Processed: closing 578432
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: > close 578432 Bug #578432 [hurd] libpthread can not be dynamically loaded through dlopen() Marked Bug as done > thanks Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. -- 578432: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=578432 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems
Processed: tagging 42079
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: > tags 42079 + wontfix Bug #42079 [hurd] hurd: exec doesn't like zip'ed binaries Ignoring request to alter tags of bug #42079 to the same tags previously set > thanks Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. -- 42079: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=42079 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems
Re: binNMUs: please exercise some care
Philipp Kern dixit: >> Maybe wb could do a “dak ls” and whatever the equivalent for dpo mini-dak is. > >Unfortunately it is not being run on the same host as dak either. Hm, rmadison then. What does packages.d.o/sid/binpkgname use? (On the other hand, that’s often quite behind…) bye, //mirabilos -- exceptions: a truly awful implementation of quite a nice idea. just about the worst way you could do something like that, afaic. it's like anti-design. that too… may I quote you on that? sure, tho i doubt anyone will listen ;)
Re: binNMUs: please exercise some care
On Fri, Oct 23, 2015 at 02:46:23PM +0200, Thorsten Glaser wrote: > On Fri, 23 Oct 2015, Adam D. Barratt wrote: > > and testing), so the only way to be certain what binNMU number to use is to > > check manually. In practice what actually happens is that people forget > > about > Maybe wb could do a “dak ls” and whatever the equivalent for dpo mini-dak is. Unfortunately it is not being run on the same host as dak either. Kind regards Philipp Kern signature.asc Description: Digital signature
