Bug#870981: netdde: should netdde be removed from unstable?

[Samuel Thibault]

Hello,

Lucas Nussbaum, on dim. 06 août 2017 12:28:52 -0400, wrote:
> OTOH, with Hurd living on debian-ports, shouldn't hurd-specific packages
> live only on debian-ports too?

That'd mean *way* less infrastructure support for them (buildds,
maintainer qa page, binNMUs, etc.), that would be really harmful for
port maintainers.

Samuel

Bug#870981: marked as done (netdde: should netdde be removed from unstable?)

[Dinnyés Dániel]

Why i am on this list? How can i unsubscribe!?

On Aug 6, 2017 17:33, "Debian Bug Tracking System" 
wrote:

> Your message dated Sun, 6 Aug 2017 12:28:52 -0400
> with message-id <20170806162852.hpshgltvttk7u...@xanadu.blop.info>
> and subject line Re: Bug#870981: netdde: should netdde be removed from
> unstable?
> has caused the Debian Bug report #870981,
> regarding netdde: should netdde be removed from unstable?
> to be marked as done.
>
> This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
> If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
> Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.
>
> (NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this
> message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system
> misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact ow...@bugs.debian.org
> immediately.)
>
>
> --
> 870981: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=870981
> Debian Bug Tracking System
> Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems
>
>
> -- Forwarded message --
> From: Lucas Nussbaum 
> To: sub...@bugs.debian.org
> Cc:
> Bcc:
> Date: Sun, 06 Aug 2017 09:50:12 -0400
> Subject: netdde: should netdde be removed from unstable?
> Source: netdde
> User: debian...@lists.debian.org
> Usertags: qa-removals-post-stretch
>
> Hi,
>
> Following a discussion[1] on the debian-qa@ mailing list on packages that
> missed both jessie and stretch, I am proposing the removal of this package
> from
> unstable, because:
>
>   it was in unstable at the time of the stretch freeze
> but wasn't part of stretch
> AND
>   it was in unstable at the time of the jessie freeze
> but it wasn't part of jessie
> AND
>   it is still not in testing
> AND
>   it was not uploaded since the beginning of 2017.
>
> If you disagree and think that this package should remain in unstable, feel
> free to just close this bug.
>
> If this bug is still open one month from now (on 2017-09-06), it will be
> turned
> into a removal request, using:
>
>   reassign -1 ftp.debian.org
>   retitle -1 RM: netdde -- RoQA; missed both jessie and stretch
>   thanks
>
> - Lucas, for the QA team.
>
>
> [1] https://lists.debian.org/debian-qa/2017/07/msg00021.html
>
>
> -- Forwarded message --
> From: Lucas Nussbaum 
> To: Svante Signell 
> Cc: 870981-d...@bugs.debian.org
> Bcc:
> Date: Sun, 6 Aug 2017 12:28:52 -0400
> Subject: Re: Bug#870981: netdde: should netdde be removed from unstable?
> On 06/08/17 at 18:16 +0200, Svante Signell wrote:
> > On Sun, 2017-08-06 at 09:50 -0400, Lucas Nussbaum wrote:
> > > Source: netdde
> > > User: debian...@lists.debian.org
> > > Usertags: qa-removals-post-stretch
> > >
> > > Hi,
> > >
> > > Following a discussion[1] on the debian-qa@ mailing list on packages
> that
> > > missed both jessie and stretch, I am proposing the removal of this
> package
> > > from
> > > unstable, because:
> > >
> > >   it was in unstable at the time of the stretch freeze
> > > but wasn't part of stretch
> > > AND
> > >   it was in unstable at the time of the jessie freeze
> > > but it wasn't part of jessie
> > > AND
> > >   it is still not in testing
> > > AND
> > >   it was not uploaded since the beginning of 2017.
> > >
> > > If you disagree and think that this package should remain in unstable,
> feel
> > > free to just close this bug.
> > >
> > > If this bug is still open one month from now (on 2017-09-06), it will
> be
> > > turned
> > > into a removal request, using:
> > >
> > >   reassign -1 ftp.debian.org
> > >   retitle -1 RM: netdde -- RoQA; missed both jessie and stretch
> > >   thanks
> > >
> > > - Lucas, for the QA team.
> > >
> > > [1] https://lists.debian.org/debian-qa/2017/07/msg00021.html
> > >
> >
> > The same applies as for bug #870985. It is currently used for hurd-i386
> only,
> > but is essential for that architecture. Please close this bug too.
>
> Done, but you know you can do it, too? :-)
>
> OTOH, with Hurd living on debian-ports, shouldn't hurd-specific packages
> live only on debian-ports too?
>
> Lucas
>

Bug#870981: marked as done (netdde: should netdde be removed from unstable?)

[Debian Bug Tracking System]

Your message dated Sun, 6 Aug 2017 12:28:52 -0400
with message-id <20170806162852.hpshgltvttk7u...@xanadu.blop.info>
and subject line Re: Bug#870981: netdde: should netdde be removed from unstable?
has caused the Debian Bug report #870981,
regarding netdde: should netdde be removed from unstable?
to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this
message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system
misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact ow...@bugs.debian.org
immediately.)


-- 
870981: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=870981
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems
--- Begin Message ---
Source: netdde
User: debian...@lists.debian.org
Usertags: qa-removals-post-stretch

Hi,

Following a discussion[1] on the debian-qa@ mailing list on packages that
missed both jessie and stretch, I am proposing the removal of this package from
unstable, because:

  it was in unstable at the time of the stretch freeze
but wasn't part of stretch
AND
  it was in unstable at the time of the jessie freeze
but it wasn't part of jessie
AND
  it is still not in testing
AND
  it was not uploaded since the beginning of 2017.

If you disagree and think that this package should remain in unstable, feel
free to just close this bug.

If this bug is still open one month from now (on 2017-09-06), it will be turned
into a removal request, using:

  reassign -1 ftp.debian.org
  retitle -1 RM: netdde -- RoQA; missed both jessie and stretch
  thanks

- Lucas, for the QA team.


[1] https://lists.debian.org/debian-qa/2017/07/msg00021.html
--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message ---
On 06/08/17 at 18:16 +0200, Svante Signell wrote:
> On Sun, 2017-08-06 at 09:50 -0400, Lucas Nussbaum wrote:
> > Source: netdde
> > User: debian...@lists.debian.org
> > Usertags: qa-removals-post-stretch
> > 
> > Hi,
> > 
> > Following a discussion[1] on the debian-qa@ mailing list on packages that
> > missed both jessie and stretch, I am proposing the removal of this package
> > from
> > unstable, because:
> > 
> >   it was in unstable at the time of the stretch freeze
> > but wasn't part of stretch
> > AND
> >   it was in unstable at the time of the jessie freeze
> > but it wasn't part of jessie
> > AND
> >   it is still not in testing
> > AND
> >   it was not uploaded since the beginning of 2017.
> > 
> > If you disagree and think that this package should remain in unstable, feel
> > free to just close this bug.
> > 
> > If this bug is still open one month from now (on 2017-09-06), it will be
> > turned
> > into a removal request, using:
> > 
> >   reassign -1 ftp.debian.org
> >   retitle -1 RM: netdde -- RoQA; missed both jessie and stretch
> >   thanks
> > 
> > - Lucas, for the QA team.
> > 
> > [1] https://lists.debian.org/debian-qa/2017/07/msg00021.html
> > 
> 
> The same applies as for bug #870985. It is currently used for hurd-i386 only,
> but is essential for that architecture. Please close this bug too.

Done, but you know you can do it, too? :-)

OTOH, with Hurd living on debian-ports, shouldn't hurd-specific packages
live only on debian-ports too?

Lucas--- End Message ---

Bug#870981: netdde: should netdde be removed from unstable?

[Svante Signell]

On Sun, 2017-08-06 at 09:50 -0400, Lucas Nussbaum wrote:
> Source: netdde
> User: debian...@lists.debian.org
> Usertags: qa-removals-post-stretch
> 
> Hi,
> 
> Following a discussion[1] on the debian-qa@ mailing list on packages that
> missed both jessie and stretch, I am proposing the removal of this package
> from
> unstable, because:
> 
>   it was in unstable at the time of the stretch freeze
> but wasn't part of stretch
> AND
>   it was in unstable at the time of the jessie freeze
> but it wasn't part of jessie
> AND
>   it is still not in testing
> AND
>   it was not uploaded since the beginning of 2017.
> 
> If you disagree and think that this package should remain in unstable, feel
> free to just close this bug.
> 
> If this bug is still open one month from now (on 2017-09-06), it will be
> turned
> into a removal request, using:
> 
>   reassign -1 ftp.debian.org
>   retitle -1 RM: netdde -- RoQA; missed both jessie and stretch
>   thanks
> 
> - Lucas, for the QA team.
> 
> [1] https://lists.debian.org/debian-qa/2017/07/msg00021.html
> 

The same applies as for bug #870985. It is currently used for hurd-i386 only,
but is essential for that architecture. Please close this bug too.

Bug#870985: marked as done (hurd-libfuse: should hurd-libfuse be removed from unstable?)

[Debian Bug Tracking System]

Your message dated Sun, 6 Aug 2017 10:29:14 -0400
with message-id <20170806142914.e3svpnsnxsljo...@xanadu.blop.info>
and subject line Re: Bug#870985: hurd-libfuse: should hurd-libfuse be removed 
from unstable?
has caused the Debian Bug report #870985,
regarding hurd-libfuse: should hurd-libfuse be removed from unstable?
to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this
message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system
misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact ow...@bugs.debian.org
immediately.)


-- 
870985: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=870985
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems
--- Begin Message ---
Source: hurd-libfuse
User: debian...@lists.debian.org
Usertags: qa-removals-post-stretch

Hi,

Following a discussion[1] on the debian-qa@ mailing list on packages that
missed both jessie and stretch, I am proposing the removal of this package from
unstable, because:

  it was in unstable at the time of the stretch freeze
but wasn't part of stretch
AND
  it was in unstable at the time of the jessie freeze
but it wasn't part of jessie
AND
  it is still not in testing
AND
  it was not uploaded since the beginning of 2017.

If you disagree and think that this package should remain in unstable, feel
free to just close this bug.

If this bug is still open one month from now (on 2017-09-06), it will be turned
into a removal request, using:

  reassign -1 ftp.debian.org
  retitle -1 RM: hurd-libfuse -- RoQA; missed both jessie and stretch
  thanks

- Lucas, for the QA team.


[1] https://lists.debian.org/debian-qa/2017/07/msg00021.html
--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message ---
On 06/08/17 at 10:15 -0400, Michael Banck wrote:
> Hi,
> 
> On Sun, Aug 06, 2017 at 09:50:12AM -0400, Lucas Nussbaum wrote:
> > Source: hurd-libfuse
> > User: debian...@lists.debian.org
> > Usertags: qa-removals-post-stretch
> > 
> > Hi,
> > 
> > Following a discussion[1] on the debian-qa@ mailing list on packages that
> > missed both jessie and stretch, I am proposing the removal of this package 
> > from
> > unstable, because:
> > 
> >   it was in unstable at the time of the stretch freeze
> > but wasn't part of stretch
> > AND
> >   it was in unstable at the time of the jessie freeze
> > but it wasn't part of jessie
> > AND
> >   it is still not in testing
> 
> Well, it's hurd-i386 only, which doesn't have testing, so the three
> above don't apply really.
> 
> > AND
> >   it was not uploaded since the beginning of 2017.
> 
> That might be the case, but that alone shouldn't be grounds for removal.
>  
> > If you disagree and think that this package should remain in unstable, feel
> > free to just close this bug.
> 
> Will do so in a bit unless you complain.

I've just closed the bug. Thanks for the feedback!

Lucas--- End Message ---

Bug#870985: hurd-libfuse: should hurd-libfuse be removed from unstable?

[Lucas Nussbaum]

Source: hurd-libfuse
User: debian...@lists.debian.org
Usertags: qa-removals-post-stretch

Hi,

Following a discussion[1] on the debian-qa@ mailing list on packages that
missed both jessie and stretch, I am proposing the removal of this package from
unstable, because:

  it was in unstable at the time of the stretch freeze
but wasn't part of stretch
AND
  it was in unstable at the time of the jessie freeze
but it wasn't part of jessie
AND
  it is still not in testing
AND
  it was not uploaded since the beginning of 2017.

If you disagree and think that this package should remain in unstable, feel
free to just close this bug.

If this bug is still open one month from now (on 2017-09-06), it will be turned
into a removal request, using:

  reassign -1 ftp.debian.org
  retitle -1 RM: hurd-libfuse -- RoQA; missed both jessie and stretch
  thanks

- Lucas, for the QA team.


[1] https://lists.debian.org/debian-qa/2017/07/msg00021.html

Bug#870981: netdde: should netdde be removed from unstable?

[Lucas Nussbaum]

Source: netdde
User: debian...@lists.debian.org
Usertags: qa-removals-post-stretch

Hi,

Following a discussion[1] on the debian-qa@ mailing list on packages that
missed both jessie and stretch, I am proposing the removal of this package from
unstable, because:

  it was in unstable at the time of the stretch freeze
but wasn't part of stretch
AND
  it was in unstable at the time of the jessie freeze
but it wasn't part of jessie
AND
  it is still not in testing
AND
  it was not uploaded since the beginning of 2017.

If you disagree and think that this package should remain in unstable, feel
free to just close this bug.

If this bug is still open one month from now (on 2017-09-06), it will be turned
into a removal request, using:

  reassign -1 ftp.debian.org
  retitle -1 RM: netdde -- RoQA; missed both jessie and stretch
  thanks

- Lucas, for the QA team.


[1] https://lists.debian.org/debian-qa/2017/07/msg00021.html