Re: looking for remaining gnome 3.8 packages for the GNOME 3.8 transition to complete.
Hi Johannes, Johannes Rohr wrote: Am 12.10.2013 15:23, schrieb shirish शिरीष: Hi all, Just for informational purposes, there is now a bug for transitioning of the remaining packages. See #726032 . mbiebl has been furiously making changes and uploading the 3.8 changes to experimental. All of the packages would have to be replaced in one go hence he wants to get some testing done before pushing them to sid/unstable. Thanks so much to the devs for making this work! For me, everything has been flawless! Now I hope that GNOME 3.10 will make it into Jessie before the freeze (announced for early November already), and Don't worry about that, the freeze is announced for November *2014*. And congrats to active Debian/GNOME maintainers, Fred -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-gtk-gnome-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/20131016093315.ga3...@0d.be
Re: Plans For Gnome3.2 In Experimental
Michael Ott wrote: At http://www.0d.be/debian/debian-gnome-3.2-status.html I missed many packages? This is because it only looked at .gz files, while the GNOME project switched to only ship .bz2 and .xz tarballs for 3.2. Fred -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-gtk-gnome-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/20110929110732.ga20...@0d.be
Re: GNOME 3 and panel applets
Josselin Mouette wrote: If you develop, maintain or use one of those packages, and you don’t want it to disappear, your options are now: 1. Prepare to disable gnome-panel support (that’s for packages which already have other options, such as using the notification area). 2. If meaningful (it depends on the applet), switch to another technology such as libappindicator or the notification area. 3. Port your applet to GTK3 and the new D-Bus API. The bindings for Python and C# will probably not work either, so you might have to start with them. Vincent Untz has now updated the libpanel-applet documentation, you can get it from the gnome-panel git tree[1], and it will appear on library.gnome.org once a gnome-panel tarball gets out. He also added a test applet using Python and gobject introspection, http://git.gnome.org/browse/gnome-panel/commit/?id=5ad4d9 Hope it helps, Frederic [1] online as http://git.gnome.org/browse/gnome-panel/tree/doc/reference/panel-applet/panel-applet-docs.sgml -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-gtk-gnome-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/20110224173543.ga4...@0d.be
Re: A first look at GNOME 2.32 - squeeze status
Michael Ott wrote: Hi Josselin! Is there a page in the web as the last time? Can you send me the link. http://www.0d.be/debian/debian-gnome-2.32-status.html Cheers, Frederic -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-gtk-gnome-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/20100915073128.ga28...@0d.be
Re: [RFC] session saving and the logout dialog
Josselin Mouette wrote: In general, I would prefer it if we could fix the UI upstream so that we get the translations for free, but of course this is a solution for long term only. Sure, the plan is to push this change upstream. Maybe it would be useful to talk with Vincent Untz from the beginning and see if this is an amenable goal; otherwise I do believe there is little point to do it, diverging on that dialog until the time it is too much work to once again port the patch to a newer GNOME version. Also note that is not only translations but also documentation and this is much more difficult to port. Regards, Frederic -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Status of GNOME 2.16 in Debian
Josselin Mouette wrote: Le jeudi 07 septembre 2006 à 10:56 +0200, Frederic Peters a écrit : Hello, Since it was just a parameter to change to my script, I have set up http://www.0d.be/debian/debian-gnome-2.16-status.html There are some errors in the displayed versions. For example libbonobo is listed as 2.15.3-1 while experimental has 2.16.0-1. Are you relying on the i386 listings maybe? That was the case, I'm currently reworking the script to use madison instead of parsing a Packages file, so those problems should be soon resolved. Frederic -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Status of GNOME 2.16 in Debian
Hello, Since it was just a parameter to change to my script, I have set up http://www.0d.be/debian/debian-gnome-2.16-status.html I looked but didn't found anything, so if there is a statement about 2.16 and Etch somewhere, I thought I could put it at the top. Hope it helps, Frederic -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Status of GNOME 2.16 in Debian
Josselin Mouette wrote: BTW, there is a small mistake: gnome-user-guide is in Debian. Thanks, I added it to the manual overrides (since its debian source package is named gnome2-user-docs, not gnome-user-docs). Frederic -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Status of GNOME 2.14 in Debian
Cesare Leonardi wrote: Since some days this page (very useful) looks completely empty. Is there any problem? The 2.14 transition seems not finished yet, isn't it? I see gnome-media and some other packages still at 2.12. It was caused by some changes on the GnomeClaims wiki page; this is now fixed, thanks for your report. Frederic -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Logout when switching to console
Jerome Warnier wrote: I'm using up-to-date i386 Debian Etch with whatever GNOME version is there (currently, gnome-session is 2.12). When I login from GDM, the session is starting up. If I switch to a console (ctrl-alt-F2 for example) during the earliest seconds, most of the time, it kills the session and goes back to the login screen of GDM, without any useful message in ~/.xsession-errors. Any idea? If I remember correctly this also happens for me since 2.8.0.6-1. Frederic -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Status of GNOME 2.14 in Debian
Hi, Michael Ott wrote: Today i see the page on work and I notice that the most packages are unstable. And on my laptop i cannot differ the colors. I thought that the packages are mostly experimental. Can you please change the colors a little bit. Is this a bit better ? I darkened a bit the ok state. Frederic -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Status of GNOME 2.14 in Debian
Sjoerd Simons wrote: On Sun, Mar 19, 2006 at 02:39:38PM +0100, Sjoerd Simons wrote: On Sun, Mar 19, 2006 at 02:18:10PM +0100, Frederic Peters wrote: For those of us tracking GNOME 2.14 arrival in Debian, I made a summary table; http://www.0d.be/debian/debian-gnome-2.14-status.html It is updated hourly (to get incoming changes) and use ftp.fr.debian.org for Packages files. Don't know what is wrong, but at least gconf isn't updated correctly. (Does it assume the experimental version the unstable version maybe ?) That's it. I'll fix that. Frederic -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Status of GNOME 2.14 in Debian
Sjoerd Simons wrote: Don't know what is wrong, but at least gconf isn't updated correctly. (Does it assume the experimental version the unstable version maybe ?) And this is now fixed. Note that build archs information is taken from packages.debian.org which lags wrt to Packages file, so it currently show 0/13 archs for gconf2 2.14.0-1. Frederic -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Status of GNOME 2.14 in Debian
Ondrej Sury wrote: On Sun, 2006-03-19 at 14:18 +0100, Frederic Peters wrote: For those of us tracking GNOME 2.14 arrival in Debian, I made a summary table; http://www.0d.be/debian/debian-gnome-2.14-status.html Could you update your script, so it checks for all archs (maybe additional column?) You can check buildd logs (or archive) for that information... I'll think about how to format things and will try to code it this evening. Frederic -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Status of GNOME 2.14 in Debian
I wrote: I'll think about how to format things and will try to code it this evening. The page now features a checkbox [ ] Display arch details; it adds row to packages where there are differences in version numbers in unstable. Exemple: upstreamdebian team libbonobo (PTS) 2.14.0 2.14.0-1 yes Unstable has 2.14.0-1 for arm hppa i386 ia64 kfreebsd-i386 sparc Unstable has 2.10.1-1 for alpha amd64 hurd-i386 mips mipsel powerpc s390 Regards, Frederic -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Status of GNOME 2.14 in Debian
Ondrej Sury wrote: Thanks, very nice, but could I have another suggestion (in addition to detailed status?), could you add column named Archs? with status: All or number of up-to-date archs, so we can just check if it's time to upload another package in dependency chain by quick look? :-))) Done. (note the arch stuff is not done for packages uptodate in incoming (like pango is now)) Frederic -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Status of GNOME 2.14 in Debian
For those of us tracking GNOME 2.14 arrival in Debian, I made a summary table; http://www.0d.be/debian/debian-gnome-2.14-status.html It is updated hourly (to get incoming changes) and use ftp.fr.debian.org for Packages files. Hope it is helpful, Frederic -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Bug#357620: gnome-blog-poster crashes when run - again/new
severity 357620 normal
tag 357620 unreproducible
thanks
Ian MacDonald wrote:
Package: gnome-blog
Version: 0.9-3
Severity: grave
Something changed. I miss gnome-blog, its just so convienent.
~$ gnome-blog-poster
Traceback (most recent call last):
File /usr/bin/gnome-blog-poster, line 3, in ?
pygtk.require('2.0')
File /usr/lib/python2.3/site-packages/pygtk.py, line 47, in
require
File /usr/lib/python2.3/site-packages/pygtk.py, line 34, in
_get_available_versions
OSError: [Errno 2] No such file or directory:
'/usr/lib/python23.zip'
This can't be caused by gnome-blog; looks similar to
http://lists.debian.org/debian-python/2003/09/msg00022.html
No definitive answer in that thread, ccing debian-python and
debian-gtk-gnome for input.
Regards,
Frederic
-- System Information:
Debian Release: testing/unstable
APT prefers unstable
APT policy: (990, 'unstable'), (500, 'testing'), (500, 'stable'), (1,
'experimental')
Architecture: i386 (i686)
Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/bash
Kernel: Linux 2.6.14-imac
Locale: LANG=C, LC_CTYPE=C (charmap=ANSI_X3.4-1968)
Versions of packages gnome-blog depends on:
ii gconf22.12.1-12 GNOME configuration database
syste
ii python2.3.5-5An interactive high-level
object-o
ii python-gnome2 2.12.3-2 Python bindings for the GNOME
desk
ii python-gnome2-extras 2.12.1-2.1 Python bindings for the GNOME
desk
gnome-blog recommends no packages.
-- no debconf information
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Nautilus depends on XMMS
Jérôme Warnier wrote: Can someone explain why Nautilus still depends on XMMS? XMMS is still a GTK1.2 app, I guess it should be removed, or at least replaced with something like beep-media-player (the fork of XMMS to GTK2.x). Package: nautilus Version: 2.8.2-2 Suggests: eog, pdf-viewer, sox, mpg321 | mpg123, xmms Regards, Frederic
Re: Nautilus depends on XMMS
Jérôme Warnier wrote: Jérôme Warnier wrote: Can someone explain why Nautilus still depends on XMMS? XMMS is still a GTK1.2 app, I guess it should be removed, or at least replaced with something like beep-media-player (the fork of XMMS to GTK2.x). Package: nautilus Version: 2.8.2-2 Suggests: eog, pdf-viewer, sox, mpg321 | mpg123, xmms It is still a problem, I think. Sure but it's not like the depends you wrote. Anyway I looked up in the package files and didn't find any pointer to xmms in the source code. Perhaps you could file a wishlist bug against nautilus ? Regards, Frederic
Re: Lost Desktop after upgrading to GNOME 2.8 on Testing
Amaya wrote: Nobody else is experiencing this? Are you using gamin instead of FAM ? I used it on two days ago Nautilus and gthumb started acting really strange wrt to files (clicking on a directory and it would vanish, etc.). Going back to FAM fixed that. This doesn't match exactly your problem but who knows... Regards, Frederic
Re: File open dialog: Where is my tab extension
Martin-ric Racine wrote : 2) The fact that it was hidden in GTK2.4+ is a _BUG_ not a feature. Sure, some of us Debian maintainer (or not) thinks so and we can continue whining on this list. Great. Useful. Bug 136541: Lack of text entry box in filechooser open dialog impairs accessibility http://bugs.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=136541 Add a comment there, report a new bug talking about your experience, mail to gtk-devel, whatever you want but this won't be resolved here. Thanks, Frederic [and I like the new file selector widget]
Re: Can't cycle windows anymore
Sven Luther wrote : I wonder though why this is mostly ignored and nobody make effort to really fix this ? Branden Robinson sent a mail to debian-devel a few hours ago with a fix. http://lists.debian.org/debian-devel/2004/06/msg01410.html Regards, Frederic
Re: Gnome 2.4 for Sid; done
Hello, Just to tell I got a mail about excessive bandwidth usage; I moved the repository to: deb http://people.debian.org/ ~fpeters/gnome2.4/ Regards, Frederic [No problem with control-center here; but I confirm the sticky-note applet doesn't work] pgpip602rVdQs.pgp Description: PGP signature
Re: Gnome 2.4 for Sid; done
which leads to a 404 when trying to fetch packages... no black magic on sources.list was able to mask this =( Fixed. Frederic
Gnome 2.4 for Sid; done
Hello, Christian Marillat [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Packaging 2.4 take exactly one day. We don't need 2 months to push 2.4 in unstable. and was right. Josselin Mouette [EMAIL PROTECTED] answered: Debian is not about providing crappy packages in one day. We are committed to provide a high-quality distribution, and it of course requires high-quality packages. Not one-day packages. and was right. But lots of people wants to play with Gnome 2.4 and its wonderful gnome-about application so I did it. I coordinated myself here: http://www.entrouvert.be/~fred/gnome-2.4/gnome-2.4-summary.html (list created from http://www.gnome.org/start/2.4/notes/rninstallation.html) And produced debs (only for i386) that are available with: deb http://apt.bxlug.be/ gnome2.4-sid/ The process was to download current Debian package and current Gnome release and to apply patches from the first to the second. Random notes: - built against XFree86 4.3 from experimental - not Debian-quality packages - upgrade fails; need to run apt-get -f install once to correct some overwriting files - tries not to diverge from sid packages but: - librsvg now depends on libcroco (I thought it was necessary) - libbonobo creates both libbonobo and bonobo-activation packages - control-center builds fontilus and I put themus in a separate package - sources are available on http://apt.bxlug.be/gnome2.4-sid/sources but my upload rate is low so I sometimes only uploaded the .diff.gz and not the upstream .tar.gz - Gnome 2.4 feels faster on my computer and I'm happy with it Regards, Frederic pgp6pp9ezBBfi.pgp Description: PGP signature
Re: Gnome 2.4 for Sid; done
The particular problem seems to be that libbonobo-activation4=2.4.0-0 does not contain any libraries at all. It got included in libbonobo2-common. This is an error due to upstream libbonobo now containing libbonobo-activation. I'm building a new version that fix this. Sorry for the inconvenience, Frederic pgpNeECCRDBP9.pgp Description: PGP signature
Re: Gnome 2.4 for Sid; done
Upon further inspection, the libbonobo-activation.so file is now in libbonobo2-common, so these packages all need to have their dep on libbonobo-activation4 converted to a dep on libbonobo2-0 = 2.4.0 (naive attempt to make a list of packages) (...) (too long) It is now fixed. $ dpkg --contents libbonobo-activation4_2.4.0-0.0.1_i386.deb | grep so -rw-r--r-- root/root 78480 2003-09-14 20:19:58 ./usr/lib/libbonobo-activation.so.4.0.0 lrwxrwxrwx root/root 0 2003-09-14 20:19:48 ./usr/lib/libbonobo-activation.so.4 - libbonobo-activation.so.4.0.0 Note that I'm not the maintainer of any of these packages; I tried to be conservative but official maintainers won't care about upgrade path from my packages. Frederic
Re: galeon-snapshot ?
Is galeon-snapshot supposed to work with gnome2 ? It is. For me it just crashes when i try launching it, and i would like to hear about other peoples experience before doing bug reports. It also crash immediatly here. But I once had a working version installed. (digging) It may be 1.2.99.20020828-1 from the woody backport. Regards, Frederic -- Frédéric Péters [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED] Théridion, spécialistes GNU/Linux, rue de l'Aqueduc 83 - 1050 Bruxelles GPG: 1024D/6783ED5E: 62BF 2EDA 404A 6EB4 F5BE A1E2 A11D CBB1 6783 ED5E
