Send your best price offer and Other Documents
Dear sir/madam, I am Dean Tan from GLOWTEXX INNOVATION TRADING CO.,LTD I am in charge of sales. We are interested in your product and we would greatly appreciate receiving any information, brochures and price lists of your products. Waiting for your reply Thanks and Regards Dean Tan
Processed: Re: Bug#994133: libc-bin: [iconv] [fr] [manpage] Missing word in the French manpage of iconv
Processing control commands: > reassign -1 manpages-fr Bug #994133 [libc-bin] libc-bin: [iconv] [fr] [manpage] Missing word in the French manpage of iconv Bug reassigned from package 'libc-bin' to 'manpages-fr'. No longer marked as found in versions glibc/2.32-2. Ignoring request to alter fixed versions of bug #994133 to the same values previously set > retitle -1 manpages-fr: [iconv] [fr] [manpage] Missing word in the French > manpage of iconv Bug #994133 [manpages-fr] libc-bin: [iconv] [fr] [manpage] Missing word in the French manpage of iconv Changed Bug title to 'manpages-fr: [iconv] [fr] [manpage] Missing word in the French manpage of iconv' from 'libc-bin: [iconv] [fr] [manpage] Missing word in the French manpage of iconv'. -- 994133: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=994133 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems
Bug#994133: libc-bin: [iconv] [fr] [manpage] Missing word in the French manpage of iconv
control: reassign -1 manpages-fr control: retitle -1 manpages-fr: [iconv] [fr] [manpage] Missing word in the French manpage of iconv Hi, On 2021-09-12 15:36, Nicolas Patrois wrote: > Package: libc-bin > Version: 2.32-2 > Severity: minor > Tags: l10n > > Dear Maintainer, > > In the French manpage, the word "forme" is missing in its end. > > Les arguments obligatoires ou optionnels pour les options de forme longue > le sont aussi pour les options de courte. > > Just before "courte". The French manpage if iconv is not provided by libc-bin, but by manpages-fr. I am therefore reassigning the bug to the right package. Regards, Aurelien -- Aurelien Jarno GPG: 4096R/1DDD8C9B aurel...@aurel32.net http://www.aurel32.net
Bug#994133: libc-bin: [iconv] [fr] [manpage] Missing word in the French manpage of iconv
Package: libc-bin Version: 2.32-2 Severity: minor Tags: l10n Dear Maintainer, In the French manpage, the word "forme" is missing in its end. Les arguments obligatoires ou optionnels pour les options de forme longue le sont aussi pour les options de courte. Just before "courte". Yours, n. -- System Information: Debian Release: bookworm/sid APT prefers unstable APT policy: (500, 'unstable') Architecture: i386 (i686) Kernel: Linux 5.7.0-1-686-pae (SMP w/3 CPU threads) Kernel taint flags: TAINT_PROPRIETARY_MODULE, TAINT_OOT_MODULE, TAINT_UNSIGNED_MODULE Locale: LANG=fr_FR.UTF-8, LC_CTYPE=fr_FR.UTF-8 (charmap=UTF-8), LANGUAGE=fr_FR:fr:en_GB:en Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/dash Init: systemd (via /run/systemd/system) LSM: AppArmor: enabled Versions of packages libc-bin depends on: ii libc6 2.32-2 Versions of packages libc-bin recommends: ii manpages 5.10-1 libc-bin suggests no packages.
Bug#994102: unistd.h: non-null check not correct for getcwd()
On 2021-09-12 12:10, Jan-Benedict Glaw wrote: > On Sun, 2021-09-12 00:16:01 +0200, Aurelien Jarno > wrote: > > On 2021-09-11 22:06, Jan-Benedict Glaw wrote: > > > Until glibc's Bugzilla issue is finally resolved > > > (https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=26545), maybe the > > > Debian package could be changed to drop the access attribute? > > > > No. Once we have patched it, we will have to differ from upstream almost > > forever, and we want to avoid that. I already have sent a patch [1], I > > am waiting for feedback. > > Sure, but I hope Debian's libc6-dev won't keep the instrumentation > enabled even after the patch is accepted upstream to remove it, > waiting for the next upstream glibc to be pulled for libc6 / libc-dev? No the point is not to wait for a released version, but to wait for a decision if this patch is acceptable or if the support for this GNU extension is simply dropped. In the latter case, the various software will have to be patched, just like other distributions using glibc >= 2.32 have already done. Regards, Aurelien -- Aurelien Jarno GPG: 4096R/1DDD8C9B aurel...@aurel32.net http://www.aurel32.net signature.asc Description: PGP signature
Bug#994102: unistd.h: non-null check not correct for getcwd()
On Sun, 2021-09-12 00:16:01 +0200, Aurelien Jarno wrote: > On 2021-09-11 22:06, Jan-Benedict Glaw wrote: > > Until glibc's Bugzilla issue is finally resolved > > (https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=26545), maybe the > > Debian package could be changed to drop the access attribute? > > No. Once we have patched it, we will have to differ from upstream almost > forever, and we want to avoid that. I already have sent a patch [1], I > am waiting for feedback. Sure, but I hope Debian's libc6-dev won't keep the instrumentation enabled even after the patch is accepted upstream to remove it, waiting for the next upstream glibc to be pulled for libc6 / libc-dev? In the meantime, I'll probably rebuild the containers to locally patch it away. Thanks, Jan-Benedict -- signature.asc Description: PGP signature
