Re: ppc64 biarch toolchain and 64bit powerpc kernels ...

2005-06-10 Thread Christoph Hellwig
On Fri, Jun 10, 2005 at 07:09:51PM +0200, Sven Luther wrote:
 timeframe to get a ppc64 biarch toolchain in sid or even experimental ? Or
 should i rely on the ubuntu toolchain, and use that to upload kernels to sid
 in the near future ? Together with a statically built procps naturally ?

The sid procpc works just fine with ppc64 kernel, no need to mess with
it at all.


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Re: ppc64 biarch toolchain and 64bit powerpc kernels ...

2005-06-10 Thread Sven Luther
On Fri, Jun 10, 2005 at 07:16:02PM +0200, Christoph Hellwig wrote:
 On Fri, Jun 10, 2005 at 07:09:51PM +0200, Sven Luther wrote:
  timeframe to get a ppc64 biarch toolchain in sid or even experimental ? Or
  should i rely on the ubuntu toolchain, and use that to upload kernels to sid
  in the near future ? Together with a statically built procps naturally ?
 
 The sid procpc works just fine with ppc64 kernel, no need to mess with
 it at all.

Oh, fine, so there is no risk of overflow of the process id.

What about the sarge procps ? 

Friendly,

Sven Luther


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Re: ppc64 biarch toolchain and 64bit powerpc kernels ...

2005-06-10 Thread Christoph Hellwig
On Fri, Jun 10, 2005 at 07:36:08PM +0200, Sven Luther wrote:
 On Fri, Jun 10, 2005 at 07:16:02PM +0200, Christoph Hellwig wrote:
  On Fri, Jun 10, 2005 at 07:09:51PM +0200, Sven Luther wrote:
   timeframe to get a ppc64 biarch toolchain in sid or even experimental ? Or
   should i rely on the ubuntu toolchain, and use that to upload kernels to 
   sid
   in the near future ? Together with a statically built procps naturally ?
  
  The sid procpc works just fine with ppc64 kernel, no need to mess with
  it at all.
 
 Oh, fine, so there is no risk of overflow of the process id.

The process id in Linux is always 32bits, and unless you tweak
/proc/sys/kernel/pid-max the actual range used is even smaller.

 What about the sarge procps ? 

It shouldn't be any different.  I have been running ppc64 kernels with
sarge for a long time.  And if there's a bug in procps somewhere where
it can't deal with some fields beeing bigger in 64bit kernels that
should be fixed in procps instead of needing another set of binaries.


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Re: ppc64 biarch toolchain and 64bit powerpc kernels ...

2005-06-10 Thread Steve Langasek
On Fri, Jun 10, 2005 at 07:09:51PM +0200, Sven Luther wrote:
 Or should i rely on the ubuntu toolchain, and use that to upload kernels
 to sid in the near future ?

*NO.*  There is no excuse for uploading packages to unstable/main that can't
be built using Debian!

-- 
Steve Langasek
postmodern programmer


signature.asc
Description: Digital signature