Re: Bug#556951: [binutils] objcopy fails with 'Invalid operation'
reassign 556951 libc6-dev thanks On Thu, Nov 19, 2009 at 05:41:24AM +0100, Aurelien Jarno wrote: On Wed, Nov 18, 2009 at 09:57:34PM -0600, Matthias Klose wrote: On 18.11.2009 21:43, Aurelien Jarno wrote: On Wed, Nov 18, 2009 at 07:58:47PM -0600, Matthias Klose wrote: I only see this when upgrading to current glibc in unstable; not with testing. Could you be more precise with the versions? glibc in testing and unstable have the same version. sorry, no. it probably was -5, but I'm not sure. I have been able to reproduce the problem here, it seems to be due to the way crt*.o files are stripped. I have lost the .deb of -5, so I need to do a rebuild of eglibc for more investigation. It is due to the use of --strip-unneeded when stripping .o objects. This will be fixed in the next upload of eglibc. -- Aurelien Jarno GPG: 1024D/F1BCDB73 aurel...@aurel32.net http://www.aurel32.net -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-glibc-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Processed: Re: Bug#556951: [binutils] objcopy fails with 'Invalid operation'
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: reassign 556951 libc6-dev Bug #556951 [binutils] [binutils] objcopy fails with 'Invalid operation' Bug reassigned from package 'binutils' to 'libc6-dev'. Bug No longer marked as found in versions binutils/2.20-4. thanks Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database) -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-glibc-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Re: Bug#556951: [binutils] objcopy fails with 'Invalid operation'
On 18.11.2009 14:54, Peter Fritzsche wrote:
forwarded 556951 http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=10982
thanks
Matthias Klose wrote:
[]
`debian/sauerbraten-dbg/usr/lib/debug//usr/lib/games/sauerbraten/sauer_cl
ient': Invalid operation dh_strip: objcopy returned exit code 1
Is this a known problem with binutils-gold?
yes, I did see this as well recently.
Could it be that it is new with 2.20-3 or 2.20-4? I think I didn't saw that in
earlier version. I think I saw it the first time when compiling batctl - which
I compiled right after update of my Sources file. This was after the 11.
November.
I wanted to write a bug report right now but haven't a glue why it fails.
objcopy --only-keep-debug debian/batctl/usr/sbin/batctl
debian/batctl-dbg/usr/lib/debug//usr/sbin/batctl
seems to work without any problems. The real problem is
objcopy --add-gnu-debuglink debian/batctl-dbg/usr/lib/debug//usr/sbin/batctl
debian/batctl/usr/sbin/batctl
So a small test would be:
$ echo 'int main() { return 0; }' test.c \
gcc -g3 test.c -o test \
objcopy --only-keep-debug test test.dbg \
objcopy --add-gnu-debuglink=./test.dbg test echo cool it works
objcopy:stCdJOm4: cannot create debug link section `./test.dbg': Invalid
operation
This works with the old linker, but not with binutils-gold
So I build the cvs version of the linker and objcopy and it is the same here.
So it is propably an upstream bug.
I only see this when upgrading to current glibc in unstable; not with testing.
Matthias
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-glibc-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Re: Bug#556951: [binutils] objcopy fails with 'Invalid operation'
On Wed, Nov 18, 2009 at 07:58:47PM -0600, Matthias Klose wrote:
On 18.11.2009 14:54, Peter Fritzsche wrote:
forwarded 556951 http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=10982
thanks
Matthias Klose wrote:
[]
`debian/sauerbraten-dbg/usr/lib/debug//usr/lib/games/sauerbraten/sauer_cl
ient': Invalid operation dh_strip: objcopy returned exit code 1
Is this a known problem with binutils-gold?
yes, I did see this as well recently.
Could it be that it is new with 2.20-3 or 2.20-4? I think I didn't saw that
in
earlier version. I think I saw it the first time when compiling batctl -
which
I compiled right after update of my Sources file. This was after the 11.
November.
I wanted to write a bug report right now but haven't a glue why it fails.
objcopy --only-keep-debug debian/batctl/usr/sbin/batctl
debian/batctl-dbg/usr/lib/debug//usr/sbin/batctl
seems to work without any problems. The real problem is
objcopy --add-gnu-debuglink debian/batctl-dbg/usr/lib/debug//usr/sbin/batctl
debian/batctl/usr/sbin/batctl
So a small test would be:
$ echo 'int main() { return 0; }' test.c \
gcc -g3 test.c -o test \
objcopy --only-keep-debug test test.dbg \
objcopy --add-gnu-debuglink=./test.dbg test echo cool it works
objcopy:stCdJOm4: cannot create debug link section `./test.dbg': Invalid
operation
This works with the old linker, but not with binutils-gold
So I build the cvs version of the linker and objcopy and it is the same here.
So it is propably an upstream bug.
I only see this when upgrading to current glibc in unstable; not with testing.
Could you be more precise with the versions? glibc in testing and
unstable have the same version.
--
Aurelien Jarno GPG: 1024D/F1BCDB73
aurel...@aurel32.net http://www.aurel32.net
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-glibc-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Re: Bug#556951: [binutils] objcopy fails with 'Invalid operation'
On 18.11.2009 21:43, Aurelien Jarno wrote: On Wed, Nov 18, 2009 at 07:58:47PM -0600, Matthias Klose wrote: I only see this when upgrading to current glibc in unstable; not with testing. Could you be more precise with the versions? glibc in testing and unstable have the same version. sorry, no. it probably was -5, but I'm not sure. Matthias -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-glibc-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Re: Bug#556951: [binutils] objcopy fails with 'Invalid operation'
On Wed, Nov 18, 2009 at 09:57:34PM -0600, Matthias Klose wrote: On 18.11.2009 21:43, Aurelien Jarno wrote: On Wed, Nov 18, 2009 at 07:58:47PM -0600, Matthias Klose wrote: I only see this when upgrading to current glibc in unstable; not with testing. Could you be more precise with the versions? glibc in testing and unstable have the same version. sorry, no. it probably was -5, but I'm not sure. I have been able to reproduce the problem here, it seems to be due to the way crt*.o files are stripped. I have lost the .deb of -5, so I need to do a rebuild of eglibc for more investigation. -- Aurelien Jarno GPG: 1024D/F1BCDB73 aurel...@aurel32.net http://www.aurel32.net -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-glibc-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
