Re: Please test eglibc 2.9-23+multiarch.2 (was Please test eglibc 2.9-23+multiarch.1)
On Mon, Aug 03, 2009 at 11:38:32AM +0200, Aurelien Jarno wrote: > Bastian Blank a écrit : > > What happens if someone install libc-bin without a new libc6 then? > > Forgot about that variant before as it is not forbidden by deps now. > If it is not the same major version, it will probably break, I'll add a > conflict to fix that, but I fear we are going to have the same problem > with apt again... Yep. So I'm also out of options. The question is, how badly will it break the binaries in the package. Bastian -- Our missions are peaceful -- not for conquest. When we do battle, it is only because we have no choice. -- Kirk, "The Squire of Gothos", stardate 2124.5 -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-glibc-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Re: Please test eglibc 2.9-23+multiarch.2 (was Please test eglibc 2.9-23+multiarch.1)
Bastian Blank a écrit : > On Mon, Aug 03, 2009 at 02:02:24AM +0200, Aurelien Jarno wrote: >> I have finally decided to remove the Depends: line in libc-bin, even if >> I don't really like that. My tests show that it works now, but don't >> hesitate to test it on your machine. > > What happens if someone install libc-bin without a new libc6 then? > Forgot about that variant before as it is not forbidden by deps now. If it is not the same major version, it will probably break, I'll add a conflict to fix that, but I fear we are going to have the same problem with apt again... -- Aurelien Jarno GPG: 1024D/F1BCDB73 aurel...@aurel32.net http://www.aurel32.net -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-glibc-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Re: Please test eglibc 2.9-23+multiarch.2 (was Please test eglibc 2.9-23+multiarch.1)
On Mon, Aug 03, 2009 at 02:02:24AM +0200, Aurelien Jarno wrote: > I have finally decided to remove the Depends: line in libc-bin, even if > I don't really like that. My tests show that it works now, but don't > hesitate to test it on your machine. What happens if someone install libc-bin without a new libc6 then? Forgot about that variant before as it is not forbidden by deps now. Bastian -- Genius doesn't work on an assembly line basis. You can't simply say, "Today I will be brilliant." -- Kirk, "The Ultimate Computer", stardate 4731.3 -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-glibc-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Please test eglibc 2.9-23+multiarch.2 (was Please test eglibc 2.9-23+multiarch.1)
On Thu, Jul 30, 2009 at 02:00:18PM +0200, Sven Joachim wrote: > On 2009-07-29 22:12 +0200, Aurelien Jarno wrote: > > > On Wed, Jul 29, 2009 at 04:10:27PM +0200, Aurelien Jarno wrote: > >> In short it looks like a Pre-Depends is overkill, and that a Depends is > >> enough. I'll upload a new version soon to experimental to fix that. > >> > > > > eglibc version 2.9-23+multiarch.1 is now in incoming and will be on the > > mirrors soon. Please test and report problems. > > It still fails in my Lenny chroot: > I have finally decided to remove the Depends: line in libc-bin, even if I don't really like that. My tests show that it works now, but don't hesitate to test it on your machine. -- Aurelien Jarno GPG: 1024D/F1BCDB73 aurel...@aurel32.net http://www.aurel32.net -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-glibc-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
