[debian-hurd-Patches][311761] Partial patch for kbuild 1:0.1.98svn2318-1

2017-12-29 Thread debian-hurd-patches
debian-hurd-Patches item #311761 was changed at 29/12/2017 17:50 by Samuel 
Thibault
You can respond by visiting: 
https://alioth.debian.org/tracker/?func=detail=410472=311761_id=30628

>Status: Closed
Priority: 3
Submitted By: Barry deFreese (bdefreese)
Assigned to: Nobody (None)
Summary: Partial patch for kbuild 1:0.1.98svn2318-1  
Category: linuxism
Group: submitted
Resolution: None


Initial Comment:
Hi,

Attached is the start of a patch for kbuild.  Unfortunately it has several 
PATH_MAX issues that I just #ifdef'd for now.  But even larger is that it 
include sys/mount.h in several places.

Thanks,

Barry

--

>Comment By: Samuel Thibault (sthibault)
Date: 29/12/2017 17:50

Message:
that got fixed some time ago

--

You can respond by visiting: 
https://alioth.debian.org/tracker/?func=detail=410472=311761_id=30628



[debian-hurd-Patches][312117] #558586: hyperestraier 1.4.9

2017-12-29 Thread debian-hurd-patches
debian-hurd-Patches item #312117 was changed at 29/12/2017 17:51 by Samuel 
Thibault
You can respond by visiting: 
https://alioth.debian.org/tracker/?func=detail=410472=312117_id=30628

>Status: Closed
Priority: 3
Submitted By: Pino Toscano (pino-guest)
Assigned to: Nobody (None)
Summary: #558586: hyperestraier 1.4.9 
Category: None
Group: None
Resolution: None


Initial Comment:
Simple malloc+free usage instead of hardcoded PATH_MAX-sized strings.

--

>Comment By: Samuel Thibault (sthibault)
Date: 29/12/2017 17:51

Message:
that got fixed some time ago

--

Comment By: Pino Toscano (pino-guest)
Date: 29/11/2009 14:32

Message:
Thanks! Filed as bug #558586.

--

Comment By: Samuel Thibault (sthibault)
Date: 29/11/2009 12:55

Message:
Seems correct, please submit!


--

You can respond by visiting: 
https://alioth.debian.org/tracker/?func=detail=410472=312117_id=30628



[debian-hurd-Patches][311309] 509252: ghc6 FTBFS (debian-ports)

2017-12-29 Thread debian-hurd-patches
debian-hurd-Patches item #311309 was changed at 29/12/2017 17:50 by Samuel 
Thibault
You can respond by visiting: 
https://alioth.debian.org/tracker/?func=detail=410472=311309_id=30628

>Status: Closed
Priority: 3
Submitted By: Samuel Thibault (sthibaul-guest)
Assigned to: Nobody (None)
Summary: 509252: ghc6 FTBFS (debian-ports) 
Category: None
Group: None
Resolution: None


Initial Comment:
This is due to ghc using setitimer(TIMER_VIRTUAL), for which Mach
doesn't provide any support. The attached patch just makes it use
ITIMER_REAL instead.

I've filed a ticket upstream
http://hackage.haskell.org/trac/ghc/ticket/2883

Maybe this could be a debian-ports candidate, as ghc6 is blocking all
haskell packages.


--

>Comment By: Samuel Thibault (sthibault)
Date: 29/12/2017 17:50

Message:
that got fixed some time ago

--

Comment By: Samuel Thibault (sthibaul-guest)
Date: 20/12/2008 12:22

Message:
Better patch, submitted upstream, that autodetects such case.


--

You can respond by visiting: 
https://alioth.debian.org/tracker/?func=detail=410472=311309_id=30628



[debian-hurd-Patches][305130] native backend for hal

2017-12-29 Thread debian-hurd-patches
debian-hurd-Patches item #305130 was changed at 29/12/2017 17:49 by Samuel 
Thibault
You can respond by visiting: 
https://alioth.debian.org/tracker/?func=detail=410472=305130_id=30628

>Status: Closed
Priority: 3
Submitted By: Samuel Thibault (sthibaul-guest)
Assigned to: Nobody (None)
Summary: native backend for hal 
Category: None
Group: None
Resolution: Later


Initial Comment:
Fixes compilation, but still using the dummy backend. We need to port hal on 
the Hurd, but we should be probably don't do it blindly, build nice hurdish 
abstractions, etc.


--

>Comment By: Samuel Thibault (sthibault)
Date: 29/12/2017 17:49

Message:
hal is not in Debian any more.

--

Comment By: Pino Toscano (pino-guest)
Date: 17/11/2009 01:51

Message:
hal 0.5.13-4 now compiles and runs again on the Hurd.
Thus changing this tracker for further work on a native backend for the Hurd.

--

Comment By: Pino Toscano (pino-guest)
Date: 25/10/2009 22:44

Message:
Thanks! Done as bug #552386

--

Comment By: Samuel Thibault (sthibault)
Date: 25/10/2009 19:35

Message:
It seems right, please submit!


--

Comment By: Pino Toscano (pino-guest)
Date: 25/10/2009 10:50

Message:
Here it is a patch for making hal compilable and installable:
- tools/hal-disable-polling.c: usual realpath()+PATH_MAX porting
- debian/control: linux-only stuff excluded
- debian/hal.init: there's no /proc/$PID/root file, so the chroot check is 
bogus (and makes startup fail); disabling it makes the hal daemon runnable via 
init script

hal still uses the dummy backend on hurd, but that can be worked on later, I 
guess.

--

Comment By: Samuel Thibault (sthibaul-guest)
Date: 22/12/2007 23:46

Message:
Oops, sorry, we're still using the dummy backend. Porting is still needed.


--

You can respond by visiting: 
https://alioth.debian.org/tracker/?func=detail=410472=305130_id=30628



[debian-hurd-Patches][310749] #479657 dancer-ircd patch

2017-12-29 Thread debian-hurd-patches
debian-hurd-Patches item #310749 was changed at 29/12/2017 17:50 by Samuel 
Thibault
You can respond by visiting: 
https://alioth.debian.org/tracker/?func=detail=410472=310749_id=30628

>Status: Closed
Priority: 3
Submitted By: Flávio Cruz (flaviocruz-guest)
Assigned to: Nobody (None)
Summary: #479657 dancer-ircd patch 
Category: None
Group: None
Resolution: None


Initial Comment:
dancer-ircd-1.0.36 patch for GNU/Hurd

--

>Comment By: Samuel Thibault (sthibault)
Date: 29/12/2017 17:50

Message:
dancer-ircd got removed from debian

--

Comment By: Samuel Thibault (sthibaul-guest)
Date: 01/05/2008 01:52

Message:
Mmm, sizeof(char) is 1 by C99 definition :)

Just a matter of taste: I would rather 

#define LOCK_SUFFIX ".lock"

and then use LOCK_SUFFIX and strlen(LOCK_SUFFIX), it is not so obvious
that lock_suffix_len is the length of lock_suffix.

I guess you have checked that only
ConfigFileEntry.{helpfile,motd,opermotd} need to be cleaned up.

Else the patch seems fine.


--

You can respond by visiting: 
https://alioth.debian.org/tracker/?func=detail=410472=310749_id=30628



[debian-hurd-Patches][303255] libusb-0.1.11

2017-12-29 Thread debian-hurd-patches
debian-hurd-Patches item #303255 was changed at 29/12/2017 17:48 by Samuel 
Thibault
You can respond by visiting: 
https://alioth.debian.org/tracker/?func=detail=410472=303255_id=30628

>Status: Closed
Priority: 3
Submitted By: Barry deFreese  (bddebian-guest)
Assigned to: Nobody (None)
Summary: libusb-0.1.11 
Category: several
Group: unreviewed
Resolution: None


Initial Comment:
Here is a patch to build libusb on GNU/Hurd.

Obviously you need to run aclocal, autoheader, and autoreconf.

It isn't quite complete becuase it didn't finish building but I was getting a 
segfault with jade making some of the files.

--

>Comment By: Samuel Thibault (sthibault)
Date: 29/12/2017 17:48

Message:
That got fixed some time ago

--

You can respond by visiting: 
https://alioth.debian.org/tracker/?func=detail=410472=303255_id=30628



[debian-hurd-Patches][303220] dvdisaster

2017-12-29 Thread debian-hurd-patches
debian-hurd-Patches item #303220 was changed at 29/12/2017 17:48 by Samuel 
Thibault
You can respond by visiting: 
https://alioth.debian.org/tracker/?func=detail=410472=303220_id=30628

>Status: Closed
Priority: 3
Submitted By: Christopher Bodenstein (physicman-guest)
Assigned to: Nobody (None)
Summary: dvdisaster 
Category: posix
Group: unreviewed
Resolution: None


Initial Comment:
Author: Christopher Bodenstein <c...@physicman.net>
Source: dvdisaster
Strip-Level: -p1
Status: unreviewed
Categories: posix

There is one instance of PATH_MAX used in a getcwd(). I use a 
get_current_dir_name() to replace it, however there is no configure.in so I 
patched configure directly to check the the function's presence.

--

>Comment By: Samuel Thibault (sthibault)
Date: 29/12/2017 17:48

Message:
That got fixed some time ago.

--

You can respond by visiting: 
https://alioth.debian.org/tracker/?func=detail=410472=303220_id=30628



[debian-hurd-Patches][303178] jamvm-1.4.2

2017-12-29 Thread debian-hurd-patches
debian-hurd-Patches item #303178 was changed at 29/12/2017 17:48 by Samuel 
Thibault
You can respond by visiting: 
https://alioth.debian.org/tracker/?func=detail=410472=303178_id=30628

>Status: Closed
Priority: 3
Submitted By: Barry deFreese  (bddebian-guest)
Assigned to: Nobody (None)
Summary: jamvm-1.4.2 
Category: build-env
Group: unreviewed
Resolution: None


Initial Comment:
Author: Barry deFreese <bddeb...@bddebian.com>
Source: jamvm
Status: unreviewed
Categories: build-env
Strip-Level: -p1

Missing configure options for gnu*)

--

>Comment By: Samuel Thibault (sthibault)
Date: 29/12/2017 17:48

Message:
jamvm is not in Debian any more.

--

You can respond by visiting: 
https://alioth.debian.org/tracker/?func=detail=410472=303178_id=30628



[debian-hurd-Patches][303152] cdargs

2017-12-29 Thread debian-hurd-patches
debian-hurd-Patches item #303152 was changed at 29/12/2017 17:47 by Samuel 
Thibault
You can respond by visiting: 
https://alioth.debian.org/tracker/?func=detail=410472=303152_id=30628

>Status: Closed
Priority: 3
Submitted By: Christopher Bodenstein (physicman-guest)
Assigned to: Nobody (None)
Summary: cdargs 
Category: posix
Group: unreviewed
Resolution: None


Initial Comment:
Author: Christopher Bodenstein <c...@physicman.net>
Source: cdargs
Status: unreviewed
Categories: posix
Strip-Level: -p1

The attached patch uses get_current_dir_name() instead of getcwd if _GNU_SOURCE 
is defined (get_current_dir_name should be tested in the configure but I can't 
get it to work properly, when I modify the configure.in the resulting configure 
is all messed up and the package won't build) and avoids the use of PATH_MAX in 
that case.


--

>Comment By: Samuel Thibault (sthibault)
Date: 29/12/2017 17:47

Message:
That was fixed some time ago.

--

You can respond by visiting: 
https://alioth.debian.org/tracker/?func=detail=410472=303152_id=30628



[debian-hurd-Patches][303210] mailutils

2017-12-29 Thread debian-hurd-patches
debian-hurd-Patches item #303210 was changed at 29/12/2017 17:47 by Samuel 
Thibault
You can respond by visiting: 
https://alioth.debian.org/tracker/?func=detail=410472=303210_id=30628

>Status: Closed
Priority: 3
Submitted By: Christopher Bodenstein (physicman-guest)
Assigned to: Nobody (None)
Summary: mailutils 
Category: posix
Group: unreviewed
Resolution: None


Initial Comment:
Author: Christopher Bodenstein <c...@physicman.net>
Source: mailutils
Strip-Level: -p1
Status: unreviewed
Categories: posix

The attached patch removes one instance of MAXHOSTNAMELEN using xgethostname().

Apparently, you need automake1.9 to get the .am files to be processed correctly.

Also, I had to disable the checks in the debian/rules file as at least one of 
them seems to make my machine freeze.


--

>Comment By: Samuel Thibault (sthibault)
Date: 29/12/2017 17:47

Message:
That was fixed some time ago

--

You can respond by visiting: 
https://alioth.debian.org/tracker/?func=detail=410472=303210_id=30628



[debian-hurd-Patches][301211] #296115: ifupdown (debian-ports)

2017-12-29 Thread debian-hurd-patches
debian-hurd-Patches item #301211 was changed at 29/12/2017 17:40 by Samuel 
Thibault
You can respond by visiting: 
https://alioth.debian.org/tracker/?func=detail=410472=301211_id=30628

>Status: Closed
Priority: 3
Submitted By: Michael Banck (mbanck)
Assigned to: Nobody (None)
Summary: #296115: ifupdown (debian-ports) 
Category: debian
Group: submitted
Resolution: None


Initial Comment:
Author: Michael Banck <mba...@debian.org>
Source: ifupdown
Status: submitted(#296115)
Categories: debian
Strip-Level: -p1

--

>Comment By: Samuel Thibault (sthibault)
Date: 29/12/2017 17:40

Message:
that was fixed a few years ago.

--

You can respond by visiting: 
https://alioth.debian.org/tracker/?func=detail=410472=301211_id=30628



[debian-hurd-Patches][315498] 9base FTBFS fix

2016-09-18 Thread debian-hurd-patches
debian-hurd-Patches item #315498 was changed at 2016-09-18 12:18 by Ola Ekström
You can respond by visiting: 
https://alioth.debian.org/tracker/?func=detail=410472=315498_id=30628

Status: Open
Priority: 3
Submitted By: Ola Ekström (rlob-guest)
Assigned to: Nobody (None)
Summary: 9base FTBFS fix 
Category: debian
Group: unreviewed
Resolution: None


Initial Comment:
Patch to successfully compile package 9base-6 on Debian GNU/Hurd.

Failing reason for 9base on hurd-i386:

>  fatal error:can't create y.tab.h, :1

Tail of log for 9base on hurd-i386:

CC ascii.c
LD ascii
built ascii
make[3]: Leaving directory '/«PKGBUILDDIR»/ascii'
make[3]: Entering directory '/«PKGBUILDDIR»/awk'
make[4]: Entering directory '/«PKGBUILDDIR»/awk'
YACC awkgram.y
../yacc.mk:14: recipe for target 'depend' failed
make[4]: Leaving directory '/«PKGBUILDDIR»/awk'
../yacc.mk:6: recipe for target 'all' failed
make[3]: Leaving directory '/«PKGBUILDDIR»/awk'
Makefile:58: recipe for target 'all' failed
make[2]: Leaving directory '/«PKGBUILDDIR»'
debian/rules:24: recipe for target 'override_dh_auto_build' failed
make[1]: Leaving directory '/«PKGBUILDDIR»'


TODO: Write a Hurd-specific disksize()-function in lib9/_p9dir.c


--

Comment By: Ola Ekström (rlob-guest)
Date: 2016-09-18 12:18

Message:
Ok will do :) I didn't see your reply unfortunately, Gmail did some creative 
filtering of my mail.


--

Comment By: Samuel Thibault (sthibault)
Date: 2016-09-18 12:00

Message:
It looks good, please submit the bug report.

But as I said, for further patches, please send them to the 
debian-hurd@lists.debian.org, there is a higher reviewing probability there.

--

You can respond by visiting: 
https://alioth.debian.org/tracker/?func=detail=410472=315498_id=30628



[debian-hurd-Patches][315498] 9base FTBFS fix

2016-09-18 Thread debian-hurd-patches
debian-hurd-Patches item #315498 was changed at 18/09/2016 12:00 by Samuel 
Thibault
You can respond by visiting: 
https://alioth.debian.org/tracker/?func=detail=410472=315498_id=30628

Status: Open
Priority: 3
Submitted By: Ola Ekström (rlob-guest)
Assigned to: Nobody (None)
Summary: 9base FTBFS fix 
Category: debian
Group: unreviewed
Resolution: None


Initial Comment:
Patch to successfully compile package 9base-6 on Debian GNU/Hurd.

Failing reason for 9base on hurd-i386:

>  fatal error:can't create y.tab.h, :1

Tail of log for 9base on hurd-i386:

CC ascii.c
LD ascii
built ascii
make[3]: Leaving directory '/«PKGBUILDDIR»/ascii'
make[3]: Entering directory '/«PKGBUILDDIR»/awk'
make[4]: Entering directory '/«PKGBUILDDIR»/awk'
YACC awkgram.y
../yacc.mk:14: recipe for target 'depend' failed
make[4]: Leaving directory '/«PKGBUILDDIR»/awk'
../yacc.mk:6: recipe for target 'all' failed
make[3]: Leaving directory '/«PKGBUILDDIR»/awk'
Makefile:58: recipe for target 'all' failed
make[2]: Leaving directory '/«PKGBUILDDIR»'
debian/rules:24: recipe for target 'override_dh_auto_build' failed
make[1]: Leaving directory '/«PKGBUILDDIR»'


TODO: Write a Hurd-specific disksize()-function in lib9/_p9dir.c


--

>Comment By: Samuel Thibault (sthibault)
Date: 18/09/2016 12:00

Message:
It looks good, please submit the bug report.

But as I said, for further patches, please send them to the 
debian-hurd@lists.debian.org, there is a higher reviewing probability there.

--

You can respond by visiting: 
https://alioth.debian.org/tracker/?func=detail=410472=315498_id=30628



[debian-hurd-Patches][315498] 9base FTBFS fix

2016-09-18 Thread debian-hurd-patches
debian-hurd-Patches item #315498, was opened at 2016-09-18 11:36 by Ola Ekström
You can respond by visiting: 
https://alioth.debian.org/tracker/?func=detail=410472=315498_id=30628

Status: Open
Priority: 3
Submitted By: Ola Ekström (rlob-guest)
Assigned to: Nobody (None)
Summary: 9base FTBFS fix 
Category: debian
Group: unreviewed
Resolution: None


Initial Comment:
Patch to successfully compile package 9base-6 on Debian GNU/Hurd.

Failing reason for 9base on hurd-i386:

>  fatal error:can't create y.tab.h, :1

Tail of log for 9base on hurd-i386:

CC ascii.c
LD ascii
built ascii
make[3]: Leaving directory '/«PKGBUILDDIR»/ascii'
make[3]: Entering directory '/«PKGBUILDDIR»/awk'
make[4]: Entering directory '/«PKGBUILDDIR»/awk'
YACC awkgram.y
../yacc.mk:14: recipe for target 'depend' failed
make[4]: Leaving directory '/«PKGBUILDDIR»/awk'
../yacc.mk:6: recipe for target 'all' failed
make[3]: Leaving directory '/«PKGBUILDDIR»/awk'
Makefile:58: recipe for target 'all' failed
make[2]: Leaving directory '/«PKGBUILDDIR»'
debian/rules:24: recipe for target 'override_dh_auto_build' failed
make[1]: Leaving directory '/«PKGBUILDDIR»'


TODO: Write a Hurd-specific disksize()-function in lib9/_p9dir.c


--

You can respond by visiting: 
https://alioth.debian.org/tracker/?func=detail=410472=315498_id=30628



[debian-hurd-Patches][314171] Debian GNU/Hurd port

2013-04-01 Thread debian-hurd-patches
debian-hurd-Patches item #314171, was opened at 01.04.2013 23:15 by Harry Beaber
You can respond by visiting: 
https://alioth.debian.org/tracker/?func=detailatid=410472aid=314171group_id=30628

Status: Open
Priority: 3
Submitted By: Harry Beaber (harr68be4-guest)
Assigned to: Nobody (None)
Summary: Debian GNU/Hurd port 
Category: None
Group: None
Resolution: None


Initial Comment:
Debian GNU/Hurd port

--

You can respond by visiting: 
https://alioth.debian.org/tracker/?func=detailatid=410472aid=314171group_id=30628


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-hurd-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: http://lists.debian.org/e1umnwy-00040w...@vasks.debian.org



[debian-hurd-Patches][314171] Debian GNU/Hurd port

2013-04-01 Thread debian-hurd-patches
debian-hurd-Patches item #314171, was changed at 02/04/2013 01:38 by Samuel 
Thibault
You can respond by visiting: 
https://alioth.debian.org/tracker/?func=detailatid=410472aid=314171group_id=30628

Status: Deleted
Priority: 3
Submitted By: Harry Beaber (harr68be4-guest)
Assigned to: Nobody (None)
Summary: Debian GNU/Hurd port 
Category: None
Group: None
Resolution: Invalid


Initial Comment:
Debian GNU/Hurd port

--

Comment By: Samuel Thibault (sthibault)
Date: 02/04/2013 01:38

Message:
Spam

--

You can respond by visiting: 
https://alioth.debian.org/tracker/?func=detailatid=410472aid=314171group_id=30628


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-hurd-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: http://lists.debian.org/e1umojb-00052n...@vasks.debian.org



[debian-hurd-Patches][314131] Debian GNU/Hurd port

2013-03-25 Thread debian-hurd-patches
debian-hurd-Patches item #314131, was opened at 26.03.2013 00:37 by Eric Aadnes
You can respond by visiting: 
https://alioth.debian.org/tracker/?func=detailatid=410472aid=314131group_id=30628

Status: Open
Priority: 3
Submitted By: Eric Aadnes (eri70aad1-guest)
Assigned to: Nobody (None)
Summary: Debian GNU/Hurd port 
Category: None
Group: None
Resolution: None


Initial Comment:
Debian GNU/Hurd port

--

You can respond by visiting: 
https://alioth.debian.org/tracker/?func=detailatid=410472aid=314131group_id=30628


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-hurd-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: http://lists.debian.org/e1ukhts-0008mm...@vasks.debian.org



[debian-hurd-Patches][314131] Debian GNU/Hurd port

2013-03-25 Thread debian-hurd-patches
debian-hurd-Patches item #314131, was changed at 26/03/2013 02:13 by Samuel 
Thibault
You can respond by visiting: 
https://alioth.debian.org/tracker/?func=detailatid=410472aid=314131group_id=30628

Status: Deleted
Priority: 3
Submitted By: Eric Aadnes (eri70aad1-guest)
Assigned to: Nobody (None)
Summary: Debian GNU/Hurd port 
Category: None
Group: None
Resolution: Invalid


Initial Comment:
Spam


--

You can respond by visiting: 
https://alioth.debian.org/tracker/?func=detailatid=410472aid=314131group_id=30628


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-hurd-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: http://lists.debian.org/e1ukisz-0002i6...@vasks.debian.org



[debian-hurd-Patches][301178] FTBFS tcpdump-3.8.3

2012-05-31 Thread debian-hurd-patches
debian-hurd-Patches item #301178, was changed at 2012-06-01 00:35 by Barry 
deFreese
You can respond by visiting: 
https://alioth.debian.org/tracker/?func=detailatid=410472aid=301178group_id=30628

Status: Closed
Priority: 3
Submitted By: Barry deFreese  (bddebian-guest)
Assigned to: Nobody (None)
Summary: FTBFS tcpdump-3.8.3 
Category: posix
Group: unsubmitted
Resolution: Fixed


Initial Comment:
Author: Barry deFreese bddeb...@comcast.net
Source: tcpdump
Status: ugly but builds
Categories: posix
Strip-Level: -p1



--- tcpdump-stdinc.horg 2005-02-10 18:33:19.0 -0500
+++ tcpdump-stdinc.h2005-02-10 18:32:40.0 -0500
@@ -42,6 +42,10 @@
 #ifndef tcpdump_stdinc_h
 #define tcpdump_stdinc_h

+#if defined(__GNU__)
+# define MAXHOSTNAMELEN 64
+#endif
+
 #ifdef WIN32

 #include stdio.h



--

Comment By: Barry deFreese (bdefreese)
Date: 2012-06-01 00:35

Message:
Package now available in the archive.

--

You can respond by visiting: 
https://alioth.debian.org/tracker/?func=detailatid=410472aid=301178group_id=30628


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-hurd-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: http://lists.debian.org/e1safpw-0005le...@vasks.debian.org



[debian-hurd-Patches][303157] FTBFS boost-jam

2012-05-31 Thread debian-hurd-patches
debian-hurd-Patches item #303157, was changed at 2012-06-01 00:53 by Barry 
deFreese
You can respond by visiting: 
https://alioth.debian.org/tracker/?func=detailatid=410472aid=303157group_id=30628

Status: Closed
Priority: 3
Submitted By: Barry deFreese  (bddebian-guest)
Assigned to: Nobody (None)
Summary: FTBFS boost-jam 
Category: linuxism
Group: unreviewed
Resolution: Out of Date


Initial Comment:
Author: Barry deFreese bddeb...@bddebian.com
Source: boost-jam
Status: unreviewed
Categories: linuxism (PATH_MAX)
Strip-Level: -p1

Here is a small patch for boost-jam.


--

Comment By: Barry deFreese (bdefreese)
Date: 2012-06-01 00:53

Message:
Package has been removed from the archive.

--

You can respond by visiting: 
https://alioth.debian.org/tracker/?func=detailatid=410472aid=303157group_id=30628


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-hurd-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: http://lists.debian.org/e1sag7c-00074l...@vasks.debian.org



[debian-hurd-Patches][303161] atlas3-3.6.0

2012-05-31 Thread debian-hurd-patches
debian-hurd-Patches item #303161, was changed at 2012-06-01 00:56 by Barry 
deFreese
You can respond by visiting: 
https://alioth.debian.org/tracker/?func=detailatid=410472aid=303161group_id=30628

Status: Closed
Priority: 3
Submitted By: Barry deFreese  (bddebian-guest)
Assigned to: Nobody (None)
Summary: atlas3-3.6.0 
Category: build-env
Group: unreviewed
Resolution: Out of Date


Initial Comment:
Author: Barry deFreese bddeb...@bddebian.com
Source: atlas3
Status: unreviewed
Categories: build-env
Strip-Level: -p1

Here is a patch to detect GNU as an OS when building atlas3.  I have tried 3 
times to build the darn thing but after 24 hours or so I have to turn off my 
machine to take to work so I haven't been able to verify that it builds 
completely.

Thanks,

Barry

--

Comment By: Barry deFreese (bdefreese)
Date: 2012-06-01 00:56

Message:
Package removed from the archive.

--

You can respond by visiting: 
https://alioth.debian.org/tracker/?func=detailatid=410472aid=303161group_id=30628


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-hurd-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: http://lists.debian.org/e1sag9x-0007kh...@vasks.debian.org



[debian-hurd-Patches][303171] chasen-2.3.3

2012-05-31 Thread debian-hurd-patches
debian-hurd-Patches item #303171, was changed at 2012-06-01 01:03 by Barry 
deFreese
You can respond by visiting: 
https://alioth.debian.org/tracker/?func=detailatid=410472aid=303171group_id=30628

Status: Closed
Priority: 3
Submitted By: Barry deFreese  (bddebian-guest)
Assigned to: Nobody (None)
Summary: chasen-2.3.3 
Category: linuxism
Group: unreviewed
Resolution: Wont Fix


Initial Comment:
Author: Barry deFreese bddeb...@bddebian.com
Source: chasen
Status: unreviewed
Categories: linuxism (PATH_MAX)
Strip-Level: -p1



--

Comment By: Barry deFreese (bdefreese)
Date: 2012-06-01 01:03

Message:
Package has been removed from the archive.

--

You can respond by visiting: 
https://alioth.debian.org/tracker/?func=detailatid=410472aid=303171group_id=30628


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-hurd-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: http://lists.debian.org/e1saghh-0003q5...@vasks.debian.org



[debian-hurd-Patches][303225] libopenspc0-0.3.99a

2012-05-31 Thread debian-hurd-patches
debian-hurd-Patches item #303225, was changed at 2012-06-01 01:12 by Barry 
deFreese
You can respond by visiting: 
https://alioth.debian.org/tracker/?func=detailatid=410472aid=303225group_id=30628

Status: Closed
Priority: 3
Submitted By: Barry deFreese  (bddebian-guest)
Assigned to: Nobody (None)
Summary: libopenspc0-0.3.99a 
Category: build-env
Group: unsubmitted
Resolution: Wont Fix


Initial Comment:
Author: Barry deFreese bddeb...@bddebian.com
Source: libopenspc
Status: unreviewd
Categories: build-env (missing hurd-i386 arch)
Strip-Level: -p1

Here is a patch

--

Comment By: Barry deFreese (bdefreese)
Date: 2012-06-01 01:12

Message:
Package has been removed from the archive.

--

Comment By: Michael Banck (mbanck)
Date: 2006-04-14 17:10

Message:
Logged In: YES 
user_id=2380

That patch is fine if course, if the package builds otherwise

--

You can respond by visiting: 
https://alioth.debian.org/tracker/?func=detailatid=410472aid=303225group_id=30628


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-hurd-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: http://lists.debian.org/e1sagpx-ek...@vasks.debian.org



[debian-hurd-Patches][303351] cscope (debian-ports)

2012-05-31 Thread debian-hurd-patches
debian-hurd-Patches item #303351, was changed at 2012-06-01 01:20 by Barry 
deFreese
You can respond by visiting: 
https://alioth.debian.org/tracker/?func=detailatid=410472aid=303351group_id=30628

Status: Closed
Priority: 3
Submitted By: Alfredo Beaumont (abeaumont-guest)
Assigned to: Nobody (None)
Summary: cscope (debian-ports) 
Category: other
Group: unreviewed
Resolution: Fixed


Initial Comment:
cscope patch for GNU/Hurd

--

Comment By: Barry deFreese (bdefreese)
Date: 2012-06-01 01:20

Message:
Version 15.7a available in the archive.

--

You can respond by visiting: 
https://alioth.debian.org/tracker/?func=detailatid=410472aid=303351group_id=30628


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-hurd-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: http://lists.debian.org/e1sagxl-0001in...@vasks.debian.org



[debian-hurd-Patches][303735] cpulimit

2012-05-31 Thread debian-hurd-patches
debian-hurd-Patches item #303735, was changed at 2012-06-01 01:23 by Barry 
deFreese
You can respond by visiting: 
https://alioth.debian.org/tracker/?func=detailatid=410472aid=303735group_id=30628

Status: Closed
Priority: 3
Submitted By: Michael Banck (mbanck)
Assigned to: Nobody (None)
Summary: cpulimit 
Category: posix
Group: unreviewed
Resolution: Fixed


Initial Comment:
Author: Ben Asselstine

--

Comment By: Barry deFreese (bdefreese)
Date: 2012-06-01 01:23

Message:
Package v1.6-1 available in the archive.

--

You can respond by visiting: 
https://alioth.debian.org/tracker/?func=detailatid=410472aid=303735group_id=30628


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-hurd-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: http://lists.debian.org/e1sagam-0001mq...@vasks.debian.org



[debian-hurd-Patches][310742] analog 6.0-14 hurd patch

2012-05-31 Thread debian-hurd-patches
debian-hurd-Patches item #310742, was changed at 2012-06-01 01:28 by Barry 
deFreese
You can respond by visiting: 
https://alioth.debian.org/tracker/?func=detailatid=410472aid=310742group_id=30628

Status: Closed
Priority: 3
Submitted By: Flávio Cruz (flaviocruz-guest)
Assigned to: Nobody (None)
Summary: analog 6.0-14 hurd patch 
Category: None
Group: None
Resolution: Out of Date


Initial Comment:
analog 6.0-14 patch for GNU/Hurd

--

Comment By: Barry deFreese (bdefreese)
Date: 2012-06-01 01:28

Message:
Newer patch filed in BTS.

--

Comment By: Samuel Thibault (sthibaul-guest)
Date: 2008-04-30 23:38

Message:
Mmm, now it's rather about style. Maybe you can send it as is, but maybe
this could pose problem: you could avoid defining has_path_access() by
writing something like:

#ifdef __GLIBC__
  commandpath = realpath(t, NULL);
  if (commandpath != NULL)
#else
  if (realpath(t, commandpath))
#endif
  {
if (access(commandpath, X_OK) == 0 
stat(commandpath, buf) == 0  S_ISREG(buf.st_mode))
  done = TRUE;
  }
#ifdef __GLIBC__
else
  free(commandpath);
#endif

but it's really a matter of taste (the maintainer's taste ;) ), you
could for instance propose two versions of the patch.


--

Comment By: Flávio Cruz (flaviocruz-guest)
Date: 2008-04-30 20:42

Message:
New version ;-)

--

Comment By: Samuel Thibault (sthibaul-guest)
Date: 2008-04-30 00:01

Message:
4K may still not be enough for the path below ;)


--

Comment By: Flávio Cruz (flaviocruz-guest)
Date: 2008-04-29 23:56

Message:
Huu, you're right, but using realpath(/, NULL) doesn't just strdup's /, but 
a buffer with 4K filled with / \0, at least in my system. Which means that 
the code below works OK.

But yeah, it's much better to patch the realpath calls just below.

--

Comment By: Samuel Thibault (sthibaul-guest)
Date: 2008-04-28 23:27

Message:
Errr, I don't understand: why are you calling realpath(/, NULL)?  You
will just get an strdup of /, which won't work with what is done
below.  You should rather patch the realpath() calls below.


--

Comment By: Flávio Cruz (flaviocruz-guest)
Date: 2008-04-28 23:14

Message:
I've updated the patch

--

Comment By: Samuel Thibault (sthibaul-guest)
Date: 2008-04-27 19:39

Message:
Mmm, SUS says that _PC_PATH_MAX is to be used for pathconf(), not
sysconf...

Also, it actually returns -1, since we don't have any path limitation
in GNU/Hurd.  A more correct fix is to set commandname to NULL to let
GLIBC's realpath allocate the string for us.  That should be done #ifdef
__GLIBC__ of course (that extension is not yet in SUS)


--

You can respond by visiting: 
https://alioth.debian.org/tracker/?func=detailatid=410472aid=310742group_id=30628


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-hurd-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: http://lists.debian.org/e1sagf7-0002mn...@vasks.debian.org



[debian-hurd-Patches][311571] Bug#522100: pulseaudio FTBFS (debian-ports)

2012-05-31 Thread debian-hurd-patches
debian-hurd-Patches item #311571, was changed at 2012-06-01 01:35 by Barry 
deFreese
You can respond by visiting: 
https://alioth.debian.org/tracker/?func=detailatid=410472aid=311571group_id=30628

Status: Closed
Priority: 3
Submitted By: Samuel Thibault (sthibaul-guest)
Assigned to: Nobody (None)
Summary: Bug#522100: pulseaudio FTBFS (debian-ports) 
Category: None
Group: None
Resolution: Fixed


Initial Comment:
PATH_MAX, PIPE_MAX, pthread_setaffinity, alsa/evdev build fix.


--

Comment By: Barry deFreese (bdefreese)
Date: 2012-06-01 01:35

Message:
Package version 2.0-3 available in the archive.

--

Comment By: Samuel Thibault (sthibault)
Date: 2010-05-07 00:37

Message:
It seems fine, please submit, thanks!


--

Comment By: Pino Toscano (pino-guest)
Date: 2010-05-06 17:59

Message:
Updated patch for pulseaudio 0.9.21. Below the various problems and eventual 
solutions found:

- src/pulse/context.c: usage of SA_NOCLDWAIT
  sigaction(2) shows it is Linux-only, and waitpid(2) says that checking for 
the presence of that flag and checking that the handler is SIG_IGN is 
equivalent; thus, make the SA_NOCLDWAIT flag check optionally compiled 
depending on the SA_NOCLDWAIT presence

- src/pulsecore/memtrap.c: SA_SIGINFO
  the first step is using a simple sa_handler if SA_SIGINFO is not defined; 
futhermore, PA remaps memory in the SIGBUS signal handler, using the data 
provided in the siginfo_t, so just fail in the simple signal handler

- src/modules/rtp/module-rtp-recv.c: SO_TIMESTAMP
  Hurd does not support activating the timestamp receiving for sockets, so 
enable it only if SO_TIMESTAMP is defined

- src/modules/rtp/rtp.c: SO_TIMESTAMP
  most probably the right type to check should be SCM_TIMESTAMP, like other 
types available for cmsg_type (eg SCM_RIGHTS)

- src/modules/module-pipe-source.c: PIPE_BUF
  make use of the available pa_pipe_buf() for the job

 - src/utils/pacmd.c: PIPE_BUF
  here the two 'ibuf' and 'obuf' are dynamically allocated with the minimum 
size of all the pipe_buf for the fd's they are used as buffer when reading from 
and writing to

- debian/rules: autogeneration of pulseaudio.install for Hurd
  used the same approach used for kfreebsd-*


If the patch looks ok, I can send the pulseaudio bits to the PA's trac and the 
debian part to #573339.


--

Comment By: Emilio Pozuelo Monfort (pochu)
Date: 2010-01-28 23:38

Message:
The patch still applies and builds with 0.9.21

--

Comment By: Pino Toscano (pino-guest)
Date: 2009-10-30 21:39

Message:
This is a first attempt in a porting patch for pulseaudio 0.9.19.
Below the various problems and eventual solutions found:

- src/pulse/context.c: usage of SA_NOCLDWAIT
  sigaction(2) shows it is Linux-only, and waitpid(2) says that checking for 
the presence of that flag and checking that the handler is SIG_IGN is 
equivalent; thus, make the SA_NOCLDWAIT flag check optionally compiled 
depending on the SA_NOCLDWAIT presence

- src/pulsecore/memtrap.c: SA_SIGINFO
  the first step is using a simple sa_handler if SA_SIGINFO is not defined;
  futhermore, PA remaps memory in the SIGBUS signal handler, using the data 
provided in the siginfo_t,
  so just fail in the simple signal handler

- src/modules/rtp/module-rtp-recv.c: SO_TIMESTAMP
  Hurd does not support activating the timestamp receiving for sockets, so 
enable it only if SO_TIMESTAMP is defined

- src/modules/rtp/rtp.c: SO_TIMESTAMP
  most probably the right type to check should be SCM_TIMESTAMP, like other 
types available for cmsg_type (eg SCM_RIGHTS)

- src/modules/module-pipe-source.c:
- src/utils/pacmd.c: PIPE_BUF
  no solution yet, manual #define for now

- debian/rules: autogeneration of pulseaudio.install for Hurd
  used the same approach used for kfreebsd-*

Of course, given the PIPE_BUF stuff (and the review needed) it is not worth 
being sent upstream yet, but I thought posting it could have been useful for 
others to take a look.


--

You can respond by visiting: 
https://alioth.debian.org/tracker/?func=detailatid=410472aid=311571group_id=30628


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-hurd-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: http://lists.debian.org/e1sagmp-0003ay...@vasks.debian.org



[debian-hurd-Patches][311704] [FTBFS] afnix-1.5.2

2012-05-31 Thread debian-hurd-patches
debian-hurd-Patches item #311704, was changed at 2012-06-01 01:39 by Barry 
deFreese
You can respond by visiting: 
https://alioth.debian.org/tracker/?func=detailatid=410472aid=311704group_id=30628

Status: Closed
Priority: 3
Submitted By: Barry deFreese (bdefreese)
Assigned to: Nobody (None)
Summary: [FTBFS] afnix-1.5.2 
Category: build-env
Group: needs-work
Resolution: Fixed


Initial Comment:
Hi,

I finally got most of the kinks worked out of this patch but now I am getting 
some type of core dump on build that I am struggling with.  Hope someone can 
help.

Thanks,

Barry



--

Comment By: Barry deFreese (bdefreese)
Date: 2012-06-01 01:39

Message:
Package v2.2.0-2 available in the archive.

--

You can respond by visiting: 
https://alioth.debian.org/tracker/?func=detailatid=410472aid=311704group_id=30628


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-hurd-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: http://lists.debian.org/e1sagps-0003px...@vasks.debian.org



[debian-hurd-Patches][312124] #558904: glfw 2.6

2012-05-31 Thread debian-hurd-patches
debian-hurd-Patches item #312124, was changed at 2012-06-01 02:02 by Barry 
deFreese
You can respond by visiting: 
https://alioth.debian.org/tracker/?func=detailatid=410472aid=312124group_id=30628

Status: Closed
Priority: 3
Submitted By: Pino Toscano (pino-guest)
Assigned to: Nobody (None)
Summary: #558904: glfw 2.6 
Category: None
Group: None
Resolution: Fixed


Initial Comment:
in compile.sh, the generic OS part in the system check is not correct for 
Hurd; thus, add a new section that sets the correct soname linkage setting.

--

Comment By: Barry deFreese (bdefreese)
Date: 2012-06-01 02:02

Message:
Package v2.7.2-1+b1 now available in the archive.

--

Comment By: Pino Toscano (pino-guest)
Date: 2009-11-30 23:18

Message:
Done, bug #558904.

--

Comment By: Samuel Thibault (sthibault)
Date: 2009-11-30 22:34

Message:
Please submit!


--

You can respond by visiting: 
https://alioth.debian.org/tracker/?func=detailatid=410472aid=312124group_id=30628


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-hurd-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: http://lists.debian.org/e1sahbj-0007ix...@vasks.debian.org



[debian-hurd-Patches][311761] Partial patch for kbuild 1:0.1.98svn2318-1

2012-05-31 Thread debian-hurd-patches
debian-hurd-Patches item #311761, was changed at 2012-06-01 01:57 by Barry 
deFreese
You can respond by visiting: 
https://alioth.debian.org/tracker/?func=detailatid=410472aid=311761group_id=30628

Status: Open
Priority: 3
Submitted By: Barry deFreese (bdefreese)
Assigned to: Nobody (None)
Summary: Partial patch for kbuild 1:0.1.98svn2318-1  
Category: linuxism
Group: submitted
Resolution: None


Initial Comment:
Hi,

Attached is the start of a patch for kbuild.  Unfortunately it has several 
PATH_MAX issues that I just #ifdef'd for now.  But even larger is that it 
include sys/mount.h in several places.

Thanks,

Barry

--

You can respond by visiting: 
https://alioth.debian.org/tracker/?func=detailatid=410472aid=311761group_id=30628


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-hurd-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: http://lists.debian.org/e1sah7s-0004n3...@vasks.debian.org



[debian-hurd-Patches][312334] file 5.04 (MAXPATHLEN)

2012-05-31 Thread debian-hurd-patches
debian-hurd-Patches item #312334, was changed at 2012-06-01 02:03 by Barry 
deFreese
You can respond by visiting: 
https://alioth.debian.org/tracker/?func=detailatid=410472aid=312334group_id=30628

Status: Closed
Priority: 3
Submitted By: Emilio Pozuelo Monfort (pochu)
Assigned to: Nobody (None)
Summary: file 5.04 (MAXPATHLEN) 
Category: None
Group: None
Resolution: Fixed


Initial Comment:
The last version of file fails to build because it uses MAXPATHLEN in a file 
that doesn't #define it to 1024 like it does in the other files.

However instead of adding the #define and workarounding the issue, I've tried 
to fix it properly.

Here's a patch to use dynamic allocation. Please review!

--

Comment By: Barry deFreese (bdefreese)
Date: 2012-06-01 02:03

Message:
Package v5.11-1+b1 available in the archive.

--

Comment By: Samuel Thibault (sthibault)
Date: 2010-02-14 19:04

Message:
getline() is a GNU extension, upstream will probably not happy to
depend on it. Apart from that the patch seems ok.


--

You can respond by visiting: 
https://alioth.debian.org/tracker/?func=detailatid=410472aid=312334group_id=30628


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-hurd-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: http://lists.debian.org/e1sahdy-ah...@vasks.debian.org



[debian-hurd-Patches][303155] #355891: [HurdFR] FTBFS cxref

2011-04-10 Thread debian-hurd-patches
Patches item #303155, was changed at 01/03/2006 18:18 by Samuel Thibault
You can respond by visiting: 
https://alioth.debian.org/tracker/?func=detailatid=410472aid=303155group_id=30628

Status: Closed
Priority: 3
Submitted By: Arnaud Fontaine (arnau-guest)
Assigned to: Nobody (None)
Summary: #355891: [HurdFR] FTBFS cxref 
Category: posix
Group: submitted
Resolution: Fixed


Initial Comment:
cxref doesn't build on Debian GNU/Hurd because of PATH_MAX issue.

--

Comment By: Samuel Thibault (sthibault)
Date: 09/04/2011 15:33

Message:
Fixed nowadays.


--

Comment By: Manuel Menal (mmenal-guest)
Date: 08/03/2006 15:16

Message:
Logged In: YES 
user_id=11991

I have reviewed this patch and thinks it's OK. The my_get_current_dir_name() 
function is similar to what glibc does, there is no obvious memory leak and it 
should work right on any POSIX system.

--

You can respond by visiting: 
https://alioth.debian.org/tracker/?func=detailatid=410472aid=303155group_id=30628


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-hurd-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: http://lists.debian.org/e1q8rk6-0006vc...@alioth.debian.org



[debian-hurd-Patches][301176] wanna-build

2011-04-09 Thread debian-hurd-patches
Patches item #301176, was changed at 11/02/2005 18:04 by Samuel Thibault
You can respond by visiting: 
https://alioth.debian.org/tracker/?func=detailatid=410472aid=301176group_id=30628

Status: Closed
Priority: 3
Submitted By: Michael Banck (mbanck)
Assigned to: Nobody (None)
Summary: wanna-build 
Category: linuxism
Group: submitted
Resolution: Fixed


Initial Comment:
Author: Michael Banck mba...@debian.org
Source: wanna-build
Status: Submitted(no Debian package)
Categories: linuxism
Strip-level: -p1


--

Comment By: Samuel Thibault (sthibault)
Date: 09/04/2011 15:28

Message:
Now a perl script in the sbuild package.


--

You can respond by visiting: 
https://alioth.debian.org/tracker/?func=detailatid=410472aid=301176group_id=30628


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-hurd-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: http://lists.debian.org/e1q8yd3-0007ox...@alioth.debian.org



[debian-hurd-Patches][301177] Bug#508522: zephyr (debian-ports)

2011-04-09 Thread debian-hurd-patches
Patches item #301177, was changed at 11/02/2005 18:06 by Samuel Thibault
You can respond by visiting: 
https://alioth.debian.org/tracker/?func=detailatid=410472aid=301177group_id=30628

Status: Closed
Priority: 3
Submitted By: Michael Banck (mbanck)
Assigned to: Nobody (None)
Summary: Bug#508522: zephyr (debian-ports) 
Category: posix
Group: unreviewed
Resolution: Fixed


Initial Comment:
Author: Munteanu Alexandru io_alex_2...@yahoo.fr
Source: zephyr
Status: unreviewed
Categories: posix
Strip-level: -p2


--

Comment By: Samuel Thibault (sthibault)
Date: 09/04/2011 15:29

Message:
Fixed in 3.0.1-1


--

You can respond by visiting: 
https://alioth.debian.org/tracker/?func=detailatid=410472aid=301177group_id=30628


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-hurd-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: http://lists.debian.org/e1q8ydq-0007ux...@alioth.debian.org



[debian-hurd-Patches][301660] #314314: iceape

2011-04-09 Thread debian-hurd-patches
Patches item #301660, was changed at 18/05/2005 00:43 by Samuel Thibault
You can respond by visiting: 
https://alioth.debian.org/tracker/?func=detailatid=410472aid=301660group_id=30628

Status: Closed
Priority: 3
Submitted By: Michael Banck (mbanck)
Assigned to: Nobody (None)
Summary: #314314: iceape 
Category: several
Group: needs-work
Resolution: Fixed


Initial Comment:
Author: Robert Millan r...@debian.org and Barry deFreese 
bddeb...@comcast.net
Source: mozilla
Status: submitted, needs-work
Categories: posix, linuxism
Strip-Level -p1

--

Comment By: Samuel Thibault (sthibault)
Date: 09/04/2011 15:30

Message:
Fixed nowadays.


--

Comment By: Samuel Thibault (sthibaul-guest)
Date: 31/01/2009 01:44

Message:
some parts of mozilla now compile (nss, nspr, etc.) but iceape still
doesn't


--

Comment By: Cyril Brulebois (kibi-guest)
Date: 22/08/2006 06:57

Message:
connecté 
user_id=14303

What's the proper way to submit the patch once these last three diff are 
reviewed? Retitle, reassign, and tag patch, right?

--

Comment By: Michael Banck (mbanck)
Date: 15/06/2005 19:47

Message:
Logged In: YES 
user_id=2380

Patch sent to the Debian BTS.  Volunteers are still sought after to properly 
fix the PATH_MAX and MAXPATHLEN issues, they are currently just #define'd.

--

You can respond by visiting: 
https://alioth.debian.org/tracker/?func=detailatid=410472aid=301660group_id=30628


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-hurd-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: http://lists.debian.org/e1q8yey-0008ev...@alioth.debian.org



[debian-hurd-Patches][303112] libao

2011-04-09 Thread debian-hurd-patches
Patches item #303112, was changed at 23/02/2006 13:22 by Samuel Thibault
You can respond by visiting: 
https://alioth.debian.org/tracker/?func=detailatid=410472aid=303112group_id=30628

Status: Closed
Priority: 3
Submitted By: Christopher Bodenstein (physicman-guest)
Assigned to: Nobody (None)
Summary: libao 
Category: posix
Group: unreviewed
Resolution: Fixed


Initial Comment:
Author: Christopher Bodenstein c...@physicman.net
Source: libao
Status: unreviewed
Categories: posix
Strip-level: -p1

Just one PATH_MAX to remove, but you have to add:
--exclude usr/lib/ao/plugins-2/libnas. --exclude usr/lib/ao/plugins-2/liboss.

to DH_INSTALL_EXCLUDE in the debian/rules to get the package to build properly.


--

Comment By: Samuel Thibault (sthibault)
Date: 09/04/2011 15:30

Message:
Fixed nowadays



--

You can respond by visiting: 
https://alioth.debian.org/tracker/?func=detailatid=410472aid=303112group_id=30628


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-hurd-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: http://lists.debian.org/e1q8yfx-0008ka...@alioth.debian.org



[debian-hurd-Patches][303154] fluxconf

2011-04-09 Thread debian-hurd-patches
Patches item #303154, was changed at 01/03/2006 17:41 by Samuel Thibault
You can respond by visiting: 
https://alioth.debian.org/tracker/?func=detailatid=410472aid=303154group_id=30628

Status: Closed
Priority: 3
Submitted By: Christopher Bodenstein (physicman-guest)
Assigned to: Nobody (None)
Summary: fluxconf 
Category: posix
Group: unreviewed
Resolution: Invalid


Initial Comment:
Author: Christopher Bodenstein c...@physicman.net
Source: fluxconf
Status: unreviewed
Categories: posix
Strip-Level: -p1

The attached patch removes a couple of MAXPATHLEN instances.
The resulting package is available at http://packages.physicman.net/hurd/ as 
usual.


--

Comment By: Samuel Thibault (sthibault)
Date: 09/04/2011 15:31

Message:
Doesn't exist any more.


--

You can respond by visiting: 
https://alioth.debian.org/tracker/?func=detailatid=410472aid=303154group_id=30628


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-hurd-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: http://lists.debian.org/e1q8ygk-0008td...@alioth.debian.org



[debian-hurd-Patches][303155] #355891: [HurdFR] FTBFS cxref

2011-04-09 Thread debian-hurd-patches
Patches item #303155, was changed at 01/03/2006 18:18 by Samuel Thibault
You can respond by visiting: 
https://alioth.debian.org/tracker/?func=detailatid=410472aid=303155group_id=30628

Status: Deleted
Priority: 3
Submitted By: Arnaud Fontaine (arnau-guest)
Assigned to: Nobody (None)
Summary: #355891: [HurdFR] FTBFS cxref 
Category: posix
Group: submitted
Resolution: Fixed


Initial Comment:
cxref doesn't build on Debian GNU/Hurd because of PATH_MAX issue.

--

Comment By: Samuel Thibault (sthibault)
Date: 09/04/2011 15:33

Message:
Fixed nowadays.


--

Comment By: Manuel Menal (mmenal-guest)
Date: 08/03/2006 15:16

Message:
Logged In: YES 
user_id=11991

I have reviewed this patch and thinks it's OK. The my_get_current_dir_name() 
function is similar to what glibc does, there is no obvious memory leak and it 
should work right on any POSIX system.

--

You can respond by visiting: 
https://alioth.debian.org/tracker/?func=detailatid=410472aid=303155group_id=30628


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-hurd-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: http://lists.debian.org/e1q8yi5-qq...@alioth.debian.org



[debian-hurd-Patches][303235] helpdeco

2011-04-09 Thread debian-hurd-patches
Patches item #303235, was changed at 16/03/2006 13:30 by Samuel Thibault
You can respond by visiting: 
https://alioth.debian.org/tracker/?func=detailatid=410472aid=303235group_id=30628

Status: Closed
Priority: 3
Submitted By: Christopher Bodenstein (physicman-guest)
Assigned to: Nobody (None)
Summary: helpdeco 
Category: posix
Group: unreviewed
Resolution: Invalid


Initial Comment:
Author: Christopher Bodenstein c...@physicman.net
Source: helpdeco
Strip-Level: -p1
Status: unreviewed
Categories: posix

There are a couple of PATH_MAX instances, the attached patch removes them.


--

Comment By: Samuel Thibault (sthibault)
Date: 09/04/2011 15:35

Message:
Doesn't exist any more.


--

You can respond by visiting: 
https://alioth.debian.org/tracker/?func=detailatid=410472aid=303235group_id=30628


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-hurd-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: http://lists.debian.org/e1q8yjo-il...@alioth.debian.org



[debian-hurd-Patches][303272] 401724: libgc-6.8

2011-04-09 Thread debian-hurd-patches
Patches item #303272, was changed at 23/03/2006 22:45 by Samuel Thibault
You can respond by visiting: 
https://alioth.debian.org/tracker/?func=detailatid=410472aid=303272group_id=30628

Status: Closed
Priority: 3
Submitted By: Barry deFreese  (bddebian-guest)
Assigned to: Nobody (None)
Summary: 401724: libgc-6.8 
Category: build-env
Group: unreviewed
Resolution: Fixed


Initial Comment:
Author: Barry deFreese bddeb...@bddebian.com
Source: libgc
Status: unreviewd
Categories: build-env (missing hurd-i386 arch)
Strip-Level: -p1

Here is a patch for building libgc-6.6 with thread support. Obviously due to 
configure.in changes, you need to run autoreconf.

The patch isn't quite complete.  I get it to build but it fails the 
make-CHECKTESTS tests.  I have tried it with both HEURISTICS2 and HEURISTICS1 
and they both fail, though with different results.

If someone smarter than me could fix this, I would be grateful.

Thanks,

Barry (aka bddebian)

--

Comment By: Samuel Thibault (sthibault)
Date: 09/04/2011 15:36

Message:
Fixed nowadays.


--

Comment By: Samuel Thibault (sthibaul-guest)
Date: 30/12/2007 18:52

Message:
New patch was sent


--

Comment By: Samuel Thibault (sthibaul-guest)
Date: 11/07/2007 17:53

Message:
6.6 now builds, but not 6.8


--

Comment By: Samuel Thibault (sthibaul-guest)
Date: 31/05/2007 00:13

Message:
1:6.6-2 compiled fine, 1:6.8-1 doesn't compile any more, see buildd errors

--

You can respond by visiting: 
https://alioth.debian.org/tracker/?func=detailatid=410472aid=303272group_id=30628


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-hurd-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: http://lists.debian.org/e1q8ykb-kr...@alioth.debian.org



[debian-hurd-Patches][310869] Bug#483281:heimdal: FTBFS on hurd-i386 (debian-ports)

2011-04-09 Thread debian-hurd-patches
Patches item #310869, was changed at 28/05/2008 03:08 by Samuel Thibault
You can respond by visiting: 
https://alioth.debian.org/tracker/?func=detailatid=410472aid=310869group_id=30628

Status: Closed
Priority: 3
Submitted By: Samuel Thibault (sthibaul-guest)
Assigned to: Nobody (None)
Summary: Bug#483281:heimdal: FTBFS on hurd-i386 (debian-ports) 
Category: None
Group: None
Resolution: Fixed


Initial Comment:
two _IOTs, some MAXHOSTNAMELEN


--

Comment By: Samuel Thibault (sthibault)
Date: 09/04/2011 15:37

Message:
Fixed nowadays.


--

Comment By: Samuel Thibault (sthibaul-guest)
Date: 31/01/2009 21:30

Message:
And now missing pthread configuration stuff.


--

You can respond by visiting: 
https://alioth.debian.org/tracker/?func=detailatid=410472aid=310869group_id=30628


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-hurd-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: http://lists.debian.org/e1q8ylu-sc...@alioth.debian.org



[debian-hurd-Patches][311053] #409261 squid 2.7.STABLE3 patch

2011-04-09 Thread debian-hurd-patches
Patches item #311053, was changed at 04/09/2008 21:51 by Samuel Thibault
You can respond by visiting: 
https://alioth.debian.org/tracker/?func=detailatid=410472aid=311053group_id=30628

Status: Closed
Priority: 3
Submitted By: Flávio Cruz (flaviocruz-guest)
Assigned to: Nobody (None)
Summary: #409261 squid 2.7.STABLE3 patch 
Category: other
Group: unreviewed
Resolution: Fixed


Initial Comment:
This patch fixes compilation problems for the squid package.

--

Comment By: Samuel Thibault (sthibault)
Date: 09/04/2011 15:38

Message:
Fixed nowadays.


--

Comment By: Samuel Thibault (sthibaul-guest)
Date: 05/09/2008 09:56

Message:
Ok then fine, please submit (and put the bug number in the title)


--

Comment By: Flávio Cruz (flaviocruz-guest)
Date: 05/09/2008 02:59

Message:
It just changes the host naming scheme. config.status was not recognizing the 
old scheme.

See http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=197993 for similar problem 
and fix

--

Comment By: Samuel Thibault (sthibaul-guest)
Date: 05/09/2008 01:02

Message:
Looks fine, I think you can submit it. Just to make sure: I guess

-   $(DEB_HOST_ARCH_CPU)-debian-$(DEB_HOST_ARCH_OS) 
+   $(DEB_BUILD_GNU_TYPE)

just changes the build directory, so that it is harmless?


--

You can respond by visiting: 
https://alioth.debian.org/tracker/?func=detailatid=410472aid=311053group_id=30628


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-hurd-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: http://lists.debian.org/e1q8yn0-xw...@alioth.debian.org



[debian-hurd-Patches][311318] #314314: iceape (debian-ports)

2011-04-09 Thread debian-hurd-patches
Patches item #311318, was changed at 22/12/2008 10:22 by Samuel Thibault
You can respond by visiting: 
https://alioth.debian.org/tracker/?func=detailatid=410472aid=311318group_id=30628

Status: Closed
Priority: 3
Submitted By: Samuel Thibault (sthibaul-guest)
Assigned to: Nobody (None)
Summary: #314314: iceape (debian-ports) 
Category: None
Group: None
Resolution: Fixed


Initial Comment:
Just configuration fixes. There are still a lot of MAXPATHLEN issues to
fix.


--

Comment By: Samuel Thibault (sthibault)
Date: 09/04/2011 15:40

Message:
Fixed nowadays.


--

Comment By: Samuel Thibault (sthibaul-guest)
Date: 02/02/2009 10:01

Message:
Updated patch, will probably get outdated as soon as doko updates
iceape to a newer upstream version.


--

You can respond by visiting: 
https://alioth.debian.org/tracker/?func=detailatid=410472aid=311318group_id=30628


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-hurd-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: http://lists.debian.org/e1q8ypb-0001mb...@alioth.debian.org



[debian-hurd-Patches][311572] Bug#522101: libao FTBFS (debian-ports)

2011-04-09 Thread debian-hurd-patches
Patches item #311572, was changed at 31/03/2009 21:30 by Samuel Thibault
You can respond by visiting: 
https://alioth.debian.org/tracker/?func=detailatid=410472aid=311572group_id=30628

Status: Closed
Priority: 3
Submitted By: Samuel Thibault (sthibaul-guest)
Assigned to: Nobody (None)
Summary: Bug#522101: libao FTBFS (debian-ports) 
Category: None
Group: None
Resolution: Fixed


Initial Comment:
PATH_MAX


--

Comment By: Samuel Thibault (sthibault)
Date: 09/04/2011 15:41

Message:
Fixed nowadays.


--

You can respond by visiting: 
https://alioth.debian.org/tracker/?func=detailatid=410472aid=311572group_id=30628


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-hurd-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: http://lists.debian.org/e1q8yqd-0001s2...@alioth.debian.org



[debian-hurd-Patches][312023] #552043: pam 1.1.0

2011-04-09 Thread debian-hurd-patches
Patches item #312023, was changed at 21/10/2009 22:06 by Samuel Thibault
You can respond by visiting: 
https://alioth.debian.org/tracker/?func=detailatid=410472aid=312023group_id=30628

Status: Closed
Priority: 3
Submitted By: Pino Toscano (pino-guest)
Assigned to: Nobody (None)
Summary: #552043: pam 1.1.0 
Category: posix
Group: None
Resolution: Fixed


Initial Comment:
A (hopefully) simple patch to remove a PATH_MAX usage in a testcase.
With this pam 1.1.0-4 compiles and the tests succeed.

--

Comment By: Samuel Thibault (sthibault)
Date: 09/04/2011 15:45

Message:
Fixed nowadays


--

Comment By: Pino Toscano (pino-guest)
Date: 23/10/2009 00:53

Message:
Done, bug #552043.

--

Comment By: Samuel Thibault (sthibault)
Date: 23/10/2009 00:15

Message:
Quite trivial indeed :)
Please submit.


--

You can respond by visiting: 
https://alioth.debian.org/tracker/?func=detailatid=410472aid=312023group_id=30628


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-hurd-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: http://lists.debian.org/e1q8yti-0001d7...@alioth.debian.org



[debian-hurd-Patches][312132] Vino FTBFS because of MAXHOSTNAMELEN usage

2011-04-09 Thread debian-hurd-patches
Patches item #312132, was changed at 04/12/2009 17:18 by Samuel Thibault
You can respond by visiting: 
https://alioth.debian.org/tracker/?func=detailatid=410472aid=312132group_id=30628

Status: Closed
Priority: 3
Submitted By: Emilio Pozuelo Monfort (pochu)
Assigned to: Nobody (None)
Summary: Vino FTBFS because of MAXHOSTNAMELEN usage 
Category: None
Group: unreviewed
Resolution: Fixed


Initial Comment:
Hi,

Since 2.26 Vino FTBFS because it ships a code copy of miniupnp which uses 
MAXHOSTNAMELEN in some places.

The attached patch makes it build on the Hurd, and I've briefly checked that 
everything is still fine on Linux. Please review :)

--

Comment By: Samuel Thibault (sthibault)
Date: 09/04/2011 15:45

Message:
Fixed nowadays.


--

Comment By: Samuel Thibault (sthibault)
Date: 07/12/2009 01:08

Message:
Mmm, why casting (p3-p1) into int? a pointer difference is already a
ptrdiff_t, which should get silently casted as appropriate.

Else it looks fine.


--

You can respond by visiting: 
https://alioth.debian.org/tracker/?func=detailatid=410472aid=312132group_id=30628


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-hurd-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: http://lists.debian.org/e1q8yu3-0001kg...@alioth.debian.org



[debian-hurd-Patches][312138] gnome-applets FTBFS because of PATH_MAX usage

2011-04-09 Thread debian-hurd-patches
Patches item #312138, was changed at 07/12/2009 02:55 by Samuel Thibault
You can respond by visiting: 
https://alioth.debian.org/tracker/?func=detailatid=410472aid=312138group_id=30628

Status: Closed
Priority: 3
Submitted By: Emilio Pozuelo Monfort (pochu)
Assigned to: Nobody (None)
Summary: gnome-applets FTBFS because of PATH_MAX usage 
Category: None
Group: unreviewed
Resolution: Fixed


Initial Comment:
Hi,

Once gnome-python-desktop is built, gnome-applets will fail to build because it 
uses PATH_MAX in one place. The attached patch makes it allocate enough memory 
for a buffer dynamically and fixes the build.

--

Comment By: Samuel Thibault (sthibault)
Date: 09/04/2011 15:46

Message:
Fixed nowadays.


--

Comment By: Emilio Pozuelo Monfort (pochu)
Date: 07/12/2009 17:31

Message:
Forwarded upstream: https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=603997

--

Comment By: Samuel Thibault (sthibault)
Date: 07/12/2009 03:18

Message:
I would have used an out: label, but that's really a matter of style.
Please submit!


--

You can respond by visiting: 
https://alioth.debian.org/tracker/?func=detailatid=410472aid=312138group_id=30628


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-hurd-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: http://lists.debian.org/e1q8yur-0001x0...@alioth.debian.org



[debian-hurd-Patches][312155] pth 2.0.7

2011-04-09 Thread debian-hurd-patches
Patches item #312155, was changed at 13/12/2009 00:20 by Samuel Thibault
You can respond by visiting: 
https://alioth.debian.org/tracker/?func=detailatid=410472aid=312155group_id=30628

Status: Closed
Priority: 3
Submitted By: Pino Toscano (pino-guest)
Assigned to: Nobody (None)
Summary: pth 2.0.7 
Category: None
Group: None
Resolution: Fixed


Initial Comment:
Current pth (2.0.7-14) fails to build because of incomplete porting for the 
setting of the context jmpbuf.
Although, pth 2.0.7-12 built, and the reason seems like older glibc provided 
the JB_* macros for the jmpbuf slots ([1] for example).
The attached solution has been taken from the i386 part of [1], ie defining 
back JB_* macros if needed.
As a result, pth now compiles and seem to be working, so the sanity check in 
gpgme's configure should not fail.

[1] 
http://www.mail-archive.com/user-mode-linux-devel@lists.sourceforge.net/msg02974.html

--

Comment By: Samuel Thibault (sthibault)
Date: 09/04/2011 15:46

Message:
Fixed nowadays.


--

Comment By: Samuel Thibault (sthibault)
Date: 13/12/2009 15:37

Message:
Maybe the short-term solution could be to just upload a pth with your
patch on debian-ports?


--

Comment By: Pino Toscano (pino-guest)
Date: 13/12/2009 15:32

Message:
I agree, and in fact the configure (see configure.ac) has a workaround to not 
use the sigaltstack implementation on Hurd, even if found.
Otherwise, the other short-term solution would be disabling the pth sanity 
check in gpgme, as the current pth is detected to be unusable.

--

Comment By: Samuel Thibault (sthibault)
Date: 13/12/2009 12:31

Message:
Mmm, not really pretty indeed. The long-term solution is rather to fix
sigaltstack, which should be as soon as glibc stops using the stack for
thread-specific data.


--

You can respond by visiting: 
https://alioth.debian.org/tracker/?func=detailatid=410472aid=312155group_id=30628


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-hurd-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: http://lists.debian.org/e1q8yut-0002am...@alioth.debian.org



[debian-hurd-Patches][312442] libcap2 2.19

2011-04-09 Thread debian-hurd-patches
Patches item #312442, was changed at 06/04/2010 21:53 by Samuel Thibault
You can respond by visiting: 
https://alioth.debian.org/tracker/?func=detailatid=410472aid=312442group_id=30628

Status: Open
Priority: 3
Submitted By: David Hedberg (davidh-guest)
Assigned to: Nobody (None)
Summary: libcap2 2.19 
Category: None
Group: None
Resolution: None


Initial Comment:
This small patch allows libcap to build and be linked with the accompanying 
utilities in progs. I have not tested it with anything else and there is of 
course no real functionality provided.

--

You can respond by visiting: 
https://alioth.debian.org/tracker/?func=detailatid=410472aid=312442group_id=30628


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-hurd-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: http://lists.debian.org/e1q8yvt-0002ko...@alioth.debian.org



[debian-hurd-Patches][312483] sound/hexter-0.6.1

2011-04-09 Thread debian-hurd-patches
Patches item #312483, was changed at 01/05/2010 16:18 by Samuel Thibault
You can respond by visiting: 
https://alioth.debian.org/tracker/?func=detailatid=410472aid=312483group_id=30628

Status: Closed
Priority: 3
Submitted By: Gokturk Yuksek (gokturk-guest)
Assigned to: Nobody (None)
Summary: sound/hexter-0.6.1 
Category: posix
Group: unreviewed
Resolution: Fixed


Initial Comment:
Proposed patch solves PATH_MAX problem by calling 'snprintf' function with 
(NULL, 0, ...)  parameters to calculate how many characters to read (including 
the \0 character), and then calling it again with an allocated buffer to do 
actual operation.

Build log is also attached.

--

Comment By: Samuel Thibault (sthibault)
Date: 09/04/2011 15:48

Message:
Fixed nowadays.


--

Comment By: Samuel Thibault (sthibault)
Date: 03/05/2010 23:08

Message:
Looks good, please submit.


--

Comment By: Gokturk Yuksek (gokturk-guest)
Date: 03/05/2010 21:40

Message:
I attached the simpler version of the patch. Unfortunately, alioth neither lets 
me remove previously attached files nor overwrite them so i attached with a new 
name.

--

Comment By: Samuel Thibault (sthibault)
Date: 02/05/2010 12:29

Message:
+1 for the '/' and again +1 for the '\0'

It's simpler because glibc doesn't have to run snprintf twice.


--

Comment By: Gokturk Yuksek (gokturk-guest)
Date: 02/05/2010 11:11

Message:
Why +1+1? If i'm not mistaken, strlen() returns the length of the string 
without the null character so strlen() + 1 should give the real length of the 
string and snprintf(..., %s/) should exactly fit into the buffer.

I don't know why i couldn't see the simpler solution, thanks for the catch up 
though :)

--

Comment By: Samuel Thibault (sthibault)
Date: 01/05/2010 16:41

Message:
Mmm, wouldn't it be simpler to allocate strlen(project_directory)+1+1?


--

You can respond by visiting: 
https://alioth.debian.org/tracker/?func=detailatid=410472aid=312483group_id=30628


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-hurd-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: http://lists.debian.org/e1q8yws-0002rb...@alioth.debian.org



[debian-hurd-Patches][312100] #557537: liboggz 1.1.0

2010-05-06 Thread debian-hurd-patches
Patches item #312100, was changed at 22/11/2009 15:09 by Pino Toscano
You can respond by visiting: 
https://alioth.debian.org/tracker/?func=detailatid=410472aid=312100group_id=30628

Status: Closed
Priority: 3
Submitted By: Pino Toscano (pino-guest)
Assigned to: Nobody (None)
Summary: #557537: liboggz 1.1.0 
Category: None
Group: None
Resolution: Fixed


Initial Comment:
Currently liboggz compiles fine but the Debian packaging fails because of 
problems with the symbols in the library and the ones expected.
The problem looks a very small problem (typo) in the configure check for the 
gnu platform, so the version script is not used.

--

Comment By: Pino Toscano (pino-guest)
Date: 06/05/2010 19:31

Message:
The patch was accepted, and liboggz now compiles fine since version 1.1.0-2.

--

Comment By: Pino Toscano (pino-guest)
Date: 22/11/2009 18:53

Message:
Reported as bug #557537.

--

Comment By: Samuel Thibault (sthibault)
Date: 22/11/2009 18:31

Message:
Indeed, please submit!


--

You can respond by visiting: 
https://alioth.debian.org/tracker/?func=detailatid=410472aid=312100group_id=30628


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-hurd-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: http://lists.debian.org/e1oa4vp-uh...@alioth.debian.org



[debian-hurd-Patches][312097] #530796: xine-lib 1.1.16.3

2010-05-06 Thread debian-hurd-patches
Patches item #312097, was changed at 20/11/2009 20:24 by Pino Toscano
You can respond by visiting: 
https://alioth.debian.org/tracker/?func=detailatid=410472aid=312097group_id=30628

Status: Closed
Priority: 3
Submitted By: Pino Toscano (pino-guest)
Assigned to: Nobody (None)
Summary: #530796: xine-lib 1.1.16.3 
Category: debian
Group: None
Resolution: Fixed


Initial Comment:
Other than the dvb fix reported in bug #530796 (and a fixed libtheora), the 
Debian packaging for xine-lib needs tweaks to the .install files. The attached 
patch to the rules file does a job similar to what's been done for 
kfreebsd-i386, plus removing more stuff.

--

Comment By: Pino Toscano (pino-guest)
Date: 06/05/2010 19:32

Message:
The patch was accepted, and xine-lib now compiles fine since version 1.1.18-1.

--

Comment By: Samuel Thibault (sthibault)
Date: 30/11/2009 23:55

Message:
Looks just fine, please submit!


--

You can respond by visiting: 
https://alioth.debian.org/tracker/?func=detailatid=410472aid=312097group_id=30628


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-hurd-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: http://lists.debian.org/e1oa4wd-xc...@alioth.debian.org



[debian-hurd-Patches][312039] #558975: avahi 0.6.25

2010-05-06 Thread debian-hurd-patches
Patches item #312039, was changed at 31/10/2009 21:37 by Pino Toscano
You can respond by visiting: 
https://alioth.debian.org/tracker/?func=detailatid=410472aid=312039group_id=30628

Status: Closed
Priority: 3
Submitted By: Pino Toscano (pino-guest)
Assigned to: Nobody (None)
Summary: #558975: avahi 0.6.25 
Category: None
Group: None
Resolution: Fixed


Initial Comment:
The scenario is the following: in avahi-core, three different network interface 
backends,
- iface-linux.c (compiled if linux/netlink.h is found)
- iface-pfroute.c (compiled if net/route.h is found)
- iface-none.c (compiled in the remaining cases)
on Hurd, it finds net/route.h so it tries to compile the pfroute backend; the 
problem is that the backend uses net/if_dl.h and the rt_* network stuff, 
unavailable.
The proposed patch extends the configure check for net/route.h by adding 
net/if_dl.h among the includes needed for the check, so it will pass if 
net/route.h and net/if_dl.h are both available.

Although the pfroute backend is used by *freebsd-*, the change shouldn't affect 
it.

--

Comment By: Pino Toscano (pino-guest)
Date: 06/05/2010 19:33

Message:
The patch was accepted, and avahi now compiles fine since version 0.6.25-3.

--

Comment By: Pino Toscano (pino-guest)
Date: 01/12/2009 01:24

Message:
Done, bug #558975.

--

Comment By: Samuel Thibault (sthibault)
Date: 30/11/2009 23:56

Message:
Just fine, please submit!


--

You can respond by visiting: 
https://alioth.debian.org/tracker/?func=detailatid=410472aid=312039group_id=30628


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-hurd-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: http://lists.debian.org/e1oa4xb-00010a...@alioth.debian.org



[debian-hurd-Patches][312017] #552397: openmpi 1.3.3

2010-05-06 Thread debian-hurd-patches
Patches item #312017, was changed at 18/10/2009 10:05 by Pino Toscano
You can respond by visiting: 
https://alioth.debian.org/tracker/?func=detailatid=410472aid=312017group_id=30628

Status: Closed
Priority: 3
Submitted By: Pino Toscano (pino-guest)
Assigned to: Nobody (None)
Summary: #552397: openmpi 1.3.3 
Category: None
Group: None
Resolution: Fixed


Initial Comment:
This should fix the various porting issues of openmpi 1.3.3 on GNU/Hurd:
- missing SA_SIGINFO, so a sa_handler is used; show_stackframe_handler() calls 
show_stackframe() with NULL parameters as that handler checks for non-NULL 
siginfo_t* and context* already
- some fixed-size char[] for getcwd() to get_current_dir_name() + free()
- some fixed-size char[] for gethostname() to a dynamic realloc() loop
- one gethostname() call commented out, as it seems unused...
- look for mach-o/arch.h instead of mach/mach_host.h to determine whether it is 
compiling on Darwin

--

Comment By: Pino Toscano (pino-guest)
Date: 06/05/2010 19:34

Message:
The patch was accepted, and openmpi now compiles fine since version 1.4.1-3.

--

Comment By: Pino Toscano (pino-guest)
Date: 26/10/2009 00:42

Message:
Ups my bad, the count is indeed 19, I must have counted the final null byte 
twice.

Thanks for the review, I sent the updated patch as bug #552397

--

Comment By: Samuel Thibault (sthibault)
Date: 25/10/2009 19:33

Message:
Mmm, why + 20?

I would rather use 13 + strlen(jobidstring) + 1 + 
strlen(orte_process_info.nodename) + 4 + 1.


--

Comment By: Pino Toscano (pino-guest)
Date: 25/10/2009 10:41

Message:
Right, added checks for ENAMETOOLONG in gethostname() loops.
Also added a PATH_MAX change in orte/orted/orted_main.c, needed in 1.3.3-2 (it 
was not in 1.3.3-1).

--

Comment By: Samuel Thibault (sthibault)
Date: 24/10/2009 01:10

Message:
In mca_base_component_find.c and ompi_mpi_finalize.c, you should check
that errno is ENAMETOOLONG, because else if some other error happens
(who knows what), you'll end up eating as much memory as possible.

Else, seems fine, please submit after having added the errno check!


--

You can respond by visiting: 
https://alioth.debian.org/tracker/?func=detailatid=410472aid=312017group_id=30628


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-hurd-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: http://lists.debian.org/e1oa4y3-00013y...@alioth.debian.org



[debian-hurd-Patches][311571] Bug#522100: pulseaudio FTBFS (debian-ports)

2010-05-06 Thread debian-hurd-patches
Patches item #311571, was changed at 31/03/2009 21:08 by Pino Toscano
You can respond by visiting: 
https://alioth.debian.org/tracker/?func=detailatid=410472aid=311571group_id=30628

Status: Open
Priority: 3
Submitted By: Samuel Thibault (sthibaul-guest)
Assigned to: Nobody (None)
Summary: Bug#522100: pulseaudio FTBFS (debian-ports) 
Category: None
Group: None
Resolution: None


Initial Comment:
PATH_MAX, PIPE_MAX, pthread_setaffinity, alsa/evdev build fix.


--

Comment By: Pino Toscano (pino-guest)
Date: 06/05/2010 19:59

Message:
Updated patch for pulseaudio 0.9.21. Below the various problems and eventual 
solutions found:

- src/pulse/context.c: usage of SA_NOCLDWAIT
  sigaction(2) shows it is Linux-only, and waitpid(2) says that checking for 
the presence of that flag and checking that the handler is SIG_IGN is 
equivalent; thus, make the SA_NOCLDWAIT flag check optionally compiled 
depending on the SA_NOCLDWAIT presence

- src/pulsecore/memtrap.c: SA_SIGINFO
  the first step is using a simple sa_handler if SA_SIGINFO is not defined; 
futhermore, PA remaps memory in the SIGBUS signal handler, using the data 
provided in the siginfo_t, so just fail in the simple signal handler

- src/modules/rtp/module-rtp-recv.c: SO_TIMESTAMP
  Hurd does not support activating the timestamp receiving for sockets, so 
enable it only if SO_TIMESTAMP is defined

- src/modules/rtp/rtp.c: SO_TIMESTAMP
  most probably the right type to check should be SCM_TIMESTAMP, like other 
types available for cmsg_type (eg SCM_RIGHTS)

- src/modules/module-pipe-source.c: PIPE_BUF
  make use of the available pa_pipe_buf() for the job

 - src/utils/pacmd.c: PIPE_BUF
  here the two 'ibuf' and 'obuf' are dynamically allocated with the minimum 
size of all the pipe_buf for the fd's they are used as buffer when reading from 
and writing to

- debian/rules: autogeneration of pulseaudio.install for Hurd
  used the same approach used for kfreebsd-*


If the patch looks ok, I can send the pulseaudio bits to the PA's trac and the 
debian part to #573339.


--

Comment By: Emilio Pozuelo Monfort (pochu)
Date: 29/01/2010 00:38

Message:
The patch still applies and builds with 0.9.21

--

Comment By: Pino Toscano (pino-guest)
Date: 30/10/2009 22:39

Message:
This is a first attempt in a porting patch for pulseaudio 0.9.19.
Below the various problems and eventual solutions found:

- src/pulse/context.c: usage of SA_NOCLDWAIT
  sigaction(2) shows it is Linux-only, and waitpid(2) says that checking for 
the presence of that flag and checking that the handler is SIG_IGN is 
equivalent; thus, make the SA_NOCLDWAIT flag check optionally compiled 
depending on the SA_NOCLDWAIT presence

- src/pulsecore/memtrap.c: SA_SIGINFO
  the first step is using a simple sa_handler if SA_SIGINFO is not defined;
  futhermore, PA remaps memory in the SIGBUS signal handler, using the data 
provided in the siginfo_t,
  so just fail in the simple signal handler

- src/modules/rtp/module-rtp-recv.c: SO_TIMESTAMP
  Hurd does not support activating the timestamp receiving for sockets, so 
enable it only if SO_TIMESTAMP is defined

- src/modules/rtp/rtp.c: SO_TIMESTAMP
  most probably the right type to check should be SCM_TIMESTAMP, like other 
types available for cmsg_type (eg SCM_RIGHTS)

- src/modules/module-pipe-source.c:
- src/utils/pacmd.c: PIPE_BUF
  no solution yet, manual #define for now

- debian/rules: autogeneration of pulseaudio.install for Hurd
  used the same approach used for kfreebsd-*

Of course, given the PIPE_BUF stuff (and the review needed) it is not worth 
being sent upstream yet, but I thought posting it could have been useful for 
others to take a look.


--

You can respond by visiting: 
https://alioth.debian.org/tracker/?func=detailatid=410472aid=311571group_id=30628


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-hurd-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: http://lists.debian.org/e1oa5lh-0002k2...@alioth.debian.org



[debian-hurd-Patches][311571] Bug#522100: pulseaudio FTBFS (debian-ports)

2010-05-06 Thread debian-hurd-patches
Patches item #311571, was changed at 31/03/2009 21:08 by Samuel Thibault
You can respond by visiting: 
https://alioth.debian.org/tracker/?func=detailatid=410472aid=311571group_id=30628

Status: Open
Priority: 3
Submitted By: Samuel Thibault (sthibaul-guest)
Assigned to: Nobody (None)
Summary: Bug#522100: pulseaudio FTBFS (debian-ports) 
Category: None
Group: None
Resolution: None


Initial Comment:
PATH_MAX, PIPE_MAX, pthread_setaffinity, alsa/evdev build fix.


--

Comment By: Samuel Thibault (sthibault)
Date: 07/05/2010 02:37

Message:
It seems fine, please submit, thanks!


--

Comment By: Pino Toscano (pino-guest)
Date: 06/05/2010 19:59

Message:
Updated patch for pulseaudio 0.9.21. Below the various problems and eventual 
solutions found:

- src/pulse/context.c: usage of SA_NOCLDWAIT
  sigaction(2) shows it is Linux-only, and waitpid(2) says that checking for 
the presence of that flag and checking that the handler is SIG_IGN is 
equivalent; thus, make the SA_NOCLDWAIT flag check optionally compiled 
depending on the SA_NOCLDWAIT presence

- src/pulsecore/memtrap.c: SA_SIGINFO
  the first step is using a simple sa_handler if SA_SIGINFO is not defined; 
futhermore, PA remaps memory in the SIGBUS signal handler, using the data 
provided in the siginfo_t, so just fail in the simple signal handler

- src/modules/rtp/module-rtp-recv.c: SO_TIMESTAMP
  Hurd does not support activating the timestamp receiving for sockets, so 
enable it only if SO_TIMESTAMP is defined

- src/modules/rtp/rtp.c: SO_TIMESTAMP
  most probably the right type to check should be SCM_TIMESTAMP, like other 
types available for cmsg_type (eg SCM_RIGHTS)

- src/modules/module-pipe-source.c: PIPE_BUF
  make use of the available pa_pipe_buf() for the job

 - src/utils/pacmd.c: PIPE_BUF
  here the two 'ibuf' and 'obuf' are dynamically allocated with the minimum 
size of all the pipe_buf for the fd's they are used as buffer when reading from 
and writing to

- debian/rules: autogeneration of pulseaudio.install for Hurd
  used the same approach used for kfreebsd-*


If the patch looks ok, I can send the pulseaudio bits to the PA's trac and the 
debian part to #573339.


--

Comment By: Emilio Pozuelo Monfort (pochu)
Date: 29/01/2010 00:38

Message:
The patch still applies and builds with 0.9.21

--

Comment By: Pino Toscano (pino-guest)
Date: 30/10/2009 22:39

Message:
This is a first attempt in a porting patch for pulseaudio 0.9.19.
Below the various problems and eventual solutions found:

- src/pulse/context.c: usage of SA_NOCLDWAIT
  sigaction(2) shows it is Linux-only, and waitpid(2) says that checking for 
the presence of that flag and checking that the handler is SIG_IGN is 
equivalent; thus, make the SA_NOCLDWAIT flag check optionally compiled 
depending on the SA_NOCLDWAIT presence

- src/pulsecore/memtrap.c: SA_SIGINFO
  the first step is using a simple sa_handler if SA_SIGINFO is not defined;
  futhermore, PA remaps memory in the SIGBUS signal handler, using the data 
provided in the siginfo_t,
  so just fail in the simple signal handler

- src/modules/rtp/module-rtp-recv.c: SO_TIMESTAMP
  Hurd does not support activating the timestamp receiving for sockets, so 
enable it only if SO_TIMESTAMP is defined

- src/modules/rtp/rtp.c: SO_TIMESTAMP
  most probably the right type to check should be SCM_TIMESTAMP, like other 
types available for cmsg_type (eg SCM_RIGHTS)

- src/modules/module-pipe-source.c:
- src/utils/pacmd.c: PIPE_BUF
  no solution yet, manual #define for now

- debian/rules: autogeneration of pulseaudio.install for Hurd
  used the same approach used for kfreebsd-*

Of course, given the PIPE_BUF stuff (and the review needed) it is not worth 
being sent upstream yet, but I thought posting it could have been useful for 
others to take a look.


--

You can respond by visiting: 
https://alioth.debian.org/tracker/?func=detailatid=410472aid=311571group_id=30628


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-hurd-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: http://lists.debian.org/e1oabzk-0002wu...@alioth.debian.org



[debian-hurd-Patches][312488] sound/wsynth-dssi-0.1.3

2010-05-04 Thread debian-hurd-patches
Patches item #312488, was opened at 2010-05-04 04:54 by Gokturk Yuksek
You can respond by visiting: 
https://alioth.debian.org/tracker/?func=detailatid=410472aid=312488group_id=30628

Status: Open
Priority: 3
Submitted By: Gokturk Yuksek (gokturk-guest)
Assigned to: Nobody (None)
Summary: sound/wsynth-dssi-0.1.3 
Category: posix
Group: None
Resolution: None


Initial Comment:
Proposed patch solves the PATH_MAX issue by determining the size of the buffer 
using 'strlen()' first and then allocating the buffer dynamically.

--

You can respond by visiting: 
https://alioth.debian.org/tracker/?func=detailatid=410472aid=312488group_id=30628


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-hurd-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: http://lists.debian.org/e1o9dtl-0005xd...@alioth.debian.org



[debian-hurd-Patches][312488] sound/wsynth-dssi-0.1.3

2010-05-04 Thread debian-hurd-patches
Patches item #312488, was changed at 04/05/2010 10:54 by Samuel Thibault
You can respond by visiting: 
https://alioth.debian.org/tracker/?func=detailatid=410472aid=312488group_id=30628

Status: Open
Priority: 3
Submitted By: Gokturk Yuksek (gokturk-guest)
Assigned to: Nobody (None)
Summary: sound/wsynth-dssi-0.1.3 
Category: posix
Group: None
Resolution: None


Initial Comment:
Proposed patch solves the PATH_MAX issue by determining the size of the buffer 
using 'strlen()' first and then allocating the buffer dynamically.

--

Comment By: Samuel Thibault (sthibault)
Date: 04/05/2010 11:38

Message:
Seems right. Please reportbug.


--

You can respond by visiting: 
https://alioth.debian.org/tracker/?func=detailatid=410472aid=312488group_id=30628


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-hurd-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: http://lists.debian.org/e1o9eap-0001ia...@alioth.debian.org



[debian-hurd-Patches][312483] sound/hexter-0.6.1

2010-05-03 Thread debian-hurd-patches
Patches item #312483, was changed at 2010-05-01 10:18 by Gokturk Yuksek
You can respond by visiting: 
https://alioth.debian.org/tracker/?func=detailatid=410472aid=312483group_id=30628

Status: Open
Priority: 3
Submitted By: Gokturk Yuksek (gokturk-guest)
Assigned to: Nobody (None)
Summary: sound/hexter-0.6.1 
Category: posix
Group: unreviewed
Resolution: None


Initial Comment:
Proposed patch solves PATH_MAX problem by calling 'snprintf' function with 
(NULL, 0, ...)  parameters to calculate how many characters to read (including 
the \0 character), and then calling it again with an allocated buffer to do 
actual operation.

Build log is also attached.

--

Comment By: Gokturk Yuksek (gokturk-guest)
Date: 2010-05-03 15:40

Message:
I attached the simpler version of the patch. Unfortunately, alioth neither lets 
me remove previously attached files nor overwrite them so i attached with a new 
name.

--

Comment By: Samuel Thibault (sthibault)
Date: 2010-05-02 06:29

Message:
+1 for the '/' and again +1 for the '\0'

It's simpler because glibc doesn't have to run snprintf twice.


--

Comment By: Gokturk Yuksek (gokturk-guest)
Date: 2010-05-02 05:11

Message:
Why +1+1? If i'm not mistaken, strlen() returns the length of the string 
without the null character so strlen() + 1 should give the real length of the 
string and snprintf(..., %s/) should exactly fit into the buffer.

I don't know why i couldn't see the simpler solution, thanks for the catch up 
though :)

--

Comment By: Samuel Thibault (sthibault)
Date: 2010-05-01 10:41

Message:
Mmm, wouldn't it be simpler to allocate strlen(project_directory)+1+1?


--

You can respond by visiting: 
https://alioth.debian.org/tracker/?func=detailatid=410472aid=312483group_id=30628


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-hurd-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: http://lists.debian.org/e1o91vn-0001eg...@alioth.debian.org



[debian-hurd-Patches][312483] sound/hexter-0.6.1

2010-05-03 Thread debian-hurd-patches
Patches item #312483, was changed at 01/05/2010 16:18 by Samuel Thibault
You can respond by visiting: 
https://alioth.debian.org/tracker/?func=detailatid=410472aid=312483group_id=30628

Status: Open
Priority: 3
Submitted By: Gokturk Yuksek (gokturk-guest)
Assigned to: Nobody (None)
Summary: sound/hexter-0.6.1 
Category: posix
Group: unreviewed
Resolution: None


Initial Comment:
Proposed patch solves PATH_MAX problem by calling 'snprintf' function with 
(NULL, 0, ...)  parameters to calculate how many characters to read (including 
the \0 character), and then calling it again with an allocated buffer to do 
actual operation.

Build log is also attached.

--

Comment By: Samuel Thibault (sthibault)
Date: 03/05/2010 23:08

Message:
Looks good, please submit.


--

Comment By: Gokturk Yuksek (gokturk-guest)
Date: 03/05/2010 21:40

Message:
I attached the simpler version of the patch. Unfortunately, alioth neither lets 
me remove previously attached files nor overwrite them so i attached with a new 
name.

--

Comment By: Samuel Thibault (sthibault)
Date: 02/05/2010 12:29

Message:
+1 for the '/' and again +1 for the '\0'

It's simpler because glibc doesn't have to run snprintf twice.


--

Comment By: Gokturk Yuksek (gokturk-guest)
Date: 02/05/2010 11:11

Message:
Why +1+1? If i'm not mistaken, strlen() returns the length of the string 
without the null character so strlen() + 1 should give the real length of the 
string and snprintf(..., %s/) should exactly fit into the buffer.

I don't know why i couldn't see the simpler solution, thanks for the catch up 
though :)

--

Comment By: Samuel Thibault (sthibault)
Date: 01/05/2010 16:41

Message:
Mmm, wouldn't it be simpler to allocate strlen(project_directory)+1+1?


--

You can respond by visiting: 
https://alioth.debian.org/tracker/?func=detailatid=410472aid=312483group_id=30628


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-hurd-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: http://lists.debian.org/e1o92sh-0007sx...@alioth.debian.org



[debian-hurd-Patches][312483] sound/hexter-0.6.1

2010-05-02 Thread debian-hurd-patches
Patches item #312483, was changed at 2010-05-01 10:18 by Gokturk Yuksek
You can respond by visiting: 
https://alioth.debian.org/tracker/?func=detailatid=410472aid=312483group_id=30628

Status: Open
Priority: 3
Submitted By: Gokturk Yuksek (gokturk-guest)
Assigned to: Nobody (None)
Summary: sound/hexter-0.6.1 
Category: posix
Group: unreviewed
Resolution: None


Initial Comment:
Proposed patch solves PATH_MAX problem by calling 'snprintf' function with 
(NULL, 0, ...)  parameters to calculate how many characters to read (including 
the \0 character), and then calling it again with an allocated buffer to do 
actual operation.

Build log is also attached.

--

Comment By: Gokturk Yuksek (gokturk-guest)
Date: 2010-05-02 05:11

Message:
Why +1+1? If i'm not mistaken, strlen() returns the length of the string 
without the null character so strlen() + 1 should give the real length of the 
string and snprintf(..., %s/) should exactly fit into the buffer.

I don't know why i couldn't see the simpler solution, thanks for the catch up 
though :)

--

Comment By: Samuel Thibault (sthibault)
Date: 2010-05-01 10:41

Message:
Mmm, wouldn't it be simpler to allocate strlen(project_directory)+1+1?


--

You can respond by visiting: 
https://alioth.debian.org/tracker/?func=detailatid=410472aid=312483group_id=30628


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-hurd-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: http://lists.debian.org/e1o8vdq-gh...@alioth.debian.org



[debian-hurd-Patches][312483] sound/hexter-0.6.1

2010-05-01 Thread debian-hurd-patches
Patches item #312483, was opened at 2010-05-01 10:18 by Gokturk Yuksek
You can respond by visiting: 
https://alioth.debian.org/tracker/?func=detailatid=410472aid=312483group_id=30628

Status: Open
Priority: 3
Submitted By: Gokturk Yuksek (gokturk-guest)
Assigned to: Nobody (None)
Summary: sound/hexter-0.6.1 
Category: posix
Group: unreviewed
Resolution: None


Initial Comment:
Proposed patch solves PATH_MAX problem by calling 'snprintf' function with 
(NULL, 0, ...)  parameters to calculate how many characters to read (including 
the \0 character), and then calling it again with an allocated buffer to do 
actual operation.

Build log is also attached.

--

You can respond by visiting: 
https://alioth.debian.org/tracker/?func=detailatid=410472aid=312483group_id=30628


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-hurd-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: http://lists.debian.org/e1o8dwl-000610...@alioth.debian.org



[debian-hurd-Patches][312483] sound/hexter-0.6.1

2010-05-01 Thread debian-hurd-patches
Patches item #312483, was changed at 01/05/2010 16:18 by Samuel Thibault
You can respond by visiting: 
https://alioth.debian.org/tracker/?func=detailatid=410472aid=312483group_id=30628

Status: Open
Priority: 3
Submitted By: Gokturk Yuksek (gokturk-guest)
Assigned to: Nobody (None)
Summary: sound/hexter-0.6.1 
Category: posix
Group: unreviewed
Resolution: None


Initial Comment:
Proposed patch solves PATH_MAX problem by calling 'snprintf' function with 
(NULL, 0, ...)  parameters to calculate how many characters to read (including 
the \0 character), and then calling it again with an allocated buffer to do 
actual operation.

Build log is also attached.

--

Comment By: Samuel Thibault (sthibault)
Date: 01/05/2010 16:41

Message:
Mmm, wouldn't it be simpler to allocate strlen(project_directory)+1+1?


--

You can respond by visiting: 
https://alioth.debian.org/tracker/?func=detailatid=410472aid=312483group_id=30628


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-hurd-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: http://lists.debian.org/e1o8dsa-vz...@alioth.debian.org



[debian-hurd-Patches][312160] seahorse-plugins 2.28.1 FTBFS (MAXPATHLEN)

2010-04-16 Thread debian-hurd-patches
Patches item #312160, was changed at 2009-12-13 22:14 by Emilio Pozuelo Monfort
You can respond by visiting: 
https://alioth.debian.org/tracker/?func=detailatid=410472aid=312160group_id=30628

Status: Closed
Priority: 3
Submitted By: Emilio Pozuelo Monfort (pochu)
Assigned to: Emilio Pozuelo Monfort (pochu)
Summary: seahorse-plugins 2.28.1 FTBFS (MAXPATHLEN) 
Category: None
Group: fixed
Resolution: Fixed


Initial Comment:
The seahorse-gpg-options.c part is similar to the seahorse patch (code copy).

--

Comment By: Emilio Pozuelo Monfort (pochu)
Date: 2010-04-17 01:33

Message:
Fixed upstream and in Debian.

--

Comment By: Emilio Pozuelo Monfort (pochu)
Date: 2009-12-14 00:30

Message:
heh, indeed (or g_socket_name to be a bit more clear).

Commited to pkg-gnome, and forwarded upstream:
https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=604495

--

Comment By: Samuel Thibault (sthibault)
Date: 2009-12-13 23:20

Message:
g_socket_name = g_strdup_printf (%s%s, g_strdup_printf, SOCKET_FILE);

seems incorrect, I guess you meant

g_socket_name = g_strdup_printf (%s%s, t, SOCKET_FILE);

? Else it seems fine.


--

You can respond by visiting: 
https://alioth.debian.org/tracker/?func=detailatid=410472aid=312160group_id=30628


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-hurd-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: http://lists.debian.org/e1o2v22-ru...@alioth.debian.org



[debian-hurd-Patches][312159] seahorse 2.28.1 FTBFS (MAXPATHLEN)

2010-04-16 Thread debian-hurd-patches
Patches item #312159, was changed at 2009-12-13 19:53 by Emilio Pozuelo Monfort
You can respond by visiting: 
https://alioth.debian.org/tracker/?func=detailatid=410472aid=312159group_id=30628

Status: Closed
Priority: 3
Submitted By: Emilio Pozuelo Monfort (pochu)
Assigned to: Emilio Pozuelo Monfort (pochu)
Summary: seahorse 2.28.1 FTBFS (MAXPATHLEN) 
Category: None
Group: fixed
Resolution: Fixed


Initial Comment:
seahorse fails to build because of unconditional MAXPATHLEN usage. The attached 
patch removes it and uses dynamic allocation instead.

--

Comment By: Emilio Pozuelo Monfort (pochu)
Date: 2010-04-17 01:33

Message:
Fixed upstream and in Debian.

--

Comment By: Emilio Pozuelo Monfort (pochu)
Date: 2009-12-14 00:28

Message:
Committed to pkg-gnome and forwarded upstream:
https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=604494

--

Comment By: Samuel Thibault (sthibault)
Date: 2009-12-13 23:17

Message:
It seems fine, please submit!


--

You can respond by visiting: 
https://alioth.debian.org/tracker/?func=detailatid=410472aid=312159group_id=30628


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-hurd-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: http://lists.debian.org/e1o2v2k-t3...@alioth.debian.org



[debian-hurd-Patches][312341] webkit 1.1.20 (PATH_MAX)

2010-04-12 Thread debian-hurd-patches
Patches item #312341, was changed at 2010-02-10 08:53 by Emilio Pozuelo Monfort
You can respond by visiting: 
https://alioth.debian.org/tracker/?func=detailatid=410472aid=312341group_id=30628

Status: Closed
Priority: 3
Submitted By: Emilio Pozuelo Monfort (pochu)
Assigned to: Emilio Pozuelo Monfort (pochu)
Summary: webkit 1.1.20 (PATH_MAX) 
Category: None
Group: fixed
Resolution: Fixed


Initial Comment:
webkit has introduced PATH_MAX in a couple of tests recently. This patch fixes 
it by using dynamic allocation.

--

Comment By: Emilio Pozuelo Monfort (pochu)
Date: 2010-03-12 13:53

Message:
Fixed upstream and in Debian.

--

Comment By: Emilio Pozuelo Monfort (pochu)
Date: 2010-02-13 16:21

Message:
Forwarded: https://bugs.webkit.org/show_bug.cgi?id=34920

--

Comment By: Samuel Thibault (sthibault)
Date: 2010-02-13 14:30

Message:
please submit!


--

You can respond by visiting: 
https://alioth.debian.org/tracker/?func=detailatid=410472aid=312341group_id=30628


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-hurd-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: http://lists.debian.org/e1o1nvv-0005ze...@alioth.debian.org



[debian-hurd-Patches][312161] gdm 2.20.10 FTBFS

2010-04-12 Thread debian-hurd-patches
Patches item #312161, was changed at 2009-12-15 01:14 by Emilio Pozuelo Monfort
You can respond by visiting: 
https://alioth.debian.org/tracker/?func=detailatid=410472aid=312161group_id=30628

Status: Closed
Priority: 3
Submitted By: Emilio Pozuelo Monfort (pochu)
Assigned to: Emilio Pozuelo Monfort (pochu)
Summary: gdm 2.20.10 FTBFS 
Category: None
Group: fixed-debian
Resolution: Fixed


Initial Comment:
Hi,

I've prepared this two patches to make gdm build on Hurd. The second one moves 
gdm_reset_locale() out of an RLIMIT #ifdef (it was there by mistake I guess).

gdm 2.28 builds fine on Hurd but we will have 2.20 for a while (will likely be 
the default for Squeeze).

--

Comment By: Emilio Pozuelo Monfort (pochu)
Date: 2010-04-12 20:01

Message:
Fixed and built.

--

Comment By: Samuel Thibault (sthibault)
Date: 2009-12-19 15:52

Message:
In that case, yes.


--

Comment By: Emilio Pozuelo Monfort (pochu)
Date: 2009-12-19 15:46

Message:
I don't intend to forward this upstream, as the last stable and unstable (2.28 
and 2.29) releases are fine. So this will be a Debian-only patch for 2.20 until 
we move to a newer release (we don't yet as they have many regressions).

Since this will be Debian only, can I leave it as is? I guess we use glibc in 
all the ports...

--

Comment By: Samuel Thibault (sthibault)
Date: 2009-12-15 01:41

Message:
Unfortunately gdm can not rely on realpath allocating a string when
given NULL, as it's only a recent POSIX extension.  What you can
however do is ifdef __GLIBC__, assume it does, and else use PATH_MAX,
as that will work fine in all cases.

The patch moving the rlimit stuff is fine.


--

You can respond by visiting: 
https://alioth.debian.org/tracker/?func=detailatid=410472aid=312161group_id=30628


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-hurd-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: http://lists.debian.org/e1o1nwv-00078q...@alioth.debian.org



[debian-hurd-Patches][312151] gtk-vnc FTBFS because of PATH_MAX usage

2010-04-12 Thread debian-hurd-patches
Patches item #312151, was changed at 2009-12-11 13:02 by Emilio Pozuelo Monfort
You can respond by visiting: 
https://alioth.debian.org/tracker/?func=detailatid=410472aid=312151group_id=30628

Status: Closed
Priority: 3
Submitted By: Emilio Pozuelo Monfort (pochu)
Assigned to: Emilio Pozuelo Monfort (pochu)
Summary: gtk-vnc FTBFS because of PATH_MAX usage 
Category: None
Group: unreviewed
Resolution: Fixed


Initial Comment:
Hi,

gtk-vnc uses PATH_MAX unconditionally, failing to build on the Hurd. The 
attached patch makes use of dynamic allocation rather than hardoced maximum 
path length. It builds fine on Hurd, and allows Vinagre to build.

--

Comment By: Emilio Pozuelo Monfort (pochu)
Date: 2010-04-12 20:05

Message:
Fixed upstream and in Debian, and package built.

--

Comment By: Emilio Pozuelo Monfort (pochu)
Date: 2009-12-13 16:27

Message:
That is so that I don't need to g_free() it if getpwuid() fails, but if 
upstream doesn't like it we can change it.

I've forwarded this upstream and to Debian:
https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=604448
http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=561004

--

Comment By: Samuel Thibault (sthibault)
Date: 2009-12-13 14:11

Message:
You should probably keep the initialization of sysdir before the one of
userdir, to keep the patch lines adding the new version close to the
patch lines removing the old one. Else it seems just fine, please
submit!


--

You can respond by visiting: 
https://alioth.debian.org/tracker/?func=detailatid=410472aid=312151group_id=30628


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-hurd-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: http://lists.debian.org/e1o1o1h-00054l...@alioth.debian.org



[debian-hurd-Patches][312442] libcap 2.19

2010-04-06 Thread debian-hurd-patches
Patches item #312442, was opened at 2010-04-06 21:53 by David Hedberg
You can respond by visiting: 
https://alioth.debian.org/tracker/?func=detailatid=410472aid=312442group_id=30628

Status: Open
Priority: 3
Submitted By: David Hedberg (davidh-guest)
Assigned to: Nobody (None)
Summary: libcap 2.19 
Category: None
Group: None
Resolution: None


Initial Comment:
This small patch allows libcap to build and be linked with the accompanying 
utilities in progs. I have not tested it with anything else and there is of 
course no real functionality provided.

--

You can respond by visiting: 
https://alioth.debian.org/tracker/?func=detailatid=410472aid=312442group_id=30628


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-hurd-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: http://lists.debian.org/e1nzepa-0001ae...@alioth.debian.org



[debian-hurd-Patches][312340] dbus 1.2.20 FTBFS (default dir watch backend)

2010-03-21 Thread debian-hurd-patches
Patches item #312340, was changed at 2010-02-09 21:57 by Emilio Pozuelo Monfort
You can respond by visiting: 
https://alioth.debian.org/tracker/?func=detailatid=410472aid=312340group_id=30628

Status: Closed
Priority: 3
Submitted By: Emilio Pozuelo Monfort (pochu)
Assigned to: Nobody (None)
Summary: dbus 1.2.20 FTBFS (default dir watch backend) 
Category: None
Group: fixed
Resolution: Fixed


Initial Comment:
The latest releases of dbus introduced changes to the dir watch interfaces that 
the default backend (which is a noop) didn't follow, breaking the build on Hurd.

The attached patch fixes it.

--

Comment By: Emilio Pozuelo Monfort (pochu)
Date: 2010-03-21 19:44

Message:
Fixed upstream and in Debian

--

Comment By: Emilio Pozuelo Monfort (pochu)
Date: 2010-02-13 16:25

Message:
Forwarded: https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=26554

--

Comment By: Samuel Thibault (sthibault)
Date: 2010-02-13 14:31

Message:
Please submit!


--

You can respond by visiting: 
https://alioth.debian.org/tracker/?func=detailatid=410472aid=312340group_id=30628


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-hurd-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: http://lists.debian.org/e1ntq8l-0007zc...@alioth.debian.org



[debian-hurd-Patches][311015] #496274 procps-3.2.7 (debian-ports)

2010-03-21 Thread debian-hurd-patches
Patches item #311015, was changed at 2008-08-21 14:38 by Emilio Pozuelo Monfort
You can respond by visiting: 
https://alioth.debian.org/tracker/?func=detailatid=410472aid=311015group_id=30628

Status: Closed
Priority: 3
Submitted By: Madhusudan C.S (madhusudancs-guest)
Assigned to: Nobody (None)
Summary: #496274 procps-3.2.7 (debian-ports) 
Category: None
Group: fixed
Resolution: Fixed


Initial Comment:
This patch eliminates the PATH_MAX problem in files ./proc/readproc.c and 
./pwd.x.

Also alternatives method is used not to override the tools that are common in 
Hurd and procps.



--

Comment By: Emilio Pozuelo Monfort (pochu)
Date: 2010-03-21 20:33

Message:
This was applied in Debian, so let's close it. It fails to build but because of 
a different problem, so let's open another report for that.

--

Comment By: Michael Banck (mbanck)
Date: 2008-09-02 11:22

Message:
Thanks, I have uploaded it to debian-ports now.

--

Comment By: Madhusudan C.S (madhusudancs-guest)
Date: 2008-08-27 20:56

Message:
Hey Samuel I am really sorry, have been a bit occupied with school work this 
week, I forgot to paste the bug number here. I reported the bug on Monday only 
through reportbug command this is the bug number I got, Bug#496274

--

Comment By: Samuel Thibault (sthibaul-guest)
Date: 2008-08-27 01:15

Message:
Looks fine, I think you can submit it through reportbug.


--

Comment By: Madhusudan C.S (madhusudancs-guest)
Date: 2008-08-23 21:28

Message:
  This is the right patch I think.

--

Comment By: Madhusudan C.S (madhusudancs-guest)
Date: 2008-08-21 22:59

Message:
New patch. tload should install and work. PATH_MAX problem and buf is better 
managed in pwdx.c

--

Comment By: Madhusudan C.S (madhusudancs-guest)
Date: 2008-08-21 21:02

Message:
 By definition, sizeof(char) is 1.

 for the buf allocation, can't you just use 6 + 
 strlen(argv[i]) + 4 + 1 ?

 Instead of using strlen(pathbuf), just remember the size  you allocated last 
 time.

Sure these both can be done. I will do it.

 Take care of spurious spacing changes, always read the 
 patch itself to check for those.

I did not understand this. Can you please tell me what you meant and where are 
those spurious spacing changes?

--

Comment By: Samuel Thibault (sthibaul-guest)
Date: 2008-08-21 17:54

Message:
Also, why removing tload?  Shouldn't it work?  You should probably also
discuss with kfreebsd people whether removing pmap, slabtop there too
(that code should probably be shared)


--

Comment By: Madhusudan C.S (madhusudancs-guest)
Date: 2008-08-21 17:48

Message:
This is the second patch and I think this should be applied, since this adds 
few additional tools that should not be installed on Hurd.

--

Comment By: Samuel Thibault (sthibaul-guest)
Date: 2008-08-21 17:46

Message:
By definition, sizeof(char) is 1.

for the buf allocation, can't you just use 6 + strlen(argv[i]) + 4 + 1 ?

Instead of using strlen(pathbuf), just remember the size you allocated
last time.

Take care of spurious spacing changes, always read the patch itself to
check for those.


--

You can respond by visiting: 
https://alioth.debian.org/tracker/?func=detailatid=410472aid=311015group_id=30628


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-hurd-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: http://lists.debian.org/e1ntqtv-0004mw...@alioth.debian.org



[debian-hurd-Patches][312341] webkit 1.1.20 (PATH_MAX)

2010-03-12 Thread debian-hurd-patches
Patches item #312341, was changed at 2010-02-10 08:53 by Emilio Pozuelo Monfort
You can respond by visiting: 
https://alioth.debian.org/tracker/?func=detailatid=410472aid=312341group_id=30628

Status: Open
Priority: 3
Submitted By: Emilio Pozuelo Monfort (pochu)
Assigned to: Emilio Pozuelo Monfort (pochu)
Summary: webkit 1.1.20 (PATH_MAX) 
Category: None
Group: fixed
Resolution: Fixed


Initial Comment:
webkit has introduced PATH_MAX in a couple of tests recently. This patch fixes 
it by using dynamic allocation.

--

Comment By: Emilio Pozuelo Monfort (pochu)
Date: 2010-03-12 13:53

Message:
Fixed upstream and in Debian.

--

Comment By: Emilio Pozuelo Monfort (pochu)
Date: 2010-02-13 16:21

Message:
Forwarded: https://bugs.webkit.org/show_bug.cgi?id=34920

--

Comment By: Samuel Thibault (sthibault)
Date: 2010-02-13 14:30

Message:
please submit!


--

You can respond by visiting: 
https://alioth.debian.org/tracker/?func=detailatid=410472aid=312341group_id=30628


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-hurd-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: http://lists.debian.org/e1nq4mj-0003co...@alioth.debian.org



[debian-hurd-Patches][312334] file 5.04 (MAXPATHLEN)

2010-02-14 Thread debian-hurd-patches
Patches item #312334, was changed at 09/02/2010 02:05 by Samuel Thibault
You can respond by visiting: 
https://alioth.debian.org/tracker/?func=detailatid=410472aid=312334group_id=30628

Status: Open
Priority: 3
Submitted By: Emilio Pozuelo Monfort (pochu)
Assigned to: Nobody (None)
Summary: file 5.04 (MAXPATHLEN) 
Category: None
Group: None
Resolution: None


Initial Comment:
The last version of file fails to build because it uses MAXPATHLEN in a file 
that doesn't #define it to 1024 like it does in the other files.

However instead of adding the #define and workarounding the issue, I've tried 
to fix it properly.

Here's a patch to use dynamic allocation. Please review!

--

Comment By: Samuel Thibault (sthibault)
Date: 14/02/2010 20:04

Message:
getline() is a GNU extension, upstream will probably not happy to
depend on it. Apart from that the patch seems ok.


--

You can respond by visiting: 
https://alioth.debian.org/tracker/?func=detailatid=410472aid=312334group_id=30628


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-hurd-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: http://lists.debian.org/e1ngjm6-0005gu...@alioth.debian.org



[debian-hurd-Patches][312341] webkit 1.1.20 (PATH_MAX)

2010-02-13 Thread debian-hurd-patches
Patches item #312341, was changed at 10/02/2010 08:53 by Samuel Thibault
You can respond by visiting: 
https://alioth.debian.org/tracker/?func=detailatid=410472aid=312341group_id=30628

Status: Open
Priority: 3
Submitted By: Emilio Pozuelo Monfort (pochu)
Assigned to: Nobody (None)
Summary: webkit 1.1.20 (PATH_MAX) 
Category: None
Group: None
Resolution: None


Initial Comment:
webkit has introduced PATH_MAX in a couple of tests recently. This patch fixes 
it by using dynamic allocation.

--

Comment By: Samuel Thibault (sthibault)
Date: 13/02/2010 14:30

Message:
please submit!


--

You can respond by visiting: 
https://alioth.debian.org/tracker/?func=detailatid=410472aid=312341group_id=30628


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-hurd-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org



[debian-hurd-Patches][312340] dbus 1.2.20 FTBFS (default dir watch backend)

2010-02-13 Thread debian-hurd-patches
Patches item #312340, was changed at 09/02/2010 21:57 by Samuel Thibault
You can respond by visiting: 
https://alioth.debian.org/tracker/?func=detailatid=410472aid=312340group_id=30628

Status: Open
Priority: 3
Submitted By: Emilio Pozuelo Monfort (pochu)
Assigned to: Nobody (None)
Summary: dbus 1.2.20 FTBFS (default dir watch backend) 
Category: None
Group: None
Resolution: None


Initial Comment:
The latest releases of dbus introduced changes to the dir watch interfaces that 
the default backend (which is a noop) didn't follow, breaking the build on Hurd.

The attached patch fixes it.

--

Comment By: Samuel Thibault (sthibault)
Date: 13/02/2010 14:31

Message:
Please submit!


--

You can respond by visiting: 
https://alioth.debian.org/tracker/?func=detailatid=410472aid=312340group_id=30628


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-hurd-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org



[debian-hurd-Patches][312341] webkit 1.1.20 (PATH_MAX)

2010-02-13 Thread debian-hurd-patches
Patches item #312341, was changed at 2010-02-10 08:53 by Emilio Pozuelo Monfort
You can respond by visiting: 
https://alioth.debian.org/tracker/?func=detailatid=410472aid=312341group_id=30628

Status: Open
Priority: 3
Submitted By: Emilio Pozuelo Monfort (pochu)
Assigned to: Nobody (None)
Summary: webkit 1.1.20 (PATH_MAX) 
Category: None
Group: None
Resolution: None


Initial Comment:
webkit has introduced PATH_MAX in a couple of tests recently. This patch fixes 
it by using dynamic allocation.

--

Comment By: Emilio Pozuelo Monfort (pochu)
Date: 2010-02-13 16:21

Message:
Forwarded: https://bugs.webkit.org/show_bug.cgi?id=34920

--

Comment By: Samuel Thibault (sthibault)
Date: 2010-02-13 14:30

Message:
please submit!


--

You can respond by visiting: 
https://alioth.debian.org/tracker/?func=detailatid=410472aid=312341group_id=30628


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-hurd-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org



[debian-hurd-Patches][312340] dbus 1.2.20 FTBFS (default dir watch backend)

2010-02-13 Thread debian-hurd-patches
Patches item #312340, was changed at 2010-02-09 21:57 by Emilio Pozuelo Monfort
You can respond by visiting: 
https://alioth.debian.org/tracker/?func=detailatid=410472aid=312340group_id=30628

Status: Open
Priority: 3
Submitted By: Emilio Pozuelo Monfort (pochu)
Assigned to: Nobody (None)
Summary: dbus 1.2.20 FTBFS (default dir watch backend) 
Category: None
Group: None
Resolution: None


Initial Comment:
The latest releases of dbus introduced changes to the dir watch interfaces that 
the default backend (which is a noop) didn't follow, breaking the build on Hurd.

The attached patch fixes it.

--

Comment By: Emilio Pozuelo Monfort (pochu)
Date: 2010-02-13 16:25

Message:
Forwarded: https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=26554

--

Comment By: Samuel Thibault (sthibault)
Date: 2010-02-13 14:31

Message:
Please submit!


--

You can respond by visiting: 
https://alioth.debian.org/tracker/?func=detailatid=410472aid=312340group_id=30628


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-hurd-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org



[debian-hurd-Patches][312341] webkit 1.1.20 (PATH_MAX)

2010-02-10 Thread debian-hurd-patches
Patches item #312341, was opened at 2010-02-10 08:53 by Emilio Pozuelo Monfort
You can respond by visiting: 
https://alioth.debian.org/tracker/?func=detailatid=410472aid=312341group_id=30628

Status: Open
Priority: 3
Submitted By: Emilio Pozuelo Monfort (pochu)
Assigned to: Nobody (None)
Summary: webkit 1.1.20 (PATH_MAX) 
Category: None
Group: None
Resolution: None


Initial Comment:
webkit has introduced PATH_MAX in a couple of tests recently. This patch fixes 
it by using dynamic allocation.

--

You can respond by visiting: 
https://alioth.debian.org/tracker/?func=detailatid=410472aid=312341group_id=30628


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-hurd-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org



[debian-hurd-Patches][312340] dbus 1.2.20 FTBFS (default dir watch backend)

2010-02-09 Thread debian-hurd-patches
Patches item #312340, was opened at 2010-02-09 21:57 by Emilio Pozuelo Monfort
You can respond by visiting: 
https://alioth.debian.org/tracker/?func=detailatid=410472aid=312340group_id=30628

Status: Open
Priority: 3
Submitted By: Emilio Pozuelo Monfort (pochu)
Assigned to: Nobody (None)
Summary: dbus 1.2.20 FTBFS (default dir watch backend) 
Category: None
Group: None
Resolution: None


Initial Comment:
The latest releases of dbus introduced changes to the dir watch interfaces that 
the default backend (which is a noop) didn't follow, breaking the build on Hurd.

The attached patch fixes it.

--

You can respond by visiting: 
https://alioth.debian.org/tracker/?func=detailatid=410472aid=312340group_id=30628


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-hurd-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org



[debian-hurd-Patches][312158] gnome-keyring 2.28.1 FTBFS (MAXPATHLEN)

2010-02-08 Thread debian-hurd-patches
Patches item #312158, was changed at 2009-12-13 18:20 by Emilio Pozuelo Monfort
You can respond by visiting: 
https://alioth.debian.org/tracker/?func=detailatid=410472aid=312158group_id=30628

Status: Closed
Priority: 3
Submitted By: Emilio Pozuelo Monfort (pochu)
Assigned to: Nobody (None)
Summary: gnome-keyring 2.28.1 FTBFS (MAXPATHLEN) 
Category: None
Group: fixed
Resolution: Fixed


Initial Comment:
gnome-keyring FTBFS because of unconditional MAXPATHLEN usage.

This patch fixes it by using dynamic allocation. Please review!

--

Comment By: Emilio Pozuelo Monfort (pochu)
Date: 2010-02-09 01:53

Message:
This is now fixed both in Debian and upstream. Closing!

--

Comment By: Emilio Pozuelo Monfort (pochu)
Date: 2009-12-14 00:27

Message:
Thanks, committed in pkg-gnome and forwarded upstream:
https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=604493

--

Comment By: Samuel Thibault (sthibault)
Date: 2009-12-13 23:14

Message:
It seems to be correct, please submit!


--

You can respond by visiting: 
https://alioth.debian.org/tracker/?func=detailatid=410472aid=312158group_id=30628


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-hurd-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org



[debian-hurd-Patches][312334] file 5.04 (MAXPATHLEN)

2010-02-08 Thread debian-hurd-patches
Patches item #312334, was opened at 2010-02-09 02:05 by Emilio Pozuelo Monfort
You can respond by visiting: 
https://alioth.debian.org/tracker/?func=detailatid=410472aid=312334group_id=30628

Status: Open
Priority: 3
Submitted By: Emilio Pozuelo Monfort (pochu)
Assigned to: Nobody (None)
Summary: file 5.04 (MAXPATHLEN) 
Category: None
Group: None
Resolution: None


Initial Comment:
The last version of file fails to build because it uses MAXPATHLEN in a file 
that doesn't #define it to 1024 like it does in the other files.

However instead of adding the #define and workarounding the issue, I've tried 
to fix it properly.

Here's a patch to use dynamic allocation. Please review!

--

You can respond by visiting: 
https://alioth.debian.org/tracker/?func=detailatid=410472aid=312334group_id=30628


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-hurd-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org



[debian-hurd-Patches][311571] Bug#522100: pulseaudio FTBFS (debian-ports)

2010-01-28 Thread debian-hurd-patches
Patches item #311571, was changed at 2009-03-31 21:08 by Emilio Pozuelo Monfort
You can respond by visiting: 
https://alioth.debian.org/tracker/?func=detailatid=410472aid=311571group_id=30628

Status: Open
Priority: 3
Submitted By: Samuel Thibault (sthibaul-guest)
Assigned to: Nobody (None)
Summary: Bug#522100: pulseaudio FTBFS (debian-ports) 
Category: None
Group: None
Resolution: None


Initial Comment:
PATH_MAX, PIPE_MAX, pthread_setaffinity, alsa/evdev build fix.


--

Comment By: Emilio Pozuelo Monfort (pochu)
Date: 2010-01-29 00:38

Message:
The patch still applies and builds with 0.9.21

--

Comment By: Pino Toscano (pino-guest)
Date: 2009-10-30 22:39

Message:
This is a first attempt in a porting patch for pulseaudio 0.9.19.
Below the various problems and eventual solutions found:

- src/pulse/context.c: usage of SA_NOCLDWAIT
  sigaction(2) shows it is Linux-only, and waitpid(2) says that checking for 
the presence of that flag and checking that the handler is SIG_IGN is 
equivalent; thus, make the SA_NOCLDWAIT flag check optionally compiled 
depending on the SA_NOCLDWAIT presence

- src/pulsecore/memtrap.c: SA_SIGINFO
  the first step is using a simple sa_handler if SA_SIGINFO is not defined;
  futhermore, PA remaps memory in the SIGBUS signal handler, using the data 
provided in the siginfo_t,
  so just fail in the simple signal handler

- src/modules/rtp/module-rtp-recv.c: SO_TIMESTAMP
  Hurd does not support activating the timestamp receiving for sockets, so 
enable it only if SO_TIMESTAMP is defined

- src/modules/rtp/rtp.c: SO_TIMESTAMP
  most probably the right type to check should be SCM_TIMESTAMP, like other 
types available for cmsg_type (eg SCM_RIGHTS)

- src/modules/module-pipe-source.c:
- src/utils/pacmd.c: PIPE_BUF
  no solution yet, manual #define for now

- debian/rules: autogeneration of pulseaudio.install for Hurd
  used the same approach used for kfreebsd-*

Of course, given the PIPE_BUF stuff (and the review needed) it is not worth 
being sent upstream yet, but I thought posting it could have been useful for 
others to take a look.


--

You can respond by visiting: 
https://alioth.debian.org/tracker/?func=detailatid=410472aid=311571group_id=30628


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-hurd-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org



[debian-hurd-Patches][312118] #558754: libmusicbrainz-2.1 2.1.5

2009-12-23 Thread debian-hurd-patches
Patches item #312118, was changed at 30/11/2009 01:40 by Pino Toscano
You can respond by visiting: 
https://alioth.debian.org/tracker/?func=detailatid=410472aid=312118group_id=30628

Status: Closed
Priority: 3
Submitted By: Pino Toscano (pino-guest)
Assigned to: Nobody (None)
Summary: #558754: libmusicbrainz-2.1 2.1.5 
Category: None
Group: None
Resolution: Fixed


Initial Comment:
Adds the recognizing of the gnu system as supported, and a dummy stub of 
osdeps functions (like done for other OSes, eg QNX).

--

Comment By: Pino Toscano (pino-guest)
Date: 23/12/2009 13:12

Message:
libmusicbrainz-2.1 2.1.5-3 provides the Hurd patch, and it compiles.

--

Comment By: Pino Toscano (pino-guest)
Date: 30/11/2009 11:57

Message:
Done, reported as bug #558754.

--

Comment By: Samuel Thibault (sthibault)
Date: 30/11/2009 02:46

Message:
Ok, please submit!


--

Comment By: Pino Toscano (pino-guest)
Date: 30/11/2009 02:41

Message:
 Mmm, you can drop the linux/cdrom.h include entirely.

Done.

 in ReadTOC(), you could use strlen(device) instead of hardcoding
 the length

Right, done (malloc+free, as it isn't c99 code).

 (I guess QNX does it but that's not a reason ;) )

Not really, the QNX code does... exactly nothing ;)

--

Comment By: Samuel Thibault (sthibault)
Date: 30/11/2009 02:10

Message:
Mmm, you can drop the linux/cdrom.h include entirely.
in ReadTOC(), you could use strlen(device) instead of hardcoding the
length (I guess QNX does it but that's not a reason ;) )


--

You can respond by visiting: 
https://alioth.debian.org/tracker/?func=detailatid=410472aid=312118group_id=30628


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-hurd-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org



[debian-hurd-Patches][312011] #550995: nss 3.12.4-1

2009-12-23 Thread debian-hurd-patches
Patches item #312011, was changed at 14/10/2009 15:44 by Pino Toscano
You can respond by visiting: 
https://alioth.debian.org/tracker/?func=detailatid=410472aid=312011group_id=30628

Status: Closed
Priority: 3
Submitted By: Pino Toscano (pino-guest)
Assigned to: Nobody (None)
Summary: #550995: nss 3.12.4-1 
Category: None
Group: None
Resolution: Fixed


Initial Comment:
nss already has a 38_hurd.dpatch, but it covers only one file. Now nss FTBFS'es 
in another file as well, so I added the new fix in the existing patch.

Does it look sane enough to be reported on BTS?

--

Comment By: Pino Toscano (pino-guest)
Date: 23/12/2009 13:13

Message:
nss 3.12.5-1 ships the updated patch, ad it compiles fine on Hurd now.

--

Comment By: Pino Toscano (pino-guest)
Date: 14/10/2009 21:24

Message:
Thanks for the review! Reported as bug #550995.

--

Comment By: Samuel Thibault (sthibault)
Date: 14/10/2009 20:32

Message:
Should be fine, please submit, thanks!


--

Comment By: Pino Toscano (pino-guest)
Date: 14/10/2009 19:22

Message:
Right-o, new hints merged into the new version.

--

Comment By: Samuel Thibault (sthibault)
Date: 14/10/2009 18:04

Message:
actually you could now fold +1 into count itself, and there no need to
have a separate dir_len variable any more.

To avoid the

+#ifdef PATH_MAX
}
+#endif

you could #ifdef the if () only, without the {.


--

Comment By: Pino Toscano (pino-guest)
Date: 14/10/2009 18:00

Message:
 Should be count+1 in snprintf

Fixed.

--

Comment By: Samuel Thibault (sthibault)
Date: 14/10/2009 17:29

Message:
Should be count+1 in snprintf


--

Comment By: Pino Toscano (pino-guest)
Date: 14/10/2009 17:03

Message:
Right, snprintf()'s back again.

--

Comment By: Samuel Thibault (sthibault)
Date: 14/10/2009 16:11

Message:
I'd rather keep the snprintf as such, as it's more readable that
strcpys.  Else it seems fine.


--

You can respond by visiting: 
https://alioth.debian.org/tracker/?func=detailatid=410472aid=312011group_id=30628


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-hurd-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org



[debian-hurd-Patches][312180] luatex 0.47.0

2009-12-23 Thread debian-hurd-patches
Patches item #312180, was opened at 23/12/2009 13:18 by Pino Toscano
You can respond by visiting: 
https://alioth.debian.org/tracker/?func=detailatid=410472aid=312180group_id=30628

Status: Open
Priority: 3
Submitted By: Pino Toscano (pino-guest)
Assigned to: Nobody (None)
Summary: luatex 0.47.0 
Category: None
Group: None
Resolution: None


Initial Comment:
A small patch to avoid PATH_MAX usage in lautex (dynamically allocating 
buffers), and also a small bit to recognize the platform.

--

You can respond by visiting: 
https://alioth.debian.org/tracker/?func=detailatid=410472aid=312180group_id=30628


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-hurd-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org



[debian-hurd-Patches][312180] luatex 0.47.0

2009-12-23 Thread debian-hurd-patches
Patches item #312180, was changed at 23/12/2009 13:18 by Samuel Thibault
You can respond by visiting: 
https://alioth.debian.org/tracker/?func=detailatid=410472aid=312180group_id=30628

Status: Open
Priority: 3
Submitted By: Pino Toscano (pino-guest)
Assigned to: Nobody (None)
Summary: luatex 0.47.0 
Category: None
Group: None
Resolution: None


Initial Comment:
A small patch to avoid PATH_MAX usage in lautex (dynamically allocating 
buffers), and also a small bit to recognize the platform.

--

Comment By: Samuel Thibault (sthibault)
Date: 23/12/2009 13:40

Message:
You could put path initialization directly in its definition, but else
seems fine!


--

You can respond by visiting: 
https://alioth.debian.org/tracker/?func=detailatid=410472aid=312180group_id=30628


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-hurd-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org



[debian-hurd-Patches][312180] #562176: luatex 0.47.0

2009-12-23 Thread debian-hurd-patches
Patches item #312180, was changed at 23/12/2009 13:18 by Pino Toscano
You can respond by visiting: 
https://alioth.debian.org/tracker/?func=detailatid=410472aid=312180group_id=30628

Status: Open
Priority: 3
Submitted By: Pino Toscano (pino-guest)
Assigned to: Nobody (None)
Summary: #562176: luatex 0.47.0 
Category: None
Group: None
Resolution: None


Initial Comment:
A small patch to avoid PATH_MAX usage in lautex (dynamically allocating 
buffers), and also a small bit to recognize the platform.

--

Comment By: Pino Toscano (pino-guest)
Date: 23/12/2009 14:22

Message:
Sent, bug #562176.

--

Comment By: Samuel Thibault (sthibault)
Date: 23/12/2009 13:40

Message:
You could put path initialization directly in its definition, but else
seems fine!


--

You can respond by visiting: 
https://alioth.debian.org/tracker/?func=detailatid=410472aid=312180group_id=30628


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-hurd-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org



[debian-hurd-Patches][312180] #562176: luatex 0.47.0

2009-12-23 Thread debian-hurd-patches
Patches item #312180, was changed at 23/12/2009 13:18 by Pino Toscano
You can respond by visiting: 
https://alioth.debian.org/tracker/?func=detailatid=410472aid=312180group_id=30628

Status: Closed
Priority: 3
Submitted By: Pino Toscano (pino-guest)
Assigned to: Nobody (None)
Summary: #562176: luatex 0.47.0 
Category: None
Group: None
Resolution: Fixed


Initial Comment:
A small patch to avoid PATH_MAX usage in lautex (dynamically allocating 
buffers), and also a small bit to recognize the platform.

--

Comment By: Pino Toscano (pino-guest)
Date: 24/12/2009 02:14

Message:
luatex 0.47.0-2 uploaded and compiled successfully.

--

Comment By: Pino Toscano (pino-guest)
Date: 23/12/2009 14:22

Message:
Sent, bug #562176.

--

Comment By: Samuel Thibault (sthibault)
Date: 23/12/2009 13:40

Message:
You could put path initialization directly in its definition, but else
seems fine!


--

You can respond by visiting: 
https://alioth.debian.org/tracker/?func=detailatid=410472aid=312180group_id=30628


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-hurd-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org



[debian-hurd-Patches][312161] gdm 2.20.10 FTBFS

2009-12-19 Thread debian-hurd-patches
Patches item #312161, was changed at 2009-12-15 01:14 by Emilio Pozuelo Monfort
You can respond by visiting: 
https://alioth.debian.org/tracker/?func=detailatid=410472aid=312161group_id=30628

Status: Open
Priority: 3
Submitted By: Emilio Pozuelo Monfort (pochu)
Assigned to: Nobody (None)
Summary: gdm 2.20.10 FTBFS 
Category: None
Group: unreviewed
Resolution: None


Initial Comment:
Hi,

I've prepared this two patches to make gdm build on Hurd. The second one moves 
gdm_reset_locale() out of an RLIMIT #ifdef (it was there by mistake I guess).

gdm 2.28 builds fine on Hurd but we will have 2.20 for a while (will likely be 
the default for Squeeze).

--

Comment By: Emilio Pozuelo Monfort (pochu)
Date: 2009-12-19 15:46

Message:
I don't intend to forward this upstream, as the last stable and unstable (2.28 
and 2.29) releases are fine. So this will be a Debian-only patch for 2.20 until 
we move to a newer release (we don't yet as they have many regressions).

Since this will be Debian only, can I leave it as is? I guess we use glibc in 
all the ports...

--

Comment By: Samuel Thibault (sthibault)
Date: 2009-12-15 01:41

Message:
Unfortunately gdm can not rely on realpath allocating a string when
given NULL, as it's only a recent POSIX extension.  What you can
however do is ifdef __GLIBC__, assume it does, and else use PATH_MAX,
as that will work fine in all cases.

The patch moving the rlimit stuff is fine.


--

You can respond by visiting: 
https://alioth.debian.org/tracker/?func=detailatid=410472aid=312161group_id=30628


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-hurd-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org



[debian-hurd-Patches][312161] gdm 2.20.10 FTBFS

2009-12-19 Thread debian-hurd-patches
Patches item #312161, was changed at 15/12/2009 01:14 by Samuel Thibault
You can respond by visiting: 
https://alioth.debian.org/tracker/?func=detailatid=410472aid=312161group_id=30628

Status: Open
Priority: 3
Submitted By: Emilio Pozuelo Monfort (pochu)
Assigned to: Nobody (None)
Summary: gdm 2.20.10 FTBFS 
Category: None
Group: unreviewed
Resolution: None


Initial Comment:
Hi,

I've prepared this two patches to make gdm build on Hurd. The second one moves 
gdm_reset_locale() out of an RLIMIT #ifdef (it was there by mistake I guess).

gdm 2.28 builds fine on Hurd but we will have 2.20 for a while (will likely be 
the default for Squeeze).

--

Comment By: Samuel Thibault (sthibault)
Date: 19/12/2009 15:52

Message:
In that case, yes.


--

Comment By: Emilio Pozuelo Monfort (pochu)
Date: 19/12/2009 15:46

Message:
I don't intend to forward this upstream, as the last stable and unstable (2.28 
and 2.29) releases are fine. So this will be a Debian-only patch for 2.20 until 
we move to a newer release (we don't yet as they have many regressions).

Since this will be Debian only, can I leave it as is? I guess we use glibc in 
all the ports...

--

Comment By: Samuel Thibault (sthibault)
Date: 15/12/2009 01:41

Message:
Unfortunately gdm can not rely on realpath allocating a string when
given NULL, as it's only a recent POSIX extension.  What you can
however do is ifdef __GLIBC__, assume it does, and else use PATH_MAX,
as that will work fine in all cases.

The patch moving the rlimit stuff is fine.


--

You can respond by visiting: 
https://alioth.debian.org/tracker/?func=detailatid=410472aid=312161group_id=30628


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-hurd-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org



[debian-hurd-Patches][312134] gnome-games FTBFS because of PATH_MAX usage

2009-12-16 Thread debian-hurd-patches
Patches item #312134, was changed at 2009-12-06 11:49 by Emilio Pozuelo Monfort
You can respond by visiting: 
https://alioth.debian.org/tracker/?func=detailatid=410472aid=312134group_id=30628

Status: Closed
Priority: 3
Submitted By: Emilio Pozuelo Monfort (pochu)
Assigned to: Emilio Pozuelo Monfort (pochu)
Summary: gnome-games FTBFS because of PATH_MAX usage 
Category: None
Group: fixed
Resolution: Fixed


Initial Comment:
Hi,

gnobots2, a gnome-games game, uses PATH_MAX, which is undefined on the Hurd. 
The attached patch makes it build on the Hurd, and keeps working fine on Linux. 
Please review!

--

Comment By: Emilio Pozuelo Monfort (pochu)
Date: 2009-12-17 02:39

Message:
Fixed upstream and in Debian on 2.28.2-1

--

Comment By: Emilio Pozuelo Monfort (pochu)
Date: 2009-12-06 17:53

Message:
Thanks, upstream bug:
https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=603909

I've directly committed it in Debian rather than submitting a bug. :)

--

Comment By: Samuel Thibault (sthibault)
Date: 2009-12-06 17:03

Message:
Please submit!


--

Comment By: Emilio Pozuelo Monfort (pochu)
Date: 2009-12-06 16:55

Message:
How about this new version?

--

Comment By: Samuel Thibault (sthibault)
Date: 2009-12-06 15:47

Message:
Instead of making game_config_game return the string twice, move the
game_config_name() call from strcmp into before the if, same in
type_selection etc.


--

You can respond by visiting: 
https://alioth.debian.org/tracker/?func=detailatid=410472aid=312134group_id=30628


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-hurd-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org



[debian-hurd-Patches][312037] #553409: freeglut 2.4.0

2009-12-15 Thread debian-hurd-patches
Patches item #312037, was changed at 30/10/2009 19:30 by Pino Toscano
You can respond by visiting: 
https://alioth.debian.org/tracker/?func=detailatid=410472aid=312037group_id=30628

Status: Closed
Priority: 3
Submitted By: Pino Toscano (pino-guest)
Assigned to: Nobody (None)
Summary: #553409: freeglut 2.4.0 
Category: None
Group: None
Resolution: Fixed


Initial Comment:
Simple patch to make freeglut compile on GNU/Hurd.

Basically, the problem is in fghJoystickOpen(), where there is
- a 'int i;' declaration at the very beginning
- various snippets for the target hosts and the platforms in each
but none of those is used for Hurd, so gcc (because of -Wall -Werror) errors 
out because of the unused variable.
The easiest solution is to pretend it is used on GNU/Hurd as well.

--

Comment By: Pino Toscano (pino-guest)
Date: 16/12/2009 01:11

Message:
freeglut 2.4.0-9 has been uploaded, and compiled fine!

--

Comment By: Pino Toscano (pino-guest)
Date: 31/10/2009 02:17

Message:
Done, bug #553409.

Thanks!

--

Comment By: Samuel Thibault (sthibault)
Date: 31/10/2009 01:44

Message:
Ok, please submit :)


--

Comment By: Pino Toscano (pino-guest)
Date: 30/10/2009 20:59

Message:
Right, better intialize it in the OS-agnostic initialization part.

--

Comment By: Samuel Thibault (sthibault)
Date: 30/10/2009 19:59

Message:
Mmm, I would have rather put it in a #else part, or even just along the
Default values saying no joystick, so that it's useful to all OSes.


--

You can respond by visiting: 
https://alioth.debian.org/tracker/?func=detailatid=410472aid=312037group_id=30628


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-hurd-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org



[debian-hurd-Patches][312121] #558790: plib 1.8.5

2009-12-15 Thread debian-hurd-patches
Patches item #312121, was changed at 30/11/2009 15:41 by Pino Toscano
You can respond by visiting: 
https://alioth.debian.org/tracker/?func=detailatid=410472aid=312121group_id=30628

Status: Closed
Priority: 3
Submitted By: Pino Toscano (pino-guest)
Assigned to: Nobody (None)
Summary: #558790: plib 1.8.5 
Category: None
Group: None
Resolution: Fixed


Initial Comment:
Here it is, Hurd support in plib:
- add a new define, UL_GNU
- compile the none joystick backend
- claim to support OSS audio (there's no null audio, so most probably this is 
the safest bet)

(Note: needs freeglut to be compiled.)

--

Comment By: Pino Toscano (pino-guest)
Date: 16/12/2009 01:11

Message:
The upload of plib 1.8.5-5 (which ships the proposed patch) fixed the issue.

--

Comment By: Pino Toscano (pino-guest)
Date: 30/11/2009 16:45

Message:
Sure: bug #558790.

--

Comment By: Samuel Thibault (sthibault)
Date: 30/11/2009 16:02

Message:
Please submit!


--

You can respond by visiting: 
https://alioth.debian.org/tracker/?func=detailatid=410472aid=312121group_id=30628


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-hurd-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org



[debian-hurd-Patches][312161] gdm 2.20.10 FTBFS

2009-12-14 Thread debian-hurd-patches
Patches item #312161, was opened at 2009-12-15 01:14 by Emilio Pozuelo Monfort
You can respond by visiting: 
https://alioth.debian.org/tracker/?func=detailatid=410472aid=312161group_id=30628

Status: Open
Priority: 3
Submitted By: Emilio Pozuelo Monfort (pochu)
Assigned to: Nobody (None)
Summary: gdm 2.20.10 FTBFS 
Category: None
Group: unreviewed
Resolution: None


Initial Comment:
Hi,

I've prepared this two patches to make gdm build on Hurd. The second one moves 
gdm_reset_locale() out of an RLIMIT #ifdef (it was there by mistake I guess).

gdm 2.28 builds fine on Hurd but we will have 2.20 for a while (will likely be 
the default for Squeeze).

--

You can respond by visiting: 
https://alioth.debian.org/tracker/?func=detailatid=410472aid=312161group_id=30628


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-hurd-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org



[debian-hurd-Patches][312161] gdm 2.20.10 FTBFS

2009-12-14 Thread debian-hurd-patches
Patches item #312161, was changed at 15/12/2009 01:14 by Samuel Thibault
You can respond by visiting: 
https://alioth.debian.org/tracker/?func=detailatid=410472aid=312161group_id=30628

Status: Open
Priority: 3
Submitted By: Emilio Pozuelo Monfort (pochu)
Assigned to: Nobody (None)
Summary: gdm 2.20.10 FTBFS 
Category: None
Group: unreviewed
Resolution: None


Initial Comment:
Hi,

I've prepared this two patches to make gdm build on Hurd. The second one moves 
gdm_reset_locale() out of an RLIMIT #ifdef (it was there by mistake I guess).

gdm 2.28 builds fine on Hurd but we will have 2.20 for a while (will likely be 
the default for Squeeze).

--

Comment By: Samuel Thibault (sthibault)
Date: 15/12/2009 01:41

Message:
Unfortunately gdm can not rely on realpath allocating a string when
given NULL, as it's only a recent POSIX extension.  What you can
however do is ifdef __GLIBC__, assume it does, and else use PATH_MAX,
as that will work fine in all cases.

The patch moving the rlimit stuff is fine.


--

You can respond by visiting: 
https://alioth.debian.org/tracker/?func=detailatid=410472aid=312161group_id=30628


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-hurd-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org



[debian-hurd-Patches][312155] pth 2.0.7

2009-12-13 Thread debian-hurd-patches
Patches item #312155, was changed at 13/12/2009 00:20 by Samuel Thibault
You can respond by visiting: 
https://alioth.debian.org/tracker/?func=detailatid=410472aid=312155group_id=30628

Status: Open
Priority: 3
Submitted By: Pino Toscano (pino-guest)
Assigned to: Nobody (None)
Summary: pth 2.0.7 
Category: None
Group: None
Resolution: None


Initial Comment:
Current pth (2.0.7-14) fails to build because of incomplete porting for the 
setting of the context jmpbuf.
Although, pth 2.0.7-12 built, and the reason seems like older glibc provided 
the JB_* macros for the jmpbuf slots ([1] for example).
The attached solution has been taken from the i386 part of [1], ie defining 
back JB_* macros if needed.
As a result, pth now compiles and seem to be working, so the sanity check in 
gpgme's configure should not fail.

[1] 
http://www.mail-archive.com/user-mode-linux-de...@lists.sourceforge.net/msg02974.html

--

Comment By: Samuel Thibault (sthibault)
Date: 13/12/2009 12:31

Message:
Mmm, not really pretty indeed. The long-term solution is rather to fix
sigaltstack, which should be as soon as glibc stops using the stack for
thread-specific data.


--

You can respond by visiting: 
https://alioth.debian.org/tracker/?func=detailatid=410472aid=312155group_id=30628


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-hurd-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org



[debian-hurd-Patches][312151] gtk-vnc FTBFS because of PATH_MAX usage

2009-12-13 Thread debian-hurd-patches
Patches item #312151, was changed at 11/12/2009 13:02 by Samuel Thibault
You can respond by visiting: 
https://alioth.debian.org/tracker/?func=detailatid=410472aid=312151group_id=30628

Status: Open
Priority: 3
Submitted By: Emilio Pozuelo Monfort (pochu)
Assigned to: Nobody (None)
Summary: gtk-vnc FTBFS because of PATH_MAX usage 
Category: None
Group: unreviewed
Resolution: None


Initial Comment:
Hi,

gtk-vnc uses PATH_MAX unconditionally, failing to build on the Hurd. The 
attached patch makes use of dynamic allocation rather than hardoced maximum 
path length. It builds fine on Hurd, and allows Vinagre to build.

--

Comment By: Samuel Thibault (sthibault)
Date: 13/12/2009 14:11

Message:
You should probably keep the initialization of sysdir before the one of
userdir, to keep the patch lines adding the new version close to the
patch lines removing the old one. Else it seems just fine, please
submit!


--

You can respond by visiting: 
https://alioth.debian.org/tracker/?func=detailatid=410472aid=312151group_id=30628


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-hurd-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org



[debian-hurd-Patches][312155] pth 2.0.7

2009-12-13 Thread debian-hurd-patches
Patches item #312155, was changed at 13/12/2009 00:20 by Pino Toscano
You can respond by visiting: 
https://alioth.debian.org/tracker/?func=detailatid=410472aid=312155group_id=30628

Status: Open
Priority: 3
Submitted By: Pino Toscano (pino-guest)
Assigned to: Nobody (None)
Summary: pth 2.0.7 
Category: None
Group: None
Resolution: None


Initial Comment:
Current pth (2.0.7-14) fails to build because of incomplete porting for the 
setting of the context jmpbuf.
Although, pth 2.0.7-12 built, and the reason seems like older glibc provided 
the JB_* macros for the jmpbuf slots ([1] for example).
The attached solution has been taken from the i386 part of [1], ie defining 
back JB_* macros if needed.
As a result, pth now compiles and seem to be working, so the sanity check in 
gpgme's configure should not fail.

[1] 
http://www.mail-archive.com/user-mode-linux-de...@lists.sourceforge.net/msg02974.html

--

Comment By: Pino Toscano (pino-guest)
Date: 13/12/2009 15:32

Message:
I agree, and in fact the configure (see configure.ac) has a workaround to not 
use the sigaltstack implementation on Hurd, even if found.
Otherwise, the other short-term solution would be disabling the pth sanity 
check in gpgme, as the current pth is detected to be unusable.

--

Comment By: Samuel Thibault (sthibault)
Date: 13/12/2009 12:31

Message:
Mmm, not really pretty indeed. The long-term solution is rather to fix
sigaltstack, which should be as soon as glibc stops using the stack for
thread-specific data.


--

You can respond by visiting: 
https://alioth.debian.org/tracker/?func=detailatid=410472aid=312155group_id=30628


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-hurd-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org



[debian-hurd-Patches][312155] pth 2.0.7

2009-12-13 Thread debian-hurd-patches
Patches item #312155, was changed at 13/12/2009 00:20 by Samuel Thibault
You can respond by visiting: 
https://alioth.debian.org/tracker/?func=detailatid=410472aid=312155group_id=30628

Status: Open
Priority: 3
Submitted By: Pino Toscano (pino-guest)
Assigned to: Nobody (None)
Summary: pth 2.0.7 
Category: None
Group: None
Resolution: None


Initial Comment:
Current pth (2.0.7-14) fails to build because of incomplete porting for the 
setting of the context jmpbuf.
Although, pth 2.0.7-12 built, and the reason seems like older glibc provided 
the JB_* macros for the jmpbuf slots ([1] for example).
The attached solution has been taken from the i386 part of [1], ie defining 
back JB_* macros if needed.
As a result, pth now compiles and seem to be working, so the sanity check in 
gpgme's configure should not fail.

[1] 
http://www.mail-archive.com/user-mode-linux-de...@lists.sourceforge.net/msg02974.html

--

Comment By: Samuel Thibault (sthibault)
Date: 13/12/2009 15:37

Message:
Maybe the short-term solution could be to just upload a pth with your
patch on debian-ports?


--

Comment By: Pino Toscano (pino-guest)
Date: 13/12/2009 15:32

Message:
I agree, and in fact the configure (see configure.ac) has a workaround to not 
use the sigaltstack implementation on Hurd, even if found.
Otherwise, the other short-term solution would be disabling the pth sanity 
check in gpgme, as the current pth is detected to be unusable.

--

Comment By: Samuel Thibault (sthibault)
Date: 13/12/2009 12:31

Message:
Mmm, not really pretty indeed. The long-term solution is rather to fix
sigaltstack, which should be as soon as glibc stops using the stack for
thread-specific data.


--

You can respond by visiting: 
https://alioth.debian.org/tracker/?func=detailatid=410472aid=312155group_id=30628


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-hurd-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org



[debian-hurd-Patches][312151] gtk-vnc FTBFS because of PATH_MAX usage

2009-12-13 Thread debian-hurd-patches
Patches item #312151, was changed at 2009-12-11 13:02 by Emilio Pozuelo Monfort
You can respond by visiting: 
https://alioth.debian.org/tracker/?func=detailatid=410472aid=312151group_id=30628

Status: Open
Priority: 3
Submitted By: Emilio Pozuelo Monfort (pochu)
Assigned to: Nobody (None)
Summary: gtk-vnc FTBFS because of PATH_MAX usage 
Category: None
Group: unreviewed
Resolution: None


Initial Comment:
Hi,

gtk-vnc uses PATH_MAX unconditionally, failing to build on the Hurd. The 
attached patch makes use of dynamic allocation rather than hardoced maximum 
path length. It builds fine on Hurd, and allows Vinagre to build.

--

Comment By: Emilio Pozuelo Monfort (pochu)
Date: 2009-12-13 16:27

Message:
That is so that I don't need to g_free() it if getpwuid() fails, but if 
upstream doesn't like it we can change it.

I've forwarded this upstream and to Debian:
https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=604448
http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=561004

--

Comment By: Samuel Thibault (sthibault)
Date: 2009-12-13 14:11

Message:
You should probably keep the initialization of sysdir before the one of
userdir, to keep the patch lines adding the new version close to the
patch lines removing the old one. Else it seems just fine, please
submit!


--

You can respond by visiting: 
https://alioth.debian.org/tracker/?func=detailatid=410472aid=312151group_id=30628


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-hurd-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org



  1   2   3   4   5   >