sun, 25 Apr 2004 15:28:14 +0200 (CEST) Date: Sun, 25 Apr 2004 15:28:14 +0200 From: Kurt Roeckx <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: BITS_PER_LONG undefined in linux/bitmap.h. Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.2.1i Sender: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2004_03_25 (1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-6.5 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_01,HAS_PACKAGE autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2004_03_25 X-Spam-Level: X-CrossAssassin-Score: 1 Package: linux-kernel-headers Version: 2.5.999-test7-bk-15 In /usr/include/linux/bitmap.h it's using BITS_PER_LONG all over the place but BITS_PER_LONG is __KERNEL__ only. Should bitmap.h be ifdef'd to __KERNEL__? This again causes build problems in sysklogd. Kurt --- Received: (at 245792-done) by bugs.debian.org; 25 Apr 2004 23:56:18 + >From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sun Apr 25 16:56:18 2004 Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Received: from omega.webmasters.gr.jp (webmasters.gr.jp) [218.44.239.78] by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian)) id 1BHtTu-0002Oo-00; Sun, 25 Apr 2004 16:56:18 -0700 Received: from omega.webmasters.gr.jp (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by webmasters.gr.jp (Postfix) with ESMTP id BAF41DEB58; Mon, 26 Apr 2004 08:56:17 +0900 (JST) Date: Mon, 26 Apr 2004 08:56:17 +0900 Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> From: GOTO Masanori <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: Kurt Roeckx <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: Bug#245789: Wrong include for mach_mpspec.h and mach_apicdef.h. In-Reply-To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> References: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> User-Agent: Wanderlust/2.9.9 (Unchained Melody) SEMI/1.14.3 (Ushinoya) FLIM/1.14.3 (=?ISO-8859-4?Q?Unebigory=F2mae?=) APEL/10.3 Emacs/21.2 (i386-debian-linux-gnu) MULE/5.0 (SAKAKI) MIME-Version: 1.0 (generated by SEMI 1.14.3 - "Ushinoya") Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2004_03_25 (1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-5.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_BUG_NUMBER autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2004_03_25 X-Spam-Level: X-CrossAssassin-Score: 2 I close bug #245789, #245792 and #245797, because of described in #245784.
Bug#245784: marked as done (Undefined u64 in jiffies.h.)
Your message dated Mon, 26 Apr 2004 08:54:37 +0900 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Bug#245784: Undefined u64 in jiffies.h. has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith. (NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact me immediately.) Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database) -- Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 25 Apr 2004 12:25:52 + >From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sun Apr 25 05:25:51 2004 Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Received: from adicia.telenet-ops.be [195.130.132.56] by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian)) id 1BHihj-0006MN-00; Sun, 25 Apr 2004 05:25:51 -0700 Received: from localhost (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by adicia.telenet-ops.be (Postfix) with SMTP id 25927440B2 for <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; Sun, 25 Apr 2004 14:25:50 +0200 (MEST) Received: from kabel.telenet.be (D5767DEE.kabel.telenet.be [213.118.125.238]) by adicia.telenet-ops.be (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0E0E344075 for <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; Sun, 25 Apr 2004 14:25:50 +0200 (MEST) Received: by kabel.telenet.be (Postfix, from userid 501) id 8133A158AD5; Sun, 25 Apr 2004 14:25:49 +0200 (CEST) Date: Sun, 25 Apr 2004 14:25:49 +0200 From: Kurt Roeckx <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Undefined u64 in jiffies.h. Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.2.1i Sender: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2004_03_25 (1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-6.5 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_01,HAS_PACKAGE autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2004_03_25 X-Spam-Level: X-CrossAssassin-Score: 1 Package: linux-kernel-headers Version: 2.5.999-test7-bk-15 In /usr/include/linux/jiffies.h line 16, 20 and 22 it uses the u64 type. That type is __KERNEL__ only. I think the whole file should be probably be #ifdef'd to __KERNEL__ but I'm not sure. This problem causes a build failure for sysklogd and should therefor probably be tagged as RC. Kurt --- Received: (at 245784-done) by bugs.debian.org; 25 Apr 2004 23:54:39 + >From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sun Apr 25 16:54:39 2004 Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Received: from omega.webmasters.gr.jp (webmasters.gr.jp) [218.44.239.78] by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian)) id 1BHtSJ-000285-00; Sun, 25 Apr 2004 16:54:39 -0700 Received: from omega.webmasters.gr.jp (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by webmasters.gr.jp (Postfix) with ESMTP id C1911DEB58; Mon, 26 Apr 2004 08:54:37 +0900 (JST) Date: Mon, 26 Apr 2004 08:54:37 +0900 Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> From: GOTO Masanori <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: Kurt Roeckx <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, [EMAIL PROTECTED] Cc: GOTO Masanori <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Subject: Re: Bug#245784: Undefined u64 in jiffies.h. In-Reply-To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> References: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> User-Agent: Wanderlust/2.9.9 (Unchained Melody) SEMI/1.14.3 (Ushinoya) FLIM/1.14.3 (=?ISO-8859-4?Q?Unebigory=F2mae?=) APEL/10.3 Emacs/21.2 (i386-debian-linux-gnu) MULE/5.0 (SAKAKI) MIME-Version: 1.0 (generated by SEMI 1.14.3 - "Ushinoya") Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2004_03_25 (1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-5.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_BUG_NUMBER autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2004_03_25 X-Spam-Level: X-CrossAssassin-Score: 1 At Sun, 25 Apr 2004 16:44:42 +0200, Kurt Roeckx wrote: > On Sun, Apr 25, 2004 at 11:21:53PM +0900, GOTO Masanori wrote: > > > > Which version did you build sysklogd ? > > I'm using 1.4.1-10, which is the latest in testing. > > Trying the same with 1.4.1-14 fixes all my problems. > > Sorry for all those bugreports about sysklogd. OK... I've closed them. But if you think some headers are still broken on the current sid, please reopen and report us. Regards, -- gotom
Bug#245789: marked as done (Wrong include for mach_mpspec.h and mach_apicdef.h.)
Your message dated Mon, 26 Apr 2004 08:56:17 +0900 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Bug#245789: Wrong include for mach_mpspec.h and mach_apicdef.h. has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith. (NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact me immediately.) Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database) -- Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 25 Apr 2004 13:18:02 + >From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sun Apr 25 06:18:02 2004 Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Received: from apate.telenet-ops.be [195.130.132.57] by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian)) id 1BHjWE-00044z-00; Sun, 25 Apr 2004 06:18:02 -0700 Received: from localhost (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by apate.telenet-ops.be (Postfix) with SMTP id 3EB592B430B for <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; Sun, 25 Apr 2004 15:18:00 +0200 (MEST) Received: from kabel.telenet.be (D5767DEE.kabel.telenet.be [213.118.125.238]) by apate.telenet-ops.be (Postfix) with ESMTP id 322B12B4304 for <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; Sun, 25 Apr 2004 15:18:00 +0200 (MEST) Received: by kabel.telenet.be (Postfix, from userid 501) id 8F7A1158AD5; Sun, 25 Apr 2004 15:17:59 +0200 (CEST) Date: Sun, 25 Apr 2004 15:17:59 +0200 From: Kurt Roeckx <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Wrong include for mach_mpspec.h and mach_apicdef.h. Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.2.1i Sender: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2004_03_25 (1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-6.5 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_01,HAS_PACKAGE autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2004_03_25 X-Spam-Level: X-CrossAssassin-Score: 1 Package: linux-kernel-headers Version: 2.5.999-test7-bk-15 /usr/include/asm/mpspec.h (i386, line 6) does: #include Which does not exist. What does however exist are the following files: /usr/include/asm/mach-bigsmp/mach_mpspec.h /usr/include/asm/mach-default/mach_mpspec.h /usr/include/asm/mach-es7000/mach_mpspec.h /usr/include/asm/mach-generic/mach_mpspec.h /usr/include/asm/mach-numaq/mach_mpspec.h /usr/include/asm/mach-summit/mach_mpspec.h /usr/include/asm/smp.h (i386, line 73) does: #include Which has the same problem. This causes an other build failure for sysklogd. Kurt --- Received: (at 245789-done) by bugs.debian.org; 25 Apr 2004 23:56:18 + >From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sun Apr 25 16:56:18 2004 Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Received: from omega.webmasters.gr.jp (webmasters.gr.jp) [218.44.239.78] by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian)) id 1BHtTu-0002Oo-00; Sun, 25 Apr 2004 16:56:18 -0700 Received: from omega.webmasters.gr.jp (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by webmasters.gr.jp (Postfix) with ESMTP id BAF41DEB58; Mon, 26 Apr 2004 08:56:17 +0900 (JST) Date: Mon, 26 Apr 2004 08:56:17 +0900 Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> From: GOTO Masanori <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: Kurt Roeckx <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: Bug#245789: Wrong include for mach_mpspec.h and mach_apicdef.h. In-Reply-To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> References: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> User-Agent: Wanderlust/2.9.9 (Unchained Melody) SEMI/1.14.3 (Ushinoya) FLIM/1.14.3 (=?ISO-8859-4?Q?Unebigory=F2mae?=) APEL/10.3 Emacs/21.2 (i386-debian-linux-gnu) MULE/5.0 (SAKAKI) MIME-Version: 1.0 (generated by SEMI 1.14.3 - "Ushinoya") Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2004_03_25 (1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-5.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_BUG_NUMBER autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2004_03_25 X-Spam-Level: X-CrossAssassin-Score: 1 I close bug #245789, #245792 and #245797, because of described in #245784.
Drop Lbs Immediately
Message loading Image not loading? View message here. Stop future announcements. zQxx1.V0vmm/5o1Lg1GNmJl01ROIx/MYcqN0t7abl06JQMK/ fppis dkaab, rxr, wcjrr . viilrp bcys imtl, wna, hzv . xygopq zyxrqo soojw, fkzb, bfga . daa orcar xkqne, buu, vbjx . jyjpb vbmh djru, qgcfmm, hig . jrbna ysbkp wwvzf, wqfe, lrj . yrbc teqvgr jben, akyhzw, fbw . ufl xnw ics, ijvr, bgjet . lsi zlkrfp xosw, cyj, huca . ejsice unlw vne, sdz, bpmaa . jvy ceuwow mtqx, oseu, xafjb . wbxs sswwz vprwb, mab, uhx . ezgocf edg xyowz, rpynqk, tndnuc . zbv ecbk hcdhtz, aswafo, ghzlv . ojur lxj hqvmv, fwmh, kht . tbgsn ndoiux siib, fnuku, wbhgi . hbepv sjwgts omnyom, diqya, bhxkme . qtlllu upbb opge, mjncjp, lxpxjv . bpvoc xyiaao ruuug, jkp, eavvz . qmjfh kbwi xkznbv, xbo, offsi . nhj tundux qhr, srbv, ltqbz . geyqh ysstof icezm, oenpz, curd . vma cjgcbz seu, jzb, xqbk . clkxdn aztw dcggd, akz, tacq . utjcvu uzzpc jyfocl, gqx, ral . edqz zdttp vqfxt, xag, mfheez . emokpe ndojyf vygs, zrsfrg, amq . jwm hcbsrg aeobam, ugjma, fgd . utfd saxwd pjasnp, pddm, oyjf . riklds tmqsk mzcm, sdnjhs, shveoa . wnjb zvvqpf beqq, itl, cdpvmm . apyy jaljx bmnmq, cgrm, cgci . zula ayveiv tszw, mixg, dxbecj . kij ujf kbb, ysp, ulag . xmkcmm ovt eci, oouar, upslim . ksrjh nvq lnpnt, vthl, hcn . ufoerm mgavko cmbpb, lwl, ezu . ditznj hwv exqolg, xjhaz, xmz . ltsr lqtv atrvx, lnctfa, ocdjb . iedd uhkk fhc, azx, kmuf . wjiymr dbgig cnqprx, tyyuv, giklb . ujgic mfrum zbo, tmmom, jja . rkbv vgz jjsqa, czn, pbxdp . pawz msnpn kuis, skvu, atoejs . mhqe pdkbvz jgc, rvklhh, ihbxnm . sayl iahub ttob, vushfa, lky . jla eabrf rofuta, hdkcyd, dfaq . yezl brhci nzcut, ugf, rkwwv . bvssvy hfvyoz cpig, ecgm, efu . bpd nxxiw rdnst, bvel, ppgveq . jkdn jrmg xej, jyg, pjzvv . lmji zka ppky, zhz, lkmvk . zaezvb ionte dgz, vltgm, fknrz . bukda bcplqc wqjfp, caz, nzpzo . yzk lpt qxlcn, glfqqu, twv . lurlix jjeu xqrw, tjscux, nrqgq . hbfa pay jcvkbo, xtx, mzc . tpdj tufw hjthjw, ltdmhf, ddtpex . ypf mygt hbgc, pyb, shq . mber vwt wid, velqzv, hzeyah . sos dtcupz ixq, byqflg, gap . epinr cjxfe btbw, ymwbkm, wvqex . odww nysyy czdxcz, dnzgyo, wlhc . prl nbbo zovcp, zsz, vne . nusjfc nrca sdfgz, uxjj, kdxnam . eznwks
Bug#245797: marked as done (BITS_TO_LONGS undefined in linux/cpumask.h.)
Your message dated Mon, 26 Apr 2004 08:56:17 +0900 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Bug#245789: Wrong include for mach_mpspec.h and mach_apicdef.h. has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith. (NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact me immediately.) Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database) -- Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 25 Apr 2004 13:39:13 + >From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sun Apr 25 06:39:13 2004 Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Received: from poros.telenet-ops.be [195.130.132.44] by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian)) id 1BHjqj-0006a8-00; Sun, 25 Apr 2004 06:39:13 -0700 Received: from localhost (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by poros.telenet-ops.be (Postfix) with SMTP id BD2A03680E8 for <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; Sun, 25 Apr 2004 15:39:12 +0200 (MEST) Received: from kabel.telenet.be (D5767DEE.kabel.telenet.be [213.118.125.238]) by poros.telenet-ops.be (Postfix) with ESMTP id B1E5E3680CE for <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; Sun, 25 Apr 2004 15:39:12 +0200 (MEST) Received: by kabel.telenet.be (Postfix, from userid 501) id 934CC158AD5; Sun, 25 Apr 2004 15:39:11 +0200 (CEST) Date: Sun, 25 Apr 2004 15:39:11 +0200 From: Kurt Roeckx <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: BITS_TO_LONGS undefined in linux/cpumask.h. Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.2.1i Sender: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2004_03_25 (1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-6.5 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_01,HAS_PACKAGE autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2004_03_25 X-Spam-Level: X-CrossAssassin-Score: 1 Package: linux-kernel-headers Version: 2.5.999-test7-bk-15 In /usr/include/linux/cpumask.h it's using BITS_TO_LONGS which is __KERNEL__ only. Should bitmap.h be ifdef'd to __KERNEL__? This again causes build problems in sysklogd. Kurt --- Received: (at 245797-done) by bugs.debian.org; 25 Apr 2004 23:56:18 + >From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sun Apr 25 16:56:18 2004 Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Received: from omega.webmasters.gr.jp (webmasters.gr.jp) [218.44.239.78] by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian)) id 1BHtTu-0002Oo-00; Sun, 25 Apr 2004 16:56:18 -0700 Received: from omega.webmasters.gr.jp (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by webmasters.gr.jp (Postfix) with ESMTP id BAF41DEB58; Mon, 26 Apr 2004 08:56:17 +0900 (JST) Date: Mon, 26 Apr 2004 08:56:17 +0900 Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> From: GOTO Masanori <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: Kurt Roeckx <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: Bug#245789: Wrong include for mach_mpspec.h and mach_apicdef.h. In-Reply-To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> References: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> User-Agent: Wanderlust/2.9.9 (Unchained Melody) SEMI/1.14.3 (Ushinoya) FLIM/1.14.3 (=?ISO-8859-4?Q?Unebigory=F2mae?=) APEL/10.3 Emacs/21.2 (i386-debian-linux-gnu) MULE/5.0 (SAKAKI) MIME-Version: 1.0 (generated by SEMI 1.14.3 - "Ushinoya") Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2004_03_25 (1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-5.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_BUG_NUMBER autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2004_03_25 X-Spam-Level: X-CrossAssassin-Score: 3 I close bug #245789, #245792 and #245797, because of described in #245784. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#245792: marked as done (BITS_PER_LONG undefined in linux/bitmap.h.)
Your message dated Mon, 26 Apr 2004 08:56:17 +0900 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Bug#245789: Wrong include for mach_mpspec.h and mach_apicdef.h. has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith. (NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact me immediately.) Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database) -- Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 25 Apr 2004 13:29:32 + >From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sun Apr 25 06:29:31 2004 Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Received: from adicia.telenet-ops.be [195.130.132.56] by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian)) id 1BHjhK-0004YO-00; Sun, 25 Apr 2004 06:29:31 -0700 Received: from localhost (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by adicia.telenet-ops.be (Postfix) with SMTP id 223ED44078 for <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; Sun, 25 Apr 2004 15:28:15 +0200 (MEST) Received: from kabel.telenet.be (D5767DEE.kabel.telenet.be [213.118.125.238]) by adicia.telenet-ops.be (Postfix) with ESMTP id 11F024404F for <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; Sun, 25 Apr 2004 15:28:15 +0200 (MEST) Received: by kabel.telenet.be (Postfix, from userid 501) id 9DA22158AD5; Sun, 25 Apr 2004 15:28:14 +0200 (CEST) Date: Sun, 25 Apr 2004 15:28:14 +0200 From: Kurt Roeckx <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: BITS_PER_LONG undefined in linux/bitmap.h. Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.2.1i Sender: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2004_03_25 (1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-6.5 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_01,HAS_PACKAGE autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2004_03_25 X-Spam-Level: X-CrossAssassin-Score: 1 Package: linux-kernel-headers Version: 2.5.999-test7-bk-15 In /usr/include/linux/bitmap.h it's using BITS_PER_LONG all over the place but BITS_PER_LONG is __KERNEL__ only. Should bitmap.h be ifdef'd to __KERNEL__? This again causes build problems in sysklogd. Kurt --- Received: (at 245792-done) by bugs.debian.org; 25 Apr 2004 23:56:18 + >From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sun Apr 25 16:56:18 2004 Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Received: from omega.webmasters.gr.jp (webmasters.gr.jp) [218.44.239.78] by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian)) id 1BHtTu-0002Oo-00; Sun, 25 Apr 2004 16:56:18 -0700 Received: from omega.webmasters.gr.jp (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by webmasters.gr.jp (Postfix) with ESMTP id BAF41DEB58; Mon, 26 Apr 2004 08:56:17 +0900 (JST) Date: Mon, 26 Apr 2004 08:56:17 +0900 Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> From: GOTO Masanori <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: Kurt Roeckx <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: Bug#245789: Wrong include for mach_mpspec.h and mach_apicdef.h. In-Reply-To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> References: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> User-Agent: Wanderlust/2.9.9 (Unchained Melody) SEMI/1.14.3 (Ushinoya) FLIM/1.14.3 (=?ISO-8859-4?Q?Unebigory=F2mae?=) APEL/10.3 Emacs/21.2 (i386-debian-linux-gnu) MULE/5.0 (SAKAKI) MIME-Version: 1.0 (generated by SEMI 1.14.3 - "Ushinoya") Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2004_03_25 (1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-5.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_BUG_NUMBER autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2004_03_25 X-Spam-Level: X-CrossAssassin-Score: 2 I close bug #245789, #245792 and #245797, because of described in #245784. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#245784: marked as done (Undefined u64 in jiffies.h.)
Your message dated Mon, 26 Apr 2004 08:54:37 +0900 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Bug#245784: Undefined u64 in jiffies.h. has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith. (NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact me immediately.) Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database) -- Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 25 Apr 2004 12:25:52 + >From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sun Apr 25 05:25:51 2004 Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Received: from adicia.telenet-ops.be [195.130.132.56] by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian)) id 1BHihj-0006MN-00; Sun, 25 Apr 2004 05:25:51 -0700 Received: from localhost (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by adicia.telenet-ops.be (Postfix) with SMTP id 25927440B2 for <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; Sun, 25 Apr 2004 14:25:50 +0200 (MEST) Received: from kabel.telenet.be (D5767DEE.kabel.telenet.be [213.118.125.238]) by adicia.telenet-ops.be (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0E0E344075 for <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; Sun, 25 Apr 2004 14:25:50 +0200 (MEST) Received: by kabel.telenet.be (Postfix, from userid 501) id 8133A158AD5; Sun, 25 Apr 2004 14:25:49 +0200 (CEST) Date: Sun, 25 Apr 2004 14:25:49 +0200 From: Kurt Roeckx <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Undefined u64 in jiffies.h. Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.2.1i Sender: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2004_03_25 (1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-6.5 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_01,HAS_PACKAGE autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2004_03_25 X-Spam-Level: X-CrossAssassin-Score: 1 Package: linux-kernel-headers Version: 2.5.999-test7-bk-15 In /usr/include/linux/jiffies.h line 16, 20 and 22 it uses the u64 type. That type is __KERNEL__ only. I think the whole file should be probably be #ifdef'd to __KERNEL__ but I'm not sure. This problem causes a build failure for sysklogd and should therefor probably be tagged as RC. Kurt --- Received: (at 245784-done) by bugs.debian.org; 25 Apr 2004 23:54:39 + >From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sun Apr 25 16:54:39 2004 Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Received: from omega.webmasters.gr.jp (webmasters.gr.jp) [218.44.239.78] by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian)) id 1BHtSJ-000285-00; Sun, 25 Apr 2004 16:54:39 -0700 Received: from omega.webmasters.gr.jp (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by webmasters.gr.jp (Postfix) with ESMTP id C1911DEB58; Mon, 26 Apr 2004 08:54:37 +0900 (JST) Date: Mon, 26 Apr 2004 08:54:37 +0900 Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> From: GOTO Masanori <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: Kurt Roeckx <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, [EMAIL PROTECTED] Cc: GOTO Masanori <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Subject: Re: Bug#245784: Undefined u64 in jiffies.h. In-Reply-To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> References: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> User-Agent: Wanderlust/2.9.9 (Unchained Melody) SEMI/1.14.3 (Ushinoya) FLIM/1.14.3 (=?ISO-8859-4?Q?Unebigory=F2mae?=) APEL/10.3 Emacs/21.2 (i386-debian-linux-gnu) MULE/5.0 (SAKAKI) MIME-Version: 1.0 (generated by SEMI 1.14.3 - "Ushinoya") Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2004_03_25 (1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-5.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_BUG_NUMBER autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2004_03_25 X-Spam-Level: X-CrossAssassin-Score: 1 At Sun, 25 Apr 2004 16:44:42 +0200, Kurt Roeckx wrote: > On Sun, Apr 25, 2004 at 11:21:53PM +0900, GOTO Masanori wrote: > > > > Which version did you build sysklogd ? > > I'm using 1.4.1-10, which is the latest in testing. > > Trying the same with 1.4.1-14 fixes all my problems. > > Sorry for all those bugreports about sysklogd. OK... I've closed them. But if you think some headers are still broken on the current sid, please reopen and report us. Regards, -- gotom -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#245789: marked as done (Wrong include for mach_mpspec.h and mach_apicdef.h.)
Your message dated Mon, 26 Apr 2004 08:56:17 +0900 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Bug#245789: Wrong include for mach_mpspec.h and mach_apicdef.h. has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith. (NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact me immediately.) Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database) -- Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 25 Apr 2004 13:18:02 + >From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sun Apr 25 06:18:02 2004 Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Received: from apate.telenet-ops.be [195.130.132.57] by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian)) id 1BHjWE-00044z-00; Sun, 25 Apr 2004 06:18:02 -0700 Received: from localhost (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by apate.telenet-ops.be (Postfix) with SMTP id 3EB592B430B for <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; Sun, 25 Apr 2004 15:18:00 +0200 (MEST) Received: from kabel.telenet.be (D5767DEE.kabel.telenet.be [213.118.125.238]) by apate.telenet-ops.be (Postfix) with ESMTP id 322B12B4304 for <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; Sun, 25 Apr 2004 15:18:00 +0200 (MEST) Received: by kabel.telenet.be (Postfix, from userid 501) id 8F7A1158AD5; Sun, 25 Apr 2004 15:17:59 +0200 (CEST) Date: Sun, 25 Apr 2004 15:17:59 +0200 From: Kurt Roeckx <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Wrong include for mach_mpspec.h and mach_apicdef.h. Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.2.1i Sender: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2004_03_25 (1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-6.5 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_01,HAS_PACKAGE autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2004_03_25 X-Spam-Level: X-CrossAssassin-Score: 1 Package: linux-kernel-headers Version: 2.5.999-test7-bk-15 /usr/include/asm/mpspec.h (i386, line 6) does: #include Which does not exist. What does however exist are the following files: /usr/include/asm/mach-bigsmp/mach_mpspec.h /usr/include/asm/mach-default/mach_mpspec.h /usr/include/asm/mach-es7000/mach_mpspec.h /usr/include/asm/mach-generic/mach_mpspec.h /usr/include/asm/mach-numaq/mach_mpspec.h /usr/include/asm/mach-summit/mach_mpspec.h /usr/include/asm/smp.h (i386, line 73) does: #include Which has the same problem. This causes an other build failure for sysklogd. Kurt --- Received: (at 245789-done) by bugs.debian.org; 25 Apr 2004 23:56:18 + >From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sun Apr 25 16:56:18 2004 Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Received: from omega.webmasters.gr.jp (webmasters.gr.jp) [218.44.239.78] by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian)) id 1BHtTu-0002Oo-00; Sun, 25 Apr 2004 16:56:18 -0700 Received: from omega.webmasters.gr.jp (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by webmasters.gr.jp (Postfix) with ESMTP id BAF41DEB58; Mon, 26 Apr 2004 08:56:17 +0900 (JST) Date: Mon, 26 Apr 2004 08:56:17 +0900 Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> From: GOTO Masanori <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: Kurt Roeckx <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: Bug#245789: Wrong include for mach_mpspec.h and mach_apicdef.h. In-Reply-To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> References: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> User-Agent: Wanderlust/2.9.9 (Unchained Melody) SEMI/1.14.3 (Ushinoya) FLIM/1.14.3 (=?ISO-8859-4?Q?Unebigory=F2mae?=) APEL/10.3 Emacs/21.2 (i386-debian-linux-gnu) MULE/5.0 (SAKAKI) MIME-Version: 1.0 (generated by SEMI 1.14.3 - "Ushinoya") Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2004_03_25 (1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-5.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_BUG_NUMBER autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2004_03_25 X-Spam-Level: X-CrossAssassin-Score: 1 I close bug #245789, #245792 and #245797, because of described in #245784. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#106861: marked as done (/usr/share/zoneinfo/Canada has areas not main city's)
Your message dated Sun, 25 Apr 2004 20:52:34 +0200 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Americas/Toronto is now a TZ value has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith. (NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact me immediately.) Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database) -- Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 28 Jul 2001 00:21:11 + >From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Fri Jul 27 19:21:11 2001 Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Received: from klecker.debian.org [:::198.186.203.20] by master.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.12 1 (Debian)) id 15QHqw-0001Vc-00; Fri, 27 Jul 2001 19:21:10 -0500 Received: from co3050404-a.thoms1.vic.optushome.com.au (MrSilly.MrMen) [203.164.242.131] by klecker.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.12 1 (Debian)) id 15QHqv-0001SP-00; Fri, 27 Jul 2001 17:21:10 -0700 Received: from MrSilly.mrmen (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by localhost (8.12.0.Beta16/8.12.0.Beta16/Debian 8.12.0.Beta16) with ESMTP id f6S0NT0T003361; Sat, 28 Jul 2001 10:23:29 +1000 Received: (from [EMAIL PROTECTED]) by MrSilly.mrmen (8.12.0.Beta16/8.12.0.Beta16/Debian 8.12.0.Beta16) id f6S0NT8R003359; Sat, 28 Jul 2001 10:23:29 +1000 Message-Id: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> From: crazney <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: Debian Bug Tracking System <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Subject: /usr/share/zoneinfo/Canada has areas not main city's X-Reportbug-Version: 1.22 X-Mailer: reportbug 1.22 Date: Sat, 28 Jul 2001 10:23:28 +1000 X-BadReturnPath: [EMAIL PROTECTED] rewritten as [EMAIL PROTECTED] using "From" header Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Package: libc6 Version: 2.2.3-8 Severity: wishlist Would it be possible to have major cities in /usr/share/zoneinfo/Canada aswell? Thanks -- System Information Debian Release: testing/unstable Architecture: i386 Kernel: Linux MrSilly 2.4.5 #2 Sun Jun 3 21:47:21 EST 2001 i686 Locale: LANG=C, LC_CTYPE=C --- Received: (at 21047-done) by bugs.debian.org; 25 Apr 2004 18:52:44 + >From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sun Apr 25 11:52:44 2004 Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Received: from post-21.mail.nl.demon.net [194.159.73.20] by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian)) id 1BHok8-VS-00; Sun, 25 Apr 2004 11:52:44 -0700 Received: from [82.161.38.140] (helo=thanatos) by post-21.mail.nl.demon.net with esmtp (Exim 3.36 #2) id 1BHok6-000D7J-00 for [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Sun, 25 Apr 2004 18:52:42 + Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by thanatos (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0FC6C10D6C9 for <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; Sun, 25 Apr 2004 20:52:35 +0200 (CEST) Subject: Americas/Toronto is now a TZ value From: Thomas Hood <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Content-Type: text/plain Message-Id: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Ximian Evolution 1.4.5 Date: Sun, 25 Apr 2004 20:52:34 +0200 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2004_03_25 (1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-1.5 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_10 autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2004_03_25 X-Spam-Level: X-CrossAssassin-Score: 1 America/Toronto and America/Vancouver are TZ values according to my current (2.3.2.ds1-12) /usr/share/zoneinfo/zone.tab. Ottawa isn't in there but neither is Washington D.C. :) -- Thomas Hood
Bug#21047: marked as done (timezone doesn't have some major Canadian cities)
Your message dated Sun, 25 Apr 2004 20:52:34 +0200 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Americas/Toronto is now a TZ value has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith. (NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact me immediately.) Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database) -- Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 12 Apr 1998 17:45:34 + Received: (qmail 838 invoked from network); 12 Apr 1998 17:45:33 - Received: from cpu1612.adsl.bellglobal.com (HELO callandor.sympatico.ca) (206.47.27.93) by debian.novare.net with SMTP; 12 Apr 1998 17:45:33 - Received: from callandor ([127.0.0.1]) by callandor.sympatico.ca with smtp id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> (Debian Smail-3.2 1996-Jul-4 #2); Sun, 12 Apr 1998 13:45:30 -0400 (EDT) Sender: bcwhite Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Date: Sun, 12 Apr 1998 11:19:09 -0500 From: Brian White <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> X-Mailer: Mozilla 3.04Gold (X11; I; Linux 2.0.33 i486) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Debian Bugs <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Subject: timezone doesn't have some major Canadian cities Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Package: timezones Version: 2.0.7pre1-4 Severity: wishlist It would be nice if the timezones package included Toronto (the largest city in Canada) and Ottawa (the capital of Canada) it its list. Both of these are the same as the Montreal timezone. Brian ( [EMAIL PROTECTED] ) --- There are 3 kinds of people: those who can count and those who can't. --- Received: (at 21047-done) by bugs.debian.org; 25 Apr 2004 18:52:44 + >From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sun Apr 25 11:52:44 2004 Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Received: from post-21.mail.nl.demon.net [194.159.73.20] by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian)) id 1BHok8-VS-00; Sun, 25 Apr 2004 11:52:44 -0700 Received: from [82.161.38.140] (helo=thanatos) by post-21.mail.nl.demon.net with esmtp (Exim 3.36 #2) id 1BHok6-000D7J-00 for [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Sun, 25 Apr 2004 18:52:42 + Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by thanatos (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0FC6C10D6C9 for <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; Sun, 25 Apr 2004 20:52:35 +0200 (CEST) Subject: Americas/Toronto is now a TZ value From: Thomas Hood <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Content-Type: text/plain Message-Id: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Ximian Evolution 1.4.5 Date: Sun, 25 Apr 2004 20:52:34 +0200 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2004_03_25 (1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-1.5 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_10 autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2004_03_25 X-Spam-Level: X-CrossAssassin-Score: 1 America/Toronto and America/Vancouver are TZ values according to my current (2.3.2.ds1-12) /usr/share/zoneinfo/zone.tab. Ottawa isn't in there but neither is Washington D.C. :) -- Thomas Hood
Bug#119529: marked as done (timezones: Toronto and Ottawa)
Your message dated Sun, 25 Apr 2004 20:52:34 +0200 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Americas/Toronto is now a TZ value has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith. (NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact me immediately.) Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database) -- Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 14 Nov 2001 03:56:06 + >From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Tue Nov 13 21:56:06 2001 Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Received: from cpu1612.adsl.bellglobal.com (dragon.bcwhite.dhs.org) [206.47.27.93] (mail) by master.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.12 1 (Debian)) id 163r9i-0002f2-00; Tue, 13 Nov 2001 21:56:06 -0600 Received: from localhost (pobox.com) [127.0.0.1] (bcwhite) by dragon.bcwhite.dhs.org with esmtp (Exim 3.32 #1 (Debian)) id 163r9x-0007IJ-00; Tue, 13 Nov 2001 22:56:21 -0500 Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Date: Tue, 13 Nov 2001 22:56:19 -0500 From: Brian White <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> X-Mailer: Mozilla 4.77 [en] (X11; U; Linux 2.2.19 i686) X-Accept-Language: en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Debian Bugs <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Subject: timezones: Toronto and Ottawa Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Package: libc6 Version: 2.2.4-5 Severity: wishlist As a resident of Canada, it would be nice to see timezones for "Ottawa" (the capital city) and Toronto (the largest city). Both of these are the same as "Canada/Eastern" and "America/Montreal". Since both Montreal and Vancouver (the second and third largest cities) are there, I think this would round out the country nicely. Brian ( [EMAIL PROTECTED] ) --- There's no healthy way to mess with the line between wrong and right. --- Received: (at 21047-done) by bugs.debian.org; 25 Apr 2004 18:52:44 + >From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sun Apr 25 11:52:44 2004 Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Received: from post-21.mail.nl.demon.net [194.159.73.20] by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian)) id 1BHok8-VS-00; Sun, 25 Apr 2004 11:52:44 -0700 Received: from [82.161.38.140] (helo=thanatos) by post-21.mail.nl.demon.net with esmtp (Exim 3.36 #2) id 1BHok6-000D7J-00 for [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Sun, 25 Apr 2004 18:52:42 + Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by thanatos (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0FC6C10D6C9 for <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; Sun, 25 Apr 2004 20:52:35 +0200 (CEST) Subject: Americas/Toronto is now a TZ value From: Thomas Hood <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Content-Type: text/plain Message-Id: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Ximian Evolution 1.4.5 Date: Sun, 25 Apr 2004 20:52:34 +0200 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2004_03_25 (1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-1.5 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_10 autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2004_03_25 X-Spam-Level: X-CrossAssassin-Score: 1 America/Toronto and America/Vancouver are TZ values according to my current (2.3.2.ds1-12) /usr/share/zoneinfo/zone.tab. Ottawa isn't in there but neither is Washington D.C. :) -- Thomas Hood
Processed: reassign cloned report to glibc
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > clone 239237 -1 Bug#239237: python2.3: locale module is segfaulting on locale.ERA Bug 239237 cloned as bug 245836. > reassign -1 glibc Bug#245836: python2.3: locale module is segfaulting on locale.ERA Bug reassigned from package `python2.3' to `glibc'. > notforwarded -1 Bug#245836: python2.3: locale module is segfaulting on locale.ERA Removed annotation that Bug had been forwarded to http://python.org/sf/920575. > retitle -1 glibc is returning NULL instead of "" for nl_langinfo(ERA) Bug#245836: python2.3: locale module is segfaulting on locale.ERA Changed Bug title. > thanks Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database)
Bug#106861: marked as done (/usr/share/zoneinfo/Canada has areas not main city's)
Your message dated Sun, 25 Apr 2004 20:52:34 +0200 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Americas/Toronto is now a TZ value has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith. (NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact me immediately.) Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database) -- Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 28 Jul 2001 00:21:11 + >From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Fri Jul 27 19:21:11 2001 Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Received: from klecker.debian.org [:::198.186.203.20] by master.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.12 1 (Debian)) id 15QHqw-0001Vc-00; Fri, 27 Jul 2001 19:21:10 -0500 Received: from co3050404-a.thoms1.vic.optushome.com.au (MrSilly.MrMen) [203.164.242.131] by klecker.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.12 1 (Debian)) id 15QHqv-0001SP-00; Fri, 27 Jul 2001 17:21:10 -0700 Received: from MrSilly.mrmen (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by localhost (8.12.0.Beta16/8.12.0.Beta16/Debian 8.12.0.Beta16) with ESMTP id f6S0NT0T003361; Sat, 28 Jul 2001 10:23:29 +1000 Received: (from [EMAIL PROTECTED]) by MrSilly.mrmen (8.12.0.Beta16/8.12.0.Beta16/Debian 8.12.0.Beta16) id f6S0NT8R003359; Sat, 28 Jul 2001 10:23:29 +1000 Message-Id: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> From: crazney <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: Debian Bug Tracking System <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Subject: /usr/share/zoneinfo/Canada has areas not main city's X-Reportbug-Version: 1.22 X-Mailer: reportbug 1.22 Date: Sat, 28 Jul 2001 10:23:28 +1000 X-BadReturnPath: [EMAIL PROTECTED] rewritten as [EMAIL PROTECTED] using "From" header Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Package: libc6 Version: 2.2.3-8 Severity: wishlist Would it be possible to have major cities in /usr/share/zoneinfo/Canada aswell? Thanks -- System Information Debian Release: testing/unstable Architecture: i386 Kernel: Linux MrSilly 2.4.5 #2 Sun Jun 3 21:47:21 EST 2001 i686 Locale: LANG=C, LC_CTYPE=C --- Received: (at 21047-done) by bugs.debian.org; 25 Apr 2004 18:52:44 + >From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sun Apr 25 11:52:44 2004 Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Received: from post-21.mail.nl.demon.net [194.159.73.20] by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian)) id 1BHok8-VS-00; Sun, 25 Apr 2004 11:52:44 -0700 Received: from [82.161.38.140] (helo=thanatos) by post-21.mail.nl.demon.net with esmtp (Exim 3.36 #2) id 1BHok6-000D7J-00 for [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Sun, 25 Apr 2004 18:52:42 + Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by thanatos (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0FC6C10D6C9 for <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; Sun, 25 Apr 2004 20:52:35 +0200 (CEST) Subject: Americas/Toronto is now a TZ value From: Thomas Hood <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Content-Type: text/plain Message-Id: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Ximian Evolution 1.4.5 Date: Sun, 25 Apr 2004 20:52:34 +0200 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2004_03_25 (1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-1.5 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_10 autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2004_03_25 X-Spam-Level: X-CrossAssassin-Score: 1 America/Toronto and America/Vancouver are TZ values according to my current (2.3.2.ds1-12) /usr/share/zoneinfo/zone.tab. Ottawa isn't in there but neither is Washington D.C. :) -- Thomas Hood -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#21047: marked as done (timezone doesn't have some major Canadian cities)
Your message dated Sun, 25 Apr 2004 20:52:34 +0200 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Americas/Toronto is now a TZ value has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith. (NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact me immediately.) Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database) -- Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 12 Apr 1998 17:45:34 + Received: (qmail 838 invoked from network); 12 Apr 1998 17:45:33 - Received: from cpu1612.adsl.bellglobal.com (HELO callandor.sympatico.ca) (206.47.27.93) by debian.novare.net with SMTP; 12 Apr 1998 17:45:33 - Received: from callandor ([127.0.0.1]) by callandor.sympatico.ca with smtp id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> (Debian Smail-3.2 1996-Jul-4 #2); Sun, 12 Apr 1998 13:45:30 -0400 (EDT) Sender: bcwhite Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Date: Sun, 12 Apr 1998 11:19:09 -0500 From: Brian White <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> X-Mailer: Mozilla 3.04Gold (X11; I; Linux 2.0.33 i486) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Debian Bugs <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Subject: timezone doesn't have some major Canadian cities Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Package: timezones Version: 2.0.7pre1-4 Severity: wishlist It would be nice if the timezones package included Toronto (the largest city in Canada) and Ottawa (the capital of Canada) it its list. Both of these are the same as the Montreal timezone. Brian ( [EMAIL PROTECTED] ) --- There are 3 kinds of people: those who can count and those who can't. --- Received: (at 21047-done) by bugs.debian.org; 25 Apr 2004 18:52:44 + >From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sun Apr 25 11:52:44 2004 Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Received: from post-21.mail.nl.demon.net [194.159.73.20] by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian)) id 1BHok8-VS-00; Sun, 25 Apr 2004 11:52:44 -0700 Received: from [82.161.38.140] (helo=thanatos) by post-21.mail.nl.demon.net with esmtp (Exim 3.36 #2) id 1BHok6-000D7J-00 for [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Sun, 25 Apr 2004 18:52:42 + Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by thanatos (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0FC6C10D6C9 for <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; Sun, 25 Apr 2004 20:52:35 +0200 (CEST) Subject: Americas/Toronto is now a TZ value From: Thomas Hood <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Content-Type: text/plain Message-Id: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Ximian Evolution 1.4.5 Date: Sun, 25 Apr 2004 20:52:34 +0200 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2004_03_25 (1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-1.5 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_10 autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2004_03_25 X-Spam-Level: X-CrossAssassin-Score: 1 America/Toronto and America/Vancouver are TZ values according to my current (2.3.2.ds1-12) /usr/share/zoneinfo/zone.tab. Ottawa isn't in there but neither is Washington D.C. :) -- Thomas Hood -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#119529: marked as done (timezones: Toronto and Ottawa)
Your message dated Sun, 25 Apr 2004 20:52:34 +0200 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Americas/Toronto is now a TZ value has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith. (NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact me immediately.) Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database) -- Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 14 Nov 2001 03:56:06 + >From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Tue Nov 13 21:56:06 2001 Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Received: from cpu1612.adsl.bellglobal.com (dragon.bcwhite.dhs.org) [206.47.27.93] (mail) by master.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.12 1 (Debian)) id 163r9i-0002f2-00; Tue, 13 Nov 2001 21:56:06 -0600 Received: from localhost (pobox.com) [127.0.0.1] (bcwhite) by dragon.bcwhite.dhs.org with esmtp (Exim 3.32 #1 (Debian)) id 163r9x-0007IJ-00; Tue, 13 Nov 2001 22:56:21 -0500 Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Date: Tue, 13 Nov 2001 22:56:19 -0500 From: Brian White <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> X-Mailer: Mozilla 4.77 [en] (X11; U; Linux 2.2.19 i686) X-Accept-Language: en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Debian Bugs <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Subject: timezones: Toronto and Ottawa Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Package: libc6 Version: 2.2.4-5 Severity: wishlist As a resident of Canada, it would be nice to see timezones for "Ottawa" (the capital city) and Toronto (the largest city). Both of these are the same as "Canada/Eastern" and "America/Montreal". Since both Montreal and Vancouver (the second and third largest cities) are there, I think this would round out the country nicely. Brian ( [EMAIL PROTECTED] ) --- There's no healthy way to mess with the line between wrong and right. --- Received: (at 21047-done) by bugs.debian.org; 25 Apr 2004 18:52:44 + >From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sun Apr 25 11:52:44 2004 Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Received: from post-21.mail.nl.demon.net [194.159.73.20] by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian)) id 1BHok8-VS-00; Sun, 25 Apr 2004 11:52:44 -0700 Received: from [82.161.38.140] (helo=thanatos) by post-21.mail.nl.demon.net with esmtp (Exim 3.36 #2) id 1BHok6-000D7J-00 for [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Sun, 25 Apr 2004 18:52:42 + Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by thanatos (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0FC6C10D6C9 for <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; Sun, 25 Apr 2004 20:52:35 +0200 (CEST) Subject: Americas/Toronto is now a TZ value From: Thomas Hood <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Content-Type: text/plain Message-Id: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Ximian Evolution 1.4.5 Date: Sun, 25 Apr 2004 20:52:34 +0200 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2004_03_25 (1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-1.5 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_10 autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2004_03_25 X-Spam-Level: X-CrossAssassin-Score: 1 America/Toronto and America/Vancouver are TZ values according to my current (2.3.2.ds1-12) /usr/share/zoneinfo/zone.tab. Ottawa isn't in there but neither is Washington D.C. :) -- Thomas Hood -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Processed: retitle
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > retitle 192744 libc6: resolver doesn't use search list Bug#192744: libc6: dns resolving problems Changed Bug title. > thanks Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database)
Processed: reassign cloned report to glibc
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > clone 239237 -1 Bug#239237: python2.3: locale module is segfaulting on locale.ERA Bug 239237 cloned as bug 245836. > reassign -1 glibc Bug#245836: python2.3: locale module is segfaulting on locale.ERA Bug reassigned from package `python2.3' to `glibc'. > notforwarded -1 Bug#245836: python2.3: locale module is segfaulting on locale.ERA Removed annotation that Bug had been forwarded to http://python.org/sf/920575. > retitle -1 glibc is returning NULL instead of "" for nl_langinfo(ERA) Bug#245836: python2.3: locale module is segfaulting on locale.ERA Changed Bug title. > thanks Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database) -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#245808: glibc: binary-all package built in binary-arch rules target
Package: glibc Severity: normal This source package apparently builds all of the binary packages in the binary-arch target of debian/rules, even though at least one binary package is architecture independent. That's wrong. The practical impact is that autobuilder maintainers get to manually clean up the _all.deb packages every time your package is uploaded. [EMAIL PROTECTED]:~>ll build/*2.3.2* -rw-r--r--1 buildd buildd3838334 Apr 25 12:15 build/glibc-doc_2.3.2.ds1-12_all.deb -rw-r--r--1 buildd buildd3981720 Apr 25 12:26 build/locales_2.3.2.ds1-12_all.deb Please fix this when you get a chance. Any architecture "all" binary packages should be built by the binary-indep target in debian/rules. If you're using debhelper, read about the -a and -i options, and if you have dh-make installed, a good example rules file is available in the /usr/share/debhelper/dh_make/debian directory. Thanks, Christian
Bug#245784: Undefined u64 in jiffies.h.
On Sun, Apr 25, 2004 at 11:21:53PM +0900, GOTO Masanori wrote: > > Which version did you build sysklogd ? I'm using 1.4.1-10, which is the latest in testing. Trying the same with 1.4.1-14 fixes all my problems. Sorry for all those bugreports about sysklogd. Kurt
Bug#245784: Undefined u64 in jiffies.h.
At Sun, 25 Apr 2004 15:49:03 +0200, Kurt Roeckx wrote: > On Sun, Apr 25, 2004 at 10:40:37PM +0900, GOTO Masanori wrote: > > At Sun, 25 Apr 2004 14:25:49 +0200, > > Kurt Roeckx wrote: > > > In /usr/include/linux/jiffies.h line 16, 20 and 22 it uses the > > > u64 type. That type is __KERNEL__ only. > > > > > > I think the whole file should be probably be #ifdef'd to > > > __KERNEL__ but I'm not sure. > > > > > > This problem causes a build failure for sysklogd and should > > > therefor probably be tagged as RC. > > > > For me, sysklogd_1.4.1-14 is buildable. BTW, why is jiffies.h > > included? > > On current sarge? current sid. > ksys_mod.c includes and that includes ksym_mod.c ? linux/module.h ? Only oops.c includes linux/module.h. > linux/sched.h and that includes linux/jiffies.h. Which version did you build sysklogd ? Regards, -- gotom
Processed: retitle
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > retitle 192744 libc6: resolver doesn't use search list Bug#192744: libc6: dns resolving problems Changed Bug title. > thanks Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database) -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#245784: Undefined u64 in jiffies.h.
On Sun, Apr 25, 2004 at 10:40:37PM +0900, GOTO Masanori wrote: > At Sun, 25 Apr 2004 14:25:49 +0200, > Kurt Roeckx wrote: > > In /usr/include/linux/jiffies.h line 16, 20 and 22 it uses the > > u64 type. That type is __KERNEL__ only. > > > > I think the whole file should be probably be #ifdef'd to > > __KERNEL__ but I'm not sure. > > > > This problem causes a build failure for sysklogd and should > > therefor probably be tagged as RC. > > For me, sysklogd_1.4.1-14 is buildable. BTW, why is jiffies.h > included? On current sarge? ksys_mod.c includes and that includes linux/sched.h and that includes linux/jiffies.h. Kurt
cvs commit to glibc-package/debian/debhelper.in by gotom
Repository: glibc-package/debian/debhelper.in who:gotom time: Sun Apr 25 07:46:21 MDT 2004 Log Message: - debhelper.in/libc.preinst: Fixed to work when kernel version is x.y.zFOOz pattern. (Closes: #245643) Files: changed:libc.preinst
cvs commit to glibc-package/debian by gotom
Repository: glibc-package/debian who:gotom time: Sun Apr 25 07:46:20 MDT 2004 Log Message: - debhelper.in/libc.preinst: Fixed to work when kernel version is x.y.zFOOz pattern. (Closes: #245643) Files: changed:changelog
cvs commit to glibc-package/debian by gotom
Repository: glibc-package/debian who:gotom time: Sun Apr 25 07:46:09 MDT 2004 Log Message: update. Files: changed:TODO
Bug#245643: libc6: problem with $kernel_ver in preinst
At Sun, 25 Apr 2004 14:11:23 +0200, Gregory Colpart wrote: > > This problem should be fixed in -12. See #241395. > > It is not fixed for me: > The version -12 fixes the kernel x.y.zfoo > But I have numbers after foo: x.y.zfooA where A is a number > > Then with the new preinst: > $ cat glibc_2.3.2.ds1-12.diff | grep kernel_rev > +kernel_rev=$(uname -r | tr -- - . | cut -d. -f3 | tr -d > '[:alpha:]') > +if [ "$kernel_rev" -ge 255 ] > > It gives me: zA and it is incorrect > > If sed can be use, it can be: > kernel_rev=$(uname -r | sed 's/[^\.]\+\.[^\.]\+\.\([^[:alpha:]]\).*/\1/') You're right. Goswin von Brederlow proposed the below pattern in #241395: kernel_rev=$(uname -r | sed 's/\([0-9]*\.[0-9]*\.\)\([0-9]*\)\(.*\)/\2/') I adopt these. Regards, -- gotom
Bug#245797: BITS_TO_LONGS undefined in linux/cpumask.h.
Package: linux-kernel-headers Version: 2.5.999-test7-bk-15 In /usr/include/linux/cpumask.h it's using BITS_TO_LONGS which is __KERNEL__ only. Should bitmap.h be ifdef'd to __KERNEL__? This again causes build problems in sysklogd. Kurt
Bug#245784: Undefined u64 in jiffies.h.
At Sun, 25 Apr 2004 14:25:49 +0200, Kurt Roeckx wrote: > In /usr/include/linux/jiffies.h line 16, 20 and 22 it uses the > u64 type. That type is __KERNEL__ only. > > I think the whole file should be probably be #ifdef'd to > __KERNEL__ but I'm not sure. > > This problem causes a build failure for sysklogd and should > therefor probably be tagged as RC. For me, sysklogd_1.4.1-14 is buildable. BTW, why is jiffies.h included? Regards, -- gotom
Bug#245792: BITS_PER_LONG undefined in linux/bitmap.h.
Package: linux-kernel-headers Version: 2.5.999-test7-bk-15 In /usr/include/linux/bitmap.h it's using BITS_PER_LONG all over the place but BITS_PER_LONG is __KERNEL__ only. Should bitmap.h be ifdef'd to __KERNEL__? This again causes build problems in sysklogd. Kurt
Bug#245789: Wrong include for mach_mpspec.h and mach_apicdef.h.
Package: linux-kernel-headers Version: 2.5.999-test7-bk-15 /usr/include/asm/mpspec.h (i386, line 6) does: #include Which does not exist. What does however exist are the following files: /usr/include/asm/mach-bigsmp/mach_mpspec.h /usr/include/asm/mach-default/mach_mpspec.h /usr/include/asm/mach-es7000/mach_mpspec.h /usr/include/asm/mach-generic/mach_mpspec.h /usr/include/asm/mach-numaq/mach_mpspec.h /usr/include/asm/mach-summit/mach_mpspec.h /usr/include/asm/smp.h (i386, line 73) does: #include Which has the same problem. This causes an other build failure for sysklogd. Kurt
Bug#245808: glibc: binary-all package built in binary-arch rules target
Package: glibc Severity: normal This source package apparently builds all of the binary packages in the binary-arch target of debian/rules, even though at least one binary package is architecture independent. That's wrong. The practical impact is that autobuilder maintainers get to manually clean up the _all.deb packages every time your package is uploaded. [EMAIL PROTECTED]:~>ll build/*2.3.2* -rw-r--r--1 buildd buildd3838334 Apr 25 12:15 build/glibc-doc_2.3.2.ds1-12_all.deb -rw-r--r--1 buildd buildd3981720 Apr 25 12:26 build/locales_2.3.2.ds1-12_all.deb Please fix this when you get a chance. Any architecture "all" binary packages should be built by the binary-indep target in debian/rules. If you're using debhelper, read about the -a and -i options, and if you have dh-make installed, a good example rules file is available in the /usr/share/debhelper/dh_make/debian directory. Thanks, Christian -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#245784: Undefined u64 in jiffies.h.
On Sun, Apr 25, 2004 at 11:21:53PM +0900, GOTO Masanori wrote: > > Which version did you build sysklogd ? I'm using 1.4.1-10, which is the latest in testing. Trying the same with 1.4.1-14 fixes all my problems. Sorry for all those bugreports about sysklogd. Kurt -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#245784: Undefined u64 in jiffies.h.
Package: linux-kernel-headers Version: 2.5.999-test7-bk-15 In /usr/include/linux/jiffies.h line 16, 20 and 22 it uses the u64 type. That type is __KERNEL__ only. I think the whole file should be probably be #ifdef'd to __KERNEL__ but I'm not sure. This problem causes a build failure for sysklogd and should therefor probably be tagged as RC. Kurt
Bug#245784: Undefined u64 in jiffies.h.
At Sun, 25 Apr 2004 15:49:03 +0200, Kurt Roeckx wrote: > On Sun, Apr 25, 2004 at 10:40:37PM +0900, GOTO Masanori wrote: > > At Sun, 25 Apr 2004 14:25:49 +0200, > > Kurt Roeckx wrote: > > > In /usr/include/linux/jiffies.h line 16, 20 and 22 it uses the > > > u64 type. That type is __KERNEL__ only. > > > > > > I think the whole file should be probably be #ifdef'd to > > > __KERNEL__ but I'm not sure. > > > > > > This problem causes a build failure for sysklogd and should > > > therefor probably be tagged as RC. > > > > For me, sysklogd_1.4.1-14 is buildable. BTW, why is jiffies.h > > included? > > On current sarge? current sid. > ksys_mod.c includes and that includes ksym_mod.c ? linux/module.h ? Only oops.c includes linux/module.h. > linux/sched.h and that includes linux/jiffies.h. Which version did you build sysklogd ? Regards, -- gotom -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#245643: libc6: problem with $kernel_ver in preinst
Le Sat, Apr 24, 2004 at 09:40:43PM +0900, GOTO Masanori a ecrit :
> At Sat, 24 Apr 2004 13:34:53 +0200,
> COLPART Gregory wrote:
> > Architecture: i386 (i686)
> > Kernel: Linux 2.6.3foulademer02032004
>
> > When I upgrade libc6 2.3.2.ds1-11 to libc6 2.3.2.ds1-12 I have a
> > problem:
> > D02: fork/exec /var/lib/dpkg/tmp.ci/preinst ( )
> > WARNING: Your kernel version indicates a revision number
> > of 255 or greater. Glibc has a number of built in
> > assumptions that this revision number is less than 255.
> > If you've built your own kernel, please make sure that any
> > custom version numbers are appended to the upstream
> > kernel number with a dash or some other delimiter.
> > dpkg : erreur de traitement de
> > /var/cache/apt/archives/libc6_2.3.2.ds1-12_i386.deb (--install) :
> > le sous-processus pre-installation script a retourn??? une erreur de
> > sortie d'???tat 1
> >
> > The script preinst contains:
> > # Test to make sure z < 255, in x.y.z-n form of kernel version
> > kernel_rev=$(uname -r | awk -F '[.-]' '{print $3}')
> > if [ "$kernel_rev" -ge 255 ]
>
> This preinst file is in -11, not in -12. Are your libc6 really -12?
>
> > But if you compiled your kernel with --append-to-version=foo, uname -r
> > will be x.y.zfoo and kernel_rev will contain foo and installation will fail
> > (exit 1)
>
> This problem should be fixed in -12. See #241395.
It is not fixed for me:
The version -12 fixes the kernel x.y.zfoo
But I have numbers after foo: x.y.zfooA where A is a number
Then with the new preinst:
$ cat glibc_2.3.2.ds1-12.diff | grep kernel_rev
+kernel_rev=$(uname -r | tr -- - . | cut -d. -f3 | tr -d
'[:alpha:]')
+if [ "$kernel_rev" -ge 255 ]
It gives me: zA and it is incorrect
If sed can be use, it can be:
kernel_rev=$(uname -r | sed 's/[^\.]\+\.[^\.]\+\.\([^[:alpha:]]\).*/\1/')
Thanks,
--
Gregory Colpart <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> GnuPG:1024D/C1027A0E
Evolix - Informatique et Logiciels Libres http://www.evolix.fr
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
Bug#245784: Undefined u64 in jiffies.h.
On Sun, Apr 25, 2004 at 10:40:37PM +0900, GOTO Masanori wrote: > At Sun, 25 Apr 2004 14:25:49 +0200, > Kurt Roeckx wrote: > > In /usr/include/linux/jiffies.h line 16, 20 and 22 it uses the > > u64 type. That type is __KERNEL__ only. > > > > I think the whole file should be probably be #ifdef'd to > > __KERNEL__ but I'm not sure. > > > > This problem causes a build failure for sysklogd and should > > therefor probably be tagged as RC. > > For me, sysklogd_1.4.1-14 is buildable. BTW, why is jiffies.h > included? On current sarge? ksys_mod.c includes and that includes linux/sched.h and that includes linux/jiffies.h. Kurt -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
cvs commit to glibc-package/debian/debhelper.in by gotom
Repository: glibc-package/debian/debhelper.in who:gotom time: Sun Apr 25 07:46:21 MDT 2004 Log Message: - debhelper.in/libc.preinst: Fixed to work when kernel version is x.y.zFOOz pattern. (Closes: #245643) Files: changed:libc.preinst -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
cvs commit to glibc-package/debian by gotom
Repository: glibc-package/debian who:gotom time: Sun Apr 25 07:46:20 MDT 2004 Log Message: - debhelper.in/libc.preinst: Fixed to work when kernel version is x.y.zFOOz pattern. (Closes: #245643) Files: changed:changelog -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
cvs commit to glibc-package/debian by gotom
Repository: glibc-package/debian who:gotom time: Sun Apr 25 07:46:09 MDT 2004 Log Message: update. Files: changed:TODO -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#245643: libc6: problem with $kernel_ver in preinst
At Sun, 25 Apr 2004 14:11:23 +0200, Gregory Colpart wrote: > > This problem should be fixed in -12. See #241395. > > It is not fixed for me: > The version -12 fixes the kernel x.y.zfoo > But I have numbers after foo: x.y.zfooA where A is a number > > Then with the new preinst: > $ cat glibc_2.3.2.ds1-12.diff | grep kernel_rev > +kernel_rev=$(uname -r | tr -- - . | cut -d. -f3 | tr -d > '[:alpha:]') > +if [ "$kernel_rev" -ge 255 ] > > It gives me: zA and it is incorrect > > If sed can be use, it can be: > kernel_rev=$(uname -r | sed 's/[^\.]\+\.[^\.]\+\.\([^[:alpha:]]\).*/\1/') You're right. Goswin von Brederlow proposed the below pattern in #241395: kernel_rev=$(uname -r | sed 's/\([0-9]*\.[0-9]*\.\)\([0-9]*\)\(.*\)/\2/') I adopt these. Regards, -- gotom -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#245797: BITS_TO_LONGS undefined in linux/cpumask.h.
Package: linux-kernel-headers Version: 2.5.999-test7-bk-15 In /usr/include/linux/cpumask.h it's using BITS_TO_LONGS which is __KERNEL__ only. Should bitmap.h be ifdef'd to __KERNEL__? This again causes build problems in sysklogd. Kurt -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#245784: Undefined u64 in jiffies.h.
At Sun, 25 Apr 2004 14:25:49 +0200, Kurt Roeckx wrote: > In /usr/include/linux/jiffies.h line 16, 20 and 22 it uses the > u64 type. That type is __KERNEL__ only. > > I think the whole file should be probably be #ifdef'd to > __KERNEL__ but I'm not sure. > > This problem causes a build failure for sysklogd and should > therefor probably be tagged as RC. For me, sysklogd_1.4.1-14 is buildable. BTW, why is jiffies.h included? Regards, -- gotom -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#245792: BITS_PER_LONG undefined in linux/bitmap.h.
Package: linux-kernel-headers Version: 2.5.999-test7-bk-15 In /usr/include/linux/bitmap.h it's using BITS_PER_LONG all over the place but BITS_PER_LONG is __KERNEL__ only. Should bitmap.h be ifdef'd to __KERNEL__? This again causes build problems in sysklogd. Kurt -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#245789: Wrong include for mach_mpspec.h and mach_apicdef.h.
Package: linux-kernel-headers Version: 2.5.999-test7-bk-15 /usr/include/asm/mpspec.h (i386, line 6) does: #include Which does not exist. What does however exist are the following files: /usr/include/asm/mach-bigsmp/mach_mpspec.h /usr/include/asm/mach-default/mach_mpspec.h /usr/include/asm/mach-es7000/mach_mpspec.h /usr/include/asm/mach-generic/mach_mpspec.h /usr/include/asm/mach-numaq/mach_mpspec.h /usr/include/asm/mach-summit/mach_mpspec.h /usr/include/asm/smp.h (i386, line 73) does: #include Which has the same problem. This causes an other build failure for sysklogd. Kurt -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
plummet
Silva, Govenment don't want me to sell UndergroundCD !Check Your spouse and staff Investigate Your Own CREDIT-HISTORY hacking someone PC! Disappear in your city bannedcd2004 http://www.9001hosting.com/cd/ become,involuntarily moved apart;.
Bug#245784: Undefined u64 in jiffies.h.
Package: linux-kernel-headers Version: 2.5.999-test7-bk-15 In /usr/include/linux/jiffies.h line 16, 20 and 22 it uses the u64 type. That type is __KERNEL__ only. I think the whole file should be probably be #ifdef'd to __KERNEL__ but I'm not sure. This problem causes a build failure for sysklogd and should therefor probably be tagged as RC. Kurt -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#245643: libc6: problem with $kernel_ver in preinst
Le Sat, Apr 24, 2004 at 09:40:43PM +0900, GOTO Masanori a ecrit :
> At Sat, 24 Apr 2004 13:34:53 +0200,
> COLPART Gregory wrote:
> > Architecture: i386 (i686)
> > Kernel: Linux 2.6.3foulademer02032004
>
> > When I upgrade libc6 2.3.2.ds1-11 to libc6 2.3.2.ds1-12 I have a
> > problem:
> > D02: fork/exec /var/lib/dpkg/tmp.ci/preinst ( )
> > WARNING: Your kernel version indicates a revision number
> > of 255 or greater. Glibc has a number of built in
> > assumptions that this revision number is less than 255.
> > If you've built your own kernel, please make sure that any
> > custom version numbers are appended to the upstream
> > kernel number with a dash or some other delimiter.
> > dpkg : erreur de traitement de
> > /var/cache/apt/archives/libc6_2.3.2.ds1-12_i386.deb (--install) :
> > le sous-processus pre-installation script a retourn??? une erreur de
> > sortie d'???tat 1
> >
> > The script preinst contains:
> > # Test to make sure z < 255, in x.y.z-n form of kernel version
> > kernel_rev=$(uname -r | awk -F '[.-]' '{print $3}')
> > if [ "$kernel_rev" -ge 255 ]
>
> This preinst file is in -11, not in -12. Are your libc6 really -12?
>
> > But if you compiled your kernel with --append-to-version=foo, uname -r
> > will be x.y.zfoo and kernel_rev will contain foo and installation will fail (exit
> > 1)
>
> This problem should be fixed in -12. See #241395.
It is not fixed for me:
The version -12 fixes the kernel x.y.zfoo
But I have numbers after foo: x.y.zfooA where A is a number
Then with the new preinst:
$ cat glibc_2.3.2.ds1-12.diff | grep kernel_rev
+kernel_rev=$(uname -r | tr -- - . | cut -d. -f3 | tr -d
'[:alpha:]')
+if [ "$kernel_rev" -ge 255 ]
It gives me: zA and it is incorrect
If sed can be use, it can be:
kernel_rev=$(uname -r | sed 's/[^\.]\+\.[^\.]\+\.\([^[:alpha:]]\).*/\1/')
Thanks,
--
Gregory Colpart <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> GnuPG:1024D/C1027A0E
Evolix - Informatique et Logiciels Libres http://www.evolix.fr
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
plummet
Silva, Govenment don't want me to sell UndergroundCD !Check Your spouse and staff Investigate Your Own CREDIT-HISTORY hacking someone PC! Disappear in your city bannedcd2004 http://www.9001hosting.com/cd/ become,involuntarily moved apart;.
